SB 563 — Prohibiting sexual assault victim be subjected to certain physical examinations
Last action — To House Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
32 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 563 adds specific protections for alleged victims in sexual offense cases, ensuring they cannot be forced to undergo certain physical examinations. It clarifies that a victim's refusal to submit to these examinations won't prevent other relevant evidence from being used in court. This change is important because it aims to protect victims from additional trauma during legal proceedings and emphasizes their autonomy over their own bodies.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB563 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 563 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 563 By Senators Trump, Woelfel, Plymale, Boso, and RuckerRucker, [Introducedoriginal Februarysponsors 8,[Originating 2019;in the Committee on the Judiciary;
ReferredReported toon theFebruary Committee12, on2019] the Judiciary] A BILL to amend and reenact §61-8B-11 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating generally to evidence in prosecutionprosecutions for sexual offenses;
prohibiting aan alleged victim from being subjectedrequired to submit to or undergo certain physical examinations;examinations in prosecutions for sexual offenses;
anddefining providing“sexual thatoffense”; a victim’s refusal to undergo certain physical examinations does not preclude admission of evidence regarding other physical examinations.
and providing that an alleged victim’s refusal to submit to or undergo certain physical examinations does not preclude admission of evidence regarding other relevant physical examinations.
(b) In any prosecution under this articlearticle, evidence of specific instances of the victim’s sexual conduct with persons other than the defendant, opinion evidence of the victim’s sexual conduct, and reputation evidence of the victim’s sexual conduct shall not be admissible:
(e)(e)(1) NoA court may requirenot order or orderotherwise arequire victim,an alleged victim in anya prosecution underfor thisa article,sexual offense to submit to or undergo a gynecological or physical examination of the breasts, buttocks, anus, or any part of the sex organs.
(2) The refusal of aan alleged victim to undergo suchan examination atdescribed thein requestsubdivision (1) of thethis defendantsection may not serve as the basis to exclude evidence obtained from other relevant physical examinations of the victim, except where constitutionally required.
The(3) purposeFor the purposes of this subsectionsubsection, isthe toterm expressly“sexual overruleoffense” themeans decisionany offense in which sexual intercourse, sexual contact, or sexual intrusion is an element of the Supremeoffense, Courtand ofincludes Appealsany inprosecution Stateunder exthis rel.article, §61-8-12, or §61-8D-5 of this code.
J.W.
v.
Knight, 223 W.Va.
785, 679 S.E.2d 617 (2009).
785, 679 S.E.2d 617 (2009).
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 143)
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 143)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Boso · Cosponsor
- Trump · Primary
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Plymale · Cosponsor
- Mike Woelfel · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Trump
Co-sponsors (4)
- Boso
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Plymale
- Mike Woelfel Democrat
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Not Voting |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| BOSO | — | Not Voting |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 563?
- SB 563 is sponsored by Boso, Trump, Patricia Rucker (Republican), Plymale, and Mike Woelfel (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 563?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 563?
- Track SB 563 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 563
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 563
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →