Wisconsin 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly Bipartisan · 27 R · 9 D cosponsors

AB 114 — Relating to: registration and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, drug pricing transparency, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

620 added · 9 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Bill AB 114 changed the maximum penalty for violations related to pharmacy benefit managers from 24 to 12. This change is important because it reduces the potential fines that these managers could face for not complying with new regulations, which could impact their accountability and the overall effectiveness of drug pricing transparency efforts. By lowering the penalties, the bill may create less deterrent for non-compliant behavior.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa1196/1 TJD:skw ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT 1, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 114 February 13, 2020 - Offered bOMMITTEE ONH EALTH.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 March 25, 2019 - Introduced by Representatives S CHRAA , KOLSTE, RIEMER , A NDERSON, BORN, BOWEN , BROOKS, BROSTOFF, CONSIDINE, ITTRICH, DUCHOW , E DMING, EMERSON, FELZKOWSKI, FIELD, GOYKE, GUNDRUM , HEBL, HESSELBEIN, H ORLACHER, H UTTON, JAMES , KITCHENS, K NODL, KRUG , KUGLITSCH, K ULP, M EYERS, MURPHY, MURSAU , NOVAK, OHNSTAD, OLDENBURG , ETERSEN, PLUMER , Q UINN, RAMTHUN , R ODRIGUEZ, R OHRKASTE, S ARGENT, SORTWELL , SINICKI, SKOWRONSKI , SPIRO, SNYDER, SPREITZER, TAFSHOLT, TUBBS , TUCK , UBECK , SUMMERFIELD , SWEARINGEN , AUCHEN , C.TAYLOR, THIESFELDT, ITTL, RANEL , VANDER M EER, VORPAGEL, RUWINK , HANKLAND , MYERS , USLER, BILLINGSand ZIMMERMAN , cosponsored by Senators RPENBACH , OTH , BERNIER, DARLING, FEYEN , HANSEN, JOHNSON , LARSON, MARKLEIN, OLSEN , INGHAND , SMITH, L.
At the locations indicated, amend the substitute amendment as follows:
TAYLOR , IFFANY, ANGGAARD and W IRCH.
Referred to Committee on Health.
A N A CT to repeal 40.51 (15m), 632.86 and 632.865 (title) and (1);
to renumber 632.865 (2);
to amend 40.51 (8), 40.51 (8m), 66.0137 (4), 120.13 (2) (g), 185.983 (1) (intro.), 601.43 (1) (a), 609.83, 616.09 (1) (a) 2.
and 628.36 (2m) (e) 1.;
and to create 628.36 (2m) (a) 2s., 632.861 and chapter 649 of the statutes;
relating to:
registration and regulation of pharmacy benefit managers, drug pricing transparency, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill generally allows the commissioner of insurance to regulate pharmacy benefit managers by requiring them to register.
The bill also establishes certain price transparency requirements and requirements on contracts the pharmacy benefit manager enters into with pharmacies, pharmacists, or health benefit plan sponsors among other requirements.
Registration of pharmacy benefit managers The bill prohibits a person, except an insurer already regulated by the commissioner, from performing any activities of a pharmacy benefit manager in this state without first registering with the commissioner.
Certain pharmacy benefit managers must be licensed by the Pharmacy Examining Board and registered as a pharmacy benefit manager.
If the Pharmacy Examining Board revokes the pharmacy or distributor license for such a pharmacy benefit manager, the - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 commissioner must revoke the pharmacy benefit manager's registration.
An applicant for registration as a pharmacy benefit manager must file an appropriate application and pay any registration fee set by the commissioner.
A registration is valid for one year.
The commissioner may refuse to register a pharmacy benefit manager for which a previous registration was suspended or revoked.
Under the bill, the commissioner, after a hearing, may suspend or revoke a registration of a pharmacy benefit manager if the registered pharmacy benefit manager, or an officer, director, or employee of a registered pharmacy benefit manager, does any of the actions specified in the bill.
The commissioner may promulgate rules necessary to carry out the intent of pharmacy benefit manager registration.
The bill also allows the commissioner to use his or her authority that is granted to regulate insurers to similarly regulate pharmacy benefit managers, including the authority to require reports, conduct examinations, and issue orders.
The commissioner is required to promulgate certain rules, including rules regarding formulary development, required disclosures, and a standardized medical exceptions approval process, among others.
The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to provide a reasonably adequate and accessible network of pharmacies.
Pharmacy benefit managers are not allowed to include mail-order pharmacies in their calculation of network adequacy.
The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to submit a network adequacy report to the commissioner.
The bill also imposes on pharmacy benefit managers a current law requirement on health maintenance organizations, limited service health organizations, and preferred provider plans that provide coverage of pharmaceutical services when performed by one or more selected pharmacists to provide an annual period of at least 30 days during which any pharmacist may elect to participate in the organization or plan under its terms as a selected provider for at least one year.
Pharmacy benefit manager regulation The bill requires pharmacy benefit managers to refrain from certain actions in their interactions with pharmacists or pharmacies including charging a pharmacist or pharmacy a fee related to the adjudication of a claim, requiring pharmacist or pharmacy accreditation or certification requirements in addition to, more stringent than, or inconsistent with requirements of the pharmacy examining board, reimbursing a pharmacist or pharmacy less than the amount reimbursed to an affiliate of the pharmacy benefit manager for the same services, failing to make payments for services properly provided by a pharmacist or pharmacy before the termination of the pharmacist or pharmacy from the network, and restricting or limiting a pharmacy or pharmacist from disclosing information to a governmental official or law enforcement that is investigating a complaint or conducting a review.
The bill requires a pharmacy benefit manager to disclose to a health benefit plan sponsor any activity, policy, or practice that presents a conflict of interest and, if the pharmacy benefit manager makes a formulary substitution to a higher cost drug, the cost of the drug and any benefit that accrues to the pharmacy benefit manager related to the substitution.
A pharmacy benefit manager is prohibited in the bill from retroactively denying a pharmacist's or pharmacy's claim unless the original claim was fraudulent, the payment of the original claim was incorrect because it had LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 already been paid, or the pharmacy services were not rendered by the pharmacist or pharmacy.
The bill requires every pharmacy benefit manager to submit annual transparency reports containing information specified in the bill to the commissioner and to certain committees of the legislature.
Current law requires pharmacy benefit managers to agree in their contracts to make certain disclosures regarding prescription drug reimbursement, including updating maximum allowable cost pricing information for prescribed drugs or devices at least every seven business days, reimbursing pharmacies or pharmacists subject to the updated maximum allowable cost pricing, and modifying information in the maximum allowable cost information in a timely fashion.
Pharmacy benefit managers currently must also include in each contract with a pharmacy a process to appeal, investigate, and resolve pricing disputes in accordance with the specifics in current law.
These current law requirements are unchanged by the bill.
Audits of pharmacists or pharmacies The bill sets requirements on a pharmacy benefit manager, insurer, defined network plan, such as a health maintenance organization, or a third-party payer that is conducting an audit of pharmacist or pharmacy records, including requiring at least two weeks' notice of an audit that is on the premises of a pharmacist or pharmacy, refraining from conducting the audit within the first seven days of the month unless the pharmacist or pharmacy consents, limiting the audit to claims submitted no more than two years before the date of the audit, establishing a written appeals process allowing for appeals of preliminary and final reports and mediation by either party, and allowing a pharmacist or pharmacy to use health care provider records to validate records and any prescription that complies with the pharmacy examining board requirements to validate claims.
The bill requires an entity that has conducted an audit of a pharmacist or pharmacy to comply with certain timing requirements for delivery of the preliminary and final reports and for allowing a pharmacist or pharmacy to address any discrepancies and requires the entity to refrain from using extrapolation in calculating the recoupments or penalties from an audit among other requirements in the bill.
If an audit identifies a clerical or record-keeping error, the pharmacy benefit manager or entity must prove that the pharmacist or pharmacy intended to commit fraud or that the error resulted in actual financial harm before requesting recoupment from the pharmacist or pharmacy based on the error.
A pharmacy benefit manager or other entity conducting an audit may not pay an auditor based on a percentage of the amount recovered in an audit.
Allowing disclosures to consumers This bill prohibits a health insurance policy, referred to in the statutes as a disability insurance policy, or a governmental self-insured health plan from including in a contract for pharmacy services, or allowing a pharmacy benefit manager or another entity to include in a contract for pharmacy services, a provision that prohibits or penalizes a pharmacist's disclosure to an individual purchasing a prescribed drug or device of the cost of a prescribed drug or device, a less expensive therapeutically equivalent drug or device, or a less expensive method of purchasing the drug or device.
- 2020 Legislature - 4 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 Cost sharing limitation, choice of provider, and drug substitution The bill sets a limitation on the amount of cost sharing that a person who is covered under a health insurance policy or self-insured governmental health plan must pay at the point of sale for a prescription drug as specified in the bill.
A policy or plan or a pharmacy benefit manager may not require a person covered under the policy or plan to pay an increased amount of cost sharing for a newly prescribed drug or device if the policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager requested the substitution of the original drug and if the newly prescribed drug or device is therapeutically equivalent to the originally prescribed drug or device.
Show all 321 changed rows (281 more)
Previous
Latest
The bill requires health insurance policies, self-insured governmental health plans, and pharmacy benefits managers to develop a procedure to ensure that a policy or plan does not deny coverage to an insured or plan participant during a plan year or subject the insured or plan participant to new exclusions, limitations, deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance if the prescribed drug or device was covered under the policy or plan for the insured or plan participant when the insured or plan participant either enrolled in coverage or renewed coverage and if the prescribing health care provider states that the prescribed drug or device is more suitable for the insured's or plan participant's condition than alternative drugs or devices that are covered under the policy or plan.
An insurer, self-insured governmental health plan, or pharmacy benefit manager may not require or penalize a person who is covered under a health insurance policy or plan to use or for not using a specific retail, specific mail order pharmacy, or other specific pharmacy within the policy's or plan's provider network.
This proposal may contain a health insurance mandate requiring a social and financial impact report under s.
601.423, stats.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
40.51 (8) of the statutes is amended to read:
40.51 (8) Every health care coverage plan offered by the state under sub.
(6) shall comply with ss.
631.89, 631.90, 631.93 (2), 631.95, 632.72 (2), 632.746 (1) to (8) and (10), 632.747, 632.748, 632.798, 632.83, 632.835, 632.85, 632.853, 632.855, 632.861, 632.867, 632.87 (3) to (6), 632.885, 632.89, 632.895 (5m) and (8) to (17), and 632.896.
SECTION 2.
40.51 (8m) of the statutes is amended to read:
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 5 - TJD:amn SECTION 2 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 40.51 (8m) Every health care coverage plan offered by the group insurance board under sub.
(7) shall comply with ss.
631.95, 632.746 (1) to (8) and (10), 632.747, 632.748, 632.798, 632.83, 632.835, 632.85, 632.853, 632.855, 632.861, 632.867, 632.885, 632.89, and 632.895 (11) to (17).
SECTION 3.
40.51 (15m) of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 4.
66.0137 (4) of the statutes is amended to read:
66.0137 (4) SELF-INSURED HEALTH PLANSIf a city, including a 1st class city, or a village provides health care benefits under its home rule power, or if a town provides health care benefits, to its officers and employees on a self-insured basis, the self-insured plan shall comply with ss.
49.493 (3) (d), 631.89, 631.90, 631.93 (2), 632.746 (10) (a) 2.
and (b) 2., 632.747 (3), 632.798, 632.85, 632.853, 632.855, 632.861, 632.867, 632.87 (4) to (6), 632.885, 632.89, 632.895 (9) to (17), 632.896, and 767.513 (4).
SECTION 5.
120.13 (2) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:
120.13 (2) (g) Every self-insured plan under par.
(b) shall comply with ss.
49.493 (3) (d), 631.89, 631.90, 631.93 (2), 632.746 (10) (a) 2.
and (b) 2., 632.747 (3), 632.798, 632.85, 632.853, 632.855, 632.861, 632.867, 632.87 (4) to (6), 632.885, 632.89, 632.895 (9) to (17), 632.896, and 767.513 (4).
SECTION 6.
185.983 (1) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
185.983 (1) (intro.) Every voluntary nonprofit health care plan operated by a cooperative association organized under s.
185.981 shall be exempt from chs.
600 to 646, with the exception of ss.
601.04, 601.13, 601.31, 601.41, 601.42, 601.43, 601.44, 601.45, 611.26, 611.67, 619.04, 623.11, 623.12, 628.34 (10), 631.17, 631.89, 631.93, 631.95, 632.72 (2), 632.745 to 632.749, 632.775, 632.79, 632.795, 632.798, 632.85, 632.853, 632.855, 632.861,.867, 632.87 (2) to (6), 632.885, 632.89, 632.895 (5) and - 2020 Legislature - 6 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 SECTION 6 (8) to (17), 632.896, and 632.897 (10) and chs.
609, 620, 630, 635, 645, and 646, but the sponsoring association shall:
SECTION 7.
601.43 (1) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
601.43 (1) (a) Insurers, other licensees and other persons subject to regulation.
Whenever the commissioner deems it necessary in order to inform himself or herself about any matter related to the enforcement of chs.
600 to 647 and 649, the commissioner may examine the affairs and condition of any licensee or, permittee, or registrant under chs.
600 to 647 and 649 or applicant for a license or, permit, or registration of any person or organization of persons doing or in process of organizing to do an insurance business in this state, and of any advisory organization serving any of the foregoing in this state.
SECTION 8.
609.83 of the statutes is amended to read:
609.83 Coverage of drugs and devices.
Limited service health organizations, preferred provider plans, and defined network plans are subject to ss.
632.853, 632.861, and 632.895 (16t).
SECTION 9.
616.09 (1) (a) 2.
of the statutes is amended to read:
616.09 (1) (a) 2.
Plans authorized under s.
616.06 are subject to s.
610.21, 1977 stats., s.
610.55, 1977 stats., s.
610.57, 1977 stats., and ss.
628.34 to 628.39, 1977 stats., to chs.
600, 601, 620, 625, 627 and 645, to ss.
632.72, 632.755, 632.86 and 632.87 and to this subchapter except s.
616.08.
SECTION 10.
628.36 (2m) (a) 2s.
of the statutes is created to read:
628.36 (2m) (a) 2s.
“Pharmacy benefit manager” has the meaning given in s.
649.01 (6).
SECTION 11.
628.36 (2m) (e) 1.
of the statutes is amended to read:
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 7 - TJD:amn SECTION 11 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 628.36 (2m) (e) 1.
A health maintenance organization, limited service health organization , preferred provider plan, or pharmacy benefit manager that provides or administers coverage of pharmaceutical services when performed by one or more pharmacists who are selected by the organization or, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager but who are not full-time salaried employees or partners of the organization or, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager shall provide an annual period of at least 30 days during which any pharmacist registered under ch.
450 may elect to participate in the health maintenance organization, limited service health organization orpreferred provider plan, or coverage administered by a pharmacy benefit manager under its terms as a selected provider for at least one year.
SECTION 12.
632.86 of the statutes is repealed.
SECTION 13.
632.861 of the statutes is created to read:
632.861 Prescription drug charges;
choice of provider.
(1) DEFINITIONS.
In this section:
(a) “Disability insurance policy” has the meaning given in s.
632.895 (1) (a).
(b) “Pharmacist” has the meaning given in s.
450.01 (15).
(c) “Pharmacy benefit manager” has the meaning given in s.
649.01 (6).
(d) “Prescribed drug or device” has the meaning given in s.
450.01 (18).
(e) “Prescription drug benefit” has the meaning given in s.
649.01 (8).
(f) “Self-insured health plan” has the meaning given in s.
632.85 (1) (c).
(2) A LLOWING DISCLOSURES.
No disability insurance policy or self-insured health plan that provides a prescription drug benefit may include in a contract for pharmacy services, or allow a pharmacy benefit manager or another entity to include in a contract for pharmacy services, a provision that prohibits or penalizes, including by increased utilization review, reduced reimbursement, or other financial - 2020 Legislature - 8 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 S ECTION 13 disincentives, a disclosure of any of the following by a pharmacist to an individual purchasing a prescribed drug or device:
(a) The cost of the prescribed drug or device to the individual.
(b) The availability of any therapeutically equivalent alternative prescribed drugs or devices or alternative methods of purchasing the prescribed drug or device, including paying cash, that are less expensive to the individual.
(3) C OST SHARING LIMITATION.
An insurer, self-insured health plan, or a pharmacy benefit manager may not require a person who is covered under a disability insurance policy or self-insured health plan to pay at the point of sale for a covered prescription drug an amount greater than the lowest of all of the following amounts:
(a) The applicable copayment for the prescription drug.
(b) The allowable claim amount for the prescription drug.
(c) The amount a person who is covered under the disability insurance policy or plan would pay for the prescription drug if the person purchased the prescription drug without using a disability insurance policy or any other source of prescription drug benefits or discounts.
(d) The amount the pharmacist or pharmacy is reimbursed for the prescription drug from the pharmacy benefit manager or insurer.
(4) C HOICE OF PROVIDER;
PENALTY PROHIBITEAn insurer, self-insured health plan, or pharmacy benefit manager is prohibited from requiring or penalizing a person who is covered under a disability insurance policy or self-insured health plan to use or for not using a specific retail, specific mail order, or other specific pharmacy provider within the network of pharmacy providers under the policy or plan.
A LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 9 - TJD:amn S ECTION 13 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 prohibited penalty under this subsection includes an increase in premium, deductible, copayment, or coinsurance.
(5) DRUG SUBSTITUTION.
(a) A disability insurance policy that offers a prescription drug benefit or self-insured health plan or a pharmacy benefit manager acting on behalf of a disability insurance policy or self-insured health plan may not require a person covered under the policy or plan to pay an increased cost-sharing amount for a newly prescribed drug or device if the substitution for the originally prescribed drug or device is suggested by the policy, plan, or pharmacy benefit manager and if the newly prescribed drug or device is therapeutically equivalent to the originally prescribed drug or device being substituted.
(b) Every disability insurance policy that offers a prescription drug benefit, self-insured health plan, and pharmacy benefit manager shall develop a procedure to ensure that a policy or plan does not deny coverage to an insured or plan participant during a plan year or subject the insured or plan participant to new exclusions, limitations, deductibles, copayments, or coinsurance under a circumstance that satisfies all of the following:
Page 12, line 23:
The prescribed drug or device was covered under the policy or plan for the insured or plan participant when the insured or plan participant either enrolled in coverage or renewed coverage, whichever is later.
delete “24" and substitute “12".
2.
A health care provider who prescribed the prescribed drug or device states, in writing, that the prescribed drug or device is more suitable for the insured's or plan participant's condition than alternative drugs or devices that are covered under the policy or plan.
SECTION 14.
632.865 (title) and (1) of the statutes are repealed.
SECTION 15.
632.865 (2) of the statutes is renumbered 649.30 (1).
- 2020 Legislature - 10 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 SECTION 16 SECTION 16.
Chapter 649 of the statutes is created to read:
CHAPTER 649 PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGERS 649.01 Definitions.
In this chapter:
(1) “Health benefit plan” has the meaning given in s.
632.745 (11).
(2) “Health care provider” has the meaning given in s.
146.81 (1).
(3) “Maximum allowable cost” means the maximum amount that a pharmacy benefit manager will pay a pharmacist or pharmacy toward the cost of a prescribed drug or device.
(4) “Pharmacist" has the meaning given in s.
450.01 (15).
(5) “Pharmacy" means an entity licensed under s.
450.06 or 450.065.
(6) “Pharmacy benefit manager" means an entity doing business in this state that contracts to provide claims processing services, to otherwise administer or manage prescription drug benefits, or both on behalf of any insurer or other entity that provides prescription drug benefits to residents of this state.
“Pharmacy benefit manager” does not include a health care provider except for a health care provider that is required to obtain a license under s.
450.06, 450.065, or 450.071 and does not include an entity that provides claims processing services or other administration of prescription drug only for the Medical Assistance program under subch.
IV of ch.
49.
(7) “Prescribed drug or device" has the meaning given in s.
450.01 (18).
(8) “Prescription drug benefit" means coverage of or payment or assistance for prescribed drugs or devices.
(9) “Registrant" means a pharmacy benefit manager that is registered under this chapter.
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 11 - TJD:amn S ECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 649.05 Registration of pharmacy benefit managers.
(1) (a) Except as provided in par.
(b), no person may perform any activities of a pharmacy benefit manager in this state without first registering with the commissioner under this chapter.
(b) A pharmacy benefit manager that is an insurer with a current certificate of authority issued under s.
601.04 is not required to register under this section.
(c) 1.
Any pharmacy benefit manager that is required to obtain a license under s.
450.06, 450.065, or 450.071 shall also register under this chapter.
2.
If the pharmacy examining board revokes a license that had been granted under s.
450.06, 450.065, or 450.071 to a registrant, the registrant shall notify the commissioner of the revocation.
The commissioner shall revoke the registration under this chapter.
(2) An applicant for registration as a pharmacy benefit manager shall do all of the following:
(a) File with the commissioner an application on a form that the commissioner provides.
(b) Pay any registration fee set by the commissioner.
(3) The commissioner shall register any pharmacy benefit manager that meets the requirements of this chapter and any requirements the commissioner requires of applicants.
Registration under this section is valid for one year unless registration is suspended or revoked.
The commissioner may refuse to register any pharmacy benefit manager for which a previous registration was suspended or revoked.
649.10 Powers and duties of the commissioner.
(1) The commissioner may do any of the following:
(a) Promulgate rules necessary to carry out the intent of this chapter.
- 2020 Legislature - 12 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 S ECTION 16 (b) Use authority granted under ss.
601.41, 601.42, 601.43, 601.44, 601.61, 601.62, 601.63, and 601.64 to enforce this chapter, s.
628.36, and ch.
632 as it relates to pharmacy benefit managers.
(2) The commissioner shall promulgate rules regarding all of the following using as a model the prescription drug benefit management model act of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for the 2nd quarter of 2018 to the extent the model act does not conflict with this chapter or ch.
632:
(a) Requirements for the development and maintenance of prescription drug formularies and other pharmacy benefit manager procedures, except that the commissioner may not allow a health benefit plan, self-insured health plan, or pharmacy benefit manager to require a consumer to obtain a prescription drug at a mail order pharmacy because the prescription drug requires special handling, provider coordination, or patient education.
(b) Information that the pharmacy benefit manager is required to provide to a person who is covered or who seeks to be covered under a health benefit plan or self-insured health plan, a prescriber of prescription drugs, or a pharmacist or pharmacy.
(c) Requirements and procedures for a medical exceptions approval process that is standardized among pharmacy benefit managers.
(d) Requirements for nondiscrimination in prescription drug benefit design.
(e) Requirements for record keeping and reporting by a pharmacy benefit manager.
(f) Responsibilities for the pharmacy benefit manager in oversight and contracting.
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 13 - TJD:amn S ECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 (g) Required disclosures by a health benefit plan or self-insured health plan or a pharmacy benefit manager.
649.20 Suspension or revocation of registration;
penalty.
(1) The commissioner, after a hearing, may suspend or revoke the registration of a registrant, if the registrant or an officer, director, or employee of the registrant does any of the following:
(a) Knowingly makes or causes to be made a false statement or misrepresentation of a material fact in an application for registration under s.
649.05.
(b) Obtains or attempts to obtain a registration under s.
649.05 through misrepresentation or fraud.
(c) Misappropriates or converts for the registrant's own use or improperly withholds insurance premiums or contributions held in a fiduciary capacity, except for any interest earnings received by the pharmacy benefit manager and disclosed to the pharmacist, pharmacy, or health benefit plan sponsor with which the pharmacy benefit manager has a contract to provide services.
(d) Commits fraudulent, coercive, or dishonest practices in the transaction of business as a pharmacy benefit manager.
(e) Uses, or knowingly permits the use of, any advertisement, promotion, solicitation, representation, proposal, or offer that is untrue, deceptive, or misleading.
(f) Has a license or registration suspended, revoked, or not renewed in any other state, district, territory, or province that impacts business conducted in this state.
- 2020 Legislature - 14 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 S ECTION 16 (g) Knowingly violates a requirement of this chapter or ch.
632 or a rule promulgated under this chapter or ch.
632.
(2) Any person who performs the activities of a pharmacy benefit manager in this state without a valid registration under s.
649.05 is subject to a forfeiture of $500 for each day of violation.
649.30 Pricing transparency;
prohibitions;
contracts.
(2) P ROHIBITIONS.
A pharmacy benefit manager or a representative of a pharmacy benefit manager may not do any of the following:
(a) Unless approved by the commissioner, charge a pharmacist or pharmacy a fee related to the adjudication of a claim, including a fee for receiving and processing a pharmacy claim, developing or managing claims processing services in a pharmacy benefit manager network, or participating in a pharmacy benefit manager network.
(b) Unless approved by the commissioner after consulting with the pharmacy examining board, require pharmacist or pharmacy accreditation standards or certification requirements in addition to, more stringent than, or inconsistent with any requirements of the pharmacy examining board.
(c) Reimburse a pharmacy or pharmacist in this state an amount less than the amount that the pharmacy benefit manager reimburses an affiliate of the pharmacy benefit manager for providing the same services.
To comply with this paragraph, the pharmacy benefit manager shall compare the amounts calculated on a per-unit basis using the same generic product identifier or generic code number.
(d) After termination of a pharmacy or pharmacist from a pharmacy benefit network, fail to make payments to a pharmacist or pharmacy for services that were properly rendered and provided before termination.
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 15 - TJD:amn S ECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 (e) Prohibit, restrict, or limit a pharmacy or pharmacist from disclosing information to the commissioner, law enforcement, or a state or federal governmental official that is investigating or examining a complaint or conducting a review of a pharmacy benefit manager's compliance with the requirements under this section.
(3) C ONFLICT OF INTEREST;
BUSINESS PRACTICES(a) If a pharmacy benefit manager makes a formulary substitution in which the substitute drug costs more than the originally prescribed drug, the pharmacy benefit manager shall disclose to the health benefit plan sponsor the cost of the drugs and any benefit that accrues, directly or indirectly, to the pharmacy benefit manager related to the substitution.
(b) A pharmacy benefit manager may not require that a pharmacy or pharmacist enter into one contract in order to enter into another contract.
(c) A pharmacy benefit manager shall notify a health benefit plan sponsor in writing of any activity, policy, or practice of the pharmacy benefit manager that presents a conflict of interest, directly or indirectly, with any requirement of this section.
(4) R ETROACTIVE CLAIM REDUCTION.
A pharmacy benefit manager may not retroactively deny or reduce a pharmacist's or pharmacy's claim after adjudication of the claim unless any of the following is true:
(a) The original claim was submitted fraudulently.
(b) The payment for the original claim was incorrect because the pharmacy or pharmacist had already been paid for the pharmacy services.
(c) The pharmacy services were not rendered by the pharmacist or pharmacy.
649.35 Audits of pharmacies or pharmacists.
(1) D EFINITION.In this section, “entity” means a defined network plan, as defined in s.
609.01 (1b), insurer, - 2020 Legislature - 16 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 S ECTION 16 3rd-party payer, or pharmacy benefit manager or a person acting on behalf of a defined network plan, insurer, 3rd-party payer, or pharmacy benefit manager.
(2) A UDIT PROCEDURE REQUIREMENTS.
An entity conducting an audit of pharmacist or pharmacy records shall do all of the following:
(a) If the audit is an audit on the premises of the pharmacist or pharmacy, notify the pharmacist or pharmacy in writing of the audit at least 2 weeks before conducting the audit.
(b) Refrain from auditing a pharmacist or pharmacy within the first 7 days of a month unless the pharmacist or pharmacy consents to an audit during that time.
(c) If the audit involves clinical or professional judgement, conduct the audit by or in consultation with a pharmacist licensed in this state or the pharmacy examining board.
(d) Limit the audit review to claims submitted no more than 2 years before the date of the audit.
(e) Audit each pharmacist or pharmacy under the same standards and parameters as other similarly situated pharmacists or pharmacies.
(f) Establish a written appeals process that allows appeals of preliminary and final reports and allows for mediation if either party is dissatisfied with the appeal.
(g) Allow the pharmacist or pharmacy to use records of a hospital, physician, or other health care provider to validate the pharmacist's or pharmacy's records and use any prescription that complies with requirements of the pharmacy examining board to validate claims in connection with a prescription, refill of a prescription, or change in prescription.
(3) RESULTS OF AUDIT(a) An entity that has conducted an audit of a pharmacist or pharmacy shall do all of the following:
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 17 - TJD:amn S ECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 1.
Deliver to the pharmacist or pharmacy a preliminary report of the audit within 60 days after date of the conclusion of the audit.
2.
Allow a pharmacist or pharmacy that is the subject of an audit at least 30 days after the date the pharmacist or pharmacy receives the preliminary report to provide documentation to address any discrepancy found in the audit.
3.
Deliver to the pharmacist or pharmacy a final audit report within 90 days of the date the pharmacist or pharmacy receives the preliminary report or the date of the final appeal of the audit, whichever is later.
4.
Refrain from assessing a recoupment or other penalty on a pharmacist or pharmacy until the appeal process is exhausted and the final report under subd.
3.
is delivered to the pharmacist or pharmacy.
5.
Base a finding of overpayment or underpayment of a claim on the actual overpayment or underpayment and not on a projection based on the number of patients served having a similar diagnosis or on the number of similar orders or refills for similar drugs.
6.
Exclude dispensing fees from calculations of overpayments.
7.
Refrain from using extrapolation in calculating the recoupments or penalties for an audit.
8.
Refrain from charging interest until the final report under subd.
3.
has been delivered.
(b) If an audit of a pharmacist or pharmacy identifies a clerical or record-keeping error in a required document or record, the pharmacy benefit manager or entity conducting the audit may not request recoupment of funds from the pharmacist or pharmacy based on such an error unless the pharmacy benefit manager or entity proves the pharmacist or pharmacy intended to commit fraud or - 2020 Legislature - 18 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 S ECTION 16 unless the error by the pharmacist or pharmacy results in actual financial harm to the pharmacy benefit manager, a health benefit plan, or a consumer.
(c) Information obtained in an audit under this section is confidential and may not be shared unless the information is required to be shared under state or federal law.
An entity conducting an audit may have access to the previous audit reports on a particular pharmacy conducted by the same entity.
(d) Any entity that conducts an audit shall provide to the health benefit plan a copy of the final report of the audit and a disclosure of any recoupment amount assessed as a result of the audit.
(5) PAYMENT OF AUDITORS.A pharmacy benefit manager or entity conducting an audit may not pay an auditor employed by or contracted with the pharmacy benefit manager or entity based on a percentage of the amount recovered in an audit.
(6) APPLICABILITY.This section does not apply to an investigative audit that is initiated as a result of a credible allegation of fraud or willful misrepresentation.
649.40 Transparency reports.
(1) Beginning on June 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, every pharmacy benefit manager shall submit to the commissioner, the joint committee on finance, and, under s.
13.172 (3), each standing committee of the legislature with jurisdiction over insurance a report that contains all of the following information from the previous calendar year:
(a) The aggregate amount of all rebates that the pharmacy benefit manager received from all pharmaceutical manufacturers by each health benefit plan sponsor and for all health benefit plan sponsors combined.
(b) The aggregate administrative fee amount that the pharmacy benefit manager received from all pharmaceutical manufacturers by each health benefit plan sponsor and for all health benefit plan sponsors combined.
LRB-0448/1 - 2020 Legislature - 19 - TJD:amn SECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 114 (c) The aggregate rebate amount that the pharmacy benefit manager received from all pharmaceutical manufacturers but retained and did not pass through to health benefit plan sponsors and the percentage of the aggregate rebate amount that is retained rebates.
(2) The commissioner shall publish, within 60 days of receiving the report under sub.
(1), on the office's Internet site information from the transparency report submitted under sub.
(1).
The commissioner shall publish the report information in a manner that does not disclose any trade secrets.
649.45 Network adequacy.
A pharmacy benefit manager shall do all of the following:
(1) Provide a reasonably adequate and accessible pharmacy network for providing prescribed drugs or devices for a health benefit plan that allows convenient patient access to pharmacies within a reasonable distance from a plan participant's residence.
A pharmacy benefit manager may not include any mail-order pharmacy in its calculations of network adequacy under this subsection.
(2) Submit to the commissioner, at the time and in the manner required by the commissioner, a pharmacy benefit manager network adequacy report describing the pharmacy benefit manager network and accessibility to the network for health benefit plan participants.
S ECTION 17.Nonstatutory provisions.
(1) PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGER;
COMPLIANCE DATE.
Notwithstanding s.
649.05, a pharmacy benefit manager is not required to register under s.
649.05 or to comply with ch.
649 until the date that is 180 days after the date of the promulgation of rules by the commissioner of insurance under s.
649.10, unless the commissioner specifies a different date on which registration or compliance is required.
- 2020 Legislature - 20 - LRB-0448/1 TJD:amn ASSEMBLY BILL 114 SECTION 17 (2) ULEMAKING;
RECONCILIATION WITH STEP THERAPY BILLIf 2019 Assembly Bill 24 or 2019 Senate Bill 26 is enacted and contains criteria for when a medical exception to a step therapy protocol must be granted, notwithstanding the requirement in s.
649.10 (2) to base rules on the prescription drug benefit management model act of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners for the 2nd quarter of 2018, the commissioner of insurance shall incorporate in rules promulgated under s.
649.10 (2) (c) criteria for granting a medical exception that are identical to the criteria for granting a medical exception in 2019 Assembly Bill 24 or 2019 Senate Bill 26.
The commissioner of insurance may incorporate in rules promulgated under s.
649.10 (2) (c) requirements and procedures for a medical exceptions process that do not conflict with 2019 Assembly Bill 24 or 2019 Senate Bill 26.
If 2019 Assembly Bill 24 or 2019 Senate Bill 26 is not enacted in the 2019 legislative session, this subsection is void.
SECTION 18.Initial applicability.
(1) For policies and plans containing provisions inconsistent with this act, this act first applies to policy or plan years beginning on January 1 of the year following the year in which this subsection takes effect.
(2) This act first applies to contracts with a pharmacy or pharmacist that are entered into, modified, or renewed on the effective date of this subsection.
SECTION 19.Effective date.
(1) This act takes effect on the first day of the 4th month beginning after publication.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Available for scheduling

  3. Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Health and Human Services, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  4. Executive action taken

  5. Read first time and referred to committee on Health and Human Services

  6. Representative Hintz added as a coauthor

  7. Received from Assembly

  8. Ordered immediately messaged

  9. Representatives Wichgers and Nygren added as coauthors

  10. Read a third time and passed, Ayes 96, Noes 0

  11. Rules suspended

  12. Ordered to a third reading

  13. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  14. Decision of the Chair upheld, Ayes 60, Noes 36

  15. Decision of the Chair appealed

  16. Point of order that Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 not germane under Assembly Rule 54 (3)(f) well taken

  17. Assembly Amendment 2 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representatives Anderson, Kolste, Riemer, Subeck, Vining, Billings, Hintz, Hesselbein, Spreitzer, Doyle, Shankland, B. Meyers, L. Myers, Pope, Hebl, Stubbs, Zamarripa, Emerson, Brostoff, Cabrera, Vruwink, Haywood, Ohnstad, Goyke, C. Taylor, Sargent, Considine, Neubauer and Fields

  18. Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted

  19. Read a second time

  20. Representatives Sanfelippo and Kurtz added as coauthors

  21. Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  22. Representative McGuire added as a coauthor

  23. Placed on calendar 2-18-2020 by Committee on Rules

  24. Referred to committee on Rules

  25. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 15, Noes 0

  26. Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  27. Report Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Health, Ayes 10, Noes 5

  28. Assembly Amendment 1 to Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Committee on Health

  29. Executive action taken

  30. Public hearing held

  31. Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Schraa

  32. Fiscal estimate received

  33. Representative Neubauer added as a coauthor

  34. Representative Milroy added as a coauthor

  35. Senator Cowles added as a cosponsor

  36. Senators Schachtner and Bewley added as cosponsors

  37. Senator Carpenter added as a cosponsor

  38. Representative Cabrera added as a coauthor

  39. Representative Wittke added as a coauthor

  40. Representative Macco added as a coauthor

  41. Senator Miller added as a cosponsor

  42. Representatives Gruszynski, Pope and Vining added as coauthors

  43. Representative Zamarripa added as a coauthor

  44. Representative Crowley added as a coauthor

  45. Representatives Pronschinske and Magnafici added as coauthors

  46. Fiscal estimate received

  47. Commissioner of Insurance report received pursuant to s.601.423(2), Wisconsin Statutes

  48. Fiscal estimate received

  49. Fiscal estimate received

  50. Read first time and referred to Committee on Health

  51. Introduced by Representatives Schraa, Kolste, Riemer, Anderson, Born, Bowen, Brooks, Brostoff, Considine, Dittrich, Duchow, Edming, Emerson, Felzkowski, Fields, Goyke, Gundrum, Hebl, Hesselbein, Horlacher, Hutton, James, Kitchens, Knodl, Krug, Kuglitsch, Kulp, Meyers, Murphy, Mursau, Novak, Ohnstad, Oldenburg, Petersen, Plumer, Quinn, Ramthun, Rodriguez, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Sortwell, Sinicki, Skowronski, Spiros, Snyder, Spreitzer, Stafsholt, Stubbs, Stuck, Subeck, Summerfield, Swearingen, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Tranel, VanderMeer, Vorpagel, Vruwink, Shankland, Myers, Tusler, Billings and Zimmerman; cosponsored by Senators Erpenbach, Roth, Bernier, Darling, Feyen, Hansen, Johnson, Larson, Marklein, Olsen, Ringhand, Smith, L. Taylor, Tiffany, Wanggaard and Wirch

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

65 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 67 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (65)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (67)

67 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 67 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASSAGE

Passed 96 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 36000
Democrat 14000
Unaffiliated 46000
Total 96000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (96)
Member Party Vote
BALLWEG — Yea
BOWEN — Yea
BRANDTJEN — Yea
BROSTOFF — Yea
CABRERA — Yea
CONSIDINE — Yea
CROWLEY — Yea
EDMING — Yea
FIELDS — Yea
GOYKE — Yea
GRUSZYNSKI — Yea
HEBL — Yea
HINTZ — Yea
HORLACHER — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KOLSTE — Yea
KUGLITSCH — Yea
KULP — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Yea
MILROY — Yea
MYERS — Yea
NYGREN — Yea
OHNSTAD — Yea
OLDENBURG — Yea
OTT — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Yea
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Yea
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SARGENT — Yea
SCHRAA — Yea
SHANKLAND — Yea
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
STUCK — Yea
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
VRUWINK — Yea
ZAMARRIPA — Yea
SPEAKER — Yea
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Yea
Billings, Jill Democrat Yea
Doyle, Steve Democrat Yea
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Yea
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Yea
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Yea
McGuire, Tip Democrat Yea
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Yea
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Yea
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Yea
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Yea
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Yea
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Yea
Vining, Robyn Democrat Yea
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Hutton, Rob Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Quinn, Romaine Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 36 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 36000
Unaffiliated 242200
Democrat 01400
Total 603600
% of votes cast 63%38%0%0%
How each member voted (96)
Member Party Vote
NYGREN — Yea
OHNSTAD — Nay
OLDENBURG — Yea
OTT — Yea
PETRYK — Yea
PLUMER — Yea
POPE — Nay
RAMTHUN — Yea
RIEMER — Nay
SANFELIPPO — Yea
SARGENT — Nay
SCHRAA — Yea
SHANKLAND — Nay
SKOWRONSKI — Yea
STEINEKE — Yea
STUCK — Nay
TAUCHEN — Yea
THIESFELDT — Yea
VORPAGEL — Yea
VRUWINK — Nay
ZAMARRIPA — Nay
SPEAKER — Yea
BALLWEG — Yea
BOWEN — Nay
BRANDTJEN — Yea
BROSTOFF — Nay
CABRERA — Nay
CONSIDINE — Nay
CROWLEY — Nay
EDMING — Yea
FIELDS — Nay
GOYKE — Nay
GRUSZYNSKI — Nay
HEBL — Nay
HINTZ — Nay
HORLACHER — Yea
KATSMA — Yea
KERKMAN — Yea
KOLSTE — Nay
KUGLITSCH — Yea
KULP — Yea
LOUDENBECK — Yea
MAGNAFICI — Yea
MEYERS — Nay
MILROY — Nay
MYERS — Nay
Anderson, Clinton Democrat Nay
Billings, Jill Democrat Nay
Doyle, Steve Democrat Nay
Emerson, Jodi Democrat Nay
Haywood, Kalan Democrat Nay
Hesselbein, Dianne Democrat Nay
McGuire, Tip Democrat Nay
Neubauer, Greta Democrat Nay
Sinicki, Christine Democrat Nay
Spreitzer, Mark Democrat Nay
Stubbs, Shelia Democrat Nay
Subeck, Lisa Democrat Nay
Taylor, Sequanna Democrat Nay
Vining, Robyn Democrat Nay
Allen, Scott Republican Yea
August, Tyler Republican Yea
Brooks, Robert Republican Yea
Dittrich, Barbara Republican Yea
Duchow, Cindi Republican Yea
Felzkowski, Mary Republican Yea
Gundrum, Rick Republican Yea
Hutton, Rob Republican Yea
Jagler, John Republican Yea
James, Jesse Republican Yea
Kitchens, Joel Republican Yea
Knodl, Daniel Republican Yea
Krug, Scott Republican Yea
Kurtz, Tony Republican Yea
Murphy, David Republican Yea
Mursau, Jeffrey Republican Yea
Neylon, Adam Republican Yea
Novak, Todd Republican Yea
Petersen, Kevin Republican Yea
Pronschinske, Treig Republican Yea
Quinn, Romaine Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Jessie Republican Yea
Snyder, Patrick Republican Yea
Sortwell, Shae Republican Yea
Spiros, John Republican Yea
Stafsholt, Rob Republican Yea
Steffen, David Republican Yea
Summerfield, Rob Republican Yea
Swearingen, Rob Republican Yea
Tittl, Paul Republican Yea
Tranel, Travis Republican Yea
Tusler, Ron Republican Yea
VanderMeer, Nancy Republican Yea
Wichgers, Chuck Republican Yea
Wittke, Robert Republican Yea
Zimmerman, Shannon Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 114?
AB 114 is sponsored by Schraa, Kolste, Riemer, Born, Mark (Republican), Bowen, Brostoff, Considine, Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Edming, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Fields, Goyke, Hebl, Hesselbein, Dianne (Democrat), Horlacher, Hutton, Rob (Republican), James, Kitchens, Joel (Republican), Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Krug, Scott (Republican), Kuglitsch, Kulp, Meyers, Murphy, David (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Novak, Todd (Republican), Ohnstad, Oldenburg, Petersen, Kevin (Republican), Plumer, Quinn, Romaine (Republican), Ramthun, Rodriguez, Jessie (Republican), Rohrkaste, Sargent, Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Skowronski, Spiros, John (Republican), Snyder, Patrick (Republican), Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), Stafsholt, Rob (Republican), Stuck, Subeck, Lisa (Democrat), Summerfield, Rob (Republican), Swearingen, Rob (Republican), Tauchen, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Paul (Republican), Tranel, Travis (Republican), VanderMeer, Nancy (Republican), Vorpagel, Vruwink, Shankland, Myers, Tusler, Ron (Republican), Billings, Jill (Democrat), Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), Taylor, Sequanna (Democrat), Stubbs, Shelia (Democrat), Sortwell, Shae (Republican), Gundrum, Rick (Republican), Emerson, Jodi (Democrat), Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Anderson, Clinton (Democrat), and Brooks, Robert (Republican).
What is the current status of AB 114?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 114?
Track AB 114 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 114

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 114

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →