Exempting physicians from specified traffic laws when responding to emergencies
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 700 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 700.
You're tracking SB 700
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 700 — Exempting physicians from specified traffic laws when responding to emergencies
Last action — To House Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
23 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 700 clarifies that physicians responding to emergency calls can be exempt from certain traffic regulations if their vehicles display a specific emblem. It now requires that they continue to ensure safety and provides a framework for the West Virginia Boards of Medicine and Osteopathic Medicine to create specific rules regarding the use of this emblem, including criteria for requesting it and penalties for misuse. These changes matter because they aim to streamline the emergency response process for physicians while still emphasizing safety and accountability.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB700 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 700 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 700 By Senators Takubo, Blair, and StollingsStollings, [Introducedoriginal Februarysponsors 5,[Originating 2020;in the Committee on the Judiciary;
referredreported on February 21, 2020] A BILL to amend the CommitteeCode onof TransportationWest Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §17C-2-10, relating to permitting allopathic and Infrastructure;osteopathic physicians to be exempt from specified traffic laws in emergency situations when responding to an emergency call and displaying emblem;
and then to the Committee on the Judiciary] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §17C-2-10, relating to permitting allopathic and osteopathic physicians to be exempt from specified traffic laws in emergency situations when responding to an emergency call;
§17C-2-10§17C-2-10. Physician exempt from specified traffic laws when responding to emergency.
(a)Physician An allopathic or osteopathic physician traveling in response to an emergency call shall be exempt from thespecified provisionstraffic oflaws §17C-6-1,when §17C-6-2, and §17C-6-3, of this code if the vehicle used by him or her displays an emblem approved by the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the West Virginia Osteopathic Board indicating that the vehicle is owned by the licensed physician and responding to anemergency. emergency call. (b) The provisions of this section do not relieve the physician from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons using the highway, nor do these provisions protect the physician from the consequences of acting in reckless disregard for the safety of others.
(c)(a) TheAn allopathic or osteopathic physician traveling in response to an emergency call is exempt from the provisions of §17C-6-1, §17C-6-2, and §17C-6-3 of this code if the vehicle used by him or her displays an emblem approved by the West Virginia Board of Medicine andor the West Virginia Board of Osteopathic BoardMedicine shallindicating proposethat separatethe rulesvehicle is owned by the licensed physician who is responding to an emergency call. (b) The provisions of this section do not relieve the physician from the duty to drive with due regard for legislativethe approvalsafety of all persons using the highway, nor do these provisions protect the physician from the consequences of acting in accordancereckless withdisregard §29A-3-1for etthe seq.safety of others.
of(c) thisThe code. West RulesVirginia proposedBoard pursuantof toMedicine thisand sectionWest shallVirginia setBoard forthof criteriaOsteopathic toMedicine requestshall anpropose emblemseparate fromrules thefor respectivelegislative boards,approval groundsin toaccordance usewith the§29A-3-1 emblem,et andseq. an administrative penalty if the emblem is used in inappropriate circumstances.
of this code. Rules proposed pursuant to this section shall set forth criteria to request an emblem from the respective boards, grounds to use the emblem, safe operation of the physician’s vehicle under the circumstances described in this section, and an administrative penalty if the emblem is used in inappropriate circumstances.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 308)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Reported do pass, but first to Judiciary
-
To Transportation and Infrastructure
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Transportation and Infrastructure then Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Tom Takubo · Primary
- Blair · Cosponsor
- Stollings · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Tom Takubo Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Blair
- Stollings
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| PITSENBARGER | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 700?
- SB 700 is sponsored by Tom Takubo (Republican), Blair, and Stollings.
- What is the current status of SB 700?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 700?
- Track SB 700 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 700
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 700
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →