Concerning the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5679 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5679.
You're tracking SB 5679
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5679 — Concerning the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services.
Last action — On motion, referred to Energy, Environment & Technology.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Senate Bill 5679 expanded the authority of certain port districts in Washington to provide telecommunications services. Specifically, it allows port districts located on the state's borders to enter into contracts with private telecommunications companies to improve access to services in underserved areas. This change matters because it could help ensure better telecommunications availability in remote regions, fostering economic growth and connectivity for local communities.
S-1592.2SUBSTITUTES-0946.1SENATE SENATE BILL 5679State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senate Energy, Environment & Telecommunications (originally sponsored by Senators Warnick, Wellman, Sheldon, Rivers, Wilson, Cleveland, Walsh, Takko, and Rolfes)READRolfesRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/17/17.AN02/02/17. ACT Relating to the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services;
amendingReferred RCWto 53.08.370Committee andon 53.08.380;Energy, Environment & Telecommunications.AN ACT Relating to the authority of port districts to provide telecommunications services;
andamending creatingRCW a53.08.370; new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that:(1) Adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services is essential to the economic well-being of communities in Washington state.(2) Many communities, particularly in remote areas, do not have adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services.(3) Some communities along the outer borders of the state may be served by a port district that does not fall within the definition of a rural port district, but due to their location, face similar telecommunications service issues.(4) Specifying that port districts in these areas have authority to enter into contracts to attract private telecommunications companies may help to create a sufficient market for the provision of adequate retail telecommunications services.Sec. 2. RCW 53.08.370 and 2000 c 81 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Both rural port districts in existence on June 8, 2000, and port districts within a county that has at least one border along the southern, eastern, or northern border of the state may construct, purchase, acquire, develop, finance, lease, license, handle, provide, add to, contract for, interconnect, alter, improve, repair, operate, and maintain any telecommunications facilities within or without the district's limits for the following purposes:(a) For the district's own use;
and creating a new section.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. The legislature finds that:(1) Adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services is essential to the economic well-being of communities in Washington state.(2) Many communities, particularly in remote areas, do not have adequate access to telecommunications facilities and services.(3) Some communities along the outer borders of the state may be served by a port district that does not fall within the definition of a rural port district, but due to their location, face similar telecommunications service issues.(4) Specifying that port districts in these areas have authority to enter into contracts to attract private telecommunications companies may help to create a sufficient market for the provision of adequate retail telecommunications services.Sec. 2. RCW 53.08.370 and 2000 c 81 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Both rural port districts in existence on June 8, 2000, and port districts within a county that has at least one border along the southern, eastern, or northern border of the state may construct, purchase, acquire, develop, finance, lease, license, handle, provide, add to, contract for, interconnect, alter, improve, repair, operate, and maintain any telecommunications facilities within or without the district's limits for the following purposes:(a) For the district's own use and for the use of other public bodies, as defined in RCW 39.10.210;
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to authorize ((rural)) port districts to provide telecommunications services to end users.(2) ((A rural)) ExceptPort as provided in subsection (7) of this section, port districts providing wholesale telecommunications services under this section shall ensure that rates, terms, and conditions for such services are not unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential.
Nothing in chapter 81, Laws of 2000 limits any existing authority of a rural port district under this title.(7) AIn accordance with any other applicable laws, a port district under this section may select a telecommunications company to operate the port district's telecommunications facilities.
Nothing in this subsection (7) is intended to limit or otherwise restrict any other authority provided by law.(8)law.--- AEND port--- district constructing or operating telecommunications facilities under this section may not construct or operate telecommunications facilities for the provision of telecommunications service in areas already served by a telecommunications provider that is offering broadband service as defined by the federal communications commission, unless the port district has constructed telecommunications facilities capable of providing broadband service to at least fifty percent of the total unserved or underserved end users located within the port district's limits.Sec. 3. RCW 53.08.380 and 2000 c 81 s 9 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A person or entity that has requested wholesale telecommunications services from a rural port district or port district as identified in RCW 53.08.370(1) may petition the commission under the procedures set forth in RCW 80.04.110 (1) through (3) if it believes the district's rates, terms, and conditions are unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential, except as provided in RCW 53.08.370.
The person or entity shall provide the district notice of its intent to petition the commission and an opportunity to review within thirty days the rates, terms, and conditions as applied to it prior to submitting its petition.
In determining whether a district is providing discriminatory or preferential rates, terms, and conditions, the commission may consider such matters as service quality, technical feasibility of connection points on the district's telecommunications facilities, time of response to service requests, system capacity, and other matters reasonably related to the provision of wholesale telecommunications services.
If the commission, after notice and hearing, determines that a rural port district's rates, terms, and conditions are unduly or unreasonably discriminatory or preferential, it shall issue a final order finding noncompliance with this section and setting forth the specific areas of apparent noncompliance.
An order imposed under this section shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction.(2) The commission may order a rural port district or port district as identified in RCW 53.08.370(1) to pay a share of the costs incurred by the commission in adjudicating or enforcing this section.(3) Without limiting other remedies at law or equity, the commission and prevailing party may also seek injunctive relief to compel compliance with an order.(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the commission's authority and jurisdiction with respect to actions, proceedings, or orders permitted or contemplated for a state commission under the federal telecommunications act of 1996, P.L.
104-104 (110 Stat.
56).--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
On motion, referred to Energy, Environment & Technology.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Placed on Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
TED - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
First reading, referred to Technology & Economic Development (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 1; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
EET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
EET - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Energy, Environment & Telecommunications.
Sponsors
- Rolfes · Cosponsor
- Wilson · Cosponsor
- Walsh · Cosponsor
- Annette Cleveland · Cosponsor
- Rivers · Cosponsor
- Sheldon · Cosponsor
- Judy Warnick · Primary
- Lisa Wellman · Cosponsor
- Takko · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Judy Warnick Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Rolfes
- Wilson
- Walsh
- Annette Cleveland Democrat
- Rivers
- Sheldon
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
- Takko
Not signed on (142)
142 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 142 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Nay |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5679?
- SB 5679 is sponsored by Rolfes, Wilson, Walsh, Annette Cleveland (Democrat), Rivers, Sheldon, Judy Warnick (Republican), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), and Takko.
- What is the current status of SB 5679?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5679?
- Track SB 5679 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5679
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5679
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →