West Virginia 2019 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 390 — Requiring electric utilities submit feasibility studies of constructing and operating middle-mile broadband internet projects

Last action — To House Technology and Infrastructure

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

103 added · 95 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SB 390 introduces a new section that specifically focuses on electric utilities' feasibility studies for broadband Internet projects in unserved and underserved areas. This change is significant because it clearly defines the roles of the Broadband Enhancement Council and the Public Service Commission in assessing whether these projects are viable. Additionally, the amendment sets a timeline for the Council to determine the feasibility of these broadband initiatives, ensuring timely information for decision-makers. Overall, these changes aim to enhance broadband access in areas that currently lack sufficient Internet service.

→
Previous
Latest
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS Introduced Version « Senate Bill 390 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Committee Substitute (1)  |   |  Email Key:
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS SB390 SUB1 « Senate Bill 390 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Introduced Version  |   |  Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Introduced Senate Bill 390 By Senators Maynard, Tarr, Plymale, Cline, and Sypolt [Introduced January 22, 2019;
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 390 Senators Maynard, Tarr, Plymale, Cline, and Sypolt [Originating in the Committee on Economic Development;
Referred to the Committee on Economic Development]   A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article, designated §31G-5-1 and §31G-5-2, all relating to determining the feasibility of electric utilities constructing and operating middle-mile broadband Internet projects to serve certain unserved and underserved areas;
Reported on January 25, 2019]   A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §31G-4-4, relating to determining the feasibility of electric utilities constructing and operating middle-mile broadband Internet projects to serve certain unserved and underserved areas;
requiring that the Broadband Enhancement Council render a judgment as to the feasibility of middle-mile broadband Internet projects within a certain period of time;
permitting the Broadband Enhancement Council render a judgment as to the feasibility of middle-mile broadband Internet projects within a certain period of time;
article 5.
article 4.
Project feasibility study.
make-ready pole access.
§31G-5-1.
§31G-4-4.
Definitions.
Electric power utilities;
For purposes of this article:
feasibility study for providing broadband services;
(a) “Commission” means the West Virginia Public Service Commission.
Public Service Commission to assist;
(b) “Council” means the Broadband Enhancement Council, as defined in article 1 of this chapter.
proposed legislation to be developed;
(c) “Electric Utility” means any electric utility operating within this state that is regulated by the Commission.
report.
(d) “Project” means a middle-mile broadband infrastructure expansion project proposed by an electric utility.
(a) For purposes of this section:
§31G-5-2.
(1) “Commission” shall mean the West Virginia Public Service Commission;
Mandatory feasibility study;
(2) “Council” shall mean the Broadband Enhancement Council, as defined in §31G-1-1 et seq.
Evaluation.
of this code;
(a) Each Electric Utility shall investigate the feasibility of constructing and operating a project within Electric Utility's distribution system and submit a feasibility study of a proposed project to the council on or before December 1, 2019.
(3) “Electric utility” shall mean any electric utility operating within this state that is regulated by the commission;
(b)  The council and the commission shall assist each such Electric Utility in its preparation of such a feasibility study.
(4) “Project” shall mean a middle-mile broadband infrastructure expansion project proposed by an electric utility.
(c) A feasibility study shall include an evaluation of the following:
(b) Each electric utility may investigate the feasibility of constructing and operating a project within the electric utility’s distribution system and, if it so elects, may submit a feasibility study of a proposed project to the council on or before December 1, 2019.  Additional feasibility studies may be submitted to the council after December 1, 2019 without penalty.  (c) The council and the commission shall assist each such electric utility in its preparation of such a feasibility study.
(i) The scope of the proposed project for which the feasibility study is conducted, which shall include, but not be limited to:
(d) The feasibility study shall include an evaluation of the following:
(A) The route of the middle-mile Infrastructure proposed for the project, the number of fiber strands that would be utilized in connection with the proposed project and dedicated to serve as the middle mile, the location of the Electric Utility's distribution infrastructure that will be utilized  in connection with the proposed project, the capacity of the middle mile broadband  infrastructure that will be available to lease to last-mile broadband Internet providers upon completion of the proposed project (B) The estimated cost of the proposed project, including, but not limited to, engineering costs, construction costs, permitting costs, materials and labor, right of way costs, and a reasonable  rate of return to the Electric Utility;
(1) The scope of the proposed project for which the feasibility study is conducted, which shall include but not be limited to:
(C) The proposed schedule of construction of the proposed project.;
(A) The route of the middle-mile infrastructure proposed for the project;
and (D) The method of attachment and connection of the middle-mile broadband fiber assets to the Electric Utility's distribution Infrastructure:
the number of fiber strands that would be utilized in connection with the proposed project and dedicated to serve as the middle-mile;
(ii) The regulatory barriers to an Electric Utility constructing a project and operating middle-mile  broadband infrastructure to provide access to unserved and underserved areas of the state, and proposed legislation to address such regulatory barriers:
the location of the electric utility’s distribution infrastructure that will be utilized in connection with the proposed project;
(iii) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the Electric Utility to make improvements to the distribution grid in furtherance of providing such middle-mile broadband Internet services in conjunction with its program of electric distribution projects;
the capacity of the middle-mile broadband infrastructure that will be available to lease to last-mile broadband Internet providers upon completion of the proposed project;
(iv) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the Electric Utility to operate middle-mile broadband Internet assets to provide access to unserved and underserved areas of the state:
(B) The estimated cost of the proposed project, including, but not limited to, engineering costs, construction costs, permitting costs, materials and labor, right-of-way costs, and a reasonable rate of return to the electric utility;    (C) The proposed schedule of construction of the proposed project;
(v) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the Electric Utility to permit a third-party to lease such capacity to provide last-mile broadband Internet services to unserved and underserved areas of the state:
and (D) The method of attachment and connection of the middle-mile broadband fiber assets to the electric utility’s distribution infrastructure;
(vi) Whether construction of middle-mile broadband Internet infrastructure utilizing Electric Utility distribution systems is feasible with respect to the maturity of the relevant technology, the compatibility of such services with existing electric services, and the financial requirements to undertake such project;
(2) The regulatory and legal barriers to an electric utility’s constructing a project and operating middle-mile broadband infrastructure to provide access to unserved areas of the state, as defined in §31G-1-2 of this code, and any underserved areas of the state, and proposed legislation to address such regulatory barriers;
(vii) The anticipated level of rate adjustment necessary to allow the Electric Utility to recover its costs associated with the proposed project, and a reasonable rate of return, on an expedited basis, that will be recovered by the Electric Utility through a rate adjustment at the commission;
(3) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the electric utility to make improvements to the distribution grid in furtherance of providing such middle-mile broadband Internet services in conjunction with its program of electric distribution projects;
and (viii) Such other information that is pertinent to the project.
(4) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the electric utility to operate middle-mile broadband Internet assets to provide access to unserved and underserved areas of the state;
(d) Upon receipt of a feasibility study, the council shall render a determination, by a majority vote of the council, as to the feasibility of the proposed project.
(5) Whether it is in the public interest and the interest of the electric utility to permit a third-party to lease such capacity to provide last-mile broadband Internet services to unserved and underserved areas of the state;
(e) In its consideration of the feasibility of a project, the council shall identify one or more last-mile broadband Internet providers that will lease the middle-mile broadband Internet capacity created by the proposed project pursuant to lease terms and conditions set by the council.
(6) Whether construction of middle-mile broadband Internet infrastructure utilizing electric utility distribution systems is feasible with respect to the maturity of the relevant technology, the compatibility of such services with existing electric services, and the financial requirements to undertake such project;  (7) The anticipated level of rate adjustment necessary to allow the electric utility to recover its costs associated with the proposed project, and a reasonable rate of return, on an expedited basis, that will be recovered by the electric utility through a rate adjustment at the commission;
(f) The council shall render such feasibility determination within 60 days from the data the feasibility study is submitted to the council.
and (8)  Such other information that is pertinent to the project.
(g) Commencing January 1, 2020, and each year thereafter, the council shall give a report of Its consideration of feasibility studies submitted pursuant to this section of the code to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Delegates, and the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.
(e) Upon receipt of a feasibility study, the council shall render a determination, by a majority vote of the council, as to the feasibility of the proposed project.
(f) In its consideration of the feasibility of a project, the council shall identify one or more last-mile broadband Internet providers that may lease the middle-mile broadband Internet capacity created by the proposed project pursuant to lease terms and conditions set by the council.
(g) The council shall render such feasibility determination within 60 days from the date the feasibility study is submitted to the council.
(h) Commencing January 1, 2020, and each year thereafter, the council shall give a report of its consideration of feasibility studies submitted pursuant to this section to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Delegates, and the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.
The purpose of this bill is to require Electric Utilities to submit feasibility studies of potential middle-mile broadband internet service projects to the Broadband Enhancement Council for the council's consideration.
The purpose of this bill is to give the option to electric utilities to submit feasibility studies of potential middle-mile broadband Internet service projects to the Broadband Enhancement Council for the council’s consideration.
  Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
  Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. To House Technology and Infrastructure

  2. To Technology and Infrastructure then Judiciary

  3. Introduced in House

  4. Ordered to House

  5. Effective from passage (Roll No. 59)

  6. Passed Senate (Roll No. 59)

  7. Reported by clerk

  8. Laid over on 3rd reading 1/31/19

  9. Reported by clerk

  10. Laid over on 3rd reading 1/30/19

  11. Read 3rd time

  12. On 3rd reading

  13. Read 2nd time

  14. On 2nd reading

  15. Read 1st time

  16. On 1st reading

  17. Committee substitute reported

  18. To Economic Development

  19. Introduced in Senate

  20. To Economic Development

  21. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

  • Cline · Cosponsor
  • Eric Tarr · Cosponsor
  • Plymale · Cosponsor
  • Maynard · Primary
  • Sypolt · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Maynard

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 2000
Unaffiliated 32000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
JEFFRIES — Yea
SMITH — Yea
BALDWIN — Yea
LINDSAY — Yea
STOLLINGS — Yea
BEACH — Yea
MANN — Yea
SWOPE — Yea
BLAIR — Yea
MARONEY — Yea
SYPOLT — Yea
BOLEY — Yea
MAYNARD — Yea
TAKUBO — Yea
BOSO — Yea
PALUMBO — Yea
TARR — Yea
PLYMALE — Yea
TRUMP — Yea
CLINE — Yea
PREZIOSO — Yea
UNGER — Yea
FACEMIRE — Yea
ROBERTS — Yea
WELD — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
ROMANO — Yea
WOELFEL — Yea
HARDESTY — Yea
RUCKER — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
IHLENFELD — Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 390?
SB 390 is sponsored by Cline, Eric Tarr (Republican), Plymale, Maynard, and Sypolt.
What is the current status of SB 390?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 390?
Track SB 390 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 390

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 390

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →