West Virginia 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SB 261 — Relating to number of magistrates serving each county

Last action — To Finance

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

150 added · 98 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of SB 261 introduces specific changes to the number of magistrates in various counties. It adds one magistrate each to Berkeley, Jefferson, Logan, Monongalia, and Putnam counties to better manage caseloads, while eliminating one position in McDowell County effective January 1, 2021. These adjustments are intended to improve the efficiency of the magistrate court system by aligning the number of magistrates with the needs of the communities they serve.

→
Previous
Latest
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS Introduced Version « Senate Bill 261 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Committee Substitute (1)  |   |  Email Key:
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS SB261 SUB1 « Senate Bill 261 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Introduced Version  |   |  Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Introduced Senate Bill 261 By Senator Trump [Introduced January 11, 2019;
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 261 By Senator Trump [Originating in the Committee on the Judiciary;
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary;
Reported on February 11, 2019]     A BILL to amend and reenact §50-1-2, §50-1-6, and §50-1-9a of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, all relating generally to magistrate courts;
and then to the Committee on Finance] A BILL to amend and reenact §50-1-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to the number of magistrates to be seated in each county of the state and their election.
establishing the number of magistrates to serve in each county of the state;
providing immediately for one additional magistrate than is currently serving to serve in Berkeley County;
providing immediately for one additional magistrate than is currently serving to serve in Jefferson County;
providing for one additional magistrate in than is currently serving to serve Logan County beginning on July 1, 2019;
providing for one additional magistrate than is currently serving to serve in Monongalia County beginning on July 1, 2019;
providing immediately for one additional magistrate than is currently serving to serve in Putnam County;
providing for election of one less magistrate than is currently serving by eliminating one magisterial office in McDowell County beginning on January 1, 2021;
providing for the initial filling of vacancies in newly created magisterial offices;
and increasing the total number of magistrate court deputy clerks that may be appointed in the state.
(a) The number of magistrates to be seated in each county of this state shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of this section.
(a) Upon the effective date of this section, the number of magistrates serving in each county shall be as follows:
(b) Any magistrate in office on the effective date of this section shall remain in office until the expiration of the term for which he or she was elected or appointed.
(1) Barbour County shall have two magistrates.
Vacancies in office for magistrates elected in 2016 shall be filled pursuant to the provisions of §50-1-6 of this code for the remainder of their term.
(2) Berkeley County shall have six magistrates.
(c) Beginning on January 1, 2021:
(3) Boone County shall have two magistrates.
(1) Barbour County shall sit two magistrates.
(4) Braxton County shall have two magistrates.
(2) Berkeley County shall sit six magistrates, except that beginning on January 1, 2025, Berkeley County shall sit seven magistrates.
(5) Brooke County shall have two magistrates.
(3) Boone County shall sit two magistrates.
(6) Cabell County shall have seven magistrates.
(4) Braxton County shall sit two magistrates.
(7) Calhoun County shall have two magistrates.
(5) Brooke County shall sit two magistrates.
(8) Clay County shall have two magistrates.
(6) Cabell County shall sit seven magistrates.
(9) Doddridge County shall have two magistrates.
(7) Calhoun County shall sit two magistrates.
(10) Fayette County shall have four magistrates.
(8) Clay County shall sit two magistrates.
(11) Gilmer County shall have two magistrates.
(9) Doddridge County shall sit two magistrates.
(12) Grant County shall have two magistrates.
(10) Fayette County shall sit three magistrates.
(13) Greenbrier County shall have three magistrates.
(11) Gilmer County shall sit two magistrates.
(14) Hampshire County shall have two magistrates.
(12) Grant County shall sit two magistrates.
(15) Hancock County shall have three magistrates.
(13) Greenbrier County shall sit two magistrates.
(16) Hardy County shall have two magistrates.
(14) Hampshire County shall sit two magistrates.
(17) Harrison County shall have five magistrates.
(15) Hancock County shall sit two magistrates.
(18) Jackson County shall have two magistrates.
(16) Hardy County shall sit two magistrates.
(19) Jefferson County shall have four magistrates.
(17) Harrison County shall sit four magistrates.
(20) Kanawha County shall have ten magistrates.
(18) Jackson County shall sit two magistrates.
(21) Lewis County shall have two magistrates.
(19) Jefferson County shall sit four magistrates.
(22) Lincoln County shall have two magistrates.
(20) Kanawha County shall sit eleven magistrates.
(23) Logan County shall have three magistrates, except that beginning on July 1, 2019, Logan County shall have four magistrates.
(21) Lewis County shall sit two magistrates.
(24) Marion County shall have four magistrates.
(22) Lincoln County shall sit two magistrates.
(25) Marshall County shall have three magistrates.
(23) Logan County shall sit three magistrates.
(26) Mason County shall have two magistrates.
(24) Marion County shall sit three magistrates.
(27) McDowell County shall have three magistrates, except that beginning on January 1, 2021, McDowell County shall have two magistrates.
Show all 97 changed rows (57 more)
Previous
Latest
(25) Marshall County shall sit two magistrates.
(28) Mercer County shall have five magistrates.
(26) Mason County shall sit two magistrates.
(29) Mineral County shall have two magistrates.
(27) McDowell County shall sit two magistrates.
(30) Mingo County shall have three magistrates.
(28) Mercer County shall sit five magistrates.
(31) Monongalia County shall have four magistrates, except that beginning on July 1, 2019, Monongalia County shall have five magistrates.
(29) Mineral County shall sit two magistrates.
(32) Monroe County shall have two magistrates.
(30) Mingo County shall sit two magistrates.
(33) Morgan County shall have two magistrates.
(31) Monongalia County shall sit five magistrates.
(34) Nicholas County shall have three magistrates.
(32) Monroe County shall sit two magistrates.
(35) Ohio County shall have four magistrates.
(33) Morgan County shall sit two magistrates.
(36) Pendleton County shall have two magistrates.
(34) Nicholas County shall sit two magistrates.
(37) Pleasants County shall have two magistrates.
(35) Ohio County shall sit three magistrates.
(38) Pocahontas County shall have two magistrates.
(36) Pendleton County shall sit two magistrates.
(39) Preston County shall have three magistrates.
(37) Pleasants County shall sit two magistrates.
(40) Putnam County shall have four magistrates.
(38) Pocahontas County shall sit two magistrates.
(41) Raleigh County shall have five magistrates.
(39) Preston County shall sit two magistrates.
(42) Randolph County shall have three magistrates.
(40) Putnam County shall two magistrates.
(43) Ritchie County shall have two magistrates.
(41) Raleigh County shall sit six magistrates.
(44) Roane County shall have two magistrates.
(42) Randolph County shall sit two magistrates.
(45) Summers County shall have two magistrates.
(43) Ritchie County shall sit two magistrates.
(46) Taylor County shall have two magistrates.
(44) Roane County shall sit two magistrates.
(47) Tucker County shall have two magistrates.
(45) Summers County shall sit two magistrates.
(48) Tyler County shall have two magistrates.
(46) Taylor County shall sit two magistrates.
(49) Upshur County shall have two magistrates.
(47) Tucker County shall sit two magistrates.
(50) Wayne County shall have three magistrates.
(48) Tyler County shall sit two magistrates.
(51) Webster County shall have two magistrates.
(49) Upshur County shall sit two magistrates.
(52) Wetzel County shall have two magistrates.
(50) Wayne County shall sit two magistrates.
(53) Wirt County shall have two magistrates.
(51) Webster County shall sit two magistrates.
(54) Wood County shall have four magistrates.
(52) Wetzel County shall sit two magistrates.
(55) Wyoming County shall have three magistrates.
(53) Wirt County shall sit two magistrates.
(b) Initial appointment.
(54) Wood County shall sit four magistrates.
– Magistrates shall be appointed to fill initial vacancies in the magisterial offices created by the amendments to this section during the 2019 Regular Session according to the requirements of §50-1-6 of this code.
(55) Wyoming County shall sit two magistrates.
Thereafter, magistrates shall be elected to such offices as required by §50-1-1 of this code.
(d) Magistrates whose terms commence on January 1, 2021, or every fourth year after that, shall be elected during the regularly scheduled election or elections taking place in 2020, or every fourth year after that.
§50-1-6.
  NOTE:
Vacancy in office of magistrate.
The purpose of this bill is to codify the number of magistrates serving in the state and within each county following the 2020 election cycle.
(a) Subject to the provisions of section one, article ten, chapter three of this code §3-10-1 and §3-10-3 of this code, when a vacancy occurs in the office of magistrate or when an additional magisterial office is created by statute to commence before the expiration of the term of office for sitting magistrates, the judge of the circuit court, or the chief judge thereof if there is more than one judge of the circuit court, shall fill the same by appointment.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
(b) At a nonpartisan judicial election in which a magistrate is elected for an unexpired term, the circuit judge, or the chief judge thereof if there is more than one judge of the circuit court, shall cause a notice of such election to be published prior to such election as a Class II-0 legal advertisement in compliance with the provisions of §59-3-1 et seq.
This section has been completely rewritten;
of this code, and the publication area for such publication shall be the county involved.
§50-1-9a.
Magistrate court deputy clerks;
duties;
salary.
(a) Whenever required by workload and upon the recommendation of the judge of the circuit court, or the chief judge of the circuit court if there is more than one judge of the circuit court, the Supreme Court of Appeals may, by rule, provide for the appointment of magistrate court deputy clerks, not to exceed seventy-two 77 in number.
The magistrate court deputy clerks shall be appointed by the judge of the circuit court, or the chief judge if there is more than one judge of the circuit court, to serve at his or her will and pleasure under the immediate supervision of the magistrate court clerk.
(b) Magistrate court deputy clerks shall have the duties, clerical or otherwise, as may be assigned by the magistrate court clerk and as may be prescribed by the rules of the Supreme Court of Appeals or the judge of the circuit court or the chief judge, if there is more than one judge of the circuit court.
Magistrate court deputy clerks may also exercise the power and perform the duties of the magistrate court clerk as may be delegated or assigned by the magistrate court clerk.
(c) A magistrate court deputy clerk may not be an immediate family member of any magistrate, magistrate court clerk, magistrate assistant, or judge of the circuit court within the same county;
may not have been convicted of a felony or any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude;
and must reside in this state.
For purposes of this subsection, “immediate family member” means a mother, father, sister, brother, child, or spouse.
(d) Magistrate court deputy clerks shall be paid an annual salary by the state on the same basis and in the same amounts established for magistrate assistants in each county, as provided in §50-1-9 of this code.
(e) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, the amendments made to section nine of this article during the 2013 First Extraordinary Session, and the effects of those amendments on subsection (d) of this section, are effective upon passage and are retroactive to January 1, 2013.
(f) Beginning January 1, 2017, the annual salary of all magistrate court deputy clerks is $39,348.
After the effective date of this section, a general salary increase granted to state employees, whose salaries are not set by statute, expressed as a percentage increase or an across-the-board increase, may also be granted to magistrate court deputy clerks.
NOTE:
The purpose of this bill is to codify the number of magistrates serving in the state and within each county following the 2020 election cycle and to increase the number of magistrate court deputy clerks that may be appointed in the state.
§50-1-2 has been completely rewritten;
Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
    Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. To Finance

  2. Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance

  3. Senator Cline requests to be removed as sponsor of bill

  4. To Judiciary

  5. Introduced in Senate

  6. To Judiciary then Finance

  7. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

  • Trump · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Trump

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (133)

133 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 133 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 261?
SB 261 is sponsored by Trump.
What is the current status of SB 261?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 261?
Track SB 261 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 261

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 261

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →