Washington 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 5522 — Providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlocal agreement with the county.

Last action — Effective date 6/11/2020.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SB 5522 removes specific requirements for notifying adjacent cities and districts when a code city seeks to annex unincorporated areas. It also simplifies the annexation process by removing phrases that would have required more extensive engagement with nearby jurisdictions, such as those with common transportation or service responsibilities. This matters because it may streamline the annexation process for cities, but it could lead to less collaboration and potential conflicts with neighboring jurisdictions over boundary changes and service delivery.

→
Previous
Latest
ENGROSSED SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5522State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenate Local Government (originally sponsored by Senator Takko)READ FIRST TIME 02/15/19.AN ACT Relating to providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlocal agreement with the county;
S-0919.1SENATE BILL 5522State of Washington66th Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenator TakkoRead first time 01/23/19.Referred to Committee on Local Government.AN ACT Relating to providing code cities with the ability to annex unincorporated areas pursuant to a jointly approved interlocal agreement with the county;
The legislature finds that city annexations of unincorporated areas within urban growth areas will be more efficient and effective if the county and city develop a jointly approved interlocal agreement so as not to create illogical boundaries or islands of unincorporated territory.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
The legislature finds that city annexations of unincorporated areas within the county they are located in will be more efficient and effective if the county and city develop a jointly approved interlocal agreement so as not to create illogical boundaries or islands of unincorporated territory.NEW SECTION.  Sec.
A new section is added to chapter 35A.14 RCW to read as follows:(1) A code city as provided in subsection (2) of this section may annex unincorporated territory pursuant to an interlocal agreement.
A new section is added to chapter 35A.14 RCW to read as follows:(1) A code city as provided in subsection (2) of this section may annex unincorporated territory pursuant to an interlocal agreement.(2) The county legislative authority of a county and the governing body of a code city may jointly initiate an annexation process for unincorporated territory by adopting an interlocal agreement as provided in chapter 39.34 RCW between the county and code city within the county.(3) The county and code city shall jointly agree on the boundaries of the annexation.
This method of annexation shall be an alternative method and is additional to all other methods provided for in this chapter.(2) The county legislative authority of a county and the governing body of a code city may jointly initiate an annexation process for unincorporated territory by adopting an interlocal agreement as provided in chapter 39.34 RCW and under this section between the county and code city within the county.
If a code city is proposing to annex territory where the sole access or majority of egress and ingress for the territory proposed for annexation is served by the transportation network of an adjacent city, or that will include areas in a fire protection district under Title 52 RCW, regional fire protection service authority under chapter 52.26 RCW, water-sewer district under Title 57 RCW, or transportation benefit district under chapter 36.73 RCW, the code city must provide written notice to the governing authority of such adjacent city, regional fire protection service authority, fire protection district, water-sewer district, or transportation benefit district.
Such adjacent city or notified district shall have thirty calendar days from the date of the notice to provide written notice of its interest in being a party to the interlocal agreement.
If timely notice is provided, such city or district shall be included as a party to the interlocal agreement.
If the adjacent city or district does not approve the interlocal agreement, the annexation may not proceed under this section.
For purposes of this subsection, "adjacent" means that the territory proposed for annexation is contiguous with the existing city limits of the nonannexing city.
The interlocal agreement must ensure that for a period of five years after the annexation any parcel zoned for residential development within the annexed area shall:(a) Maintain a zoning designation that provides for residential development;
and(b) Not have its minimum gross residential density reduced below the density allowed for by the zoning designation for that parcel prior to annexation.(3) The county and code city shall jointly agree on the boundaries of the annexation and its effective date.
An interlocal agreement may include phased annexation of territory, and may be amended following the same process as initial approval, including adding additional territory.
Each legislative body holding a public hearing shall:(a) Separately or jointly, publish a notice of availability of the agreement at least once a week for four weeks before the date of the hearing in one or more newspapers of general circulation within the code city and one or more newspapers of general circulation within the territory proposed for annexation;
Each legislative body holding a public hearing shall, separately or jointly, publish the agreement at least once a week for two weeks before the date of the hearing in one or more newspapers of general circulation within the code city and one or more newspapers of general circulation within the territory proposed for annexation.(4) On the date set for hearing, residents or property owners of the area included in the resolution for annexation shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
and(b) If the legislative body has the ability to do so, post the notice of availability of the agreement on its web site for the same four weeks that the notice is published in the newspapers under (a) of this subsection.
The notice shall describe where the public may review the agreement and the territory to be annexed.(4) On the date set for hearing, the public shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard.
If the annexation agreement includes phased annexation of territory, the legislative body shall adopt a separate ordinance at the time of each phase of annexation.
Upon the date fixed in the ordinance of annexation the area annexed shall become part of the city.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/11/2020.

  2. Chapter 142, 2020 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 68; nays, 28; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  10. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM

  11. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  12. Minority; do not pass.

  13. LG - Majority; do pass.

  14. Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM

  15. First reading, referred to Local Government.

  16. Third reading, passed; yeas, 25; nays, 22; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  17. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  18. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  19. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  20. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  21. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  22. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  23. Made eligible to be placed on second reading.

  24. Made eligible to be placed on second reading.

  25. Moved to Rules White Sheet.

  26. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  27. Moved to Rules White Sheet.

  28. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  29. Senate Rules "X" file.

  30. Senate Rules "X" file.

  31. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  32. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  33. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM

  34. Minority; do not pass.

  35. LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  36. Minority; do not pass.

  37. LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  38. Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Local Government at 08:00 AM

  39. First reading, referred to Local Government.

Sponsors

  • Takko · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 25 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Takko

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 68 Yea · 28 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 191301
Republican 101101
Democrat 39400
Total 682802
% of votes cast 69%29%0%2%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Chambers — Yea
Chandler — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Hoff — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Nay
Jenkin — Nay
Johnson, J. — Nay
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McCaslin — Nay
Mead — Yea
Mosbrucker — Nay
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Smith — Not Voting
Sullivan — Yea
Sutherland — Nay
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Nay
Van Werven — Yea
Alex Ramel Democrat Yea
Amy Walen Democrat Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Bill Ramos Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Dave Paul Democrat Nay
Davina Duerr Democrat Yea
Debra Entenman Democrat Yea
Debra Lekanoff Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Nay
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Lauren Davis Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Lisa Callan Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mari Leavitt Democrat Nay
Melanie Morgan Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
My-Linh Thai Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Nay
Sharon Shewmake Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Alex Ybarra Republican Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Nay
Chris Corry Republican Nay
Chris Gildon Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Not Voting
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jenny Graham Republican Yea
Jeremie Dufault Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Keith Goehner Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Matt Boehnke Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Skyler Rude Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 22 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121201
Republican 0901
Democrat 13100
Total 252202
% of votes cast 51%45%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Becker — Nay
Billig — Yea
Brown — Nay
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Das — Yea
Ericksen — Not Voting
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Nay
Hobbs — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Nay
Randall — Nay
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Nay
Takko — Yea
Wilson, L. — Nay
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Claire Wilson Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Jesse Salomon Democrat Yea
Joe Nguyen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Liz Lovelett Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Ron Muzzall Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5522?
SB 5522 is sponsored by Takko.
What is the current status of SB 5522?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 23, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 5522?
Track SB 5522 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5522

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5522

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →