Allowing senior judge to continue receiving per diem compensation beyond annual salary of sitting judge due...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 97 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 97.
You're tracking SB 97
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 97 — Allowing senior judge to continue receiving per diem compensation beyond annual salary of sitting judge due to delay by Governor in filling vacancy
Last action — To House Pensions and Retirement
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
41 added · 40 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of SB 97 now explicitly states that the Governor's delay in filling a judicial vacancy is a reason why senior judges or justices may continue to receive their per diem compensation after they have already collected a sitting circuit judge's annual salary. This clarification is significant because it addresses a legal issue raised in a prior court case, where a senior judge challenged the constitutionality of compensation limitations. By reaffirming this provision, the bill aims to ensure that the compensation structure for senior judges remains clear and enforceable under state law.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB97 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 97 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 97 By Senators Trump, Hamilton, Lindsay, Romano, and RomanoMaroney, [Introducedoriginal Januarysponsors 8,[Originating 2020;in the Committee on the Judiciary;
referredreported toon theFebruary Committee5, on2020] the Judiciary] A BILL to amend and reenact §51-9-10 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to adding a circumstance, a delay by the Governor in filling a judicial vacancy,vacancy toas thean circumstancesadditional circumstance in which a senior judge or justice may continue to receive per diem compensation after the judge or justice has already received the amount of the annual salary of a sitting circuit judge.
Provided, That the combined total of per diem compensation and retirement benefits paid to a senior judge or justice during a single calendar year may not exceed the annual salary of a sitting circuit judge, except as set forth in subsection (d) of this section. (d) Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section, for purposes of maintaining judicial efficacy and continuity in judicial decisiondecisionmaking, making, a senior judge or justice may continue to receive per diem compensation after the combined total of per diem compensation and retirement benefits paid to the senior judge or justice during that calendar year exceeds the annual salary of a sitting circuit judgejudge, if the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Appeals enters an administrative order certifying there are certain extraordinary circumstances involving the necessary absence of a sitting judicial officer because ofof: (1) A protracted, but temporary, illness or medical condition;
(1) A protracted, but temporary, illness or medical condition;
Immediately upon entering such an order, the Chiefchief Justicejustice shall submit copies of the order to the State Auditor and the State Treasurer.
The purpose of this bill is to add,add a circumstance, a delay by the Governor in filling a judicial vacancy, to the circumstances in which a senior judge or justice may continue to receive per diem compensation after the judge or justice has already received the amount of the annual salary of a sitting circuit judge.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
To House Pensions and Retirement
-
To Pensions and Retirement then Finance
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 104)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
Laid over on 2nd reading 2/7/20
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Trump · Primary
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
- Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Romano · Cosponsor
- Maroney · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Trump
Co-sponsors (4)
- Bill Hamilton Republican
- Lindsay
- Romano
- Maroney
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Not Voting |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 97?
- SB 97 is sponsored by Trump, Bill Hamilton (Republican), Lindsay, Romano, and Maroney.
- What is the current status of SB 97?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 97?
- Track SB 97 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 97
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 97
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →