Relating to: bills making honorary designations of state highways or bridges.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 249 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 249.
You're tracking AB 249
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 249 — Relating to: bills making honorary designations of state highways or bridges.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
51 added · 12 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of AB 249 introduces a rule that any bill designating a state highway or bridge in someone's honor can only be passed if the honoree has been deceased for over five years, was a legal resident of the state, and has made notable contributions to the public good. Additionally, the amendment now prohibits the use of state funds for creating or maintaining markers that recognize these honors, unless funds have been donated. This change is significant because it sets clearer criteria for who can be honored and ensures that taxpayers are not financially responsible for these memorials.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0307/1LRB-3197/1 EVM:skwEVM:kjf ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 2, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 249 JuneMay 19,29, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by RepresentatiORPAGEL.Representatives VOS, CONSIDINE, DUCHOW , KRUG, M URSAU, PETERSEN , RAMTHUN , SCHRAA, SKOWRONSKI , SPIRO, SUBECK and TUSLER , cosponsored by Senator P ETROWSKI.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendTransportation. the bill as follows:
1.A N A CT to create 13.087 of the statutes;
Pagerelating 2,to: line 12:
deletebills thatmaking linehonorary anddesignations substitute:of state highways or bridges.
“(g)Analysis Theby bill prohibits the expenditureLegislative ofReference stateBureau funds,This otherbill thanprovides fromstandards therelated receiptto ofbills contributions,making forhonorary thedesignations erection or maintenance of anystate markershighways identifyingor thebridges. designation.”.
2.The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
PageS 2,ECTION line1. 21:
after13.087 “author"of insertthe “orstatutes ais cosponsor".created to read:
13.087 Bills for honorary designation of a highway or bridge.
(1) No house of the legislature may pass a bill that designates a state highway or bridge in honor of a person unless all of the following are satisfied:
(a) The honoree has been deceased for more than 5 years.
(b) The honoree was a legal resident of the state at the time of his or her death.
(c) The honoree has provided extraordinary public service, a substantial and proven contribution to the public good, or outstanding service to the nation as - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3197/1 EVM:kjf ASSEMBLY BILL 249 SECTION 1 exemplified by a particular event or episode.
The event or episode referenced in this paragraph shall be substantiated by reliable sources and be recognized by at least one significant state or federal award or recognition or honor of similar prestige.
(d) The designation reflects a community consensus and is without opposition in the community in which the highway or bridge is located.
(e) The honoree has a strong connection to a community in which the highway or bridge is located and to the state.
(f) The designation is part of a plan for continued recognition of the honoree preexisting to introduction of the bill.
A plan under this paragraph shall include the provision of honors prior to a public hearing on the bill and may include state or national awards, memorials, or scholarships.
(g) The designation is without cost to the state.
(h) Except as provided in this paragraph, the proposed designation does not supersede an existing designation.
A designation may supersede an existing designation if, as substantiated by at least 4 sources, information not considered at the time of original designation is discovered demonstrating that the existing designation would not have been made had the information been known or that the existing honoree's actions reflect negatively on the community in which the highway or bridge is located or on the state.
(i) The bill identifies the specific highway segment or bridge being designated.
(j) The author of the bill represents the district in which the highway or bridge is located.
(2) No house of the legislature may pass a bill that designates a state highway or bridge in honor of a group or entity.
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled Current pdf
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 2 pdf
- Amended Assembly Amendment 1 pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2020 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 11-19-2019
-
Presented to the Governor on 11-14-2019 by directive of the Speaker
-
Report correctly enrolled on 11-13-2019
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 11-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Transportation, Veterans and Military Affairs, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Transportation, Veterans and Military Affairs
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Vorpagel
-
Placed on calendar 6-20-2019 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 10, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Transportation, Ayes 13, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Thiesfeldt
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation
-
Introduced by Representatives Vos, Considine, Duchow, Krug, Mursau, Petersen, Ramthun, Schraa, Skowronski, Spiros, Subeck and Tusler; cosponsored by Senator Petrowski
Sponsors
- Robin Vos · Primary
- Considine · Primary
- Cindi Duchow · Primary
- Scott Krug · Primary
- Jeffrey Mursau · Primary
- Kevin Petersen · Primary
- Ramthun · Primary
- Schraa · Primary
- Skowronski · Primary
- John Spiros · Primary
- Lisa Subeck · Primary
- Ron Tusler · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →12 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (12)
- Vos, Robin Republican
- Considine
- Duchow, Cindi Republican
- Krug, Scott Republican
- Mursau, Jeffrey Republican
- Petersen, Kevin Republican
- Ramthun
- Schraa
- Skowronski
- Spiros, John Republican
- Subeck, Lisa Democrat
- Tusler, Ron Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 249?
- AB 249 is sponsored by Vos, Robin (Republican), Considine, Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Krug, Scott (Republican), Mursau, Jeffrey (Republican), Petersen, Kevin (Republican), Ramthun, Schraa, Skowronski, Spiros, John (Republican), Subeck, Lisa (Democrat), and Tusler, Ron (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 249?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 249?
- Track AB 249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 249
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 249
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →