Relating to: changing the 12 percent rule regarding the total value of taxable property included in the cre...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 294 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 294.
You're tracking AB 294
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 294 — Relating to: changing the 12 percent rule regarding the total value of taxable property included in the creation of a tax incremental financing district in the village of Ontario. (FE)
Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
21 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Assembly Bill 294 allows the village of Ontario to create a new Tax Incremental District (TID) without being limited by the usual 12 percent cap on taxable property value. Previously, the bill proposed raising the limit to 18 percent specifically for this district, but that higher limit has now been removed. This change simplifies the regulations for Ontario, enabling them to establish TID Number 2 while ensuring that once it ends, the 12 percent cap will return. This matters because it gives Ontario greater flexibility in developing its property tax base without the constraints of the typical percentage limit during the life of the new TID.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBs0133/1LRB-3203/1 EVM:ahe ASSEMBLY SUBSTITUTEBILL AMENDMENT294 1,June TO13, ASSEMBLY2019 BILL- 294Introduced Octoberby 22,Representative 2019LDENBURG -, Offeredcosponsored by RepresentatiLDENBURG.Senator TESTIN.
Referred to Committee on Ways and Means.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau With regard to the village of Ontario, this bill changes the rule that the equalized value of taxable property of a new or amended tax incremental district (TID) plus the value increment of all existing TIDs does not exceed 12 percent of the total equalized value of taxable property in the city or village.
Under the bill, the 12 percent rule does not apply to the village of Ontario, with regard to the creation of TID Number 2 by the village.
Upon the termination of that TID, the limit will return to 12 percent.
For further information see the local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The 12 percent limit described under sub.
shalldoes benot 18apply percent with regard to Tax Incremental District - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3203/1 EVM:ahe ASSEMBLY BILL 294 SECTION 1 Number 2 that is created by the village board of the village of Ontario, except that this paragraph does not apply upon the termination of that districtdistrict. or Tax Incremental District Number 1 in the village of Ontario.
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
- Substitute Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 pdf
Action History
-
Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report concurrence recommended by Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Trade
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 11-7-2019 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 8, Noes 2
-
Report Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Ways and Means, Ayes 10, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Assembly Substitute Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Oldenburg
-
Public hearing held
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Ways and Means
-
Introduced by Representative Oldenburg; cosponsored by Senator Testin
Sponsors
- Oldenburg · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Oldenburg
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (131)
131 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 131 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 294?
- AB 294 is sponsored by Oldenburg.
- What is the current status of AB 294?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 294?
- Track AB 294 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 294
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 294
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →