Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed House 2 D cosponsors

HB 1787 — Providing oversight of the state procurement and contracting for information technology goods and services.

Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 1787 includes specific changes that strengthen oversight of state procurement processes for information technology goods and services. Importantly, it centralizes authority and responsibility within one agency, the Office of the Chief Information Officer, to ensure consistency and adherence to high ethical standards throughout these contracts. The intent is to improve transparency, encourage competition among local small businesses, and ensure that all procurement information is easily accessible to the public. This matters because it aims to make state contracts more efficient and accountable, ultimately benefiting taxpayers and local economies.

→
Previous
Latest
H-2148.1SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1787State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy House Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Hudgins, Koster, Appleton, Doglio, Kraft, and Ormsby;
Z-0252.1HOUSE BILL 1787State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Representatives Hudgins, Koster, Appleton, Doglio, Kraft, and Ormsby;
by request of Office of the Chief Information Officer)READ FIRST TIME 02/24/17.AN ACT Relating to oversight of the state procurement and contracting for information technology goods and services;
by request of Office of the Chief Information OfficerRead first time 01/30/17.
amending RCW 39.26.005, 39.26.010, 39.26.050, 39.26.060, 39.26.080, 39.26.090, 39.26.110, 39.26.130, 39.26.140, and 39.26.180;
Referred to Committee on State Govt, Elections & IT.AN ACT Relating to oversight of the state procurement and contracting for information technology goods and services;
and creating a new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1.  RCW 39.26.005 and 2012 c 224 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:It is the intent of this chapter to promote open competition and transparency for all contracts for goods and services entered into by state agencies, unless specifically exempted under this chapter.
and amending RCW 39.26.005, 39.26.010, 39.26.050, 39.26.060, 39.26.080, 39.26.090, 39.26.110, 39.26.130, 39.26.140, and 39.26.180.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1.  RCW 39.26.005 and 2012 c 224 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:It is the intent of this chapter to promote open competition and transparency for all contracts for goods and services entered into by state agencies, unless specifically exempted under this chapter.
Payment for goods and services under performance-based contracts should be contingent on the contractor achieving performance outcomes.(4) An agency and contractor may execute a contract using electronic signatures.(5) As used in subsection (2) of this section, "data" includes all information that supports the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the contractor's reports, including computer models and the methodology for those models.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11.  If specific funding for the purposes of this act, referencing this act by bill or chapter number, is not provided by June 30, 2017, in the omnibus appropriations act, this act is null and void.--- END ---
Payment for goods and services under performance-based contracts should be contingent on the contractor achieving performance outcomes.(4) An agency and contractor may execute a contract using electronic signatures.(5) As used in subsection (2) of this section, "data" includes all information that supports the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the contractor's reports, including computer models and the methodology for those models.--- END ---
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  4. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  5. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  6. First reading, referred to State Government.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 98; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  10. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  11. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  12. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  13. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  14. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  15. APP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. APP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  17. Referred to Appropriations.

  18. SEIT - Majority; do pass.

  19. First reading, referred to State Government, Elections & Information Technology (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

  • Appleton · Cosponsor
  • Beth Doglio · Cosponsor
  • Hudgins · Primary
  • Koster · Cosponsor
  • Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
  • Kraft · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Hudgins

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (145)

145 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 145 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage (#2)

Passed 98 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 52000
Republican 14000
Democrat 32000
Total 98000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Yea
Lytton — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Blake — Yea
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Condotta — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Farrell — Yea
Hargrove — Yea
Johnson — Yea
Smith — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Koster — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1787?
HB 1787 is sponsored by Appleton, Beth Doglio (Democrat), Hudgins, Koster, Timm Ormsby (Democrat), and Kraft.
What is the current status of HB 1787?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1787?
Track HB 1787 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1787

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 1787

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →