Relating to: an exception from local levy limits for certain amounts levied for charges assessed by a joint...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 472 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 472.
You're tracking AB 472
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 472 — Relating to: an exception from local levy limits for certain amounts levied for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services department. (FE)
Last action — Published 3-4-2020
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 24, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
72 added · 14 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill AB 472 add a definition for "Joint emergency medical services district," which specifies that this type of district can be formed by two or more cities, villages, or towns. This change clarifies how local governments can collaborate in providing emergency medical services, allowing for more flexibility and cooperation in resource sharing. Additionally, some minor edits were made to the bill’s structure and dates, ensuring the language is precise and up-to-date. These updates matter because they help streamline the creation and funding of emergency medical services across communities, potentially leading to better emergency response outcomes.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0591/1LRB-4191/1 MES:amnMES:cdc&amn ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 472 OctoberSeptember 4,24, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentativOUDENBECKRepresentatives L OUDENBECK , M URSAU , M URPHY, MILROY and MURSAUD ITTRICH, cosponsored by Senators N ASS, FEYEN and WANGGAARD .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendWays theand billMeans. as follows:
A N A CT to amend 66.0602 (3) (h) 1., 66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
and 66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
of the statutes;
relating to:
an exception from local levy limits for certain amounts levied for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services department.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Generally under current law, local levy limits are applied to the property tax levies that are imposed in December of each year.
Current law prohibits any city, village, town, or county (political subdivision) from increasing its levy by a percentage that exceeds its “valuation factor," which is defined as the greater of either 0 percent or the percentage change in the political subdivision's equalized value due to new construction, less improvements removed.
In addition, the calculation of a political subdivision's levy does not include any tax increment that is generated by a tax incremental district.
Current law contains a number of exceptions to the levy limit, such as amounts a county levies for a countywide emergency medical system, for a county children with disabilities education board, and for certain bridge and culvert construction and repair.
In addition, a political subdivision may exceed the levy limit that is otherwise applicable if its governing body adopts a resolution to do so and if that resolution is approved by the electors in a referendum.
Another current law exception (the joint fire department exception) is for the amount that a city, village, or town (municipality) levies to pay for charges assessed by a joint fire department, but only to the extent that the amount levied to pay for - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4191/1 MES:cdc&amn ASSEMBLY BILL 472 such charges would cause the municipality to exceed the otherwise applicable levy limit.
This exception to the levy limit applies only if the charges assessed by a joint fire department increase in the current year by an amount equal to or less than the rate of inflation over the preceding year, plus 2 percent, and if the municipality's governing body adopts a resolution in favor of exceeding the otherwise applicable levy limit.
Under this bill, the joint fire department exception is expanded so that it also applies to the amount that a municipality levies to pay for charges assessed by a joint emergency medical services district, subject to the same conditions and limitations as current apply to a joint fire department.
The bill first applies to a levy that is imposed in December 2019.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
66.0602 (3) (h) 1.
of the statutes is amended to read:
66.0602 (3) (h) 1.
Subject to subd.
2., the limit otherwise applicable under this section does not apply to the amount that a city, village, or town levies in that year to pay for charges assessed by a joint fire department or a joint emergency medical services district, but only to the extent that the amount levied to pay for such charges would cause the city, village, or town to exceed the limit that is otherwise applicable under this section.
SECTION 2.
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
of the statutes is amended to read:
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
a.
The total charges assessed by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district for the current year increase, relative to the total charges assessed by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district for the previous year, by a percentage that is less than or equal to the percentage change in the U.S.
consumer price index for all urban consumers, U.S.
city average, as determined by the U.S.
department of labor, for the 12 months ending on September 30 of the year of the levy, plus 2 percent.
LRB-4191/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - MES:cdc&amn SECTION 3 ASSEMBLY BILL 472 SECTION 3.
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
of the statutes is amended to read:
Show all 55 changed lines (15 more)
66.0602 (3) (h) 2.
b.
The governing body of each city, village, and town that is served by the joint fire department or the joint emergency medical services district adopts a resolution in favor of exceeding the limit as described in subd.
PageSECTION 2,4.Initial lineapplicability. 1:
before(1) This act first applies to a levy that lineis insert:imposed in December 2019.
“SECTION 1e.
66.0602 (1) (ak) of the statutes is created to read:
66.0602 (1) (ak) “Joint emergency medical services district” means a joint emergency medical services district organized by any combination of 2 or more cities, villages, or towns under s.
66.0301 (2).”.
2.
Page 2, line 1:
deletECTION 1" and substituteECTION 1m".
3.
Page 3, line 6:
delete “2019" and substitute “2020".
Show all 55 changed rows (15 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 3-4-2020
-
Report approved by the Governor on 3-3-2020. 2019 Wisconsin Act 133
-
Presented to the Governor on 2-28-2020 by directive of the Speaker
-
Report correctly enrolled on 2-25-2020
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 2-19-2020 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 10-10-2019 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 11, Noes 0
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Loudenbeck and Mursau
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Wittke added as a coauthor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Representative Knodl added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
-
Introduced by Representatives Loudenbeck, Mursau, Murphy, Milroy and Dittrich; cosponsored by Senators Nass, Feyen and Wanggaard
Sponsors
- Loudenbeck · Primary
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
- David Murphy · Primary
- Milroy · Primary
- Barbara Dittrich · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 127 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Loudenbeck
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Murphy, David Republican
- Milroy
- Dittrich, Barbara Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (127)
127 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 127 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 472?
- AB 472 is sponsored by Loudenbeck, Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Murphy, David (Republican), Milroy, and Dittrich, Barbara (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 472?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 24, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 472?
- Track AB 472 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 472
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 472
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →