Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

SB 6034 — Authorizing limited retail telecommunications services for public utility districts that provide only sewer, water, and telecommunications on the effective date of this act.

Last action — Effective date 6/7/2018.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 20, 2017. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    1 primary, 6 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Senate Bill 6034 allows public utility districts that offer water, sewer, and telecommunications services to provide retail internet services more easily. It simplifies the process for districts to respond to community requests for improved internet services by only requiring a petition from local residents, rather than needing existing providers to completely cease their services first. This change is important because it aims to address inadequate internet service in areas that may not have sufficient coverage, allowing residents to gain better connectivity options more swiftly.

→
Previous
Latest
S-4413.1SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6034State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Energy, Environment & Technology (originally sponsored by Senators Rolfes, Sheldon, Angel, Hunt, Chase, Kuderer, and Hasegawa)READ FIRST TIME 02/02/18.AN ACT Relating to authorizing limited retail telecommunications services for public utility districts that provide only sewer, water, and telecommunications on the effective date of this act;
S-3236.4SENATE BILL 6034State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Rolfes, Sheldon, Angel, Hunt, Chase, Kuderer, and HasegawaPrefiled 12/20/17.
adding a new section to chapter 54.16 RCW;
Read first time 01/08/18.
and adding a new section to chapter 34.12 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 54.16 RCW to read as follows:(1) The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(a) "Broadband" means networks of deployed telecommunications equipment and technologies necessary to provide high-speed internet access and other advanced telecommunications services.(b) "Inadequate" means internet retail service that does not meet one hundred percent of the standards detailed in the service level agreement.(c) "Partnership payment structure" means a group of or individual property owners who agree to pay a term payment structure for infrastructure improvements to their property.(d) "Petition" means a formal written request for retail internet service by property owners on the public utility district broadband network.(e) "Service level agreement" means a standard agreement, adopted during an open public meeting, between the retail internet service provider and the public utility that describes the required percentage of broadband download and upload speed and system availability, customer service, and transmission time.(2) Any public utility district that, as of the effective date of this section, provides only water, sewer, and wholesale telecommunications services in a county with an area less than five hundred square miles and is located west of the Puget Sound may provide end-user internet services to end users on the public utility district's broadband network located within the public utility district boundaries only when all of the existing providers of end-user internet service on the public utility district's broadband network cease to provide end-user service or provide inadequate end-user service as determined in the manner prescribed by this section.(3) Upon receiving a petition meeting the requirements of subsection (4) of this section, a public utility district board of commissioners may hold up to three meetings to:(a) Verify the signature or signatures of the property owners on the petition and certify the petition;(b) Determine and submit findings that the retail internet service available to the petitioners served by the public utility district's broadband network is either nonexistent or inadequate as defined in the service level agreement adopted by the commissioners for all existing internet service providers on the public utility district's broadband network;
Referred to Committee on Energy, Environment & Technology.AN ACT Relating to authorizing limited retail telecommunications services for public utility districts that provide only sewer, water, and telecommunications on the effective date of this act;
and(c) By resolution, authorize the public utility district to provide retail internet service to end users on the public utility district's broadband network.(4) A petition meets the requirements of subsection (3) of this section if it is delivered to a public utility district board of commissioners, declares that the signatories on the public utility district's broadband network have no or inadequate retail internet service providers, requests the public utility district to provide the retail internet service, and is signed by one of the following:(a) A majority of a group, including homeowners' associations, of any geographical area within the public utility district, who have developed a partnership payment structure to finance broadband deployment with the public utility district;
and adding a new section to chapter 54.16 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 54.16 RCW to read as follows:(1) Any public utility district that, as of the effective date of this section, provides only water, sewer, and telecommunications services in a county with an area less than five-hundred square miles may provide end user telecommunications services in the manner prescribed by this section.(2) Upon receiving a petition meeting the requirements of subsection (3) of this section, a public utility district board of commissioners may hold three meetings or hearings to:(a) Verify the signature or signatures on the petition and certify the petition;(b) Determine and submit findings that the retail service available to the individual or the petitioners in their geographical area is either nonexistent or inadequate;
or(b) Any individual who has developed a partnership payment structure to finance broadband deployment with the public utility district.(5) For the purposes of this section, the adequacy of retail internet service is determined by measuring retail internet service to end users on the public utility district's broadband network and comparing it with service standards in the public utility district service level agreement used for all public utility district network providers.
and(c) By resolution, authorize the public utility district to provide either retail service, connectivity, or both in the area defined in the petition.(3) A petition meets the requirements of subsection (2) of this section if it is delivered to a public utility district board of commissioners, declares that the signatories have no or inadequate retail service providers, requests the public utility district to provide the retail service, and is signed by one of the following:(a) A majority of the residents or businesses in any telecommunications local utility district;(b) A majority of a group, including homeowner associations, of any geographical area who have developed a partnership payment structure to finance broadband deployment with the public utility district;
Measurement of the existing retail internet service provider's service must be quantified by measuring the service with speed and capacity devices and software.
or(c) Any individual who has developed a partnership payment structure to finance broadband deployment with the public utility district.(4) For purposes of this section, the adequacy of retail service is determined by measuring retail service in the area and comparing it with service standards in the public utility district service level agreement used for other public utility district network providers.
Additionally, a retail internet service provider may submit its own assessment of its service level for consideration by the commission within thirty days of the first meeting conducted under subsection (3) of this section.(6) The commissioners of a public utility district may by resolution authorize the public utility district to provide or contract for provision of internet services to end users on the public utility district's broadband network when it is determined that no service or inadequate service exists for the individual or petitioners identified in subsection (4) of this section.(7)(a) In case of failure to reach an agreement on the adequacy of retail internet service, the commissioners must request an appointment of an administrative law judge under Title 34 RCW to hear the dispute.(b) The commissioners must provide a written notice, together with a copy of the dispute, and may require the disputing parties to attend a hearing before the administrative law judge, at a time and place to be specified in the written notice.(c) The place of any such hearing may be the office of the commissioners or another place designated by the commissioners.
Measurement of the existing retail service provider's service must be quantified by measuring the service with speed and capacity devices and software.
The disputed information must be presented at the hearing.(d) Upon review and consideration of all of the evidence, the administrative law judge must determine if the retail internet service is inadequate or nonexistent as defined in this section.
Additionally, a retail service provider may submit its own assessment of its service level for consideration by the commission within thirty days of the first meeting or hearing conducted under subsection (2) of this section.(5) If, after reviewing the measurements and evaluating the retail service provider's submission, if any, under subsection (4) of this section, a public utility district board of commissioners determines that no or inadequate service exists for the individual or petitioners identified in subsection (3) of this section, the commission, may by resolution authorize the public utility district to provide or contract for provision of internet connectivity to end users in such area.(6) All rates for retail services offered by a public utility district under this section must be fair and nondiscriminatory, except the public utility district may set tiers of service charges based on service demands of the user, including commercial and residential rates.--- END ---
Upon making a determination, the administrative law judge must state findings of fact and must issue and file a determination with the commissioners.(8) Any public utility district providing cable television service under this section must secure a cable television franchise, pay franchise fees, and any applicable taxes to the local cable franchise authority as required by federal law.(9) Nothing in this section may be construed or is intended to confer upon the utilities and transportation commission any authority to exercise jurisdiction over locally regulated utilities.(10) All rates for retail internet services offered by a public utility district under this section must be fair and nondiscriminatory, except the public utility district may set tiers of service charges based on service demands of the end user, including commercial and residential rates.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 34.12 RCW to read as follows:When requested by the public utility district commissioners, the chief administrative law judge shall assign an administrative law judge to conduct proceedings under section 1 of this act.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/7/2018.

  2. Chapter 186, 2018 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 46; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 93; nays, 5; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  12. Returned to second reading for amendment.

  13. House receded from amendments.

  14. Senate refuses to concur in House amendments. Asks House to recede from amendments.

  15. Third reading, passed; yeas, 94; nays, 4; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  16. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  17. Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.

  18. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  19. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  20. Minority; without recommendation.

  21. Minority; do not pass.

  22. FIN - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Agriculture & Natural Resources.

  23. Referred to Finance.

  24. Minority; without recommendation.

  25. TED - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  26. First reading, referred to Technology & Economic Development (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

  27. Third reading, passed; yeas, 45; nays, 2; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  28. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  29. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  30. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  31. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  32. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  33. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  34. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  35. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  36. EENT - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  37. EENT - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  38. First reading, referred to Energy, Environment & Technology.

  39. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

  • Chase · Cosponsor
  • Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
  • Kuderer · Cosponsor
  • Rolfes · Primary
  • Angel · Cosponsor
  • Sheldon · Cosponsor
  • Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Rolfes

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 46 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 31000
Republican 6201
Democrat 9000
Total 46201
% of votes cast 94%4%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Fain — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 93 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47300
Democrat 33000
Republican 13200
Total 93500
% of votes cast 95%5%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Hargrove — Yea
Blake — Yea
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Smith — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 94 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47300
Republican 14100
Democrat 33000
Total 94400
% of votes cast 96%4%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Hargrove — Yea
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Smith — Yea
Shea — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 45 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30001
Republican 6201
Democrat 9000
Total 45202
% of votes cast 92%4%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Baumgartner — Not Voting
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Ranker — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6034?
SB 6034 is sponsored by Chase, Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Kuderer, Rolfes, Angel, Sheldon, and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 6034?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 20, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 6034?
Track SB 6034 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6034

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6034

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →