SB 487 — Relating to: an exception from local levy limits for certain amounts levied for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services department. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
73 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 487 introduces a new definition for "joint emergency medical services district," specifying that it can be formed by two or more cities, villages, or towns. This change is significant because it allows local governments to collaborate more effectively on emergency medical services, potentially improving access and efficiency in providing these critical services. Additionally, the amendment makes minor adjustments to section references and dates within the bill for clarity. These changes help streamline the legislation and ensure it is up-to-date.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0647/1LRB-4418/1 MES:amnMES:cdc&amn SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 487 October 17,10, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatoASS.Senators N ASS, FEYEN and W ANGGAARD , cosponsored by Representatives LOUDENBECK , MURSAU , MURPHY , MILROY and DITTRICH.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendAgriculture, theRevenue billand asFinancial follows:Institutions.
A N A CT to amend 66.0602 (3) (h) 1., 66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
and 66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
of the statutes;
relating to:
an exception from local levy limits for certain amounts levied for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services department.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Generally under current law, local levy limits are applied to the property tax levies that are imposed in December of each year.
Current law prohibits any city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) from increasing its levy by a percentage that exceeds its “valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of either 0 percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized value due to new construction, less improvements removed.
In addition, the calculation of a political subdivision's levy does not include any tax increment that is generated by a tax incremental district.
Current law contains a number of exceptions to the levy limit, such as amounts a county levies for a countywide emergency medical system, for a county children with disabilities education board, and for certain bridge and culvert construction and repair.
In addition, a political subdivision may exceed the levy limit that is otherwise applicable if its governing body adopts a resolution to do so and if that resolution is approved by the electors in a referendum.
Another current law exception (the joint fire department exception) is for the amount that a city, village, or town (municipality) levies to pay for charges assessed by a joint fire department, but only to the extent that the amount levied to pay for - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4418/1 MES:cdc&amn SENATE BILL 487 such charges would cause the municipality to exceed the otherwise applicable levy limit.
This exception to the levy limit applies only if the charges assessed by a joint fire department increase in the current year by an amount equal to or less than the rate of inflation over the preceding year, plus 2 percent, and if the municipality's governing body adopts a resolution in favor of exceeding the otherwise applicable levy limit.
Under this bill, the joint fire department exception is expanded so that it also applies to the amount that a municipality levies to pay for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services district, subject to the same conditions and limitations as current apply to a joint fire department.
The bill first applies to a levy that is imposed in December 2019.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
66.0602 (3) (h) 1.
of the statutes is amended to read:
66.0602 (3) (h) 1.
Subject to subd.
2., the limit otherwise applicable under this section does not apply to the amount that a city, village, or town levies in that year to pay for charges assessed by a joint fire department or a joint emergency medical services district, but only to the extent that the amount levied to pay for such charges would cause the city, village, or town to exceed the limit that is otherwise applicable under this section.
SECTION 2.
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
of the statutes is amended to read:
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
The total charges assessed by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district for the current year increase, relative to the total charges assessed by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district for the previous year, by a percentage that is less than or equal to the percentage change in the U.S.
consumer price index for all urban consumers, U.S.
city average, as determined by the U.S.
department of labor, for the 12 months ending on September 30 of the year of the levy, plus 2 percent.
LRB-4418/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - MES:cdc&amn SECTION 3 SENATE BILL 487 SECTION 3.
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
of the statutes is amended to read:
Show all 55 changed lines (15 more)
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
The governing body of each city, village, and town that is served by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district adopts a resolution in favor of exceeding the limit as described in subd.
PageSECTION 2,4.Initial lineapplicability. 1:
before(1) This act first applies to a levy that lineis insert:imposed in December 2019.
“SECTION 1e.
66.0602 (1) (ak) of the statutes is created to read:
66.0602 (1) (ak) “Joint emergency medical services district” means a joint emergency medical services district organized by any combination of 2 or more cities, villages, or towns under s.
66.0301 (2).”.
2.
Page 2, line 1:
deletECTION 1" and substitute ECTION 1m".
3.
Page 3, line 6:
delete “2019" and substitute “2020".
Show all 55 changed rows (15 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Nass
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions
-
Introduced by Senators Nass, Feyen and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Loudenbeck, Mursau, Murphy, Milroy and Dittrich
Sponsors
- Dan Feyen · Primary
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 129 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Feyen, Dan Republican
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (129)
129 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 129 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 487?
- SB 487 is sponsored by Feyen, Dan (Republican), Wanggaard, Van (Republican), and Nass, Steve (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 487?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 487?
- Track SB 487 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 487
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 487
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →