Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 2 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 5679 — Concerning the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services.

Last action — On motion, referred to Energy, Environment & Technology.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Senate Bill 5679 expanded the authority of certain port districts in Washington to provide telecommunications services. Specifically, it allows port districts located on the state's borders to enter into contracts with private telecommunications companies to improve access to services in underserved areas. This change matters because it could help ensure better telecommunications availability in remote regions, fostering economic growth and connectivity for local communities.

→
Previous
Latest
S-1592.2SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5679State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senate Energy, Environment & Telecommunications (originally sponsored by Senators Warnick, Wellman, Sheldon, Rivers, Wilson, Cleveland, Walsh, Takko, and Rolfes)READ FIRST TIME 02/17/17.AN ACT Relating to the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services;
S-0946.1SENATE BILL 5679State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senators Warnick, Wellman, Sheldon, Rivers, Wilson, Cleveland, Walsh, Takko, and RolfesRead first time 02/02/17.
amending RCW 53.08.370 and 53.08.380;
Referred to Committee on Energy, Environment & Telecommunications.AN ACT Relating to the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services;
and creating a new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:(1) Adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services is essential to the economic well-being of communities in Washington state.(2) Many communities, particularly in remote areas, do not have adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services.(3) Some communities along the outer borders of the state may be served by a port district that does not fall within the definition of a rural port district, but due to their location, face similar telecommunications service issues.(4) Specifying that port districts in these areas have authority to enter into contracts to attract private telecommunications companies may help to create a sufficient market for the provision of adequate retail telecommunications services.Sec. 2.  RCW 53.08.370 and 2000 c 81 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Both rural port districts in existence on June 8, 2000, and port districts within a county that has at least one border along the southern, eastern, or northern border of the state may construct, purchase, acquire, develop, finance, lease, license, handle, provide, add to, contract for, interconnect, alter, improve, repair, operate, and maintain any telecommunications facilities within or without the district's limits for the following purposes:(a) For the district's own use;
amending RCW 53.08.370;
and creating a new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:(1) Adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services is essential to the economic well-being of communities in Washington state.(2) Many communities, particularly in remote areas, do not have adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services.(3) Some communities along the outer borders of the state may be served by a port district that does not fall within the definition of a rural port district, but due to their location, face similar telecommunications service issues.(4) Specifying that port districts in these areas have authority to enter into contracts to attract private telecommunications companies may help to create a sufficient market for the provision of adequate retail telecommunications services.Sec. 2.  RCW 53.08.370 and 2000 c 81 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Both rural port districts in existence on June 8, 2000, and port districts within a county that has at least one border along the southern, eastern, or northern border of the state may construct, purchase, acquire, develop, finance, lease, license, handle, provide, add to, contract for, interconnect, alter, improve, repair, operate, and maintain any telecommunications facilities within or without the district's limits for the following purposes:(a) For the district's own use and for the use of other public bodies, as defined in RCW 39.10.210;
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize ((rural)) port districts to provide telecommunications services to end users.(2) ((A rural)) Except as provided in subsection (7) of this section, port districts providing wholesale telecommunications services under this section shall ensure that rates, terms, and conditions for such services are not unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize ((rural)) port districts to provide telecommunications services to end users.(2) ((A rural)) Port districts providing wholesale telecommunications services under this section shall ensure that rates, terms, and conditions for such services are not unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential.
Nothing in chapter 81, Laws of 2000 limits any existing authority of a rural port district under this title.(7) A port district under this section may select a telecommunications company to operate the port district's telecommunications facilities.
Nothing in chapter 81, Laws of 2000 limits any existing authority of a rural port district under this title.(7) In accordance with any other applicable laws, a port district under this section may select a telecommunications company to operate the port district's telecommunications facilities.
Nothing in this subsection (7) is intended to limit or otherwise restrict any other authority provided by law.(8) A port district constructing or operating telecommunications facilities under this section may not construct or operate telecommunications facilities for the provision of telecommunications service in areas already served by a telecommunications provider that is offering broadband service as defined by the federal communications commission, unless the port district has constructed telecommunications facilities capable of providing broadband service to at least fifty percent of the total unserved or underserved end users located within the port district's limits.Sec. 3.  RCW 53.08.380 and 2000 c 81 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A person or entity that has requested wholesale telecommunications services from a rural port district or port district as identified in RCW 53.08.370(1) may petition the commission under the procedures set forth in RCW 80.04.110 (1) through (3) if it believes the district's rates, terms, and conditions are unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential, except as provided in RCW 53.08.370.
Nothing in this subsection (7) is intended to limit or otherwise restrict any other authority provided by law.--- END ---
The person or entity shall provide the district notice of its intent to petition the commission and an opportunity to review within thirty days the rates, terms, and conditions as applied to it prior to submitting its petition.
In determining whether a district is providing discriminatory or preferential rates, terms, and conditions, the commission may consider such matters as service quality, technical feasibility of connection points on the district's telecommunications facilities, time of response to service requests, system capacity, and other matters reasonably related to the provision of wholesale telecommunications services.
If the commission, after notice and hearing, determines that a rural port district's rates, terms, and conditions are unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential, it shall issue a final order finding noncompliance with this section and setting forth the specific areas of apparent noncompliance.
An order imposed under this section shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction.(2) The commission may order a rural port district or port district as identified in RCW 53.08.370(1) to pay a share of the costs incurred by the commission in adjudicating or enforcing this section.(3) Without limiting other remedies at law or equity, the commission and prevailing party may also seek injunctive relief to compel compliance with an order.(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the commission's authority and jurisdiction with respect to actions, proceedings, or orders permitted or contemplated for a state commission under the federal telecommunications act of 1996, P.L.
104-104 (110 Stat.
56).--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. On motion, referred to Energy, Environment & Technology.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  4. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  5. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  6. Placed on Rules White Sheet.

  7. By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.

  8. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  9. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  10. TED - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  11. First reading, referred to Technology & Economic Development (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

  12. Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  13. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  14. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  15. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  16. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  17. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  18. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  19. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  20. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  21. EET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  22. EET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  23. First reading, referred to Energy, Environment & Telecommunications.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 48 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 32100
Democrat 8000
Republican 8000
Total 48100
% of votes cast 98%2%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Becker — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Nelson — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Pearson — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Yea
Rossi — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Nay
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5679?
SB 5679 is sponsored by Rolfes, Wilson, Walsh, Annette Cleveland (Democrat), Rivers, Sheldon, Judy Warnick (Republican), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), and Takko.
What is the current status of SB 5679?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5679?
Track SB 5679 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5679

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5679

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →