Requiring electric utilities submit feasibility studies of constructing and operating middle-mile broadband...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 390 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 390.
You're tracking SB 390
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 390 — Requiring electric utilities submit feasibility studies of constructing and operating middle-mile broadband internet projects
Last action — To House Technology and Infrastructure
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
103 added · 95 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 390 introduces a new section that specifically focuses on electric utilities' feasibility studies for broadband Internet projects in unserved and underserved areas. This change is significant because it clearly defines the roles of the Broadband Enhancement Council and the Public Service Commission in assessing whether these projects are viable. Additionally, the amendment sets a timeline for the Council to determine the feasibility of these broadband initiatives, ensuring timely information for decision-makers. Overall, these changes aim to enhance broadband access in areas that currently lack sufficient Internet service.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSB390 VersionSUB1 « Senate Bill 390 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 390 By Senators Maynard, Tarr, Plymale, Cline, and Sypolt [Introduced[Originating Januaryin 22,the 2019;Committee on Economic Development;
ReferredReported to the Committee on EconomicJanuary Development]25, 2019] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new article,section, designated §31G-5-1§31G-4-4, and §31G-5-2, all relating to determining the feasibility of electric utilities constructing and operating middle-mile broadband Internet projects to serve certain unserved and underserved areas;
requiringpermitting that the Broadband Enhancement Council render a judgment as to the feasibility of middle-mile broadband Internet projects within a certain period of time;
article 5.4.
Projectmake-ready feasibilitypole study.access.
§31G-5-1.§31G-4-4.
Definitions.Electric power utilities;
Forfeasibility purposesstudy offor thisproviding article:broadband services;
(a) “Commission” means the West Virginia Public Service Commission.Commission to assist;
(b)proposed “Council”legislation meansto thebe Broadbanddeveloped; Enhancement Council, as defined in article 1 of this chapter.
(c)report. “Electric Utility” means any electric utility operating within this state that is regulated by the Commission.
(d)(a) “Project”For meanspurposes aof middle-milethis broadbandsection: infrastructure expansion project proposed by an electric utility.
§31G-5-2.(1) “Commission” shall mean the West Virginia Public Service Commission;
Mandatory(2) feasibility“Council” study;shall mean the Broadband Enhancement Council, as defined in §31G-1-1 et seq.
Evaluation.of this code;
(a)(3) Each“Electric Electricutility” Utility shall investigatemean theany feasibilityelectric ofutility constructing and operating a project within Electricthis Utility'sstate distributionthat systemis andregulated submitby a feasibility study of a proposed project to the councilcommission; on or before December 1, 2019.
(b) (4) The“Project” council and the commission shall assistmean eacha suchmiddle-mile Electricbroadband Utilityinfrastructure inexpansion itsproject preparationproposed ofby suchan aelectric feasibilityutility. study.
(c)(b) AEach electric utility may investigate the feasibility of constructing and operating a project within the electric utility’s distribution system and, if it so elects, may submit a feasibility study of a proposed project to the council on or before December 1, 2019. Additional feasibility studies may be submitted to the council after December 1, 2019 without penalty. (c) The council and the commission shall includeassist aneach evaluationsuch electric utility in its preparation of thesuch following:a feasibility study.
(i)(d) The scope of the proposed project for which the feasibility study is conducted, which shall include,include butan notevaluation beof limitedthe to:following:
(A)(1) The routescope of the middle-mile Infrastructure proposed for the project, the number of fiber strands that would be utilized in connection with the proposed project andfor dedicatedwhich to serve as the middlefeasibility mile,study theis locationconducted, ofwhich theshall Electricinclude Utility's distribution infrastructure that will be utilized in connection with the proposed project, the capacity of the middle mile broadband infrastructure that will be available to lease to last-mile broadband Internet providers upon completion of the proposed project (B) The estimated cost of the proposed project, including, but not be limited to,to: engineering costs, construction costs, permitting costs, materials and labor, right of way costs, and a reasonable rate of return to the Electric Utility;
(C)(A) The proposedroute schedule of constructionthe ofmiddle-mile theinfrastructure proposed project.;for the project;
andthe (D)number Theof methodfiber ofstrands attachmentthat andwould be utilized in connection ofwith the middle-mileproposed broadbandproject fiberand assetsdedicated to theserve Electricas Utility'sthe distributionmiddle-mile; Infrastructure:
(ii)the Thelocation regulatoryof barriersthe toelectric anutility’s Electricdistribution Utility constructing a project and operating middle-mile broadband infrastructure tothat providewill accessbe toutilized unservedin andconnection underservedwith areas of the state, and proposed legislationproject; to address such regulatory barriers:
(iii)the Whethercapacity itof is in the publicmiddle-mile interestbroadband andinfrastructure thethat interestwill ofbe theavailable Electric Utility to makelease improvements to thelast-mile distribution grid in furtherance of providing such middle-mile broadband Internet servicesproviders inupon conjunctioncompletion with its program of electricthe distributionproposed projects;project;
(iv)(B) WhetherThe itestimated iscost inof the publicproposed interestproject, andincluding, thebut interestnot oflimited theto, Electricengineering Utilitycosts, toconstruction operatecosts, middle-milepermitting broadbandcosts, Internetmaterials assetsand tolabor, provideright-of-way accesscosts, and a reasonable rate of return to unservedthe andelectric underservedutility; areas(C) The proposed schedule of construction of the state:proposed project;
(v)and Whether(D) itThe ismethod inof theattachment public interest and theconnection interest of the Electricmiddle-mile Utility to permit a third-party to lease such capacity to provide last-mile broadband Internetfiber servicesassets to unservedthe andelectric underservedutility’s areasdistribution ofinfrastructure; the state:
(vi)(2) WhetherThe constructionregulatory ofand middle-milelegal broadbandbarriers Internetto infrastructurean utilizingelectric Electricutility’s Utilityconstructing distributiona systemsproject isand feasibleoperating withmiddle-mile respectbroadband infrastructure to theprovide maturityaccess to unserved areas of the relevantstate, technology,as thedefined compatibilityin §31G-1-2 of suchthis servicescode, withand existingany electricunderserved services,areas andof the financialstate, requirementsand proposed legislation to undertakeaddress such project;regulatory barriers;
(vii)(3) TheWhether anticipatedit levelis ofin ratethe adjustmentpublic necessaryinterest toand allow the Electricinterest Utilityof tothe recoverelectric itsutility coststo associatedmake withimprovements to the proposeddistribution project,grid andin afurtherance reasonable rate of return,providing onsuch anmiddle-mile expeditedbroadband basis,Internet thatservices willin beconjunction recoveredwith byits theprogram Electricof Utilityelectric throughdistribution aprojects; rate adjustment at the commission;
(4) Whether it is in the public interest and (viii)the Suchinterest otherof informationthe thatelectric isutility pertinentto operate middle-mile broadband Internet assets to provide access to unserved and underserved areas of the project.state;
(d)(5) UponWhether receiptit ofis ain feasibilitythe study,public interest and the councilinterest shallof renderthe aelectric determination,utility byto permit a majoritythird-party voteto oflease thesuch council,capacity asto provide last-mile broadband Internet services to theunserved feasibilityand underserved areas of the proposedstate; project.
(e)(6) InWhether itsconstruction considerationof middle-mile broadband Internet infrastructure utilizing electric utility distribution systems is feasible with respect to the maturity of the feasibilityrelevant technology, the compatibility of asuch project,services with existing electric services, and the councilfinancial shallrequirements identifyto oneundertake orsuch moreproject; last-mile(7) broadbandThe Internetanticipated providerslevel thatof willrate leaseadjustment necessary to allow the middle-mileelectric broadbandutility Internetto capacityrecover createdits bycosts associated with the proposed projectproject, pursuantand toa leasereasonable termsrate andof conditionsreturn, seton an expedited basis, that will be recovered by the council.electric utility through a rate adjustment at the commission;
(f)and The(8) councilSuch shallother renderinformation suchthat feasibility determination within 60 days from the data the feasibility study is submittedpertinent to the council.project.
(g)(e) CommencingUpon Januaryreceipt 1,of 2020,a andfeasibility eachstudy, year thereafter, the council shall giverender a reportdetermination, ofby Itsa considerationmajority ofvote feasibility studies submitted pursuant to this section of the codecouncil, as to the Governor,feasibility the President of the Senate,proposed theproject. Speaker of the House of Delegates, and the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.
(f) In its consideration of the feasibility of a project, the council shall identify one or more last-mile broadband Internet providers that may lease the middle-mile broadband Internet capacity created by the proposed project pursuant to lease terms and conditions set by the council.
(g) The council shall render such feasibility determination within 60 days from the date the feasibility study is submitted to the council.
(h) Commencing January 1, 2020, and each year thereafter, the council shall give a report of its consideration of feasibility studies submitted pursuant to this section to the Governor, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Delegates, and the Joint Committee on Government and Finance.
The purpose of this bill is to requiregive Electricthe Utilitiesoption to electric utilities to submit feasibility studies of potential middle-mile broadband internetInternet service projects to the Broadband Enhancement Council for the council'scouncil’s consideration.
Strike-throughsBill indicateStatus | languageBill thatTracking | wouldLegacy beWV strickenCode | fromBulletin aBoard | headingDistrict orMaps | theSenate presentRoster | lawHouse andRoster | underscoringLive | indicatesBlog | newJobs | languageLinks | thatHome wouldThis beWeb added.site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
To House Technology and Infrastructure
-
To Technology and Infrastructure then Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 59)
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 59)
-
Reported by clerk
-
Laid over on 3rd reading 1/31/19
-
Reported by clerk
-
Laid over on 3rd reading 1/30/19
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Economic Development
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Economic Development
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Cline · Cosponsor
- Eric Tarr · Cosponsor
- Plymale · Cosponsor
- Maynard · Primary
- Sypolt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Maynard
Co-sponsors (4)
- Cline
- Eric Tarr Republican
- Plymale
- Sypolt
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| LINDSAY | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| BOSO | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| HARDESTY | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| IHLENFELD | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 390?
- SB 390 is sponsored by Cline, Eric Tarr (Republican), Plymale, Maynard, and Sypolt.
- What is the current status of SB 390?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 390?
- Track SB 390 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 390
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 390
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →