Relating to procedure for driver's license suspension and revocation for DUI
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 130 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 130.
You're tracking SB 130
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 130 — Relating to procedure for driver's license suspension and revocation for DUI
Last action — Chapter 342, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
77 added · 18 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 130 includes changes to the title and modifies several sections of West Virginia's traffic laws. This update clarifies and establishes new rules regarding license revocation and suspension for individuals convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs. It also transfers authority for certain hearings from an administrative office to the courts, which could streamline the legal process for these cases. Overall, these changes aim to improve road safety by ensuring clearer consequences for repeat offenders and enhancing legal clarity for law enforcement.
SB130 HFAHFAT #1 Shott 3-4 Reese 7892 Delegate Shott moved to amend the bill on page thirteen, section two-a, lines one through seven, by striking out allthe oftitle subsection (a) and insertingsubstituting intherefor lieu thereof a new subsectiontitle, (a), to read as follows:
§17C‑5‑2a.Eng.
DefinitionSenate ofBill phraseNo. “in this state”;
phrases130-A synonymousBILL withto drivingamend underand reenact §17C‑5‑2, §17C‑5‑2a, §17C‑5‑2b, §17C‑5‑4, §17C‑5‑7, and §17C‑5‑12 of the influenceCode of alcohol;West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
validationto ofamend warrantssaid andcode indictments.by adding thereto a new section, designated §17C‑5‑7a;
(a)to Foramend purposesand ofreenact this§17C‑5A‑1, article§17C‑5A‑1a, and §17C-5A-1§17C‑5A‑3 etof seq.said code;
of this code, the phrase “in this state” shall mean anywhere within the physical boundaries of this state, including, but not limited to, publicly maintained streets and highways, and subdivision streets or other areas not publicly maintained but nonetheless open to theamend usesaid ofcode theby publicadding forthereto purposes of vehicular travel, but as used in §17C‑5‑2(e), §17C‑5‑2(f), §17C‑5‑2(g), §17C‑5‑2(h), §17C‑5‑2(i), §17C‑5‑2(j), and §17C‑5‑2(k) of this code, the term does not mean or include driving or operating a vehiclenew solelysection, anddesignated exclusively§17C‑5A‑2b; on one’s own property in an area not open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.
and to amend Adoptedsaid Rejectedcode by adding thereto a new section, designated §17C‑5C‑1a, all relating generally to offenses involving operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, controlled substances, or drugs and the administrative process for revocation or suspension of a person’s license to operate a motor vehicle based on such offenses;
defining terms;
transferring authority for hearing certain matters related to revocations or suspensions of licenses from the Office of Administrative Hearings to the courts;
establishing mandatory license revocation or suspension periods for individuals convicted of certain offenses;
authorizing alternate revocation or suspension periods conditioned upon participation in Motor Vehicle Alcohol Test and Lock Program for certain offenses;
establishing mandatory license revocation or suspension periods for individuals upon second and subsequent convictions for certain offenses;
clarifying what constitutes a second or subsequent offense for purposes of criminal penalties and license revocations and suspensions;
clarifying that certain offenses involving driving under the influence take place only when the operator is upon a public highway or private road;
clarifying the term “in this state” for purposes of enforcement of certain serious traffic crimes;
requiring the Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles to revoke a person’s license upon conviction of certain offenses or for refusal to submit to a secondary chemical test in certain circumstances;
requiring individuals whose licenses have been revoked or suspended upon conviction of certain offenses to complete the comprehensive safety and treatment program before the license can be reinstated;
requiring driver consent to participation in Motor Vehicle Alcohol Test and Lock Program;
requiring deferral program for certain first offenses to be completed within one year;
prohibiting a secondary test of blood without consent absent issuance of a search warrant;
requiring that a person arrested for driving under the influence be provided with certain verbal and written warnings prior to submitting to a secondary chemical test;
requiring an officer to 15 minutes before a refusal to submit to a secondary chemical test is considered final;
requiring that, following an individual’s refusal to submit to a secondary chemical test, an arresting officer submit a sworn statement containing certain information to Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles and the court;
providing for a hearing before the court to contest a documented refusal to submit to a secondary chemical test;
providing minimum license revocation periods for refusal to submit to a secondary chemical test;
directing the Bureau for Public Health to make reports and recommendations on the levels of drugs and controlled substances to be used as evidence in certain criminal proceedings;
limiting the administrative jurisdiction of Division of Motor Vehicles and Office of Administrative Hearings to offenses occurring on or before June 30, 2020;
eliminating all statutory provisions authorizing or requiring the Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles to take administrative action upon an individual’s license on the basis of driving under the influence or refusal to submit to a secondary test absent direction from court;
requiring the Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles to provide certain records to the court following a person’s arrest;
providing a procedure to correct a license revocation or suspension based on mistaken driver identity;
providing that a plea of no contest constitutes a conviction;
requiring the clerk of the court to transmit a copy of an order related to revoking or suspending a person’s license to the Division of Motor Vehicles;
directing that a copy of a license revocation or suspension order to be sent to the person whose license is being revoked or suspended by certified mail;
providing that revocation for refusal to submit to secondary chemical test run concurrently with other revocation or suspension imposed as a result of an offense that led to the arrest;
making persons convicted of driving under the influence eligible for participation in comprehensive safety and treatment program and related reductions in length of revocation for successful completion thereof;
requiring the Office of Administrative Hearings to dispose of all matters pending before it by a certain date;
establishing a timeline for jurisdiction of matters currently filed in the Office of Administrative Hearings to transfer to the courts;
requiring that matters related to license suspension or revocation for driving under the influence, pending before the Office of Administrative Hearings on its termination, be dismissed;
requiring that matters not related to license suspension or revocation for driving under the influence, pending before the Office of Administrative Hearings on its termination, be transferred to a circuit court according to certain procedures;
Show all 45 changed lines (5 more)
terminating the Office of Administrative Hearings by a certain date;
eliminating obsolete language;
providing internal effective dates;
and making technical corrections.
Adopted Rejected
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- SB130 HFAT SHOTT 3-4 adopted.htm View text html
- SB130 HFA _1 SHOTT 3-4 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Chapter 342, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20
-
To Governor 3/18/20
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/18/20 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/18/20 - Senate Journal
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to House
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 534)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Passed House (Roll No. 633)
-
Read 3rd time
-
From House Calendar, 3rd reading, placed on Special Calendar
-
From Special Calendar, 3rd reading, placed on House Calendar
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 198)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
2nd reference dispensed
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Trump · Primary
- Ihlenfeld · Cosponsor
- Facemire · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Trump
Co-sponsors (2)
- Ihlenfeld
- Facemire
Not signed on (131)
131 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 131 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 41% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (100)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diserio | — | Yea |
| Rowan | — | Yea |
| Atkinson | — | Yea |
| Doyle | — | Yea |
| Shott | — | Yea |
| Kump | — | Yea |
| Sponaugle | — | Yea |
| Espinosa | — | Yea |
| Lavender-Bowe | — | Yea |
| Steele | — | Yea |
| Estep-Burton | — | Yea |
| Linville | — | Yea |
| Storch | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Little | — | Yea |
| Summers | — | Yea |
| Bibby | — | Yea |
| Foster | — | Yea |
| Mandt | — | Yea |
| Swartzmiller | — | Yea |
| Brown, S. | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Maynard | — | Yea |
| Sypolt | — | Yea |
| Cadle | — | Yea |
| Hamrick | — | Yea |
| Hanna | — | Yea |
| Miley | — | Yea |
| Waxman | — | Yea |
| Capito | — | Yea |
| Hardy | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Westfall | — | Yea |
| Higginbotham | — | Yea |
| Pack | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Cowles | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Phillips | — | Yea |
| Householder | — | Yea |
| Porterfield | — | Yea |
| Jeffries, J. | — | Yea |
| Angelucci | — | Nay |
| Skaff | — | Nay |
| Barnhart | — | Nay |
| Hartman | — | Nay |
| Staggers | — | Nay |
| Boggs | — | Nay |
| Hicks | — | Nay |
| Thompson, C. | — | Nay |
| Brown, N. | — | Nay |
| Paynter | — | Nay |
| Thompson, R. | — | Nay |
| Pethtel | — | Nay |
| Tomblin | — | Nay |
| Byrd | — | Nay |
| Walker | — | Nay |
| Canestraro | — | Nay |
| Pyles | — | Nay |
| Caputo | — | Nay |
| Robinson | — | Nay |
| Zukoff | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Nay |
| Kessinger | — | Nay |
| Rodighiero | — | Nay |
| Fast | — | Nay |
| Longstreth | — | Nay |
| Fleischauer | — | Nay |
| Lovejoy | — | Nay |
| Rowe | — | Nay |
| Evan Hansen | Democrat | Nay |
| John Williams | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Pushkin | Democrat | Nay |
| Sean Hornbuckle | Democrat | Nay |
| Shawn Fluharty | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Nay |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Nay |
| Christopher W. Toney | Republican | Yea |
| D. Rolland Jennings | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Nay |
| Evan Worrell | Republican | Yea |
| Gary G. Howell | Republican | Nay |
| George Miller | Republican | Nay |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Butler | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Ellington | Republican | Yea |
| John Paul Hott | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Rohrbach | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Pat McGeehan | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick Martin | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hanshaw | Republican | Yea |
| Roy Cooper | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vernon Criss | Republican | Yea |
| William Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Not Voting |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 130?
- SB 130 is sponsored by Trump, Ihlenfeld, and Facemire.
- What is the current status of SB 130?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 08, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 130?
- Track SB 130 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 130
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 130
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →