Relating to: the regulation of nonferrous metallic mining, prospecting, exploration, and bulk sampling, rep...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 499 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 499.
You're tracking AB 499
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 499 — Relating to: the regulation of nonferrous metallic mining, prospecting, exploration, and bulk sampling, repealing administrative rules relating to wetlands, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation. (FE)
Last action — Published 12-12-2017
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 14, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
22 sponsors
22 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 13 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1023 added · 883 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Assembly Bill 499 includes several new sections and amendments to existing statutes that regulate nonferrous metallic mining and related activities. Notably, it repeals certain administrative rules regarding wetlands and gives the authority to establish new rules in this area. These changes matter because they could affect environmental protections and the procedures for mining operations, potentially impacting local ecosystems and communities.
CORRECTED COPY - 2018 LEGISLATURE LRB-4118/1LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED 2017 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SeptemberNovember 14,3, 2017 - IntroducedPrinted by Representativesdirection UTTONoENATE ,CHIEF KUL,CLERK. JARCHOW, RODRIGUEZ, H ORLACHER, Q UINN, M ACCO, SANFELIPPO, EDMING, K REMER, GANNON , TAUCHEN, D UCHOW, KLEEFISCH, SKOWRONSKI, W ICHGERS, KNODL, BERNIER, KOOYENGA, R.BROOKS, IMMERMAN and BRANDTJEN, cosponsored by Senators TIFFANY, FITZGERALD, DARLING, L EM AHIEU, MOULTON , FEYEN, STROEBEL, APENGA , ANGGAARD , RAIG, ASEE, NASSand VUKMIR.
Referred to Committee on Labor.
to amend 20.370 (2) (gh), 70.375 (2) (b), 70.375 (4) (h), 281.35 (5) (e), 283.84 (3m), 293.01 (9), 293.01 (18), 293.13 (2) (b) (intro.), 293.13 (2) (b) 4., 293.13 (2) (b) 7., 293.13 (2) (c) (intro.), 293.13 (2) (c) 7., 293.15 (8), 293.31 (title), 293.31 (1), 293.31 (2), 293.31 (3), 293.31 (4), 293.43 (1), 293.43 (1m) (b), 293.49 (1) (a) (intro.), 293.51 (title), 293.51 (3), 293.55 (1) (c), 293.55 (1) (d), 293.65 (3) (b) and 293.81;
and to create 293.01 (2m), 293.15 (7m), 293.26, 293.31 (4m), 293.32 (4), 293.37 (5), 293.40, 293.43 (2m), 293.43 (3m), 293.43 (4m), 293.49 (1) (a) 2m., 293.495, 293.51 (2m),(1g), 293.51 (1m), 293.51 (1r), 293.51 (5) and 293.66 of the statutes;
the regulation of nonferrous metallic mining, prospecting, exploration, and bulk sampling, - 2018 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 repealing administrative rules relating to wetlands, granting rule-making authority, and making an appropriation.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau ThisEngrossment billinformation: makes changes in the laws relating to the regulation and permitting of nonferrous metallic mineral prospecting and mining.
NonferrousThe metallictext -of 2018Engrossed Legislature2017 -Assembly 2Bill -499, LRB-4118/1as MCP:allpassed ASSEMBLYby BILLthe 499assembly mineralson areNovember metallic2, minerals2017, otherconsists thanof iron,the suchfollowing asdocuments copperadopted orin zinc.the assembly on November 2, 2017:
the bill as affected by Assembly Amendments 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9.
The text also includes the November 6, 2017, chief clerk's corrections to Assembly Amendments 1, 5, and 6 of 2017 Assembly Bill 499.
Content of Engrossed 2017 Assembly Bill 499:
This bill makes changes in the laws relating to the regulation and permitting of nonferrous metallic mineral prospecting and mining.
Nonferrous metallic minerals are metallic minerals other than iron, such as copper or zinc.
PPOINT OINT OF APPLICATION FOR GROUNDWATER STANDARDS This bill also makes changes to the locations at which groundwater standards may apply at nonferrous metallic mining and prospecting sites.
This bill requires DNR, for each mining or prospecting site, to determine the depth in the Precambrian bedrock below which the groundwater is not reasonably capable of being used for human consumption and is not hydrologically connected to LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 3 - MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 other sources of groundwater that are suitable for human consumption.
This bill repeals section NR 132.06 (4) of the LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 3 - MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 administrative code.
BBULK ULK SAMPLING This bill creates a separate process for engaging in bulk sampling for nonferrous metallic minerals.
The bill defines “bulk sampling” as excavating in a potential mining site by removing less than 10,000 tons of material, including overburden and any other material removed from any portion of the excavation site, to assess the quality and quantity of nonferrous metallic mineral deposits and to collect and analyze data to prepare an application for a mining permit or other approval.
The bill allowsrequires a person who intends to engageobtain ina bulk sampling tolicense fileand aany bulkother samplingpermit, planlicense, withor DNR.approval required by DNR before engaging in bulk sampling.
- 2018 Legislature - 4 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 Under the bill, a person who intends to engage in bulk sampling must file a bulk sampling plan with DNR.
The bill also requires a person who has submitted - 2018 Legislature - 4 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 a bulk sampling plan to submit all applications for approvals and all applications for waivers, exemptions, or exceptions to approvals for the bulk sampling at one time.
Under the bill, if there are any significant changes to the information provided in a bulk sampling plan submitted to DNR, the applicant must file a revised bulk sampling plan.
DNR must then provide the applicant with updated information regarding any approvals or modifications to existing approvals that DNR requires.
TheAfter billall providesof thatthe DNR is not required toapprovals prepareare anissued, environmentalDNR impactmust statementthen (EIS)issue forthe anapplicant approvala required for bulk sampling.sampling license.
Finally,The the bill requiresprovides that DNR tois actnot on any required constructionto siteprepare erosionan controlenvironmental orimpact stormstatement water(EIS) managementfor an approval required for bulk sampling,sampling evenor iffor DNR has authorized a localbulk programsampling tolicense. issue approvals for construction site erosion control or storm water management.
AThe PPLICATION,bill REVIEW,also ANDrequires PERMITTINGDNR PROCESSto Underact currenton law,any arequired personconstruction whosite proposeserosion tocontrol prospect or minestorm forwater nonferrousmanagement metallicapproval mineralsrequired mustfor obtainbulk asampling, prospectingeven orif miningLRB-4762/1 permit- and2018 anyLegislature other- permit,5 license,- certification,MCP:all orENGROSSED otherASSEMBLY authorizationBILL (approval)499 thatDNR ishas requiredauthorized undera thelocal environmentalprogram andto naturalissue resourcesapprovals laws, for exampleconstruction wastewatersite dischargeerosion permits,control highor capacitystorm wellwater approvals,management. and permits for discharges into wetlands.
Finally, the bill provides that DNR may revoke or suspend a bulk sampling license if it determines, after a hearing, that the license holder has failed to comply with any law, DNR rule, or license term, or has failed to increase the amount of any bond required for bulk sampling.
F INANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Under current law, an operator of a nonferrous mining or prospecting operation must file a bond, cash, certificates of deposit, or government securities with DNR to ensure that the operator will be able to cover the cost of the reclamation plan for the mining or prospecting site.
An operator must also maintain proof of financial responsibility for complying with the long-term care requirements of the mining or prospecting site after the site is closed.
Under rules promulgated by DNR, an applicant for a nonferrous metallic mining permit must also create and maintain an irrevocable trust in perpetuity to ensure the availability of funds for preventative and remedial activities, such as responding to a spill of a hazardous substance at the mining site.
This bill limits the forms of proof of financial responsibility for long-term care that DNR may require to a bond, cash, certificates of deposit, government securities, or insurance.
The bill provides that DNR may not require an operator to provide a form of financial assurance other than those listed in the statutes.
The bill also requires two additional forms of financial assurance from the operator of a mine.
First, before beginning to mine, the operator must file with DNR a bond, cash, certificate of deposit, or government security to cover unforeseen remedial contingencies that are not otherwise covered by the bonds or other security for remediation and long-term care.
The bond or other security for remedial contingencies must be 10 percent of the total amount of the bonds or other security for remediation and long-term care, and must be released no later than 40 years after the operator stops extracting material from the mining site.
Second, at the time of closure of the mining waste site, the operator must provide DNR with proof of financial responsibility in an amount equal to the reasonably anticipated costs, for the period running from 40 to 250 years after closure of the mining waste site, to repair or replace any engineered cover systems or tailings water management control systems.
The proof of financial responsibility must be in the form of an interest-bearing security or account.
At the time that the mining permit is approved, DNR must determine the amount of the proof of financial responsibility to be provided and identify the reasonably anticipated costs that the amount is intended to cover.
The operator may use these funds to cover any identified anticipated cost.
DNR must release any remaining funds to the operator after all of the identified anticipated costs are incurred or after determining that the identified anticipated costs are no longer applicable.
A PPLICATION, REVIEW, AND PERMITTING PROCESS Under current law, a person who proposes to prospect or mine for nonferrous metallic minerals must obtain a prospecting or mining permit and any other permit, license, certification, or other authorization (approval) that is required under the - 2018 Legislature - 6 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 environmental and natural resources laws, for example wastewater discharge permits, high capacity well approvals, and permits for discharges into wetlands.
Show all 228 changed lines (188 more)
The bill requires DNR, upon LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 5 - MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 the request of a person who intends to file a notice of intent to apply, to review the person's proposed methodology for collecting data, and to either approve the proposed methodology or provide the methodology that DNR requires to be used.
This bill provides that, if DNR requires an applicant for a nonferrous metallic mining permit to conduct modeling to determine whether the proposed mining operation's waste site complies with groundwater or surface water quality LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 7 - MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 standards, DNR may not require the applicant to examine a period longer than the proposed operating period of the waste site plus 250 years.
ApplicationReview processtimeline —This financialbill assurancecreates requirementa Undertimeline currentfor law,DNR to review an operatorapplication offor a nonferrous mining or prospecting operation must file a bond, cash, certificates of deposit, or governmentmining securitiespermit, withrequest DNRadditional toinformation ensurefrom that the operatorapplicant, willand beprepare ablea todraft coverenvironmental theimpact coststatement, ofa thedraft reclamationprospecting planor formining thepermit, miningand orother prospectingdraft site.approvals.
An operator must also submit a certificate of insurance certifying that the operator has a liability insurance policy in place that adequately covers personal injury and property damage and must maintain proof of financial responsibility for complying with the long-term care requirements of the mining or prospecting site after the site is closed.
Under rules promulgated by DNR, an applicant for a nonferrous metallic mining permit must also create and maintain an irrevocable trust in perpetuity to ensure the availability of funds for preventative and remedial activities, such as responding to a spill of a hazardous substance at the mining site.
This bill limits the forms of proof of financial responsibility for long-term care that DNR may require to a bond, cash, certificates of deposit, government securities, or insurance.
The bill provides that DNR may not require an operator to provide a form of financial assurance other than those listed in the statutes.
- 2018 Legislature - 6 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 Review timeline This bill creates a timeline for DNR to review an application for a prospecting or mining permit, request additional information from the applicant, and prepare a draft environmental impact statement, a draft prospecting or mining permit, and other draft approvals.
Hearing and review process Under current law, DNR holds a public informational hearing on DNR's draft EIS, after which DNR prepares a final EIS.
DNR then conducts a master hearing on the final EIS, the draft mining or prospecting permits that DNR has prepared, and - 2018 Legislature - 8 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 all other approvals that are required for the prospecting or mining project, to the extent possible.
Under current law, the provisions related to notice, hearing, and LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 7 - MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 comment in the nonferrous metallic mining law apply to any other needed approval, unless the applicant fails to apply for an approval in time for it to be considered at the master hearing.
Under current law, anyDNR personmust whoissue isa aggrievedmining bypermit awithin DNR90 decisiondays relatingafter tocompletion nonferrousof metallicthe exploration,public prospecting,hearing orrecord miningif mayit requestmakes ancertain administrativedeterminations, contestedincluding casethat hearing,the unlessproposed theoperation matterwill wascomply heardwith atall applicable air, groundwater, surface water, and solid and hazardous waste management laws and DNR rules and that the masterproposed hearing.mine will not endanger public health, safety, or welfare.
Under the bill, DNR must also issue a mining permit during this 90-day timeline if it finds that the technology that will be used at the proposed operation is capable of resulting in compliance with all applicable air, groundwater, surface water, and solid and hazardous waste management law and DNR rules and is reasonably certain to result in compliance with these laws and rules at the proposed mining site.
Review process Under current law, any person who is aggrieved by a DNR decision relating to nonferrous metallic exploration, prospecting, or mining may request an administrative contested case hearing, unless the matter was heard at the master hearing.
A person seeking such a contested case hearing must request the hearing within 3060 days after DNR issues the decision to approve or deny the mining LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 9 - MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 or prospecting permit.
TheUnder hearingthe examinerbill, maya notperson issueseeking anjudicial orderreview prohibitingof ana activitydecision thatin issuch authorizeda bycontested thecase DNRhearing decisionmust beingbring reviewedthe inaction thewithin contesteddays caseof hearing.the decision.
Under the bill, a person seeking judicial review of a decision in such a contested case hearing must bring the action within 30 days of the decision.
Under the bill, a person seeking judicial review of a decision in a contested case hearing or of any DNR decision relating to nonferrous metallic mining, prospecting, exploration, or bulk sampling must bring the action in the court for the county in which the majority of - 2018 Legislature - 8 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 the mining or prospecting site is located or in which the majority of the exploration or bulk sampling will occur.
FEESF EES This bill exempts nonferrous metallic mining from certain solid waste disposal fees that are required under current law.
ForN furtherET informationPROCEEDS seeTAX Under the statebill, for purposes of imposing and localcollecting fiscalthe estimate,net whichproceeds willtax beon printedmining, asthe ansecretary appendixof the Department of Revenue may adjust the allocation of gross revenue, deductions, allowances, or credits between or among organizations owned or controlled by the same interests, if the secretary determines that the adjustment is necessary in order to thisprevent bill.evasion of the tax or to clearly reflect the income of any such organizations.
Under current law, the secretary of DOR may make the same determination and adjustment with regard to the imposition and collection of income and franchise taxes.
The amounts in the schedule for the administration, regulation, and enforcement of nonferrous metallic mining exploration, bulk sampling, prospecting, mining and - 2018 Legislature - 10 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 1 mine reclamation activities under ch.
SSECTION ECTION1n. 2.
70.375 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
70.375(2) (b) The secretary may promulgate any rules necessary to implement the tax under ss.
70.37 to 70.39 and 70.395 (1e).
In respect to mines not in operation on November 28, 1981, ss.
71.10 (1), 71.30 (1) and (2), 71.74 (2), (3), (9), (11) and (15), 71.77, 71.78, 71.80 (6), 71.83 (1) (a) 1.
and 2.
and (b) 2.
and (2) (a) 3.
and (b) 1.
and 71.85 (2) apply to the administration of this section.
SECTION 2.
SSECTION ECTION 3.
SSECTION ECTION 4.
227.42 (4), anyyany Any person who receives notice of a denial or modification requirement under par.
(c) is LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 9 - MCP:all SECTION 4 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 entitled to a contested case hearing under ch.
293.01 (2m) “Bulk sampling” means excavating in a potential mining site by removing less than 10,000 tons of material, including overburden and any other LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 11 - MCP:all SECTION 6 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 material removed from any portion of the excavation site, for the purposes of obtaining site-specific data to assess the quality and quantity of the nonferrous metallic mineral deposits and of collecting data from and analyzing the excavated materials in order to prepare the application for a mining permit or for any other approval.
293.01(18) “Prospecting" means engaging in the examination of an area for the purpose of determining the quality and quantity of nonferrous metallic minerals, other than for exploration or bulk samplingbut including the obtaining of a nonferrous metallic mineral sample, by such physical means as excavating, - 2018 Legislature - 10 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 8 trenching, construction of shafts, ramps and tunnels and other means, other than for exploration or bulk sampli,sampling, which the department, by rule, identifies, and the production of prospecting refuse and other associated activities.
However, the fact that prospecting activities and construction may have use ultimately in mining, if approved, shall not mean that prospecting activities and construction - 2018 Legislature - 12 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 8 constitute mining within the meaning of sub.
Revegetation to stabilize disturbed soils and prevent air and water pollution, with the objective of reestablishing a variety of populations of plants LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 11 - MCP:all S ECTION 13 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 and animals indigenous to the area immediately prior to exploration, bulk sampling, prospecting, or mining.
293.15 (7m) Issue licenses and approvals necessary for bulk sampling.
293.15 (8) Promulgate rules regulating the production, storage and disposal of radioactive waste from exploration, bulk sampling,sampling,ecting, prospecting, or mining after LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 13 - MCP:all S ECTION 15 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 seeking comments from the department of health services.
293.26 Bulk samplingsampling. plan.
(1) AIn personthis whosection, intends“approval” tomeans engageany inpermit, bulklicense, samplingcertification, maycontract, fileor aother bulkauthorization samplingthat planthe withdepartment issues, or any other action by the department.department, that is required to engage in bulk sampling.
(1m) No person may engage in bulk sampling except as provided in a bulk sampling license issued by the department under sub.
(4) or (14m) and any approval required by the department to engage in bulk sampling identified under sub.
(4) or sub.
(4m).
A person who intends to engage in bulk sampling shall file a bulk sampling plan with the department.
- 2018 Legislature - 12 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (b) A description of the methods to be used for the bulk sampling.
- 2018 Legislature - 14 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (c) A site-specific plan for controlling surface erosion that conforms to requirements under ss.
134.90 (1) (c), and any information relating to the location, quality, or quantity of LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 13 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 a nonferrous metallic mineral deposit, to production or sales figures, or to processes LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 15 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 or production unique to the applicant or that would tend to adversely affect the competitive position of the applicant if made public.
(4) Within 14 days of receipt of a bulkcomplete sampling plan, the department shall identify for the applicant, in writing, all approvals that are required before the bulk sampling mayplan beunder implemented,sub. any waivers, exemptions, or exceptions to those approvals that are potentially available, and any information that the department needs to issue the approvals or to issue a decision on any waiver, exemption, or exception.
If(2), nothe department shall identify for the applicant, in writing, all approvals that are required,required before the departmentbulk shallsampling notifymay thebe applicantimplemented, thatany nowaivers, exemptions, or exceptions to those approvals that are requiredpotentially available, and any information that the applicantdepartment mayneeds proceedto withissue the bulkapprovals sampling.or to issue a decision on any waiver, exemption, or exception.
(5) If no approvals are required, the department shall notify the applicant that no approvals are required and issue a stormbulk watersampling dischargelicense permitto underthe s.applicant.
(4m) An applicant shall file a revised bulk sampling plan if there are any significant changes to the information provided in the previous bulk sampling plan under sub.
(2).
(a) If the revised bulk sampling plan is filed before the department approves or denies any waiver, exemption, or exception under sub.
(12), issues any approval under sub.
(13) or (14), or issues a bulk sampling license under sub.
(14m), within 14 days of receiving the revised bulk sampling plan, the department shall notify the applicant, in writing, of any changes to the information provided to the applicant under sub.
(4).
(b) If the revised bulk sampling plan is filed after the department approves or denies any waiver, exemption, or exception under sub.
(12), issues any approval under sub.
(13) or (14), or issues a bulk sampling license under sub.
(14m), within 14 days of receiving the revised bulk sampling plan, the department shall identify for the applicant, in writing, any modifications to existing approvals or additional approvals that the department requires.
- 2018 Legislature - 16 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (5) If a storm water discharge permit under s.
(4).(4) or (4m) (a).
(4).(4) or (4m) (a).
(4).(4) or (4m) (a).
- 2018 Legislature - 14 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (d) A bond, as provided in sub.
(4),(4) or (4m), the application for any approval, for a waiver, exemption, or exception to an approval, or for a determination that the proposed bulk sampling activity is below the threshold that requires an approval, is considered to be complete on the 30th day after the department receives the application, unless, before that day, the department provides the applicant with written notification that the application is not complete, stating the reason for the determination and describing the specific information necessary to make the application complete.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 17 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (b) If the department provides a notice under par.
LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 15 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (b) If the surety for a bond submitted under par.
- 2018 Legislature - 18 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (d) The department may require that the amount of the bond submitted under this subsection be increased at any time, if the department determines that it is unlikely that the bond would be adequate to fund the cost to this state of completing the revegetation plan.
(4),(4) or (4m), the department shall require the bulk sampling activity for which the approval is issued to be conducted at locations that result in the fewest overall adverse environmental impacts.
- 2018 Legislature - 16 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 16 (11) (a) In determining whether to approve or deny an application for an approval identified under sub.
(4),(4) or (4m), the department shall consider the site-specific erosion control plan, the revegetation plan, and any wetland mitigation program.
(4) or (4m) in order to meet the requirements applicable to the approval, and, as modified, approve the application.
(4),(4) or (4m), the department shall approve or deny an application within 30 days after the day on which the application is considered to be complete under sub.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 19 - MCP:all S ECTION 16 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (a) The application is for a waiver, exemption, or exception to an approval for a bulk sampling activity or for a determination that the proposed bulk sampling activity is below the threshold that requires an approval.
(4),(4) or (4m), the department shall approve or deny any application for an approval identified under sub.
(4) or (4m) to which sub.
LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 17 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (b) The department shall publish a class 1 notice, under ch.
The department shall - 2018 Legislature - 20 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 send the notice to any person to whom the department is required to give notice of any proposed determination, application, or hearing concerning an approval described in par.
- 2018 Legislature - 18 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 16 (e) The department shall hold a public informational hearing within 30 days after the date of the publication of the notice under par.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 21 - MCP:all SECTION 16 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (14) (a) If it is not possible to coordinate the public comment period and public informational hearing for an approval that is an individual permit for which federal law requires the opportunity for public comment or the ability to request a public hearing prior to issuance of the approval with the public comment period and public informational hearing under sub.
(14m) Upon issuing all of the approvals required by the department to engage in bulk sampling under subs.
(13) and (14), the department shall issue the applicant a bulk sampling license.
(4) or (4m) or a bulk sampling license is issued upon mailing and is final and effective upon issuance.
LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 19 - MCP:all S ECTION 16 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 (16) The department is not required to prepare an environmental impact statement or an environmental assessment for a bulk sampling license or for an approval required for bulk sampling.
SECTION(17) 17.The department may revoke or suspend a bulk sampling license issued under this section if it determines, after a hearing, that the license holder has failed to comply with statutes or rules of the department or with the terms of the license, or has failed to increase bond amounts to adequate levels as specified by the department.
- 2018 Legislature - 22 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 17 SECTION 17.
Specific environmental data which would be pertinent to a specific prospecting or mining application, but which was obtained or collected or generated prior to the notice of intent to apply for a prospecting or mining permit, shall be - 2018 Legislature - 20 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 18 submitted in writing to the department together with any substantiating background information which would assist the department in establishing the validity of the data.
The department shall review the data and, if it concludes that LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 23 - MCP:all S ECTION 18 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 the benefits of permitting the admission of the data outweigh the policy reasons for excluding it, and if the data is otherwise admissible, inform the person giving the notice of intent to prospect or mine that the data will be accepted by the department.
If the LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 21 - MCP:all SECTION 20 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 department holds a public informational hearing to receive comments from interested persons under this section, the hearing shall be completed within 45 days after public notice is given under sub.
S- ECTION2018 Legislature - 24 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 21 SECTION 21.
293.31 (4) AfterNoAfter No later than 90 days after the receipt period for receiving and consideration of considering comments from interested persons under sub.
(3), the department shall inform the person giving notice of intent to apply for a prospecting or mining permit of the type and quantity of information that it then believes to be needed to support an application,,application, and, where applicable, the methodology to be used in gathering information.
The department shall also begin informing inform the person giving notice of intent to apply for a prospecting or mining permit as totheto of the timely application date and other filing requirements for all other approvals, licenses, and permits, so as to facilitate the consideration of all other matters at the hearing on the prospecting or mining permit relating to the proposed prospecting or mining project.
SSECTION ECTION 22.
army corps of engineers, and any other federal regulatory agency - 2018 Legislature - 22 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 22 with responsibilities related to the potential prospecting or mining operation to address sampling methodology and any other issue of mutual concern related to processing an application for a prospecting or mining permit.
The memorandum LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 25 - MCP:all S ECTION 22 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 may include an agreement between the department and the applicant relating to timelines, including timelines for the parties to conduct environmental studies and for granting or denying the prospecting or mining permit.
(4) and (5), within 180 days after an applicant submits an application for a prospecting or mining permit, an environmental impact report, if required, and any applications for other approvals, licenses, or permits relating to the prospecting or mining operation the department LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 23 - MCP:all SECTION 25 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 shall review the information submitted and, if necessary, provide comments to the applicant and request additional information from the applicant relating to the proposed prospecting or mining project.
- 2018 Legislature - 26 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 25 (2) Subject to subs.
(2) the secretary of the department determines that the applicant has made a substantial modification to the mining or prospecting plan that significantly changes the information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement or adequately review an application, the department shall notify the applicant of the - 2018 Legislature - 24 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 25 secretary's determination and request additional information from the applicant.
(1).A(1). determination by the secretary under this subsection is not subject to administrative or judicial review and may be made only once during an applicant's permitting process.
A LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 27 - MCP:all SECTION 25 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 determination by the secretary under this subsection is not subject to administrative or judicial review and may be made only once during an applicant's permitting process.
SSECTION ECTION 26.
293.43 (1) APPLICABILITYThisPPLICABILITYThis section, and ch.
SSECTION ECTION 27.
If an applicant fails to make application for an approval, license or permit for an activity incidental to prospecting or mining LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 25 - MCP:all SECTION 27 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 in time for notice under this section to be provided, the notice and comment requirements, if any, shall be controlled by the specific statutory provisions with respect to that application.
If notice under those specific statutory notice - 2018 Legislature - 28 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 27 requirements can be given for consideration of the approval, license or permit at the hearing under this section, the application shall be considered at that hearing;
The substantive requirements for the issuance of any approval, permit,permit,r or license incidental to prospecting or mining are not affected by the fact that a hearing on the approval, permit,icense is conducted as part of a hearing under this section.
- 2018 Legislature - 26 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 29 3.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 29 - MCP:all SECTION 29 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 5.
LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 27 - MCP:all SECTION 29 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 4.
- 2018 Legislature - 30 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 29 5.
- 2018 Legislature - 28 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 29 11.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 31 - MCP:all S ECTION 29 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 13.
The department shall hold a single public informational hearing covering the draft prospecting or mining permit, all other draft approvals, and the draft environmental impact statement, except that if an application for an approval is filed too late to allow the application to be considered at the public informational hearing for the prospecting or mining permit, the department shall hold a separate public LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 29 - MCP:all S ECTION 31 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 informational hearing on the draft approval in the county where the majority of the proposed prospecting or mining site is located not less than 30 days after the date of the publication of a separate notice under sub.
The department shall publish the separate notice for the approval on its Internet site not - 2018 Legislature - 32 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 31 more than 10 days after the application is considered to be complete, which is the 30th day after the department receives the application unless, before that day, the department requests additional information, in which case the application is considered to be complete when the applicant provides the information.
SECTION 35m.
293.49 (1) (a) 2m.
of the statutes is created to read:
293.49 (1) (a) 2m.
The technology that will be used at the proposed operation is capable of resulting in compliance with all applicable air, groundwater, surface water, and solid and hazardous waste management laws and rules of the department and is reasonably certain to result in compliance with these laws and rules at the proposed mining site.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 33 - MCP:all SECTION 36 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 293.495 Subsequently filed applications for other approvals.
For purposes of this subsection, an application for an approval other than a mining or prospecting permit is considered to be complete on the 30th day after the - 2018 Legislature - 30 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 36 department receives the application unless, before that day, the department requests additional information, in which case the application is considered to be complete when the applicant provides the information.
293.43 (3m) but before the department issues the decision to grant or deny the application for the mining or prospecting permit, the department shall approve the application and issue the approval, or deny the application, after the - 2018 Legislature - 34 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 36 separate public informational hearing for the approval required under s.
LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 31 - MCP:all SECTION 36 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 2.
281.343 (7r) and except that if a LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 35 - MCP:all S ECTION 36 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 withdrawal of surface water or groundwater is subject to regional review or council approval under s.
- 2018 Legislature - 32 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 37 SECTION 37.
293.51 (title) Bonds and other securit.security.
293.51 (2m)(1g) of the statutes is created to read:
293.51 (2m)(1g) An operator shall maintain proof of financial responsibility ensuring the availability of funds for compliance with the long-term care requirements specified in the waste site feasibility study and plan of operation consistent with the requirements under s.
SECTION 40.39k.
293.51 (1m) of the statutes is created to read:
293.51(1m) Upon notification that an application for a mining permit has been approved by the department but prior to commencing mining, the operator shall file with the department a bond issued by a surety company licensed to do business in this state, cash, certificates of deposit, or government security, to cover unforeseen remedial contingencies not otherwise covered by the bonds or other security required under sub.
(1) or (1g), including for the provision of a replacement water supply if required under s.
293.65 (4) (d).
The amount of the bond or other security required shall be 10 percent of the total amount of the bonds or other security required under subs.
(1) and (1g).
The operator shall increase, and may decrease, the amount of the bond under this subsection according to any increase or decrease in the amount of the bonds or other security required under subs.
(1) or (1g) until the operator ceases - 2018 Legislature - 36 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 39k to extract material from the mining site, at which point the amount of the bond under this subsection shall remain the same until released by the department.
The bond or other security under this subsection shall be released no later than 40 years after the operator ceases to extract material from the mining site.
SECTION 39m.
293.51 (1r) of the statutes is created to read:
293.51 (1r) At the time of closure of the mining waste site, the operator shall provide proof of financial responsibility to the department in an amount equal to the reasonably anticipated costs during the period between 40 and 250 years after closure of the mining waste site to repair or replace any engineered cover systems or tailings water management control systems used at the mining site or mining waste site to avoid adverse environmental consequences.
At the time that the application for a mining permit is approved, the department shall determine the amount to be paid at the time of closure based on the net present value discounted at a rate of at least 5 percent per year, and identify the reasonably anticipated costs that the amount is intended to cover.
The operator shall provide the proof of financial responsibility in the form of a cash deposit, which the department shall segregate and invest in an interest-bearing account;
certificates of deposit, government securities, or other interest-bearing forms of security;
or proof of establishment of an interest-bearing account, including an escrow account or trust account.
The operator or any successor in interest may use the funds or request the department release the funds to cover any reasonably anticipated costs that were identified by the department.
The department shall release any remaining funds to the operator or the operator's successor in interest after all of the reasonably anticipated costs that were identified by the department have been incurred, or upon determining that the reasonably anticipated costs are no longer applicable.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 37 - MCP:all S ECTION 40 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 40.
(1)(1), (1g), (1m), and (2m),(1r), mining application, and certificate of insurance, the department shall issue written authorization to commence mining at the permitted mining site in accordance with the approved mining and reclamation plans.
The department shall provide notice of any modification which involves an increase or decrease in the area of a mining site or a substantial LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 33 - MCP:all S ECTION 43 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 change in the mining or reclamation plan in the same manner as an original application for a mining permit under s.
No withdrawal of groundwater for prospecting or mining purposes or the dewatering of - 2018 Legislature - 38 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 44 mines may be made to the unreasonable detriment of public or private water supplies or the unreasonable detriment of public rights in the waters of the state.
281.34 provide a replacement water supply of similar quality, provide an increased amount of water to the water supply, or temporarily augment the quantity of water in, or flowing into or from, the affected waters of the state that is of substantially similar quality and that has substantially similar characteristics - 2018 Legislature - 34 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 44 to the water that was in the affected waters of the state before any proposed mining or prospecting activity began.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 39 - MCP:all S ECTION 45 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 The department shall notify the applicant of its determination before the department issues a draft environmental impact statement.
Any person who engages in exploration without a license or bulk sampling without the necessary license or approvals shall forfeit not less than $100 nor more than $1,000 for each parcel as defined under s.
293.21 (1) (b) on which unlicensed exploration or bulk sampling without the necessary approvalsoklicense or approvals took place.
293.51 (3) shall forfeit all profits obtained from such illegal activities and not more than $10,000 for each day during which the mine was LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 35 - MCP:all SECTION 46 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 in operation.
Each day's violation of this section shall be deemed a separate offense.offense.If the violator is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership or association, any officer, director, member, manager or partner who knowingly authorizes, supervises or contracts for exploration, bulk sampling, prospecting, or mining shall also be subject to the penalties of this section.
IfSECTION the47. violator is a corporation, limited liability company, partnership or association, any officer, director, member, manager or partner who knowingly authorizes, supervises or contracts for exploration, bulk sampling, prospecting, or mining shall also be subject to the penalties of this section.
S ECTION 47.
- 2018 Legislature - 40 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 47 293.95 Review.
(1) LLIMITS IMITS ON CONTESTED CASE HEARINGSNo person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department on an exploration license or relating to bulk sampling.
(2) CCONTESTED ONTESTED CASE HEARINGS;
AFTER INITIAL MINING OR PROSPECTING PERMIT DECISION OR DECISION ON AMENDED PLAN(a)PLAN.(a) Entitlement.
- 2018 Legislature - 36 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 S ECTION 47 2.
227.42 and the person requests the hearing within 3060 days after the department issues the decision to approve or deny the amended LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 41 - MCP:all SECTION 47 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 mining plan, reclamation plan, or mining waste site feasibility study and plan of operation.
(c) Restriction on orders.
The hearing examiner presiding over a contested case hearing under this subsection may not issue an order prohibiting activity authorized under a decision of the department that is being reviewed in the contested case hearing.
227.53 (1) (a) and shall commence the action, in the circuit court for the county in which the majority of the proposed mining or prospecting site LRB-4118/1 - 2018 Legislature - 37 - MCP:all S ECTION 47 ASSEMBLY BILL 499 is located, no more than 30 days after service of the decision or, if the hearing examiner does not issue a final decision by the deadline under par.
(3) C ONTESTED CASE HEARINGS ON OTHER DECISIONSADECISIONS. person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department related to a mining or prospecting operation that is issued after the department issues the decision to approve the application for the mining or prospecting permit for the mining or prospecting operation, other than a decision described in sub.
A person is entitled to a contested case hearing on a decision by the department related to a mining or prospecting operation that is issued after the department issues the decision to approve the application for the mining or prospecting permit for the mining or prospecting operation, other than a decision described in sub.
- 2018 Legislature - 42 - LRB-4762/1 MCP:all ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 47 (4) VENUE.
(2) or (3) or of any decision of the department underrelated thisto subchapteran exploration, bulk sampling, mining, or prospecting operation shall bring the action in the circuit court for the county in which the majority of the mining or prospecting site is located or in which the majority of the exploration or bulk sampling will occur.
In the event of a power failure, tailing pipelines should be self draining to the tailings area or to an emergency spill area or - 2018 Legislature - 38 - LRB-4118/1 MCP:all ASSEMBLY BILL 499 SECTION 49 standby pumps and pipelines or standby power should be provided.
LRB-4762/1 - 2018 Legislature - 43 - MCP:all SECTION 53 ENGROSSED ASSEMBLY BILL 499 NR 182.08 (2) (d) 8.
NR 182.07 (1)portant(1. aquatic habitat, such as class II trout stream or state scenic river, shall be indicated.
SECTIONImportant 54.0Effectiveaquatic date.habitat, such as class II trout stream or state scenic river, shall be indicated.
(1)SECTION Notwithstanding54.Effective sectiondate. 227.265 of the statutes, this act takes effect on the day after publication.
(1) Notwithstanding section 227.265 of the statutes, this act takes effect on the first day of the 7th month beginning after publication.
Show all 228 changed rows (188 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Bill Text Engrossed pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Action History
-
Published 12-12-2017
-
Report approved by the Governor on 12-11-2017. 2017 Wisconsin Act 134
-
Presented to the Governor on 12-7-2017
-
Report correctly enrolled on 11-27-2017
-
Received from Senate concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 19, Noes 14
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 6)
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 5)
-
LRB correction (Assembly Amendment 1)
-
Printed engrossed by the direction of the Senate Chief Clerk-4762
-
Placed on calendar 11-7-2017 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Public hearing requirement waived by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 18 (1m), Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Withdrawn from joint committee on Finance and made Available for Scheduling by committee on Senate Organization, pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Referred to joint committee on Finance by Committee on Senate Organization pursuant to Senate Rule 41 (1)(e), Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Available for scheduling
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Senate Organization
-
Received from Assembly
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed, Ayes 53, Noes 38, Paired 6
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Assembly Amendment 9 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 9 offered by Representative Spiros
-
Assembly Amendment 8 laid on table, Ayes 57, Noes 35
-
Assembly Amendment 8 offered by Representatives Sinicki, Shankland, Anderson, Hesselbein, Kolste, Ohnstad, C. Taylor, Vruwink, Sargent, Subeck, Doyle and Hebl
-
Assembly Amendment 7 withdrawn and returned to author
-
Assembly Amendment 7 offered by Representative Spiros
-
Assembly Amendment 6 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 5 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 4 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 3 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 2 adopted
-
Assembly Amendment 1 adopted
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 11-2-2017 by Committee on Rules
-
Referred to committee on Rules
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 6 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 5 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 4 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 3 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Report Assembly Amendment 1 adoption recommended by Committee on Labor, Ayes 6, Noes 3
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Assembly Amendment 6 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Assembly Amendment 5 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Assembly Amendment 4 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Assembly Amendment 3 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Hutton
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Labor
-
Introduced by Representatives Hutton, Kulp, Jarchow, Rodriguez, Horlacher, Quinn, Macco, Sanfelippo, Edming, Kremer, Gannon, Tauchen, Duchow, Kleefisch, Skowronski, Wichgers, Knodl, Bernier, Kooyenga, R. Brooks, Zimmerman and Brandtjen; cosponsored by Senators Tiffany, Fitzgerald, Darling, LeMahieu, Moulton, Feyen, Stroebel, Kapenga, Wanggaard, Craig, Lasee, Nass and Vukmir
Sponsors
- Kleefisch · Primary
- Rob Hutton · Primary
- Sanfelippo · Primary
- Brandtjen · Primary
- Kremer · Primary
- Skowronski · Primary
- Jarchow · Primary
- Macco · Primary
- Horlacher · Primary
- Cindi Duchow · Primary
- Gannon · Primary
- Romaine Quinn · Primary
- Kulp · Primary
- Daniel Knodl · Primary
- Kooyenga · Primary
- Shannon Zimmerman · Primary
- Jessie Rodriguez · Primary
- Chuck Wichgers · Primary
- Edming · Primary
- Tauchen · Primary
- Bernier · Primary
- Robert Brooks · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →22 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (22)
- Kleefisch
- Hutton, Rob Republican
- Sanfelippo
- Brandtjen
- Kremer
- Skowronski
- Jarchow
- Macco
- Horlacher
- Duchow, Cindi Republican
- Gannon
- Quinn, Romaine Republican
- Kulp
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
- Kooyenga
- Zimmerman, Shannon Republican
- Rodriguez, Jessie Republican
- Wichgers, Chuck Republican
- Edming
- Tauchen
- Bernier
- Brooks, Robert Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 26 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 53 | 38 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALLWEG | — | Yea |
| BARCA | — | Nay |
| BERCEAU | — | Nay |
| BERNIER | — | Yea |
| BOWEN | — | Nay |
| BRANDTJEN | — | Yea |
| BROSTOFF | — | Nay |
| CONSIDINE | — | Nay |
| CROWLEY | — | Nay |
| EDMING | — | Yea |
| FIELDS | — | Nay |
| GENRICH | — | Nay |
| GOYKE | — | Nay |
| HEBL | — | Nay |
| HINTZ | — | Nay |
| HORLACHER | — | Yea |
| JARCHOW | — | Yea |
| KATSMA | — | Yea |
| KERKMAN | — | Yea |
| KESSLER | — | Nay |
| KLEEFISCH | — | Yea |
| KOLSTE | — | Nay |
| KREMER | — | Yea |
| KUGLITSCH | — | Yea |
| KULP | — | Yea |
| LOUDENBECK | — | Yea |
| MACCO | — | Yea |
| MASON | — | Nay |
| MEYERS | — | Nay |
| MILROY | — | Nay |
| NERISON | — | Yea |
| NYGREN | — | Yea |
| OHNSTAD | — | Nay |
| OTT | — | Yea |
| PETRYK | — | Yea |
| POPE | — | Nay |
| RIEMER | — | Nay |
| RIPP | — | Yea |
| ROHRKASTE | — | Yea |
| SARGENT | — | Nay |
| SCHRAA | — | Yea |
| SHANKLAND | — | Nay |
| SKOWRONSKI | — | Yea |
| STEINEKE | — | Yea |
| STUCK | — | Nay |
| TAUCHEN | — | Yea |
| THIESFELDT | — | Yea |
| VRUWINK | — | Nay |
| WACHS | — | Nay |
| WEATHERSTON | — | Yea |
| YOUNG | — | Nay |
| ZAMARRIPA | — | Nay |
| ZEPNICK | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Hesselbein, Dianne | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Spreitzer, Mark | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Felzkowski, Mary | Republican | Yea |
| Hutton, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Jacque, André | Republican | Yea |
| Jagler, John | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Nay |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Nay |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Quinn, Romaine | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Nay |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Stafsholt, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Nay |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 499?
- AB 499 is sponsored by Kleefisch, Hutton, Rob (Republican), Sanfelippo, Brandtjen, Kremer, Skowronski, Jarchow, Macco, Horlacher, Duchow, Cindi (Republican), Gannon, Quinn, Romaine (Republican), Kulp, Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kooyenga, Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), Rodriguez, Jessie (Republican), Wichgers, Chuck (Republican), Edming, Tauchen, Bernier, and Brooks, Robert (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 499?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced September 14, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 499?
- Track AB 499 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 499
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 499
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →