An act relating to expanding the Front-Line Employees Hazard Pay Grant Program
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 353 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 353.
You're tracking S 353
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 353 — An act relating to expanding the Front-Line Employees Hazard Pay Grant Program
Last action — Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S 353 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
Unfinished Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
New Business/House Proposal of Amendment
-
House Proposal of Amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
House message House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Read Third time and Passed in Concurrence with Proposal of Amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill placed in all remaining stages of passage as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Third Reading Ordered
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Bancroft of Westford, Bock of Chester, Carroll of Bennington, Dickinson of St. Albans Town, Jerome of Brandon, Kimbell of Woodstock, Morris of Springfield, O'Sullivan of Burlington, Ralph Watson of Hartland, and Toleno of Brattleboro agreed to
-
Report of Committee on Appropriations agreed to.
-
Report of Committee on Commerce and Economic Development agreed to.
-
Rep. Myers of Essex recommended for the committee on Appropriations
-
Rep. Jerome of Brandon reported for the committee on Commerce and Economic Development
-
Read Second Time
-
Rep. McCoy of Poultney moved to suspend rules and take up bill for immediate consideration
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
-
Read First Time and Referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered on roll call, requested by Senator Hooker, Passed -- Needed 14 of 28 to Pass -- Yeas = 28, Nays = 0
-
Read 2nd time
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Ashe
-
Committee Bill for Second Reading
-
Committee bill read first time & placed on Notice Calendar per Senate Rule 48
Sponsors
- Senate Committee on Appropriations · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Senate Committee on Appropriations
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (189)
189 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 189 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat/Progressive | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ashe | — | Yea |
| Balint | — | Yea |
| Benning | — | Yea |
| Bray | — | Yea |
| Campion | — | Yea |
| Hooker | — | Yea |
| Kitchel | — | Yea |
| MacDonald | — | Yea |
| Mazza | — | Yea |
| McCormack | — | Yea |
| McNeil | — | Yea |
| Nitka | — | Yea |
| Parent | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Pollina | — | Yea |
| Sears | — | Yea |
| Sirotkin | — | Yea |
| Starr | — | Yea |
| White | — | Yea |
| Ingram | — | Not Voting |
| Rodgers | — | Not Voting |
| Alison Clarkson | Democrat | Yea |
| Ann E Cummings | Democrat | Yea |
| Ruth E Hardy | Democrat | Yea |
| Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew J Perchlik | Democrat/Progressive | Yea |
| Philip E Baruth | Democrat/Progressive | Yea |
| Brian P Collamore | Republican | Yea |
| Randy D Brock | Republican | Yea |
| Richard A Westman | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 353?
- S 353 is sponsored by Senate Committee on Appropriations.
- What is the current status of S 353?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track S 353?
- Track S 353 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 353
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 353
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →