Addressing the presumption of occupational disease for purposes of workers' compensation by adding medical ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6213 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6213.
You're tracking SB 6213
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6213 — Addressing the presumption of occupational disease for purposes of workers' compensation by adding medical conditions to the presumption and extending the presumption to certain publicly employed firefighters and investigators and law enforcement.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The key change in Senate Bill 6213 is the expansion of the list of conditions that are presumed to be occupational diseases for certain firefighters and law enforcement officers. This includes specific cancer types and the addition of strokes alongside heart problems, helping ensure better protection and benefits for these workers facing serious health risks tied to their jobs. This update is significant because it recognizes the unique dangers these professionals face and provides them with critical support in the event they develop serious health issues after their service.
S-3669.1SENATEENGROSSED SENATE BILL 6213State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Ranker, Conway, Hobbs, Keiser, Van De Wege, Palumbo, Hasegawa, Saldaña, Hunt, Walsh, Kuderer, Wellman, and FortunatoRead first time 01/10/18.
(((b))) (ii) any heart problemsproblems, or strokes, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion due to firefighting activities;
(i) Any heart problemsproblems, or strokes, experienced within seventy-two hours of exposure to smoke, fumes, or toxic substances, or experienced within twenty-four hours of strenuous physical exertion in the line of duty;
and ((who))(ii)(A) SubjectWas to (a)(ii)(B) of this subsection, was given a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator that showed no evidence of cancer.cancer;
((Theor(B)(I) presumptionFor within subsection (1)(c) of this section shall only apply to)) (B) If a firefighter asor definedfire ininvestigator RCW 41.26.030(16)(h) who became a firefighter before July 1, 2018, or fire investigator whoon becameor aafter firethe investigatoreffective beforedate Julyof 1,this 2018,section, the employer did not receiveprovide a qualifying medical examination upon becoming a firefighter or fire investigator,investigator; the firefighter or fire investigator satisfies the qualifying medical examination requirement if the firefighter or fire investigator received a qualifying medical examination on or before July 1, 2019.
Inor(II) addition,For ifa the firefighter or fire investigator iswho diagnosedbecame with a cancerfirefighter listedor infire (b)investigator ofbefore this subsection at the timeeffective date of thethis qualifyingsection, medical examination and otherwise meets the requirementsemployer ofdid thisnot section,provide thea presumptionqualifying establishedmedical inexamination subsectionupon (1)(a)(iii)becoming ofa thisfirefighter sectionor applies.(b)fire Theinvestigator presumptionand establishedthe inemployer subsectionprovides (1)(a)(iii)a ofqualifying thismedical sectionexamination shallon onlyor applybefore toJuly the1, following2019. cancers:
If a firefighter or fire investigator described in this subsection (3)(a)(ii)(B)(II) did not receive a qualifying medical examination before July 1, 2019, or is diagnosed with a cancer listed in (b) of this subsection at the time of the qualifying medical examination under this subsection (3)(a)(ii)(B)(II) and otherwise meets the requirements of this section, the presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section applies.
((The presumption within subsection (1)(c) of this section shall only apply to)) (b) The presumption established in subsection (1)(a)(iii) of this section shall only apply to the following cancers:
The department, using existing medical research, shall define in rule the extent of tobacco use that shall exclude a firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer from the provisions of this section.(6) For purposes of this section, "firefighting activities" means fire suppression, fire prevention, fire investigation, emergency medical services, rescue operations, hazardous materials response, aircraft rescue, and training and other assigned duties related to emergency response.(7)(a) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to the board of industrial insurance appeals and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the board of industrial insurance appeals shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(b) When a determination involving the presumption established in this section is appealed to any court and the final decision allows the claim for benefits, the court shall order that all reasonable costs of the appeal, including attorney fees and witness fees, be paid to the firefighter, fire investigator, or law enforcement officer or his or her beneficiary by the opposing party.(c) When reasonable costs of the appeal must be paid by the department under this section in a state fund case, the costs shall be paid from the accident fund and charged to the costs of the claim.---claim.(8)(a) ENDBy ---July 1, 2018, the department of labor and industries must convene a work group to discuss policy and procedural options for amending the first responder occupations and occupational diseases included in RCW 51.32.185.
The work group must consider the following list of topics including, but not limited to:(i) The process for adding new first responder occupations and occupational diseases to RCW 51.32.185;
and(ii) The establishment of procedures to gather, evaluate, and accept or reject data necessary to inform stakeholder recommendations and policymaker decisions for amending the first responder occupations and occupational diseases covered in RCW 51.32.185.(b) The work group must include representatives of state fund employers, self-insured employers, and worker advocates along with public health professionals in the disciplines of occupational medicine, epidemiology, and industrial hygiene.(c) By December 1, 2019, the work group must provide a report to the appropriate committees of the legislature.
The report must include a description of the work group deliberations and any consensus recommendations for legislation or rule making.(d) The work group expires upon completion of the report to the legislature.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Engrossed Bill Current html
- Bill View text html
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Placed on second reading.
-
Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LAWS - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Workplace Standards (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 46; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
LBRC - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
Sponsors
- Walsh · Cosponsor
- Phil Fortunato · Cosponsor
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Hobbs · Cosponsor
- Palumbo · Cosponsor
- Ranker · Primary
- Steve Conway · Cosponsor
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
- Van De Wege · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ranker
Co-sponsors (12)
- Walsh
- Phil Fortunato Republican
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Hobbs
- Palumbo
- Steve Conway Democrat
- Keiser
- Kuderer
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
- Van De Wege
Not signed on (138)
138 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 138 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 46 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 2% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Not Voting |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Braun | Republican | Nay |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6213?
- SB 6213 is sponsored by Walsh, Phil Fortunato (Republican), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Hobbs, Palumbo, Ranker, Steve Conway (Democrat), Keiser, Kuderer, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
- What is the current status of SB 6213?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6213?
- Track SB 6213 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6213
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6213
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →