Concerning obligations of mental health professionals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5800 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5800.
You're tracking SB 5800
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5800 — Concerning obligations of mental health professionals.
Last action — On motion, referred to Law & Justice.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of Senate Bill 5800, the obligation for mental health professionals to warn about a patient's potential violent behavior was clarified. Now, they only have a duty to warn if the patient has explicitly communicated a specific threat that poses an imminent danger to identifiable individuals. This change is significant because it protects mental health providers from liability, provided they take reasonable steps to address the threat, fostering a more supportive environment in which they can focus on patient care without fear of legal repercussions for unforeseen outcomes.
S-1034.1SENATEENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5800State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senator BaumgartnerRead first time 02/10/17.
andamending adding a new section to chapter 7.70 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 7.70 RCW to71.05.120; read as follows:(1) As used in this section:(a) "Mental health professional" means a psychiatrist, psychologist, physician assistant working with a supervising psychiatrist, psychiatric advanced registered nurse practitioner, psychiatric nurse, social worker, or chemical dependency professional, and any person licensed by the department of health as a mental health counselor, mental health counselor associate, marriage and family therapist, or marriage and family therapist associate.(b) "Mental health services" means outpatient and inpatient services provided to diagnose or treat mental disorders covered by the diagnostic categories listed in the most current version of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, published by the American psychiatric association, or any successor publication.(2) A mental health professional or an individual health care provider providing mental health services to a patient has a duty to warn or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from a patient's violent behavior only if the patient has communicated to the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient an actual threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims.(3) The duty to warn or take reasonable precautions to provide protection from a patient's violent behavior is discharged by the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient if reasonable efforts are made to communicate the threat to the reasonably identifiable victim or victims and to law enforcement personnel.(4) A mental health professional or an individual health care provider providing mental health services to a patient is not liable for civil damages for failing to predict, warn of, or take reasonable precautions to provide protections from a patient's violent behavior unless the patient has communicated to the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient an actual threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims and the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient has failed to take reasonable precautions to provide protection to the reasonably identifiable victim or victims by communicating the threat as provided in this section or taking other reasonable measures, which may include reasonable attempts to hospitalize the patient voluntarily.(5) This section does not limit, and is in addition to, any other statutory immunities from liability of mental health professionals or individual health care providers as otherwise provided by law.--- END ---
reenacting and amending RCW 71.05.120;
adding a new section to chapter 71.05 RCW;
providing an effective date;
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 71.05 RCW to read as follows:(1) As used in this section:(a) "Mental health professional" means a psychiatrist, psychologist, physician assistant working with a supervising psychiatrist, psychiatric advanced registered nurse practitioner, psychiatric nurse, social worker, or chemical dependency professional, and any person licensed by the department of health as a mental health counselor, mental health counselor associate, marriage and family therapist, or marriage and family therapist associate.(b) "Mental health services" means voluntary or involuntary outpatient and inpatient services provided to diagnose or treat mental disorders covered by the diagnostic categories listed in the most current version of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, published by the American psychiatric association, or any successor publication.(2) A mental health professional or an individual health care provider providing mental health services to a patient has a duty to warn of a patient's violent behavior only if the patient has communicated to the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient an actual threat of physical violence that poses a serious or imminent threat to the health or safety of a reasonably identifiable person or persons.(3) The duty to warn of a serious or imminent threat to the health or safety of a reasonably identifiable person or persons is discharged by the mental health professional or the individual health care provider providing mental health services to the patient if reasonable efforts are made to communicate the threat to the reasonably identifiable person or persons whose health or safety is threatened and to law enforcement personnel.(4) No mental health professional or individual health care provider providing mental health services is liable for civil damages for discharging the duty to warn as provided in this section, or having discharged the duty to warn, for failing to predict, warn of, or take reasonable precautions to provide protections from a patient's violent behavior so long as the mental health professional or individual health care provider providing mental health services acted in good faith and without gross negligence.(5) This section does not limit, and is in addition to, any other statutory immunities from liability of mental health professionals or individual health care providers as otherwise provided by law.Sec. 2. RCW 71.05.120 and 2016 c 158 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:(1) No officer of a public or private agency, nor the superintendent, professional person in charge, his or her professional designee, or attending staff of any such agency, nor any public official performing functions necessary to the administration of this chapter, nor peace officer responsible for detaining a person pursuant to this chapter, nor any ((county)) designated mental health professional, nor the state, a unit of local government, or an evaluation and treatment facility shall be civilly or criminally liable for performing duties pursuant to this chapter with regard to the decision of whether to admit, discharge, release, administer antipsychotic medications, or detain a person for evaluation and treatment:
PROVIDED, That such duties were performed in good faith and without gross negligence.(2) Peace officers and their employing agencies are not liable for the referral of a person, or the failure to refer a person, to a mental health agency pursuant to a policy adopted pursuant to RCW 71.05.457 if such action or inaction is taken in good faith and without gross negligence.(3) This section does not relieve a person from giving the required notices under RCW 71.05.330(2) or 71.05.340(1)(b), or the duty to warn ((or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from violent behavior where the patient has communicated an actual threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims.
The duty to warn or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from violent behavior is discharged if reasonable efforts are made to communicate the threat to the victim or victims and to law enforcement personnel)) as provided for in section 1 of this act.Sec. 3. RCW 71.05.120 and 2016 sp.s.
c 29 s 208 and 2016 c 158 s 4 are each reenacted and amended to read as follows:(1) No officer of a public or private agency, nor the superintendent, professional person in charge, his or her professional designee, or attending staff of any such agency, nor any public official performing functions necessary to the administration of this chapter, nor peace officer responsible for detaining a person pursuant to this chapter, nor any designated crisis responder, nor the state, a unit of local government, an evaluation and treatment facility, a secure detoxification facility, or an approved substance use disorder treatment program shall be civilly or criminally liable for performing duties pursuant to this chapter with regard to the decision of whether to admit, discharge, release, administer antipsychotic medications, or detain a person for evaluation and treatment:
PROVIDED, That such duties were performed in good faith and without gross negligence.(2) Peace officers and their employing agencies are not liable for the referral of a person, or the failure to refer a person, to a mental health agency pursuant to a policy adopted pursuant to RCW 71.05.457 if such action or inaction is taken in good faith and without gross negligence.(3) This section does not relieve a person from giving the required notices under RCW 71.05.330(2) or 71.05.340(1)(b), or the duty to warn ((or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from violent behavior where the patient has communicated an actual threat of physical violence against a reasonably identifiable victim or victims.
The duty to warn or to take reasonable precautions to provide protection from violent behavior is discharged if reasonable efforts are made to communicate the threat to the victim or victims and to law enforcement personnel)) as provided for in section 1 of this act.NEW SECTION. Sec. 4. Section 2 of this act expires April 1, 2018.NEW SECTION. Sec. 5. Section 3 of this act takes effect April 1, 2018.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Engrossed Bill Current html
- Bill View text html
Action History
-
On motion, referred to Law & Justice.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Placed on Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
First reading, referred to Judiciary (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 33; nays, 16; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
HLTH - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Health Care.
Sponsors
- Baumgartner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 9 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Baumgartner
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Nay |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Nay |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Nay |
| Kuderer | — | Nay |
| McCoy | — | Nay |
| Miloscia | — | Nay |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Nay |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Nay |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Nay |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Nay |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5800?
- SB 5800 is sponsored by Baumgartner.
- What is the current status of SB 5800?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5800?
- Track SB 5800 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5800
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5800
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →