West Virginia 2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 308 — Creating criminal penalties for violation of orders issued for protection of victims of financial exploitation

Last action — Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2020

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2020. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

15 added · 121 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill SB 308 changes the title to emphasize its focus on creating a new criminal offense for violating protection orders aimed at safeguarding individuals from financial exploitation. It also requires that these orders clearly state the potential for criminal prosecution if they are violated, thus enhancing the legal tools available to protect victims. This is important because it strengthens protections for vulnerable individuals and establishes clear penalties for offenders, making it a more effective deterrent against financial abuse.

→
Previous
Latest
SB308 SFA Trump 2-3 #1 Smith 7883   Senator Trump moved to amend the bill by striking out everything after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
SB308 SFAT #3 Trump 2-3 Smith  7883   Senator Trump  moved to amend the bill by striking out the title and substituting therefor a new title, to read as follows:
CHAPTER 55.
Eng.Com.
ACTIONS, SUITS AND ARBITRATION;
Sub.
JUDICIAL SALe ARTICLE 7J.
for Senate Bill 308—A Bill to amend and reenact §55-7-5 of the Code of West Virginia,1931, as amended;
Financial exploitation of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult.
and to amend and reenact §61-2-29b of said code, all relating to creating the criminal offense of  violating the terms of protection orders issued for  the protection of persons who are victims or potential victims of financial exploitation;
§55-7J-5.
requiring orders of protection to state that violations of such orders may result in criminal prosecution;
Action to freeze assets;
and establishing  penalties for such offenses.
burden of proof;
      Adopted Rejected
options the court may exercise.
(a) An elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult may bring an action to enjoin the alleged commission of financial exploitation and may petition the court to freeze the assets of the person allegedly committing the financial exploitation in an amount equal to, but not greater than, the alleged value of lost property or assets for purposes of restoring to the victim the value of the lost property or assets.
The burden of proof required to freeze the assets of a person allegedly committing financial exploitation shall be a preponderance of the evidence.
Upon a finding that the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult has been formally exploited, the court may:
(1) Grant injunctive relief;
(2) Order the violator to, in escrow an amount of money equivalent to the value of the misappropriated assets for distribution to the aggrieved elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult;
(3) Order the violator to return to the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated person any real or personal property which was misappropriated;
or (4) Provide for the appointment of a receiver;
(b) In an action under section one of this article, the court may void or limit the application of contracts or clauses resulting from the financial exploitation.
(c) In an action brought under this article, upon the filing of the complaint or on the appearance of any defendant, claimant or other party, or at any later time, the court may require the plaintiff, defendant, claimant or other party or parties to post security, or additional security, in a sum the court directs to pay all costs, expenses and disbursements that are awarded against that party or that the party may be directed to pay by any interlocutory order, by the final judgment or after appeal.
(d) An order entered under this section shall state that a violation of the order may result in criminal prosecution under §61-2-29b of this code and state the penalties therefor.
CHAPTER 61.
CRIMES AND THEIR PUNISHMENT ARTICLE 2.
CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON §61-2-29b.
Financial exploitation of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult;
penalties;
definitions.
(a) Any person who financially exploits an elderly person, protected person or an incapacitated adult in the amount of less than $1,000 is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or confined in jail for not more than one year, or both fined and confined.
(b) Any person who financially exploits an elderly person, protected person or an incapacitated adult in the amount of $1,000 or more is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $10,000 and imprisoned in a state correctional facility not less than two nor more than 20 years.
(c) Any person convicted of a violation of this section shall, in addition to any other penalties at law, be subject to an order of restitution.
(d) In determining the value of the money, goods, property or services referred to in subsection (a) of this section, it shall be permissible to cumulate amounts or values where such money, goods, property or services were fraudulently obtained as part of a common scheme or plan.
(e) Financial institutions and their employees, as defined by §31A-2A-1 of this code and as permitted by subsection thirteen, section four of said article, others engaged in financially related activities, as defined by §31A-8C-1 of this code, caregivers, relatives and other concerned persons are permitted to report suspected cases of financial exploitation to state or federal law-enforcement authorities, the county prosecuting attorney and to the Department of Health and Human Resources, Adult Protective Services Division or Medicaid Fraud Division, as appropriate.
Public officers and employees are required to report suspected cases of financial exploitation to the appropriate entities as stated above.
The requisite agencies shall investigate or cause the investigation of the allegations.
(f) When financial exploitation is suspected and to the extent permitted by federal law, financial institutions and their employees or other business entities required by federal law or regulation to file suspicious activity reports and currency transaction reports shall also be permitted to disclose suspicious activity reports or currency transaction reports to the prosecuting attorney of any county in which the transactions underlying the suspicious activity reports or currency transaction reports occurred.
(g) Any person or entity that in good faith reports a suspected case of financial exploitation pursuant to this section is immune from civil liability founded upon making that report.
(h) For the purposes of this section:
(1) "Incapacitated adult" means a person as defined by section twenty-nine of this article;
(2) "Elderly person" means a person who is 65 years or older;
(3) "Financial exploitation" or "financially exploit" means the intentional misappropriation or misuse of funds or assets of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult, but shall not apply to a transaction or disposition of funds or assets where the accused made a good-faith effort to assist the elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult with the management of his or her money or other things of value;
and (4) "Protected person" means any person who is defined as a "protected person" in §44A-1-4 of this code and who is subject to the protections of chapter forty-four-a or forty-four-c of this code.
(i) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, acting as guardian, conservator, trustee or attorney for or holding power of attorney for an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult shall not, standing alone, constitute a defense to a violation of subsection (a) of this section.
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
Previous
Latest
(5) Any person who willfully violates a material term of an order entered pursuant to §55-7J-5 of this code is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall;
(1) For the first offense, be fined not more than $1,000 or confined in jail not more than days, or both fined and confined;
and             (2) For a second or subsequent offense, be fined not more than $2,500 or confined in jail not more than one year, or both fined and confined.
  Adopted Rejected
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2020

  2. Approved by Governor 3/25/20

  3. To Governor 3/18/20

  4. Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - House Journal

  5. Approved by Governor 3/25/20 - Senate Journal

  6. To Governor 3/18/20 - House Journal

  7. To Governor 3/18/20 - Senate Journal

  8. House Message received

  9. Completed legislative action

  10. Communicated to Senate

  11. Passed House (Roll No. 564)

  12. Read 3rd time

  13. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  14. Read 2nd time

  15. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  16. Read 1st time

  17. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  18. Do pass

  19. To House Judiciary

  20. Do pass, but first to Judiciary

  21. To House Senior, Children, and Family Issues

  22. To Senior, Children, and Family Issues then Judiciary

  23. Introduced in House

  24. Ordered to House

  25. Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 66)

  26. Read 3rd time

  27. On 3rd reading

  28. Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  29. Read 2nd time

  30. Laid over on 2nd reading 2/3/20

  31. On 2nd reading

  32. Read 1st time

  33. On 1st reading

  34. Committee substitute reported

  35. To Judiciary

  36. Introduced in Senate

  37. To Judiciary

  38. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

  • Ryan Weld · Primary
  • Ihlenfeld · Cosponsor
  • Jeffries · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Ihlenfeld
  • Jeffries

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASSAGE

Passed 94 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 23101
Unaffiliated 66004
Democrat 5000
Total 94105
% of votes cast 94%1%0%5%
How each member voted (100)
Member Party Vote
Kump — Yea
Rowe — Yea
Angelucci — Yea
Espinosa — Yea
Lavender-Bowe — Yea
Shott — Yea
Atkinson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Linville — Yea
Skaff — Yea
Fast — Yea
Longstreth — Yea
Sponaugle — Yea
Barnhart — Yea
Fleischauer — Yea
Lovejoy — Yea
Staggers — Yea
Mandt — Yea
Steele — Yea
Foster — Yea
Storch — Yea
Bates — Yea
Hamrick — Yea
Summers — Yea
Bibby — Yea
Hanna — Yea
Maynard — Yea
Swartzmiller — Yea
Boggs — Yea
Miley — Yea
Sypolt — Yea
Brown, N. — Yea
Hardy — Yea
Thompson, C. — Yea
Brown, S. — Yea
Hartman — Yea
Nelson — Yea
Thompson, R. — Yea
Hicks — Yea
Pack — Yea
Tomblin — Yea
Byrd — Yea
Higginbotham — Yea
Paynter — Yea
Cadle — Yea
Pethtel — Yea
Walker — Yea
Phillips — Yea
Waxman — Yea
Canestraro — Yea
Householder — Yea
Porterfield — Yea
Westfall — Yea
Capito — Yea
Caputo — Yea
Pyles — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Jeffries, J. — Yea
Cowles — Yea
Robinson — Yea
Zukoff — Yea
Rodighiero — Yea
Diserio — Yea
Doyle — Yea
Kessinger — Yea
Rowan — Yea
Graves — Not Voting
Little — Not Voting
Estep-Burton — Not Voting
Hill — Not Voting
Evan Hansen Democrat Yea
John Williams Democrat Yea
Mike Pushkin Democrat Yea
Sean Hornbuckle Democrat Yea
Shawn Fluharty Democrat Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Betsy Kelly Republican Yea
Betsy Kelly Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Christopher W. Toney Republican Yea
D. Rolland Jennings Republican Yea
Dean Jeffries Republican Yea
Evan Worrell Republican Yea
Gary G. Howell Republican Yea
George Miller Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Jeff Campbell Republican Yea
Jim Butler Republican Yea
Joe Ellington Republican Yea
John Paul Hott Republican Yea
Mark Dean Republican Yea
Matthew Rohrbach Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Pat McGeehan Republican Nay
Patrick Martin Republican Yea
Roger Hanshaw Republican Yea
Roy Cooper Republican Yea
T. Kevan Bartlett Republican Yea
Vernon Criss Republican Not Voting
William Anderson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passage

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 32000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
LINDSAY — Yea
SMITH — Yea
BALDWIN — Yea
MANN — Yea
STOLLINGS — Yea
BEACH — Yea
MARONEY — Yea
SWOPE — Yea
BLAIR — Yea
MAYNARD — Yea
SYPOLT — Yea
BOLEY — Yea
PALUMBO — Yea
TAKUBO — Yea
PITSENBARGER — Yea
TARR — Yea
CLINE — Yea
PLYMALE — Yea
TRUMP — Yea
FACEMIRE — Yea
PREZIOSO — Yea
UNGER — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
ROBERTS — Yea
WELD — Yea
HARDESTY — Yea
ROMANO — Yea
WOELFEL — Yea
IHLENFELD — Yea
RUCKER — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 308?
SB 308 is sponsored by Ryan Weld (Republican), Ihlenfeld, and Jeffries.
What is the current status of SB 308?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2020. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 308?
Track SB 308 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 308

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 308

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →