Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 5970 — Establishing the crisis intervention response team pilot project.

Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 5970 establishes a Crisis Intervention Response Team pilot project that pairs law enforcement officers with mental health professionals to respond to behavioral health crises. This change recognizes the importance of having trained mental health experts involved in these critical situations to improve safety and outcomes for individuals in distress. By creating teams and providing targeted training, the bill aims to reduce violent interactions and foster better resolutions to crises, ultimately benefiting both the community and taxpayers. This pilot program represents a shift towards more integrated approaches in addressing mental health emergencies.

→
Previous
Latest
S-4764.1SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5970State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Frockt, Saldaña, O'Ban, and Palumbo)READ FIRST TIME 02/06/18.AN ACT Relating to the mental health field response teams program;
S-2951.1SENATE BILL 5970State of Washington65th Legislature2017 3rd Special SessionBy Senators Frockt, Saldaña, O'Ban, and PalumboRead first time 06/29/17.
and adding a new section to chapter 36.28A RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 36.28A RCW to read as follows:(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall develop and implement a mental health field response team grant program.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.AN ACT Relating to the crisis intervention response team pilot project;
The purpose of the program is to assist local law enforcement agencies to develop and operate mental health field response team capabilities, utilizing mental health professionals to professionally, humanely, and safely respond to encounters involving persons with mental health issues.
adding new sections to chapter 43.101 RCW;
A portion of the grant funds may also be used to develop data management capability to support the program.(2) Grants must be awarded to local law enforcement agencies based on locally developed proposals to incorporate mental health professionals into the agencies' mental health field response planning and response.
creating a new section;
Two or more agencies may submit a joint grant proposal to develop their mental health field response proposals.
and providing expiration dates.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature recognizes the need to address the impact of behavioral health crises on individuals, communities, and state and local institutions.
Proposals must provide a plan for improving mental health field response through modifying or expanding law enforcement practices in partnership with mental health professionals.
By virtue of their position, law enforcement officers are often the first called to respond to or assist individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis.
A peer review panel appointed by the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs in consultation with fully integrated managed care organizations and behavioral health organizations must review the grant applications.
The legislature recognizes that law enforcement has made efforts to respond appropriately to such calls through crisis intervention training and other measures focused on behavioral health.
Once the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs certifies that the application satisfies the proposal criteria, the grant funds will be distributed.
However, violent interactions between persons in crisis and law enforcement remain an issue of significant state and national concern.
To the extent possible, at least one grant recipient agency should be from the east side of the state and one from the west side of the state with the crest of the Cascades being the dividing line.
While crisis intervention training and techniques are critical to reducing violence and harm, there is no substitute for the experience and skills of licensed mental health professionals.
Grant recipients must be selected and receiving funds no later than October 1, 2018.(3) Grant recipients must include at least one designated crisis responder who will perform professional services under the plan.
Results from new programs used in other states demonstrate that partnerships between law enforcement and mental health professionals improve outcomes for safety and also address the needs of those in crisis.
A mental health professional may assist patrolling officers in the field or in an on-call capacity, provide preventive, follow-up, training on mental health field response best practices, or other services at the direction of the local law enforcement agency.
Accordingly, the legislature hereby establishes the crisis intervention response team pilot project to deploy law enforcement and mental health professionals as partners in the field.
Nothing in this subsection (3) requires or limits the mental health professional's participation in field patrol.(4) Within existing resources, the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall:(a) Consult with the department of social and health services research and data analysis unit to establish data collection and reporting guidelines for grant recipients.
The allocation of grant funds will facilitate the implementation of this innovative approach, and also create an opportunity to measure possible outcomes through a study conducted by the Washington state institute for public policy.
The data will be used to study and evaluate whether the use of mental health field response teams improves outcomes of interactions with persons experiencing behavioral health crises, including reducing rates of violence and harm, reduced arrests, and jail or emergency room usage;
The legislature aims to foster peaceful resolution to volatile situations, and ultimately save taxpayer dollars, by directly acknowledging and addressing behavioral health crises with the combined efforts and expertise of law enforcement and mental health professionals.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 43.101 RCW to read as follows:(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the crisis intervention response team pilot project is created within the commission.
and(b) Consult with the department of social and health services behavioral health administration and the managed care system to develop requirements for participating mental health professionals.(5) The Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs shall submit an annual report to the governor and appropriate committees of the legislature on the program.
The purpose of the project is to create crisis intervention response teams composed of qualified law enforcement and mental health professionals to respond professionally, humanely, and safely to crises involving persons with behavioral health issues.(2)(a) The commission shall award two grants, one to an eligible applicant west of the crest of the Cascade mountains and one to an eligible applicant east of the crest of the Cascade mountains.(b) Eligible applicants include law enforcement agencies with:
The report must include information on grant recipients, use of funds, participation of mental health professionals, and feedback from the grant recipients by December 1st of each year the program is funded.(6) Grant recipients shall develop and provide or arrange for training necessary for mental health professionals to operate successfully and competently in partnership with law enforcement agencies.
A need for crisis intervention professionals for responding to calls for service in the field;
The training must provide the professionals with a working knowledge of law enforcement procedures and tools sufficient to provide for the safety of the professionals, partnered law enforcement officers, and members of the public.--- END ---
a commitment to improving crisis intervention through modifying or expanding upon law enforcement practices;
and a commitment to partnering with mental health professionals.
In evaluating grant applications, the commission shall consult with the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs and behavioral health organizations.
Grants must be reviewed and awarded through peer review panels.(c) Grant recipients must be selected and receiving funds no later than June 30, 2018.(3) Grant recipients must:(a) Establish at least four and no more than twelve crisis intervention response teams with grant funds;(b) Include on each crisis intervention team one experienced law enforcement officer who has completed enhanced crisis intervention training under RCW 43.101.427 and one person designated as a mental health professional by the department of social and health services who has completed training under section 3 of this act;
the officer and mental health professional must be assigned as partners and patrol together;(c) Use crisis intervention teams to:
(i) Assist law enforcement officers with service calls necessitating crisis intervention;
(ii) conduct proactive and follow-up investigations related to crisis intervention;
(iii) appropriately corespond to calls involving special weapons and tactics teams or other enhanced teams;
(iv) directly lead and handle the agency's most serious crisis intervention calls;
and (v) where appropriate, educate and train other officers in the agency on best practices for crisis intervention.(4) The commission shall:(a) Adopt policies and procedures necessary to administer the project, including for evaluating and selecting grant recipients, monitoring use of grant funds, and collecting and evaluating data to assess the effectiveness of the project;(b) Consult with the Washington state institute for public policy to establish data collection and reporting guidelines for grant recipients in order for the institute to conduct the study under section 4 of this act;
and(c) Consult with the department of social and health services to develop requirements for mental health professionals participating in the project.(5) The commission shall submit an annual report to the governor and appropriate committees of the legislature on the project, including information on selected grant recipients, use of funds, number of teams, and an assessment and input by the commission and grant recipients, by December 1st of each year the project is funded.(6) This section expires July 1, 2022.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 43.101 RCW to read as follows:(1) The commission shall provide training for mental health professionals participating in the crisis intervention response team pilot project under section 2 of this act.(2) The commission shall develop and provide training necessary for mental health professionals to operate successfully and competently as part of crisis intervention response teams.
The training must provide the professionals with a working knowledge of law enforcement procedures and tools sufficient to provide for the safety of the professionals, partnered law enforcement officers, and members of the public.(3) All mental health professionals participating in the project must complete the training under this section prior to operating in the field with a crisis intervention response team, unless the commission provides a written waiver to the professional.
A written waiver may only be provided if the professional demonstrates a full understanding and competency of the training materials and curriculum.(4) The commission shall provide the training required in this section, together with facilities, supplies, materials, and the room and board for noncommuting attendees.(5) This section expires July 1, 2022.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 43.101 RCW to read as follows:(1) The Washington state institute for public policy, in consultation with the commission, shall develop data collection and reporting guidelines for the commission to require of grant recipients under section 2 of this act.
The institute shall conduct a study on whether the use of crisis intervention response teams improves outcomes of interactions with persons experiencing behavioral health crises, including reducing rates of violence and harm and other measurable effects identified by the institute.(2) This section expires July 1, 2022.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  3. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  4. PS - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  5. First reading, referred to Public Safety (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

  6. Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.

  7. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  8. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  9. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  10. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  11. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  12. 2nd substitute bill substituted.

  13. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  14. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  15. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  16. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  17. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  19. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  20. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  21. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  22. Referred to Ways & Means.

  23. Referred to Ways & Means.

  24. LAW - Majority; without recommendation.

  25. And refer to Ways & Means.

  26. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  27. LAW - Majority; without recommendation.

  28. And refer to Ways & Means.

  29. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  30. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  31. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Sponsors

  • Frockt · Primary
  • Palumbo · Cosponsor
  • O'Ban · Cosponsor
  • Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Frockt

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 47 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30001
Republican 8001
Democrat 9000
Total 47002
% of votes cast 96%0%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Baumgartner — Not Voting
Becker — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5970?
SB 5970 is sponsored by Frockt, Palumbo, O'Ban, and Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 5970?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5970?
Track SB 5970 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5970

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5970

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →