Relating to: notification of changed property tax assessment for agricultural land. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 13 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 13.
You're tracking SB 13
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 13 — Relating to: notification of changed property tax assessment for agricultural land. (FE)
Last action — Published 5-1-2019
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
71 added · 8 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Senate Bill 13 changes the threshold at which assessors are required to notify taxpayers about changes in property tax assessments for agricultural land. Originally set at $300, the new threshold is raised to $500. This means that if the assessment difference is $500 or less, assessors will not need to notify the property owner. This change could reduce the paperwork and administrative burden for assessors while potentially leading to less communication with property owners about small changes in their tax assessments.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0049/1LRB-0140/1 EKL:kjfEKL:klm&cjs SENATE AMENDMENT 2, TO SENATE BILL 13 FebruaryJanuary 26,29, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatoEYEN.Senators FEYEN , MARKLEIN, NASS and OLSEN , cosponsored by Representatives THIESFELDT, KRUG , KURTZ, NOVAK, QUINN , R AMTHUN , ZIMMERMAN , SPIROS and T USLER.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendAgriculture, theRevenue billand asFinancial follows:Institutions.
1.A N A CT to amend 70.365 of the statutes;
Pagerelating 2,to: line 4:
deletenotification “$300"of andchanged substituteproperty “$500".tax assessment for agricultural land.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill creates an exception to the requirement that an assessor notify a taxpayer when the taxpayer's property is assessed for property tax purposes at a value that differs from the prior year's assessment.
Under this bill, an assessor is not required to provide notification for an assessment of agricultural land if the difference between the two assessments is $300 or less.
For further information see the local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
70.365 of the statutes is amended to read:
70.365 Notice of changed assessment.
When the assessor assesses any taxable real property, or any improvements taxed as personal property under s.
77.84 (1), and arrives at a different total than the assessment of it for the previous year, the assessor shall notify the person assessed if the address of the person is known - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0140/1 EKL:klm&cjs SENATE BILL 13 S ECTION 1 to the assessor, otherwise the occupant of the property.
However, the assessor is not required to provide notice under this section if land is classified as agricultural land, as defined in s.
70.32 (2) (c) 1g., for the current year and previous year and the difference between the assessments is $300 or less.
If the assessor determines that land assessed under s.
70.32 (2r) for the previous year is no longer eligible to be assessed under s.
70.32 (2r), and the current classification under s.
70.32 (2) (a) is not undeveloped, agricultural forest, productive forest land, or other, the assessor shall notify the person assessed if the assessor knows the person's address, or otherwise the occupant of the property, that the person assessed may be subject to a conversion charge under s.
74.485.
Any notice issued under this section shall be in writing and shall be sent by ordinary mail at least 15 days before the meeting of the board of review or before the meeting of the board of assessors in 1st class cities and in 2nd class cities that have a board of assessors under s.
70.075, except that, in any year in which the taxation district conducts a revaluation under s.
70.05, the notice shall be sent at least 30 days before the meeting of the board of review or board of assessors.
The notice shall contain the amount of the changed assessment and the time, date, and place of the meeting of the local board of review or of the board of assessors.
However, if the assessment roll is not complete, the notice shall be sent by ordinary mail at least 15 days prior to the date to which the board of review or board of assessors has adjourned, except that, in any year in which the taxation district conducts a revaluation under s.
70.05, the notice shall be sent at least 30 days prior to the date to which the board of review or board of assessors has adjourned.
The assessor shall attach to the assessment roll a statement that the notices required by this section have been mailed and failure to receive the notice shall not affect the validity of the changed assessment, the resulting changed tax, the procedures of the LRB-0140/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - EKL:klm&cjs SECTION 1 SENATE BILL 13 board of review or of the board of assessors or the enforcement of delinquent taxes by statutory means.
After the person assessed or the occupant of the property receives notice under this section, if the assessor changes the assessment as a result of the examination of the rolls as provided in s.
70.45 and the person assessed waives, in writing and on a form prescribed or approved by the department of revenue, the person's right to the notice of the changed assessment under this section, no additional notice is required under this section.
The secretary of revenue shall prescribe the form of the notice required under this section.
The form shall include information notifying the taxpayer of the procedures to be used to object to the assessment.
The form shall also indicate whether the person assessed may be subject to a conversion charge under s.
74.485.
S ECTION 20Initial applicability.
(1) This act first applies to the property tax assessments as of January 1, 2020.
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 pdf
Action History
-
Published 5-1-2019
-
Report approved by the Governor on 4-30-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 2
-
Presented to the Governor on 4-25-2019
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended and taken up
-
Read
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 32, Noes 0
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 4-9-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 8, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions, Ayes 9, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Feyen
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Feyen
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Agriculture, Revenue and Financial Institutions
-
Introduced by Senators Feyen, Marklein, Nass and Olsen; cosponsored by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Krug, Kurtz, Novak, Quinn, Ramthun, Zimmerman, Spiros and Tusler
Sponsors
- Dan Feyen · Primary
- Olsen · Primary
- Howard Marklein · Primary
- Steve Nass · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 128 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Feyen, Dan Republican
- Olsen
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Nass, Steve Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (128)
128 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 128 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (33)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| JOHNSON | — | Yea |
| RISSER | — | Yea |
| BEWLEY | — | Yea |
| ROTH | — | Yea |
| KOOYENGA | — | Yea |
| SCHACHTNER | — | Yea |
| COWLES | — | Yea |
| SHILLING | — | Yea |
| CRAIG | — | Yea |
| DARLING | — | Yea |
| STROEBEL | — | Yea |
| ERPENBACH | — | Yea |
| MILLER | — | Yea |
| TIFFANY | — | Yea |
| OLSEN | — | Yea |
| HANSEN | — | Yea |
| PETROWSKI | — | Yea |
| RINGHAND | — | Yea |
| Carpenter, Tim | Democrat | Yea |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Yea |
| Larson, Chris | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Jeff | Democrat | Yea |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Wirch, Robert | Democrat | Yea |
| Feyen, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Kapenga, Chris | Republican | Yea |
| LeMahieu, Devin | Republican | Yea |
| Marklein, Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Nass, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Testin, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Wanggaard, Van | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 13?
- SB 13 is sponsored by Feyen, Dan (Republican), Olsen, Marklein, Howard (Republican), and Nass, Steve (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 13?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 13?
- Track SB 13 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 13
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 13
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →