Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 5 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 6213 — Addressing the presumption of occupational disease for purposes of workers' compensation by adding medical conditions to the presumption and extending the presumption to certain publicly employed firefighters and investigators and law enforcement.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The key change in Senate Bill 6213 is the expansion of the list of conditions that are presumed to be occupational diseases for certain firefighters and law enforcement officers. This includes specific cancer types and the addition of strokes alongside heart problems, helping ensure better protection and benefits for these workers facing serious health risks tied to their jobs. This update is significant because it recognizes the unique dangers these professionals face and provides them with critical support in the event they develop serious health issues after their service.

→
Previous
Latest
S-3669.1SENATE BILL 6213State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Ranker, Conway, Hobbs, Keiser, Van De Wege, Palumbo, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Hunt, Walsh, Kuderer, Wellman, and FortunatoRead first time 01/10/18.
ENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6213State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Ranker, Conway, Hobbs, Keiser, Van De Wege, Palumbo, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Hunt, Walsh, Kuderer, Wellman, and FortunatoRead first time 01/10/18.
(((b))) (ii) any heart problems or strokes, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion due to firefighting activities;
(((b))) (ii) any heart problems, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion due to firefighting activities;
(i) Any heart problems or strokes, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion in the line of duty;
(i) Any heart problems, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion in the line of duty;
and ((who))(ii)(A) Subject to (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection, was given a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator that showed no evidence of cancer.
and ((who))(ii)(A) Was given a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator that showed no evidence of cancer;
((The presumption within subsection (1)(c) of this section shall only apply to)) (B) If a firefighter as defined in RCW 41.26.030(16)(h) who became a firefighter before July 1, 2018, or fire investigator who became a fire investigator before July 1, 2018, did not receive a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator, the firefighter or fire investigator satisfies the qualifying medical examination requirement if the firefighter or fire investigator received a qualifying medical examination on or before July 1, 2019.
or(B)(I) For a firefighter or fire investigator who became a firefighter or fire investigator on or after the effective date of this section, the employer did not provide a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator;
In addition, if the firefighter or fire investigator is diagnosed with a cancer listed in (b) of this subsection at the time of the qualifying medical examination and otherwise meets the requirements of this section, the presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section applies.(b) The presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section shall only apply to the following cancers:
or(II) For a firefighter or fire investigator who became a firefighter or fire investigator before the effective date of this section, the employer did not provide a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator and the employer provides a qualifying medical examination on or before July 1, 2019.
If a firefighter or fire investigator described in this subsection (3)(a)(ii)(B)(II) did not receive a qualifying medical examination before July 1, 2019, or is diagnosed with a cancer listed in (b) of this subsection at the time of the qualifying medical examination under this subsection (3)(a)(ii)(B)(II) and otherwise meets the requirements of this section, the presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section applies.
((The presumption within subsection (1)(c) of this section shall only apply to)) (b) The presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section shall only apply to the following cancers:
The department, using existing medical research, shall define in rule the extent of tobacco use that shall exclude a firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer from the provisions of this section.(6) For purposes of this section, "firefighting activities" means fire suppression, fire prevention, fire investigation, emergency medical services, rescue operations, hazardous materials response, aircraft rescue, and training and other assigned duties related to emergency response.(7)(a) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to the board of industrial insurance appeals and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the board of industrial insurance appeals shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(b) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to any court and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the court shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(c) When reasonable costs of the appeal must be paid by the department under this section in a state fund case, the costs shall be paid from the accident fund and charged to the costs of the claim.--- END ---
The department, using existing medical research, shall define in rule the extent of tobacco use that shall exclude a firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer from the provisions of this section.(6) For purposes of this section, "firefighting activities" means fire suppression, fire prevention, fire investigation, emergency medical services, rescue operations, hazardous materials response, aircraft rescue, and training and other assigned duties related to emergency response.(7)(a) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to the board of industrial insurance appeals and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the board of industrial insurance appeals shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(b) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to any court and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the court shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(c) When reasonable costs of the appeal must be paid by the department under this section in a state fund case, the costs shall be paid from the accident fund and charged to the costs of the claim.(8)(a) By July 1, 2018, the department of labor and industries must convene a work group to discuss policy and procedural options for amending the first responder occupations and occupational diseases included in RCW 51.32.185.
The work group must consider the following list of topics including, but not limited to:(i) The process for adding new first responder occupations and occupational diseases to RCW 51.32.185;
and(ii) The establishment of procedures to gather, evaluate, and accept or reject data necessary to inform stakeholder recommendations and policymaker decisions for amending the first responder occupations and occupational diseases covered in RCW 51.32.185.(b) The work group must include representatives of state fund employers, self-insured employers, and worker advocates along with public health professionals in the disciplines of occupational medicine, epidemiology, and industrial hygiene.(c) By December 1, 2019, the work group must provide a report to the appropriate committees of the legislature.
The report must include a description of the work group deliberations and any consensus recommendations for legislation or rule making.(d) The work group expires upon completion of the report to the legislature.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Placed on second reading.

  3. Committee relieved of further consideration.

  4. Referred to Appropriations.

  5. Minority; do not pass.

  6. LAWS - Majority; do pass.

  7. First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

  8. Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  9. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  10. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  11. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  12. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  13. Minority; without recommendation.

  14. LBRC - Majority; do pass.

  15. First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ranker

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (138)

138 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 138 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30001
Democrat 9000
Republican 7101
Total 46102
% of votes cast 94%2%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Becker — Yea
Baumgartner — Not Voting
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6213?
SB 6213 is sponsored by Walsh, Phil Fortunato (Republican), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Hobbs, Palumbo, Ranker, Steve Conway (Democrat), Keiser, Kuderer, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
What is the current status of SB 6213?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 6213?
Track SB 6213 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6213

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6213

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →