AB 561 — Relating to: postadoption contact agreements.
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
174 added · 29 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill AB 561 focus on clarifying how post-adoption contact agreements between birth parents and adoptive parents can be formed and enforced. The key changes include provisions for either a mutual agreement between the parties or, if they cannot reach an agreement, a court's involvement to appoint a mediator or arbitrator. Additionally, the bill specifies that these contact agreements cannot be enforced during certain circumstances, such as when the child is placed outside of the adoptive home or if the birth parent is denied physical placement. These updates aim to protect the rights of all parties involved while providing a structured framework for maintaining relationships after adoption.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0689/3LRB-4080/1 EAW:skw&wljEAW:skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 561 DecemberOctober 6,23, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentativeRepresentatives ITTRIC.DITTRICH, LUMER , BALLWEG , FELZKOWSKI , AMES , KERKMAN , KUL, M AGNAFIC, M ILRO, M URPHY, MURSAU , R AMTHUN , TUSLER, THIESFELDT, TRANEL , BORN , VANDERM EER and T ITTL, cosponsored by Senators OLSEN , ACQUE, DARLING and C OWLES.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendFamily theLaw. bill as follows:
A N A CT to amend 48.426 (3) (c) and 48.92 (2);
andto create 48.425 (1) (h), 48.43 (2) (c) and 48.905 of the statutes;
relating to:
postadoption contact agreements.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill allows a proposed adoptive parent and a birth parent or other relative with whom a child has a substantial relationship to enter into an agreement for postadoption contact and allows a court to approve such an agreement.
Under current law, there is no mechanism to formalize or enforce an agreement entered into between a birth parent or other relative and a proposed adoptive parent for postadoption contact, commonly known as an “open adoption.” Under current law, a termination of parental rights order and an adoption permanently severs the child's legal relationship with the birth parent and other relatives and creates the legal relationship of parent and child between the child and the adoptive parent.
However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has stated that in a proceeding for the termination of parental rights, when considering the impact on the child of severing the legal relationship between a parent or other relatives, a court may, in its discretion, afford due weight to an adoptive parent's stated intent to permit continued visitation between the child and the parent or other relatives, while bearing in mind that such a promise is legally unenforceable after the termination of parental rights and adoption.
State v.
Margaret H., 2000 WI 42, ¶¶ 29-30.
Under the bill, a proposed adoptive parent and a birth parent or other relative with whom the child has a substantial relationship may enter into an agreement for - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4080/1 EAW:skw ASSEMBLY BILL 561 postadoption contact privileges.
Under the bill, a court is required to consider the terms of any such agreement when considering the impact on the child of severing the child's relationship with the parent or other relative.
Under the bill, a postadoption contact agreement may control the types and frequency of contact that the parties agree to.
A court in an action to terminate parental rights may approve a postadoption contact agreement if the agreement meets certain requirements, as specified under the bill.
The bill also specifies how an agreement may be modified, terminated, or enforced.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
48.425 (1) (h) of the statutes is created to read:
48.425(1) (h) A statement as to whether a postadoption contact agreement has been entered into under s.
48.905.
If such an agreement has been entered into, the agency or tribal child welfare department shall attach a copy of the agreement to the report.
S ECTION 2.
48.426 (3) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
48.426 (3) (c) Whether the child has substantial relationships with the parent or other family members, and whether it would be harmful to the child to sever these those relationships.
In determining whether it would be harmful to the child to sever those relationships, the court shall consider the terms of any postadoption contact agreement that has been entered into under s.
48.905.
S ECTION 3.
48.43 (2) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
48.43 (2) (c) A court may approve a postadoption contact agreement entered into under s.
48.905.
S ECTION 4.
48.905 of the statutes is created to read:
48.905 Postadoption contact agreement.
(1) P ARTIES.A proposed adoptive parent may enter into a postadoption contact agreement with a parent of the child LRB-4080/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - EAW:skw SECTION 4 ASSEMBLY BILL 561 who is the subject of the adoption or with another relative with whom the child has a substantial relationship.
(2) ERMS.
A postadoption contact agreement shall contain all of the following provisions:
(a) An acknowledgment by the parent or relative that failure to comply with the terms of the agreement is not grounds to revoke the termination of the parent's rights or the adoption.
An acknowledgment under this paragraph is not required if s.
48.028 and the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 USC 1901 to 1963, apply to the proceeding.
Show all 87 changed lines (47 more)
(b) A statement by each party to the agreement that the agreement was entered into voluntarily, that the terms of the agreement are understood, that no promises or threats were made to coerce a party to enter into the agreement, and that no representations have been relied upon other than those contained in the agreement.
(c) An acknowledgment that if a dispute arises about fulfillment of the terms of the agreement, the parties shall participate, or attempt to participate, in good faith, in mediation or an alternative dispute resolution process, with the mediator or arbitrator to be selected by the adoptive parent.
(d) A description of the postadoption contact and frequency of contact agreed to by the proposed adoptive parent.
Contact may include any of the following:
PageSharing 3,of lineinformation 17:about the child between the adoptive parent and parent or relative.
delete “the adoptive parent" and substitute “mutual agreement of the parties or, if the parties cannot agree, the court".
PageSharing 5,of linethe 23:parent's or relative's medical history.
afterNFORCEMENT." insert “(a)".
PageWritten, 6,oral, lineor 8:electronic communication between the child and parent or relative.
delete- that2020 lineLegislature and- substitute4 “by- mutualLRB-4080/1 agreementEAW:skw ofASSEMBLY theBILL parties.561 SECTION 4 4.
IfVisitation by the partiesparent cannotor agreerelative onwith athe mediatorchild orunder arbitrator,specified theconditions courtor shallconditions appointthat themay mediatorbe orset arbitratorby withinthe 30proposed daysadoptive ofparent aat requestthe bytime anyof party.visitation.
The(3) mediatorAPPROVAL. or arbitrator's fees shall be paid equally by”.
In a proceeding to terminate parental rights or a proceeding to grant an adoption, a court may approve a postadoption contact agreement if it finds all of the following:
(a) The agreement contains all of the provisions specified in sub.
(2), and the court is satisfied that the proposed adoptive parent and the parent or relative understand those provisions.
(b) The agreement is signed by the proposed adoptive parent and parent or relative.
(c) An agency having guardianship, legal custody, or supervision of the child, the child's guardian ad litem, and, in the case of an Indian child, the Indian child's tribe, have submitted favorable recommendations for approval of the postadoption contact agreement.
(d) The court determines that the parent or relative will not undermine the proposed adoptive parent's relationship with the child.
(e) The court determines that the parent or relative will not act in a manner that is contrary to the proposed adoptive parent's parenting decisions that are related to the child's physical, emotional, educational, or spiritual welfare.
(f) The court determines by clear and convincing evidence that approval of the agreement is in the best interests of the child.
In considering the best interests of the child under this section, the court shall consider all of the following:
1.
Whether the child has a substantial relationship with the parent or relative, and whether it would be harmful to the child not to preserve that relationship.
LRB-4080/1 - 2020 Legislature - 5 - EAW:skw SECTION 4 ASSEMBLY BILL 561 2.
The needs of the child and how those needs would be affected by postadoption contact with the parent or relative as provided under the agreement.
3.
The wishes of the child, which may be communicated by the child, or through the child's guardian ad litem or other appropriate professional.
PageAny 6,other linefactor 10:that the court determines is relevant to the best interests of the child.
after(4) thatSTIPULATED lineMODIFICATIO. insert:
“(b)At Anany agreementtime underafter thisapproval sectionof isan notagreement enforceableby fora anycourt, periodan duringadoptive whichparent themay childagree hasto beenmodify placedthe outsidepostadoption ofcontact theagreement adoptivewith parent'sthe homeformer underparent ch.or relative.
48The ormodified 938,agreement orshall duringbe whichin thewriting, parentsigned isby denied physical placement with the childparties, inand ashall courtbe ordersubmitted underto ch.the court.
767.The court may approve the modified agreement, without a hearing, if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that modification of the agreement is in the best interests of the child.
LRBa0689/3(5) -P 2020ETITION LegislatureTO -MODIFY 2OR -TERMINATE. EAW:skw&wlj (7) LIMITATION.
AnAt agreementany undertime thisafter sectionapproval doesof notan affectagreement by a tribalcourt, rightan underadoptive s.parent may petition the court for modification or termination of the postadoption contact agreement.
48.028The orcourt undershall schedule a hearing on the federalpetition, Indianwith Childnotice Welfareto Act,the 25adoptive USCparent, 1901former toparent 1963,or andrelative, mayan notagency impairthat ahad culturalguardianship, contactlegal agreementcustody, or othersupervision agreementof madethe betweenchild before the adoptiveadoption, parentsand, ofin athe childcase andof an Indian tribe.”.child, the Indian child's tribe.
5.The court may modify or terminate the agreement, after a hearing, if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that modification or termination of the agreement is in the best interests of the child and that there has been a substantial change in circumstances since the agreement was approved by the court.
Page(6) 6,ENFORCEMENT line. 23:
A party may petition the court for enforcement of the terms of the agreement after thatattempting linemediation insert:or an alternative dispute resolution process in good faith to obtain specific performance of the terms of the agreement.
“SECTION- 6m.2020 Legislature - 6 - LRB-4080/1 EAW:skw ASSEMBLY BILL 561 SECTION 4 The court shall schedule a hearing on the petition, with notice to the adoptive parent, former parent or relative, an agency that had guardianship, legal custody, or supervision of the child before the adoption, and, in the case of an Indian child, the Indian child's tribe.
0InitialThe applicability.court may order specific performance of the terms of the agreement, after a hearing, if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that enforcement is in the best interests of the child.
(1)In Thisfirst actattempting firstmediation appliesor an alternative dispute resolution process, the mediator or arbitrator shall be selected by the adoptive parent, with the mediator or arbitrator's fees to abe terminationpaid ofequally parentalby rightsthe petitionadoptive filedparent onand former parent or relative unless agreed otherwise in the effectivemediation dateor ofordered thisotherwise subsection.”.by the arbitrator or the court.
SECTION 5.
48.92 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
48.92 (2) After the order of adoption is entered the relationship of parent and child between the adopted person and the adopted person's birth parents and the relationship between the adopted person and all persons whose relationship to the adopted person is derived through those birth parents shall be completely altered and all the rights, duties, and other legal consequences of those relationships shall cease to exist, unless the birth parent is the spouse of the adoptive parent, in which case those relationships shall be completely altered and those rights, duties, and other legal consequences shall cease to exist only with respect to the birth parent who is not the spouse of the adoptive parent and all persons whose relationship to the adopted person is derived through that birth parent.
Notwithstanding the extinction of all parental rights under this subsection, a court may approve a postadoption contact agreement under s.
48.905 or order reasonable visitation under s.
48.925.
Show all 87 changed rows (47 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Representative Milroy withdrawn as a coauthor
-
Placed on calendar 1-15-2020 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 7, Noes 2
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Family Law, Ayes 9, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Snyder added as a coauthor
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Dittrich
-
Representative Edming added as a coauthor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Family Law
-
Introduced by Representatives Dittrich, Plumer, Ballweg, Felzkowski, James, Kerkman, Kulp, Magnafici, Milroy, Murphy, Mursau, Ramthun, Tusler, Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Born, VanderMeer and Tittl; cosponsored by Senators Olsen, Jacque, Darling and Cowles
Sponsors
- Plumer · Primary
- Ballweg · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- James · Primary
- Kerkman · Primary
- Kulp · Primary
- Magnafici · Primary
- Milroy · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
- Ramthun · Primary
- Ron Tusler · Primary
- Thiesfeldt · Primary
- Travis Tranel · Primary
- Mark Born · Primary
- Nancy VanderMeer · Primary
- Paul Tittl · Primary
- Barbara Dittrich · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →18 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on
Sponsors (18)
- Plumer
- Ballweg
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- James
- Kerkman
- Kulp
- Magnafici
- Milroy
- Murphy, David Republican
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Ramthun
- Tusler, Ron Republican
- Thiesfeldt
- Tranel, Travis Republican
- Born, Mark Republican
- VanderMeer, Nancy Republican
- Tittl, Paul Republican
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 561?
- AB 561 is sponsored by Plumer, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), James, Kerkman, Kulp, Magnafici, Milroy, Murphy, David (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Ramthun, Tusler, Ron (Republican), Thiesfeldt, Tranel, Travis (Republican), Born, Mark (Republican), VanderMeer, Nancy (Republican), Tittl, Paul (Republican), and Dittrich, Barbara (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 561?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 561?
- Track AB 561 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 561
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 561
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →