Creating criminal penalties for violation of orders issued for protection of victims of financial exploitation
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 308 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 308.
You're tracking SB 308
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 308 — Creating criminal penalties for violation of orders issued for protection of victims of financial exploitation
Last action — Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
15 added · 121 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill SB 308 changes the title to emphasize its focus on creating a new criminal offense for violating protection orders aimed at safeguarding individuals from financial exploitation. It also requires that these orders clearly state the potential for criminal prosecution if they are violated, thus enhancing the legal tools available to protect victims. This is important because it strengthens protections for vulnerable individuals and establishes clear penalties for offenders, making it a more effective deterrent against financial abuse.
SB308 SFASFAT #3 Trump 2-3 #1Smith Smith 7883 Senator Trump moved moved to amend the bill by striking out everythingthe aftertitle theand enactingsubstituting clausetherefor anda insertingnew intitle, lieuto thereofread theas following:follows:
CHAPTEREng.Com. 55.
ACTIONS,Sub. SUITS AND ARBITRATION;
JUDICIALfor SALeSenate ARTICLEBill 7J.308—A Bill to amend and reenact §55-7-5 of the Code of West Virginia,1931, as amended;
Financialand exploitationto amend and reenact §61-2-29b of ansaid elderlycode, person,all protectedrelating personto creating the criminal offense of violating the terms of protection orders issued for the protection of persons who are victims or incapacitatedpotential adult.victims of financial exploitation;
§55-7J-5.requiring orders of protection to state that violations of such orders may result in criminal prosecution;
Actionand toestablishing freeze penalties assets;for such offenses.
burden of proof; Adopted Rejected
options the court may exercise.
(a) An elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult may bring an action to enjoin the alleged commission of financial exploitation and may petition the court to freeze the assets of the person allegedly committing the financial exploitation in an amount equal to, but not greater than, the alleged value of lost property or assets for purposes of restoring to the victim the value of the lost property or assets.
The burden of proof required to freeze the assets of a person allegedly committing financial exploitation shall be a preponderance of the evidence.
Upon a finding that the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult has been formally exploited, the court may:
(1) Grant injunctive relief;
(2) Order the violator to, in escrow an amount of money equivalent to the value of the misappropriated assets for distribution to the aggrieved elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult;
(3) Order the violator to return to the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated person any real or personal property which was misappropriated;
or (4) Provide for the appointment of a receiver;
(b) In an action under section one of this article, the court may void or limit the application of contracts or clauses resulting from the financial exploitation.
(c) In an action brought under this article, upon the filing of the complaint or on the appearance of any defendant, claimant or other party, or at any later time, the court may require the plaintiff, defendant, claimant or other party or parties to post security, or additional security, in a sum the court directs to pay all costs, expenses and disbursements that are awarded against that party or that the party may be directed to pay by any interlocutory order, by the final judgment or after appeal.
(d) An order entered under this section shall state that a violation of the order may result in criminal prosecution under §61-2-29b of this code and state the penalties therefor.
CHAPTER 61.
CRIMES AND THEIR PUNISHMENT ARTICLE 2.
CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON §61-2-29b.
Financial exploitation of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult;
penalties;
definitions.
(a) Any person who financially exploits an elderly person, protected person or an incapacitated adult in the amount of less than $1,000 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or confined in jail for not more than one year, or both fined and confined.
(b) Any person who financially exploits an elderly person, protected person or an incapacitated adult in the amount of $1,000 or more is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $10,000 and imprisoned in a state correctional facility not less than two nor more than 20 years.
(c) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall, in addition to any other penalties at law, be subject to an order of restitution.
(d) In determining the value of the money, goods, property or services referred to in subsection (a) of this section, it shall be permissible to cumulate amounts or values where such money, goods, property or services were fraudulently obtained as part of a common scheme or plan.
(e) Financial institutions and their employees, as defined by §31A-2A-1 of this code and as permitted by subsection thirteen, section four of said article, others engaged in financially related activities, as defined by §31A-8C-1 of this code, caregivers, relatives and other concerned persons are permitted to report suspected cases of financial exploitation to state or federal law-enforcement authorities, the county prosecuting attorney and to the Department of Health and Human Resources, Adult Protective Services Division or Medicaid Fraud Division, as appropriate.
Public officers and employees are required to report suspected cases of financial exploitation to the appropriate entities as stated above.
The requisite agencies shall investigate or cause the investigation of the allegations.
(f) When financial exploitation is suspected and to the extent permitted by federal law, financial institutions and their employees or other business entities required by federal law or regulation to file suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports shall also be permitted to disclose suspicious activity reports or currency transaction reports to the prosecuting attorney of any county in which the transactions underlying the suspicious activity reports or currency transaction reports occurred.
(g) Any person or entity that in good faith reports a suspected case of financial exploitation pursuant to this section is immune from civil liability founded upon making that report.
(h) For the purposes of this section:
(1) "Incapacitated adult" means a person as defined by section twenty-nine of this article;
(2) "Elderly person" means a person who is 65 years or older;
(3) "Financial exploitation" or "financially exploit" means the intentional misappropriation or misuse of funds or assets of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult, but shall not apply to a transaction or disposition of funds or assets where the accused made a good-faith effort to assist the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult with the management of his or her money or other things of value;
and (4) "Protected person" means any person who is defined as a "protected person" in §44A-1-4 of this code and who is subject to the protections of chapter forty-four-a or forty-four-c of this code.
(i) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, acting as guardian, conservator, trustee or attorney for or holding power of attorney for an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult shall not, standing alone, constitute a defense to a violation of subsection (a) of this section.
Show all 44 changed lines (4 more)
(5) Any person who willfully violates a material term of an order entered pursuant to §55-7J-5 of this code is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall;
(1) For the first offense, be fined not more than $1,000 or confined in jail not more than days, or both fined and confined;
and (2) For a second or subsequent offense, be fined not more than $2,500 or confined in jail not more than one year, or both fined and confined.
Adopted Rejected
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- SB308 SFAT _3 TRUMP 2-3 adopted.htm View text html
- SB308 SFA TRUMP 2-3 _1 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2020
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20
-
To Governor 3/18/20
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - House Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/18/20 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/18/20 - Senate Journal
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Passed House (Roll No. 564)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
Do pass, but first to Judiciary
-
To House Senior, Children, and Family Issues
-
To Senior, Children, and Family Issues then Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 66)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Laid over on 2nd reading 2/3/20
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Ryan Weld · Primary
- Ihlenfeld · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ryan Weld Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Ihlenfeld
- Jeffries
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 66 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 94 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 1% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (100)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kump | — | Yea |
| Rowe | — | Yea |
| Angelucci | — | Yea |
| Espinosa | — | Yea |
| Lavender-Bowe | — | Yea |
| Shott | — | Yea |
| Atkinson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Linville | — | Yea |
| Skaff | — | Yea |
| Fast | — | Yea |
| Longstreth | — | Yea |
| Sponaugle | — | Yea |
| Barnhart | — | Yea |
| Fleischauer | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy | — | Yea |
| Staggers | — | Yea |
| Mandt | — | Yea |
| Steele | — | Yea |
| Foster | — | Yea |
| Storch | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hamrick | — | Yea |
| Summers | — | Yea |
| Bibby | — | Yea |
| Hanna | — | Yea |
| Maynard | — | Yea |
| Swartzmiller | — | Yea |
| Boggs | — | Yea |
| Miley | — | Yea |
| Sypolt | — | Yea |
| Brown, N. | — | Yea |
| Hardy | — | Yea |
| Thompson, C. | — | Yea |
| Brown, S. | — | Yea |
| Hartman | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Thompson, R. | — | Yea |
| Hicks | — | Yea |
| Pack | — | Yea |
| Tomblin | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Higginbotham | — | Yea |
| Paynter | — | Yea |
| Cadle | — | Yea |
| Pethtel | — | Yea |
| Walker | — | Yea |
| Phillips | — | Yea |
| Waxman | — | Yea |
| Canestraro | — | Yea |
| Householder | — | Yea |
| Porterfield | — | Yea |
| Westfall | — | Yea |
| Capito | — | Yea |
| Caputo | — | Yea |
| Pyles | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Jeffries, J. | — | Yea |
| Cowles | — | Yea |
| Robinson | — | Yea |
| Zukoff | — | Yea |
| Rodighiero | — | Yea |
| Diserio | — | Yea |
| Doyle | — | Yea |
| Kessinger | — | Yea |
| Rowan | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Not Voting |
| Little | — | Not Voting |
| Estep-Burton | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Not Voting |
| Evan Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| John Williams | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Pushkin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Hornbuckle | Democrat | Yea |
| Shawn Fluharty | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Christopher W. Toney | Republican | Yea |
| D. Rolland Jennings | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Evan Worrell | Republican | Yea |
| Gary G. Howell | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Ellington | Republican | Yea |
| John Paul Hott | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Rohrbach | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Pat McGeehan | Republican | Nay |
| Patrick Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hanshaw | Republican | Yea |
| Roy Cooper | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vernon Criss | Republican | Not Voting |
| William Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 308?
- SB 308 is sponsored by Ryan Weld (Republican), Ihlenfeld, and Jeffries.
- What is the current status of SB 308?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 308?
- Track SB 308 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 308
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 308
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →