Concerning individuals serving community custody terms.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2417 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2417.
You're tracking HB 2417
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2417 — Concerning individuals serving community custody terms.
Last action — Effective date 6/11/2020.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 2417 has made several key modifications regarding how violations by offenders on community custody are managed. Firstly, offenders will now have their violation behavior assessed to determine appropriate sanctions, rather than automatically being classified based on a set number of prior low-level violations, which could lead to harsher penalties without a structured review process. This change allows for a more nuanced evaluation of each incident, ensuring that sanctions are fair and commensurate with the specific violation. Additionally, there is now a requirement for the Department to gather and report data on violations and sanctions, which adds a level of accountability and transparency that was previously lacking. These adjustments aim to create a more just and effective system for managing community custody violations.
H-4370.1SUBSTITUTEH-3868.1HOUSE HOUSE BILL 2417State of Washington66th Legislature2020 Regular SessionByHouseSessionByRepresentatives PublicDavis Safetyand (originallyPetersonRead sponsoredfirst bytime Representatives01/14/20.Referred Davisto andCommittee Peterson)READon FIRSTPublic TIMESafety.AN 02/03/20.AN ACT Relating to individuals serving community custody terms;
addingand creating a new sectionsection.BE toIT chapterENACTED 72.09BY RCW;THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec.
and creating new sections.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec.
The department shall adopt rules creating a structured violation process that includes presumptive sanctions, aggravating and mitigating factors, and definitions for low level violations and high level violations.(b) After((After an offender has committed and been sanctioned for five low level violations, ((all))all subsequent violations committed by that offender ((shallshall automatically))mayautomatically be considered high level violations,violations.(c)))(i) provided that any decision to elevate a violation complies with policies and rules established by the department.(c)(i) The department must define aggravating factors that indicate the offender may present a current and ongoing foreseeable risk and which therefore((,)) elevate an offender's behavior to a high level violation process.(ii) The state and its officers, agents, and employees may not be held criminally or civilly liable for a decision to elevate or not to elevate an offender's behavior to a high level violation process under this subsection unless the state or its officers, agents, and employees acted with reckless disregard.(3) The department may intervene when an offender commits a low level violation ((as follows:(a) For a first low level violation, the department may sanction))by sanctioning the offender to one or more nonconfinement sanctions((.(b) For a second or subsequent low level violation, the department may sanction the offender))or to not more than three days in total confinement.(((i)))(a) The department shall develop rules to ensure that each offender subject to a short-term confinement sanction is provided the opportunity to respond to the alleged violation prior to imposition of total confinement.(((ii)))(b) The offender may appeal the short-term confinement sanction to a panel of three reviewing officers designated by the secretary or by the secretary's designee.
Prehearing time served must be credited to the offender's sanction time.(5) If((If the offender's underlying offense is one of the following felonies provided in this subsection and the violation behavior constitutes a new misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor,misdemeanor or felony, the offender shall be held in total confinement pending a sanction hearing, and until the earliersanction of:expires or until if a prosecuting attorney files new charges against the offender, whichever occurs first:(a) Assault in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.011;(b) Assault of a child in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.120;(c) Assault of a child in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.130;(d) Burglary in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.52.020;(e) Child molestation in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.083;(f) Commercial sexual abuse of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.100;(g) Dealing in depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, as defined in RCW 9.68A.050;(h) Homicide by abuse, as defined in RCW 9A.32.055;(i) Indecent liberties with forcible compulsion, as defined in RCW 9A.44.100(1)(a);(j) Indecent liberties with a person capable of consent, as defined in RCW 9A.44.100(1)(b);(k) Kidnapping in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.40.020;(l) Murder in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.32.030;(m) Murder in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.32.050;(n) Promoting commercial sexual abuse of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.101;(o) Rape in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.040;(p) Rape in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.050;(q) Rape of a child in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.073;(r) Rape of a child in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.076;(s) Robbery in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.56.200;(t) Sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.040;
Theor(u) dateVehicular homicide while under the sanctioninfluence expiresof ((orintoxicating untilliquor if));or any drug, as defined in RCW 46.61.520(1)(a).(6))) The department shall adopt rules creating hearing procedures for high level violations.
the date a prosecuting attorney files new charges against the offender((, whichever occurs first));
or the date a prosecuting attorney provides the department with written notice that new charges will not be filed for the violation behavior.
The following underlying offenses apply to the restrictions in this subsection:(a) Assault in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.011;(b) Assault of a child in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.120;(c) Assault of a child in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.36.130;(d) Burglary in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.52.020;(e) Child molestation in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.083;(f) Commercial sexual abuse of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.100;(g) Dealing in depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, as defined in RCW 9.68A.050;(h) Homicide by abuse, as defined in RCW 9A.32.055;(i) Indecent liberties with forcible compulsion, as defined in RCW 9A.44.100(1)(a);(j) Indecent liberties with a person capable of consent, as defined in RCW 9A.44.100(1)(b);(k) Kidnapping in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.40.020;(l) Murder in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.32.030;(m) Murder in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.32.050;(n) Promoting commercial sexual abuse of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.101;(o) Rape in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.040;(p) Rape in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.050;(q) Rape of a child in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.073;(r) Rape of a child in the second degree, as defined in RCW 9A.44.076;(s) Robbery in the first degree, as defined in RCW 9A.56.200;(t) Sexual exploitation of a minor, as defined in RCW 9.68A.040;
or(u) Vehicular homicide while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or any drug, as defined in RCW 46.61.520(1)(a).(6) The department shall adopt rules creating hearing procedures for high level violations.
or (iv) the safety of the community, then the panel will reverse, vacate, remand, or modify the sanction.(7)sanction.(((7)))(6) For purposes of this section, the hearings officer may not rely on unconfirmed or unconfirmable allegations to find that the offender violated a condition.(8)condition.(((8)))(7) Hearing officers shall report through a chain of command separate from that of community corrections officers.Sec.
The community corrections officer's report shall serve as the notice that the department will hold the offender for not more than three days from the time of such notice for the new crime,crime((, except if the offender's underlying offense is a felony offense listed in RCW 9.94A.737(5), in which case the department will hold the offender for thirty days from the time of arrest ((or)),or until a prosecuting attorney charges the offender with a crime, or until a prosecuting attorney provides written notice to the department that new charges will not be filed, whichever occurs first.first)).
The community corrections officer's report shall serve as notice that the department will hold the offender in total confinement for not more than three days from the time of such notice for the new crime,crime((, except if the offender's underlying offense is a felony offense listed in RCW 9.94A.737(5), in which case the department will hold the offender for thirty days from the time of arrest ((or)),or until a prosecuting attorney charges the offender with a crime, or until a prosecuting attorney provides written notice to the department that new charges will not be filed, whichever occurs first.first)).
ASections new1 sectionthrough is3 added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department shall track and collect data and information on violations of communitythis custodyact conditionsapply andretrospectively the sanctions imposed for violations under RCW 9.94A.737, which includes, but is not limited to, the following:(a) The number and typesprospectively ofregardless high level violations and the types of sanctions imposed, including term lengths for confinement sanctions;(b) The number and types of low level violations and the typesdate of sanctionsan imposed,offender's includingunderlying nonconfinementcrime.--- sanctions,END confinement--- sanctions, and term lengths for confinement sanctions;(c) The circumstances and frequency at which low level violations are elevated to high level violations under RCW 9.94A.737(2)(b);(d) The number of warrants issued for violations;(e) The number of violations resulting in confinement under RCW 9.94A.737(5), including the length of the confinement, the number of times new charges are filed, and the number of times the department received written notice that new charges would not be filed;(f) Trends in the rate of violations, including the rate of all violations, high level violations, and low level violations;
and(g) Trends in the rate of confinement, including frequency of confinement sanctions and average stays.(2) The department shall submit a report with a summary of the data and information collected under this section, including statewide and regional trends, to the governor and appropriate committees of the legislature by November 1, 2021, and every November 1st of each year thereafter.NEW SECTION. Sec.
5.
(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the department of corrections shall contract with an independent third party to provide a comprehensive review of the community corrections staffing model and develop an updated staffing model for use by the department of corrections.
The updated model must include additional time and flexibility for community corrections officers to focus on case management, engagement, and interventions.(2) The department of corrections shall submit a report, including a summary of the review and update, to the governor and appropriate committees of the legislature by July 1, 2021.NEW SECTION. Sec.
6.
Sections 1 through 3 of this act apply retroactively and prospectively regardless of the date of an offender's underlying crime.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 6/11/2020.
-
Chapter 82, 2020 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 26; nays, 21; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 01:30 PM
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the Senate Committee on Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation at 01:30 PM
-
HSRR - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Human Services, Reentry & Rehabilitation.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 95; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading.
-
Placed on second reading.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Appropriations at 09:00 AM
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Public Safety.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Public Safety.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 08:00 AM
-
PS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
PS - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Scheduled for public hearing in the House Committee on Public Safety at 03:30 PM
-
First reading, referred to Public Safety.
Sponsors
- Lauren Davis · Primary
- Strom Peterson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Lauren Davis Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Strom Peterson Democrat
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 21 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 43% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Becker | — | Not Voting |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Das | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Nay |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Nay |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Nay |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Randall | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Nay |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Not Voting |
| Takko | — | Nay |
| Wilson, L. | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Nay |
| Van De Wege | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Claire Wilson | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Jesse Salomon | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Nguyen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Lovelett | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Nay |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Nay |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Nay |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Nay |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Nay |
| Ron Muzzall | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 42 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 95 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 2% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hoff | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Mead | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Sutherland | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chambers | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Alex Ramel | Democrat | Yea |
| Amy Walen | Democrat | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Bill Ramos | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Paul | Democrat | Yea |
| Davina Duerr | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Entenman | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra Lekanoff | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Lauren Davis | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Callan | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mari Leavitt | Democrat | Yea |
| Melanie Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Nay |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| My-Linh Thai | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Shewmake | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Alex Ybarra | Republican | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Corry | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gildon | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Not Voting |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jenny Graham | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremie Dufault | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Goehner | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Boehnke | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Skyler Rude | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2417?
- HB 2417 is sponsored by Lauren Davis (Democrat) and Strom Peterson (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2417?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2020. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2417?
- Track HB 2417 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2417
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2417
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →