Wisconsin 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Introduced

SB 493 — Relating to: authorizing La Crosse County to become a premier resort area. (FE)

Last action — Fiscal estimate received

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill allows La Crosse County to become a premier resort area despite not meeting the typical requirement of 40% tourism-related retail property value, with specific regulations on tax proceeds usage.

  • 66.1113 (2) (a)

    at least 40 percent of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property within such political subdivision is used by tourism-related retailers. → at least 40 percent of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property within such political subdivision is used by tourism-related retailers.

    The bill retains the 40% requirement for most political subdivisions but creates an exception for La Crosse County.

  • 66.1113 (2) (b)

    a political subdivision that is a premier resort area may impose the tax under s. 77.994. → a political subdivision that is a premier resort area may impose the tax under s. 77.994.

    The bill specifies that the tax can be imposed only by those political subdivisions recognized as premier resort areas.

  • 66.1113

    66.1113 (2) (k) 1. La Crosse County may enact an ordinance or adopt a resolution declaring itself to be a premier resort area under par. (a) even if less than 40 percent of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property within the county is used by tourism-related retailers.

    La Crosse County is authorized to declare itself a premier resort area without meeting the usual tourism-related property value requirement.

  • 66.1113

    66.1113 (2) (k) 2. Notwithstanding par. (d), if an ordinance enacted or resolution adopted as described under subd. 1. takes effect, the proceeds of the tax may be used only to pay for transportation expenses within the county, such as construction, reconstruction, and improvement of highways, including bridges. No amount of the tax proceeds may be used to pay for mass transit.

    Tax proceeds must be dedicated to transportation expenses in La Crosse County, prohibiting use for mass transit.

  • 66.1113

    66.1113 (2) (k) 2. Seventy-five percent of the proceeds shall be spent to benefit county highways and the county board may distribute the remaining 25 percent of the proceeds to cities, villages, and towns that are located entirely or predominantly within the county to be used for transportation expenses within those jurisdictions.

    The distribution of tax proceeds specifies that 75% benefits county highways, with the remaining 25% available for local municipalities.

  • 66.1113

    66.1113 (2) (k) 2. In each fiscal year after the ordinance takes effect, the county may not impose the tax unless it spends or commits to spend at least the same amount of revenue generated by county-levied taxes that are dedicated to highway improvements and maintenance that it spent from that source and for those purposes during the fiscal year before the fiscal year in which the county first imposes the tax authorized under this paragraph.

    La Crosse County must match prior spending on highway improvements before imposing the new tax.

Action History

  1. Fiscal estimate received

  2. Read first time and referred to Committee on Economic Development, Commerce and Local Government

  3. Introduced by Senator Shilling; cosponsored by Representative Doyle

Sponsors

  • Shilling · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Shilling

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (131)

131 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 131 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 493?
SB 493 is sponsored by Shilling.
What is the current status of SB 493?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 493?
Track SB 493 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 493

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 493

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →