SB 810 — Implementing federal Affordable Clean Energy rule
Last action — Chapter 132, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
11 added · 202 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Bill SB 810 include the addition of guidance for the state to develop a carbon dioxide emissions compliance plan for existing fossil fuel power plants by September 1, 2020. This marks a shift towards ensuring that specific facilities can voluntarily propose their own plans to meet federal standards. The removal of several legislative findings also simplifies the language by eliminating detailed references to the federal rule's implementation timeline and the state's stance on federal jurisdiction, making the bill focus more on actionable steps rather than regulatory disputes. These amendments matter because they set a clear deadline and framework for the state’s compliance with federal environmental standards, which is critical for reducing emissions and addressing climate change.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS SB810Enrolled SUB1Version - Final Version « Senate Bill 810 History OTHER VERSIONS — EnrolledCommittee VersionSubstitute -(1) Final Version | Introduced Version | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Enrolled Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 810 Senators Smith and Cline, original sponsors [Originating[Passed inMarch the4, Committee2020; on the Judiciary;
reportedin oneffect February90 24,days 2020]from passage] AAN BILLACT to amend and reenact §22-5-20 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to adoption of a state plan implementing the federal Affordable Clean Energy rule pursuant to section 111(d) of the federal Clean Air Act.
(a)The LegislativeWest findings.Virginia Department of Environmental Protection shall propose a legislative rule for promulgation in accordance with §29A-3-1 of this code to implement the Affordable Clean Energy rule, consisting of Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas, Emissions from Existing Electric Utility Generating Units (EGUs) pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act, section 111(d).
— (1) The United States Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a federal rule pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.
S.
C.
§7411(d), to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from electric generating units.
(2) The rule is expected to go into effect on or about June 30, 2015, and will require each state to submit a state plan pursuant to Section 111(d) that sets forth laws, policies and regulations that will be enacted by the state to meet the federal guidelines in the rule.
(3) The creation of this state plan necessitates establishment and creation of law affecting the economy and energy policy of this state.
(4) The Environmental Protection Agency has stated that any state plan it ultimately approves shall become enforceable federal law upon that state.
(5) The state disputes the jurisdiction and purported binding nature asserted by the Environmental Protection Agency through this rule, and reserves to itself those rights and responsibilities properly reserved to the State of West Virginia.
(6) Given the economic impact and potentially legally binding nature of the submission of a state plan, there is a compelling state interest to require appropriate legislative review and passage of law prior to submission, if any, of a state plan pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.
(b) Submission of a state plan.
— Absent specific legislative enactment granting such powers or rule-making authority, the Department of Environmental Protection or any other agency or officer of state government is not authorized to submit to the Environmental Protection Agency a state plan under this section, or otherwise pursuant to Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act:
Provided, That the Department of Environmental Protection, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection Advisory Council and other necessary and appropriate agencies and entities, may develop a proposed state plan in accordance with this section.
(c) Development of a Proposed State Plan.
— (1) The Department of Environmental Protection shall, no later than one hundred eighty days after a rule is finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency that requires the state to submit a state plan under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.
S.
C.
§ 7411(d), submit to the Legislature a report regarding the feasibility of the state's compliance with the Section 111(d) rule.
The report must include a comprehensive analysis of the effect of the Section 111(d) rule on the state, including, but not limited to, the need for legislative or other changes to state law, and the factors referenced in subsection (g) of this section.
The report must make at least two feasibility determinations:
(i) Whether the creation of a state plan is feasible based on the comprehensive analysis;
and (ii) whether the creation of a state plan is feasible before the deadline to submit a state plan to Environmental Protection Agency under the Section 111(d) rule, assuming no extensions of time are granted by Environmental Protection Agency.
If the department determines that a state plan is or is not feasible under clause (i) of this subsection, the report must explain why.
If the department determines that a state plan is not feasible under clause (ii) of this subsection, it shall explain how long it requires to create a state plan and then endeavor to submit such a state plan to the Legislature as soon as practicable.
Such state plan may be on a unit-specific performance basis and may be based upon either a rate-based model or a mass-based model.
(2) If the department determines that the creation of a state plan is feasible, it shall develop and submit the proposed state plan to the Legislature sitting in regular session, or in an extraordinary session convened for the purpose of consideration of the state plan, in sufficient time to allow for the consideration of the state plan prior to the deadline for submission to the Environmental Protection Agency.
(3) In addition to submitting the proposed state plan to the Legislature, the department shall publish the report and any proposed state plan on its website.
(d) If the department proposes a state plan to the Legislature in accordance with subsection (c) of this section, the department shall propose separate standards of performance for carbon dioxide emissions from existing coal-fired electric generating units in accordance with subsection (e) of this section and from existing natural gas-fired electric generating units in accordance with subsection (f) of this section.
The standards of performance developed and proposed under any state plan to comply with Section 111 of the Clean Air Act should allow for greater flexibility and take into consideration the additional factors set forth in subsection (g) of this section as a part of any state plan to achieve targeted reductions in greenhouse gas emissions which are equivalent or comparable to the goals and marks established by federal guidelines.
(e) Standards of performance for existing coal-fired electric generating units.
— Except as provided under subsection (g) of this section, the standard of performance proposed for existing coal-fired electric generating units under subsection (c) of this section may be based upon:
(1) The best system of emission reduction which, taking into account the cost of achieving the reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements, has been adequately demonstrated for coal-fired electric generating units that are subject to the standard of performance;
(2) Reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide that can reasonably be achieved through measures undertaken at each coal-fired electric generating unit;
and (3) Efficiency and other measures that can be undertaken at each coal-fired electric generating unit to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the unit without switching from coal to other fuels or limiting the economic utilization of the unit.
(f) Standards of performance for existing natural gas-fired electric generating units.
— Except as provided in subsection (g) of this section, the standard of performance proposed for existing gas-fired electric generating units under subsection (c) of this section may be based upon:
(1) The best system of emission reduction which, taking into account the cost of achieving the reduction and any nonair quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements, has been adequately demonstrated for natural gas-fired electric generating units that are subject to the standard of performance;
Show all 77 changed lines (37 more)
(2) Reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide that can reasonably be achieved through measures at each natural gas-fired electric generating unit;
and (3) Efficiency and other measures that can be undertaken at the unit to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the unit without switching from natural gas to other lower-carbon fuels or limiting the economic utilization of the unit.
(g) Flexibility in establishing standards of performance.
— In developing a flexible state plan to achieve targeted reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, the department shall endeavor to establish an achievable standard of performance for any existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating unit, and examine whether less stringent performance standards or longer compliance schedules may be implemented or adopted for existing fossil fuel-fired electric generating units in comparison to the performance standards established for new, modified or reconstructed generating units, based on the following:
(1) Consumer impacts, including any disproportionate impacts of energy price increases on lower income populations;
(2) Nonair quality health and environmental impacts;
(3) Projected energy requirements;
(4) Market-based considerations in achieving performance standards;
(5) The costs of achieving emission reductions due to factors such as plant age, location or basic process design;
(6) Physical difficulties with or any apparent inability to feasibly implement certain emission reduction measures;
(7) The absolute cost of applying the performance standard to the unit;
(8) The expected remaining useful life of the unit;
(9) The impacts of closing the unit, including economic consequences such as expected job losses at the unit and throughout the state in fossil fuel production areas including areas of coal production and natural gas production and the associated losses to the economy of those areas and the state, if the unit is unable to comply with the performance standard;
(10) Impacts on the reliability of the system;
and (11) Any other factors specific to the unit that make application of a modified or less stringent standard or a longer compliance schedule more reasonable.
(h) Legislative consideration of proposed state plan under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act.
— (1) If the department submits a proposed state plan to the Legislature under this section, the Legislature may by act, including presentment to the Governor:
(i) Authorize the department to submit the proposed state plan to the Environmental Protection Agency;
(ii) authorize the department to submit the state plan with amendment;
or (iii) not grant such rulemaking or other authority to the department for submission and implementation of the state plan.
(2) If the Legislature fails to enact or approve all or part of the proposed state plan, the department may propose a new or modified state plan to the Legislature in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(3) If the Environmental Protection Agency does not approve the state plan, in whole or in part, the department shall as soon as practicable propose a modified state plan to the Legislature in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(i) Legal effect.
— Any obligation created by this section and any state plan submitted to the Environmental Protection Act pursuant to this section shall have no legal effect if:
(1) The Environmental Protection Agency fails to issue, or withdraws, its federal rules or guidelines for reducing carbon dioxide emissions from existing fossil fuel-fired electrical generating units under 42 U.
S.
C.
§7411(d);
or, (2) A court of competent jurisdiction invalidates the Environmental Protection Agency's federal rules or guidelines issued to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide from existing fossil fuel-fired electrical generating units under 42 U.
S.
C.
§7411(d).
(j) Effective date.
— All provisions of this section are effective immediately upon passage The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection shall propose a legislative rule for promulgation in accordance with §29A-3-1 of this code to implement the Affordable Clean Energy rule, consisting of Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas, Emissions from Existing Electric Utility Generating Units (EGUs) pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act, section 111(d).
NOTE:
The purpose of this bill is to reflect the federal repeal of the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) and authorize the state’s implementation of the Trump Administration’s Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Show all 77 changed rows (37 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Chapter 132, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20
-
To Governor 3/13/20
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/13/20 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/13/20 - Senate Journal
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Passed House (Roll No. 520)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 325)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
Immediate consideration
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Reported do pass, but first to Judiciary
-
To Energy, Industry, and Mining
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Energy, Industry, and Mining then Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Cline · Cosponsor
- Randy E. Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Randy E. Smith Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Cline
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 4% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (100)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Espinosa | — | Yea |
| Kessinger | — | Yea |
| Rowan | — | Yea |
| Angelucci | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Lavender-Bowe | — | Yea |
| Shott | — | Yea |
| Atkinson | — | Yea |
| Fast | — | Yea |
| Little | — | Yea |
| Skaff | — | Yea |
| Fleischauer | — | Yea |
| Longstreth | — | Yea |
| Sponaugle | — | Yea |
| Barnhart | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy | — | Yea |
| Staggers | — | Yea |
| Foster | — | Yea |
| Mandt | — | Yea |
| Storch | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Summers | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hamrick | — | Yea |
| Swartzmiller | — | Yea |
| Bibby | — | Yea |
| Hanna | — | Yea |
| Maynard | — | Yea |
| Sypolt | — | Yea |
| Boggs | — | Yea |
| Thompson, C. | — | Yea |
| Brown, N. | — | Yea |
| Hardy | — | Yea |
| Miley | — | Yea |
| Thompson, R. | — | Yea |
| Brown, S. | — | Yea |
| Hartman | — | Yea |
| Tomblin | — | Yea |
| Hicks | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Higginbotham | — | Yea |
| Pack | — | Yea |
| Walker | — | Yea |
| Cadle | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Paynter | — | Yea |
| Waxman | — | Yea |
| Pethtel | — | Yea |
| Canestraro | — | Yea |
| Householder | — | Yea |
| Phillips | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Capito | — | Yea |
| Porterfield | — | Yea |
| Caputo | — | Yea |
| Pyles | — | Yea |
| Zukoff | — | Yea |
| Cowles | — | Yea |
| Jeffries, J. | — | Yea |
| Robinson | — | Yea |
| Diserio | — | Yea |
| Rodighiero | — | Yea |
| Doyle | — | Nay |
| Estep-Burton | — | Nay |
| Kump | — | Not Voting |
| Rowe | — | Not Voting |
| Westfall | — | Not Voting |
| Linville | — | Not Voting |
| Steele | — | Not Voting |
| Evan Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Williams | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Pushkin | Democrat | Nay |
| Sean Hornbuckle | Democrat | Nay |
| Shawn Fluharty | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Christopher W. Toney | Republican | Yea |
| D. Rolland Jennings | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Evan Worrell | Republican | Yea |
| Gary G. Howell | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Ellington | Republican | Yea |
| John Paul Hott | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Rohrbach | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Pat McGeehan | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hanshaw | Republican | Yea |
| Roy Cooper | Republican | Not Voting |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vernon Criss | Republican | Not Voting |
| William Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 810?
- SB 810 is sponsored by Cline and Randy E. Smith (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 810?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 810?
- Track SB 810 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 810
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 810
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →