S 25 — An act relating to miscellaneous cannabis regulation procedures
Last action — Senate Message, signed by Governor June 7, 2021
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S 25 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Senate Message, signed by Governor June 7, 2021
-
Signed by Governor on June 7, 2021
-
Delivered to Governor on June 1, 2021
-
Senate Message, House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
Rules suspended & ordered delivered to Governor forthwith, on motion of Senator Balint
-
As passed by Senate and House
-
House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
House proposal of amendment; text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Balint
-
House Proposal of Amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Read Third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Donahue of Northfield agreed to
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Gannon of Wilmington agreed to
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Report of Committee on Government Operations as amended agreed to
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Donahue of Northfield disagreed to
-
Division results Yeas 57, Nays 76
-
Division demanded
-
Rep. Donahue of Northfield moved to amend the report of the Committee on Government Operations
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Peterson of Clarendon disagreed to
-
Division results Yeas 38, Nays 89
-
Division demanded
-
Rep. Peterson of Clarendon moved to amend the report of the Committee on Government Operations
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Gannon of Wilmington agreed to
-
Report of Committee on Government Operations amended as offered by Committee on Ways and Means
-
Rep. Scheu of Middlebury recommended for the Committee on Appropriations
-
Rep. Beck of St. Johnsbury recommended for the Committee on Ways and Means
-
Rep. Gannon of Wilmington reported for the Committee on Government Operations
-
Read Second time
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
-
Referred to Committee on Ways and Means per Rule 35(a)
-
Read First Time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary amended as recommended by Committee on Finance
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary amended as recommended by Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported favorably by Senator Pearson for Committee on Finance with recommendation of amendment
-
Reported favorably by Senator Sears for Committee on Appropriations with recommendation of amendment
-
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator White for Committee on Judiciary
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
New Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Finance
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Finance per Senate Rule 31
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Joseph Benning · Primary
- Christopher Pearson · Cosponsor
- Richard Sears · Cosponsor
- Rebecca "Becca" E White · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Joseph Benning
Co-sponsors (3)
- Christopher Pearson
- Richard Sears
- Rebecca "Becca" E White Democrat
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 25?
- S 25 is sponsored by Joseph Benning, Christopher Pearson, Richard Sears, and Rebecca "Becca" E White (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 25?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track S 25?
- Track S 25 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 25
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 25
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →