Providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlo...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5522 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5522.
You're tracking SB 5522
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5522 — Providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlocal agreement with the county.
Last action — Effective date 6/11/2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 5522 removes specific requirements for notifying adjacent cities and districts when a code city seeks to annex unincorporated areas. It also simplifies the annexation process by removing phrases that would have required more extensive engagement with nearby jurisdictions, such as those with common transportation or service responsibilities. This matters because it may streamline the annexation process for cities, but it could lead to less collaboration and potential conflicts with neighboring jurisdictions over boundary changes and service delivery.
ENGROSSEDS-0919.1SENATE SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5522State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenateSessionBySenator LocalTakkoRead Governmentfirst (originallytime sponsored01/23/19.Referred byto SenatorCommittee Takko)READon FIRSTLocal TIMEGovernment.AN 02/15/19.AN ACT Relating to providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlocal agreement with the county;
The legislature finds that city annexations of unincorporated areas within urbanthe growthcounty areasthey are located in will be more efficient and effective if the county and city develop a jointly approved interlocal agreement so as not to create illogical boundaries or islands of unincorporated territory.NEW SECTION. Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 35A.14 RCW to read as follows:(1) A code city as provided in subsection (2) of this section may annex unincorporated territory pursuant to an interlocal agreement.agreement.(2) The county legislative authority of a county and the governing body of a code city may jointly initiate an annexation process for unincorporated territory by adopting an interlocal agreement as provided in chapter 39.34 RCW between the county and code city within the county.(3) The county and code city shall jointly agree on the boundaries of the annexation.
This method of annexation shall be an alternative method and is additional to all other methods provided for in this chapter.(2) The county legislative authority of a county and the governing body of a code city may jointly initiate an annexation process for unincorporated territory by adopting an interlocal agreement as provided in chapter 39.34 RCW and under this section between the county and code city within the county.
If a code city is proposing to annex territory where the sole access or majority of egress and ingress for the territory proposed for annexation is served by the transportation network of an adjacent city, or that will include areas in a fire protection district under Title 52 RCW, regional fire protection service authority under chapter 52.26 RCW, water-sewer district under Title 57 RCW, or transportation benefit district under chapter 36.73 RCW, the code city must provide written notice to the governing authority of such adjacent city, regional fire protection service authority, fire protection district, water-sewer district, or transportation benefit district.
Such adjacent city or notified district shall have thirty calendar days from the date of the notice to provide written notice of its interest in being a party to the interlocal agreement.
If timely notice is provided, such city or district shall be included as a party to the interlocal agreement.
If the adjacent city or district does not approve the interlocal agreement, the annexation may not proceed under this section.
For purposes of this subsection, "adjacent" means that the territory proposed for annexation is contiguous with the existing city limits of the nonannexing city.
The interlocal agreement must ensure that for a period of five years after the annexation any parcel zoned for residential development within the annexed area shall:(a) Maintain a zoning designation that provides for residential development;
and(b) Not have its minimum gross residential density reduced below the density allowed for by the zoning designation for that parcel prior to annexation.(3) The county and code city shall jointly agree on the boundaries of the annexation and its effective date.
An interlocal agreement may include phased annexation of territory, and may be amended following the same process as initial approval, including adding additional territory.
Each legislative body holding a public hearing shall:(a)shall, Separatelyseparately or jointly, publish a notice of availability of the agreement at least once a week for fourtwo weeks before the date of the hearing in one or more newspapers of general circulation within the code city and one or more newspapers of general circulation within the territory proposed for annexation;annexation.(4) On the date set for hearing, residents or property owners of the area included in the resolution for annexation shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
and(b) If the legislative body has the ability to do so, post the notice of availability of the agreement on its web site for the same four weeks that the notice is published in the newspapers under (a) of this subsection.
The notice shall describe where the public may review the agreement and the territory to be annexed.(4) On the date set for hearing, the public shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
If the annexation agreement includes phased annexation of territory, the legislative body shall adopt a separate ordinance at the time of each phase of annexation.
Upon the date fixed in the ordinance of annexation the area annexed shall become part of the city.
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 6/11/2020.
-
Chapter 142, 2020 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 68; nays, 28; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LG - Majority; do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 25; nays, 22; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Made eligible to be placed on second reading.
-
Made eligible to be placed on second reading.
-
Moved to Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Moved to Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Takko · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Takko
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 10 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 39 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 68 | 28 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 29% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Nay |
| Jenkin | — | Nay |
| Johnson, J. | — | Nay |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Nay |
| Maycumber | — | Nay |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Nay |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Nay |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Nay |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Nay |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Nay |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Nay |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Nay |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Nay |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Not Voting |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Nay |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Nay |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Nay |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Nay |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 22 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 51% | 45% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Becker | — | Nay |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Not Voting |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Nay |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Randall | — | Nay |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Nay |
| Sheldon | — | Nay |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Nay |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Nay |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Not Voting |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5522?
- SB 5522 is sponsored by Takko.
- What is the current status of SB 5522?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 5522?
- Track SB 5522 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5522
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5522
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →