Expanding Coyote Control Program through voluntary assessment on breeding cows
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 142 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 142.
You're tracking SB 142
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 142 — Expanding Coyote Control Program through voluntary assessment on breeding cows
Last action — To House Finance
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
47 added · 60 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 142 modifies the Coyote Control Program to allow for a voluntary $1 assessment on breeding-age cows, in addition to existing assessments on sheep and goats. The previous draft suggested expanding participation by making the cow owner's involvement optional, and it included outdated references to fiscal years. This change is important as it seeks to better protect livestock from coyote predation while ensuring that cow owners can opt in without obligation.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB142 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 142 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 142 By Senators Sypolt, Hamilton, Jeffries, and Lindsay, Pitsenbarger,original andsponsors Romano[Originating [Introducedin Januarythe 8,Committee 2020;on Agricultural and Rural Development;
referredreported on January 23, 2020] A BILL to amend and reenact §7-7-6e of the CommitteeCode onof AgricultureWest andVirginia, Rural1931, Development;as amended, relating to Coyote Control Program;
andproviding thenfor tovoluntary theassessment Committee on Finance]breeding-age Acows BILL to amendparticipate andin reenact §7-7-6e of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to expanding the Coyote Control ProgramProgram; by providing for an assessment on breeding cows;
providingdeleting anlanguage optionregarding expenditures for ownersfiscal ofyear breedingending cowsJune not30, to2006; participate in the program; requiring notice;
andrequiring settingnotice forthby acertain purpose.cow owners participating in program;
and making technical changes.
assessment on breedingbreeding-age age sheep, coats,goats, and cows:cows;
After June 30, 2005, it shall be the duty of the (a) CoyotesThe county assessor and his or her deputies of each county within the state, at the time they are amaking continuingassessments threatof tothe ownerspersonal property within such county, shall assess and collect an assessment of livestock$1 throughouton Westall Virginia.breeding-age sheep, and $1 on all breeding-age goats, and $1 on all breeding-age cows:
TheProvided, bestThat coursepayment of action,the asassessment recognizedon bybreeding-age professionalcows wildlifeis biologists,voluntary hasat been the depopulationoption of potentialthe orcow offendingowner. individual animals and family units on farms where they present problems to livestock.
(b) The Westassessor Virginiacollecting Integratedthe Predationassessment Managementon Program,breeding-age createdsheep inand 1996goats collaborativelyshall withbe USDAallowed Wildlifea Services,commission wasof instrumental10 inpercent reversingupon all such taxes moneys collected and shall send the declineCommissioner of Agriculture 90 percent of such taxes so the assessment collected, who shall deposit the same in a special account in the goatState andTreasury sheepto industrybe withinknown as the state.Integrated Predation Management Fund.
WithExpenditures coyotesfrom nowthe occupyingfund everyshall countybe infor the state,purposes itset isforth necessaryin this section and are not authorized from collections but are to expandbe made only in accordance with appropriation by the CoyoteLegislature Controland Programin statewideaccordance towith includethe breedingprovisions ageof cows.§12-3-1 et seq.
After June 30, 2005, it shall be the duty of (b) In order to fund our ability to better protect the state’s livestock the county assessor and his or her deputies of each county within the state, at the time they are making assessments of the personal property within such county, to assess and collect an assessment of $1 on all breeding age sheep and $1 on all breeding age goats, and $1 on all breeding age cows:
Provided, That payment of the assessment on breeding age cows is voluntary at the option of the cow owner:
Provided, however, That a cow owner who chooses not to pay the assessment is not eligible to participate in the Coyote Control Program.
(c) The assessor collecting the assessment on breeding age sheep and goats shall be allowed a commission of ten percent upon all such taxes moneys collected and shall send the Commissioner of Agriculture 90 percent of such taxes so the assessment collected, who shall deposit the same in a special account in the state Treasury to be known as the “Integrated Predation Management Fund.” Expenditures from the Fund shall be for the purposes set forth in this section and are not authorized from collections but are to be made only in accordance with appropriation by the Legislature and in accordance with the provisions of §12-3-1 et seq.
Provided, That for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, expenditures are authorized from collections rather than pursuant to an appropriation by the LegislatureLegislature. (d) The money in the Fund shall be used by the Commissioner solely to enter into a cooperative service agreement with the United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) and Wildlife Services (WS) to expand the Coyote Control Program statewide.
Any(c) personThe whomoneys doesin notthe payfund thisshall assessmentbe isused notby eligiblethe forCommissioner theof servicesAgriculture providedsolely byto thisenter into a cooperative agreement.service agreement agreements with the United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and Wildlife Services to expand the Coyote Control Program statewide.
(e)(d) WithinAny 30person dayswho ofdoes anot cowpay owner’sthis electionassessment tois participatenot ineligible thefor Coyote Control Program, and prior to the placementservices ofprovided anyby controlthis method on the land,cooperative theagreement participatingagreements. cow owner must provide written notice of his or her participation in the program to:
(1)(e) AnyWithin 30 days of a cow owner’s election to participate in the Coyote Control Program, and prior to the placement of any control method on the land, the participating cow owner must provide written notice of his or her participation in the program to any landowner from whom the cow owner leases property to graze cattle and whose property may be affected by the cow owner’s participation in the program;program.
andNOTE: (2) Any landowner of property adjacent to the property on which the Coyote Control Program will be implemented.
The NOTE:purpose of this bill is to expand the Coyote Control Program by providing for a voluntary assessment on breeding-age cows to participate in the program.
The purpose of this bill is to expand the Coyote Control Program by providing for an assessment on breeding cows.
The bill provides an option for owners of breeding cows not to participate in the program.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
To House Finance
-
Do pass, but first to Finance
-
To House Agriculture and Natural Resources
-
To Agriculture and Natural Resources then Finance
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 83)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Reported do pass
-
To Finance
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Agriculture and Rural Development
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Agriculture and Rural Development then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Sypolt · Primary
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Lindsay · Cosponsor
- Pitsenbarger · Cosponsor
- Romano · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Sypolt
Co-sponsors (5)
- Bill Hamilton Republican
- Jeffries
- Lindsay
- Pitsenbarger
- Romano
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 142?
- SB 142 is sponsored by Sypolt, Bill Hamilton (Republican), Jeffries, Lindsay, Pitsenbarger, and Romano.
- What is the current status of SB 142?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 142?
- Track SB 142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →