Handheld photo speed monitoring devices; officer may operate near school crossing zone.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 917 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 917.
You're tracking SB 917
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 917 — Handheld photo speed monitoring devices; officer may operate near school crossing zone.
Last action — Left in Militia, Police and Public Safety
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Provides that a law-enforcement officer may operate a handheld photo speed monitoring device, defined in the bill, in or around a school crossing zone for the purpose of recording images of vehicles that are traveling at speeds of at least 12 miles per hour above the posted school crossing zone speed limit within such school crossing zone when such school crossing zone is indicated by appropriately placed signs displaying the maximum speed limit and the use of such handheld automated speed monitoring device.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
147 added · 183 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 917 includes specifications on how speed measurement devices, such as radar and handheld photo speed monitoring devices, can be used in legal proceedings. It clarifies that evidence of calibration for these devices is acceptable in court but must be validated at least every six months. These changes matter because they aim to ensure that speed enforcement technology remains accurate and reliable, which helps uphold fairness in legal cases regarding speeding violations.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version 18105241D18106952D SENATE BILL NO.
917 OfferedAMENDMENT JanuaryIN 19,THE 2018NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the Senate Committee on Transportation on February 7, 2019) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Senator Chase) A BILL to amend and reenact § 46.2-882 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 46.2-882.1, relating to handheld photo speed monitoring devices.
---------- Patrons-- Chase and McClellan ---------- Referred to Committee on Transportation ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
No calibration or testing of such device or system shall be valid for longer than six months.
State Police officers may use laser speed determination devices, radar, and/or microcomputer devices, or handheld photo speed monitoring devices as described in this section.
All localities may use radar andand, laser speed determination devices, or handheld photo speed monitoring devices to measure speed.
Civil penalties collected under this section shall be paid intoto the statelocality treasuryin andwhich allocated to the Departmentviolation ofoccurred. State Police.
Imposition of a penalty pursuant to this section by mailing a summons shall not be deemed a conviction as an operator and shall not be made part of the operating record of the person upon whom such liability is imposed, nor shall it be used for insurance purposes in the provision of motor vehicle insurance coverage.
However, if a law-enforcement officer uses a handheld photo speed monitoring device to record a violation of § 46.2-878.1 and personally issues a summons at the time of the violation, the conviction that results shall be made a part of the person's driving record and used for insurance purposes in the provision of motor vehicle insurance coverage.
A summons for a violation of § 46.2-873 issued pursuantas toprovided in this section may be executed by mailing by first-class mail a copy thereof to the owner, lessee, or renter of the vehicle.
in the case of a vehicle lessee or renter, the copy shall be mailed to the address contained in the records of the lessor or renter.owner.
If the summons is issued to an owner,owner lessee, or renterlessee of a vehicle with a registration outside the Commonwealth and such person fails to appear on the date of return set out in the summons mailed pursuant to this section, the summons will be eligible for all legal collections activities.
Information collected under this section pertaining to a specific violation shall be purged and not retained later than 60 days after the collection of any civil penalties.
However, only a law-enforcement officer may swear to or affirm the certificate required by subdivision B 3 of § 46.2-882.1 of the Code of Virginia.Virginia as created by this act.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Senate: Committee substitute printed 18106952D-S1 Current html February 07, 2018
- Senate: Presented and ordered printed 18105241D View text html January 19, 2018
Action History
-
Left in Militia, Police and Public Safety
-
Assigned MPPS sub: Subcommittee #2
-
Referred to Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB917S1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 18106952D-S1
-
Reading of substitute waived
-
Read second time
-
Referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Presented and ordered printed 18105241D
Sponsors
- Jennifer L. McClellan · Cosponsor
- Amanda F. Chase · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
- Jennifer L. McClellan
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 917 do?
- Provides that a law-enforcement officer may operate a handheld photo speed monitoring device, defined in the bill, in or around a school crossing zone for the purpose of recording images of vehicles that are traveling at speeds of at least 12 miles per hour above the posted school crossing zone speed limit within such school crossing zone when such school crossing zone is indicated by appropriately placed signs displaying the maximum speed limit and the use of such handheld automated speed monitoring device.
- Who sponsors SB 917?
- SB 917 is sponsored by Jennifer L. McClellan and Chase, Amanda F..
- What is the current status of SB 917?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 917?
- Track SB 917 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 917
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 917
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →