Concerning transfer of jurisdiction from a tribe in dependency cases involving Indian children.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5770 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5770.
You're tracking SB 5770
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5770 — Concerning transfer of jurisdiction from a tribe in dependency cases involving Indian children.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 5770 clarifies the process for transferring jurisdiction from state courts to tribal courts in cases involving Indian children. Notably, it introduces a provision for what happens if a tribal court declines to accept jurisdiction, ensuring the state court reverts back to handling the case properly. This change matters because it aims to streamline the legal process and protect the rights of Indian children and their families, ensuring that their cases are resolved in a manner that respects tribal sovereignty while also adhering to federal and state laws.
S-1560.1SUBSTITUTES-1267.1SENATE SENATE BILL 5770State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senate Human Services, Mental Health & Housing (originally sponsored by Senators McCoy, Darneille, Saldaña, and Hunt)READHuntRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/17/17.AN02/09/17. ACT Relating to transfer of jurisdiction from a tribe in dependency cases involving Indian children;
Referred to Committee on Human Services, Mental Health & Housing.AN ACT Relating to transfer of jurisdiction from a tribe in dependency cases involving Indian children;
The state court shall not enter a final order in any child custody proceeding, except an order dismissing the proceeding and returning the Indian child to the care of the parent or Indian custodian from whose care the child was removed, while awaiting receipt of a tribal court order accepting jurisdiction, or in the absence of a tribal court order or other formal written declination of jurisdiction.(c) If the Indian child's tribe declines jurisdiction, the state court shall enter an order vacating the order transferring jurisdiction and proceed with adjudication of the child custody matter in strict compliance with the federal Indian child welfare act, this chapter, and any applicable tribal-state agreement.(5) IfConsistent a tribal court orders transfer of jurisdiction from the tribe, the state court shall hold a hearing to determine if accepting jurisdiction is consistent with P.L.
95-608,95-608 and RCW 13.34.240 and 13.38.100, civilthere rulemay 82.5,be andoccasions anywhen othera applicabletribe statehas orexercised federaljurisdiction laws.of an Indian child but is unable to continue with its jurisdiction due to unforeseen circumstances.
TheIf a tribal court shallorders transfer aof copyjurisdiction offrom the entiretribe, courtthe filestate toshall recognize the statechild courtunder forRCW its13.34.030(6)(c) consideration.and take jurisdiction of the case.
IfPending jurisdictionreceipt isof acceptedsuch tribal court order, the state court shallmay determineconduct whetheradditional hearings and enter orders, which strictly comply with the childrequirements willof bethe treatedfederal asIndian dependentchild underwelfare RCWact 13.34.030(6).---and this chapter.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Placed on Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
First reading, referred to Community Development, Housing & Tribal Affairs (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 49; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Held on second reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
HSMH - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
HSMH - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Human Services, Mental Health & Housing.
Sponsors
- Darneille · Cosponsor
- McCoy · Primary
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- McCoy
Co-sponsors (3)
- Darneille
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5770?
- SB 5770 is sponsored by Darneille, McCoy, Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 5770?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5770?
- Track SB 5770 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5770
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5770
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →