SB 166 — Relating to: eligibility for physician, dentist, and health care provider educational loan assistance programs. (FE)
Last action — Published 11-26-2019
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 18, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
163 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 166 added a requirement that any clinic or organization seeking to participate in the educational loan assistance program must not provide abortion services, nor be affiliated with any organization that does. This change matters because it limits the types of clinics eligible for the program, potentially affecting where future health care providers, such as physicians and dentists, may choose to work in order to receive loan repayment benefits. This could have implications for access to care in certain communities, particularly if fewer clinics qualify for the program.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0714/1LRB-2697/1 TJD:cdcMDK:kjf SENATE AMENDMENT 3, TO SENATE BILL 166 NovemberApril 1,18, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by SenatorSenators DARLING, ARLINGBEWLEY, .CARPENTER and C OWLES , cosponsored by Representatives F ELZKOWSKI , RIEMER, THIESFELDT, BOWEN , DUCHOW , H ORLACHER , KOLSTE, KULP, LOUDENBECK , MURPHY , MURSAU , MYERS , ROHRKASTE , SKOWRONSKI , SPIROS, SPREITZER, STEFFEN, C .T AYLOR, TUSLER , VANDER M EER and V INING.
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendUniversities, theTechnical billColleges, asChildren follows:and Families.
A N A CT to amend 36.60 (1) (ag), 36.60 (3) (a), 36.60 (3) (am), 36.60 (5) (b) (intro.), 36.61 (1) (am) and 36.61 (5) (b) (intro.);
and to create 36.60 (1) (ah), 36.60 (5) (bm) and 36.61 (5) (bm) of the statutes;
relating to:
eligibility for physician, dentist, and health care provider educational loan assistance programs.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill makes physicians and dentists who agree to practice in free or charitable clinics eligible to participate in an educational loan assistance program administered by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System under current law.
The bill makes similar changes to an educational loan assistance program for other health care professionals administered by the Board of Regents.
Physicians and dentists.
If a physician agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or “eligible practice area,” as defined under current law, the physician is eligible to have some of his or her educational loans repaid.
Up to $100,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area and up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in an eligible practice area.
Current law defines an “eligible practice area” as a primary care or mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, an American Indian reservation, or trust land of an American Indian tribe.
Under current law, a dentist is eligible for repayment if he or she agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area, as determined under federal law.
Up to $50,000 may be repaid for practice in a rural area or dental health shortage area.
- 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2697/1 MDK:kjf SENATE BILL 166 The bill amends the definition of “eligible practice area” so that it also includes a free or charitable clinic.
The bill also makes a dentist who practices in a free or charitable clinic eligible for educational loan repayment.
As a result, if a physician or dentist agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a free or charitable clinic, the physician or dentist is eligible to have up to $50,000 of his or her educational loans repaid.
The bill defines “free or charitable clinic” as a safety-net health care organization that uses volunteers and staff to serve economically disadvantaged individuals who are uninsured, underinsured, or have limited or no health care access.
In addition, the organization must be exempt from federal taxation or operate as a program component or affiliate of an organization exempt from federal taxation.
The organization must also provide services without regard to a patient's ability to pay and charge either no fee or a nominal or sliding fee for services.
Current law requires physicians and dentists who participate in the educational loan assistance program to agree to care for patients who are insured or receive health care benefits under governmental programs.
The bill also requires physicians and dentists to agree to care for patients who are uninsured or underinsured.
Current law also requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants.
Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must ensure that the priorities do not disadvantage those applicants.
Other health care providers.
Under current law, the following health care providers are eligible to have up to $25,000 of their educational loans repaid if they agree to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for three years in a rural area or eligible practice area:
physician assistants, nurse-midwives, and nurse practitioners.
Dental hygienists are eligible for the same repayment if they agree to practice at least 32 clinical hours per week for three years in a rural area or dental health shortage area.
Like physicians, the bill includes free or charitable clinics, as defined above, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” The bill also includes a mental health shortage area, as determined under federal law, in the definition of “eligible practice area.” Unlike the program for physicians under current law, the program for other health care providers under current law does not include mental health shortage areas.
As a result, in addition to eligibility under current law, any of the foregoing health care professionals, except dental hygienists, is eligible for educational loan repayment if he or she agrees to practice in a free or charitable clinic or a mental health shortage area for the required time.
In addition to eligibility under current law, dental hygienists are eligible if they agree to practice in a free or charitable clinic for the required time.
Like the program for physicians and dentists, current law requires the Board of Regents to establish priorities for repayments based on specified considerations if funding is not available to make repayments to all applicants.
Under the bill, if the Board of Regents determines that a consideration does not apply to applicants LRB-2697/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - MDK:kjf SENATE BILL 166 who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the Board of Regents must develop a mechanism to fairly assess all applicants under the priorities.
For further information see the state fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
36.60 (1) (ag) of the statutes is amended to read:
36.60 (1) (ag) “Eligible practice area" means a free or charitable clinic, a primary care shortage area, a mental health shortage area, an American Indian reservation or trust lands of an American Indian tribe.
SECTION 2.
36.60 (1) (ah) of the statutes is created to read:
Show all 83 changed lines (43 more)
36.60 (1) (ah) “Free or charitable clinic” means a safety-net health care organization that satisfies all of the following:
PageThe 3,organization lineuses 18:volunteers and staff to provide a range of medical, dental, pharmacy, vision, or behavioral health services to economically disadvantaged individuals who are uninsured, underinsured, or have limited or no access to primary, specialty, or prescription health care.
after2. that line insert:
“5.The organization is exempt from taxation under section 501 (c) of the Internal Revenue Code or operates as a program component or affiliate of such an organization.
The3. organization does not provide abortion services and is not an affiliate of an organization, other than a hospital, that provides abortion services.”.
The organization provides services without regard to a patient's ability to pay.
4.
The organization charges patients no fee for services or charges a nominal or sliding fee.
SECTION 3.
36.60 (3) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
- 2020 Legislature - 4 - LRB-2697/1 MDK:kjf SENATE BILL 166 SECTION 3 36.60(3) (a) The board shall enter into a written agreement with the physician, in which the physician agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for 3 years in one or more eligible practice areas in this state or in a rural area, except that a physician specializing in psychiatry may only agree to practice psychiatry in a mental health shortage area or in a rural area and a physician in the expanded loan assistance program under sub.
(9) may only agree to practice at a public or private nonprofit entity in a health professional shortage area.
The physician shall also agree to care for patients who are insured, underinsured, or uninsuredwhom health benefits are payable under medicare, medical assistance, or any other governmental program.
SECTION 4.
36.60 (3) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:
36.60 (3) (am) The board shall enter into a written agreement with the dentist, in which the dentist agrees to practice at least 32 clinic hours per week for 3 years in one or more dental health shortage areas in this state, in a free or charitable clinic, or in a rural area.
The dentist shall also agree to care for patients who are insured, underinsured, or uninsured or for whom dental health benefits are payable under medicare, medical assistance, or any other governmental program.
SECTION 5.
36.60 (5) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
36.60 (5) (b) (intro.) If the cost of repaying the loans of all eligible applicants, when added to the cost of loan repayments scheduled under existing agreements, exceeds the total amount of funds transferred to the board under s.
20.505 (8) (hm) 6r., the contributions received and penalties assessed by the board, and the appropriation under s.
20.285 (1) (qj), then, subject to par.
(bm),rd shall establish priorities among the eligible applicants based upon the following considerations:
LRB-2697/1 - 2020 Legislature - 5 - MDK:kjf SECTION 6 SENATE BILL 166 SECTION 6.
36.60 (5) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
36.60 (5) (bm) If the board determines that a consideration under par.
(b) does not apply to eligible applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the board shall develop a mechanism to fairly assess all applicants under the priorities established under par.
(b).
SECTION 7.
36.61 (1) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:
36.61 (1) (am) “Eligible practice area" means a primary care shortage area, an American Indian reservation, or trust lands of an American Indian tribe has the meaning given in s.
36.60 (1) (ag), except that with respect to a dental hygienist “eligible practice area" means a dental health shortage area or a free or charitable clinic.
SECTION 8.
36.61 (5) (b) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
36.61 (5) (b) (intro.) If the cost of repaying the loans of all eligible applicants, when added to the cost of loan repayments scheduled under existing agreements, exceeds the total amount of funds transferred to the board under s.
20.505 (8) (hm) 6r., the contributions received and penalties assessed by the board, and the appropriation under s.
20.285 (1) (qj), then, subject to par.
(bm), the board shall establish priorities among the eligible applicants based upon the following considerations:
SECTION 9.
36.61 (5) (bm) of the statutes is created to read:
36.61 (5) (bm) If the board determines that a consideration under par.
(b) does not apply to eligible applicants who desire to practice in free or charitable clinics, the board shall develop a mechanism to fairly assess all applicants under the priorities established under par.
(b).
Show all 83 changed rows (43 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 3 pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 pdf
Action History
-
Published 11-26-2019
-
Report approved by the Governor on 11-25-2019. 2019 Wisconsin Act 58
-
Presented to the Governor on 11-19-2019 by directive of the President, pursuant to Senate Rule 44m (3)
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Representative Bowen withdrawn as a cosponsor
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Representative C. Taylor withdrawn as a cosponsor
-
Read a third time and concurred in
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Read first time and referred to calendar of 11-7-2019 pursuant to Assembly Rule 42 (1)(a)
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Senate Amendment 3 adopted, Ayes 19, Noes 14
-
Senate Amendment 2 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 11-5-2019 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator Darling
-
Representative Edming added as a cosponsor
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 6, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families, Ayes 7, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Darling
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Jacque
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Universities, Technical Colleges, Children and Families
-
Introduced by Senators Darling, Bewley, Carpenter and Cowles; cosponsored by Representatives Felzkowski, Riemer, Thiesfeldt, Bowen, Duchow, Horlacher, Kolste, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Murphy, Mursau, Myers, Rohrkaste, Skowronski, Spiros, Spreitzer, Steffen, C. Taylor, Tusler, VanderMeer and Vining
Sponsors
- Darling · Primary
- Bewley · Primary
- Tim Carpenter · Primary
- Cowles · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 128 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Darling
- Bewley
- Carpenter, Tim Democrat
- Cowles
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (128)
128 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 128 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 166?
- SB 166 is sponsored by Darling, Bewley, Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), and Cowles.
- What is the current status of SB 166?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 18, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 166?
- Track SB 166 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 166
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 166
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →