Concerning noncompetition agreements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6526 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6526.
You're tracking SB 6526
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6526 — Concerning noncompetition agreements.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 6526 broadens the scope of the bill by replacing a focus on hourly employees with a general prohibition against noncompetition agreements for any person in a lawful profession, trade, or business. It introduces specific exceptions for certain individuals involved in business sales, partnerships, or limited liability companies under certain conditions. This change matters because it makes it harder for employers to enforce noncompetition clauses, promoting greater job mobility and protecting workers' rights to pursue their careers without unnecessary restrictions.
S-4698.1SUBSTITUTES-4102.1SENATE SENATE BILL 6526State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Labor & Commerce (originally sponsored by Senators Conway, Keiser, Hasegawa, Saldaña, and Kuderer)READKudererAN FIRST TIME 02/02/18.AN ACT Relating to noncompetition agreements;
and adding a new section to chapter 49.44 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 49.44 RCW to read as follows:Anyfollows:(1) Except as provided under subsection (2) of this section, any contract that restrains ana hourlyperson employee from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is against public policy and is void and unenforceable to the extent that it restrains a person from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business.---business.(2) ENDThe ---following persons may agree to refrain from carrying on a similar business within a specific geographic area:(a)(i) A person who sells:(A) All or substantially all of his or her operating assets of a business entity;(B) All or substantially all of his or her operating assets of a division or a subsidiary of a business entity;
or(C) All of the ownership interest of any subsidiary of a business entity.(ii) However, if the buyer does not operate a like business in the specified geographic area, the agreement is void.(b) Any partner who disassociates from a partnership or who is a partner at the time the partnership is dissolved.
However, if no other member of the partnership continues to operate a like business in the specified geographic area, the agreement is void.(c) Any member whose interest in a limited liability company is terminated.
However, if no other member of the limited liability company carries on a like business in the specified geographic area, the agreement is void.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LBRC - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Labor & Commerce.
Sponsors
- Keiser · Cosponsor
- Kuderer · Cosponsor
- Steve Conway · Primary
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Rebecca Saldaña · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Steve Conway Democrat
Co-sponsors (4)
- Keiser
- Kuderer
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Rebecca Saldaña Democrat
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6526?
- SB 6526 is sponsored by Keiser, Kuderer, Steve Conway (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), and Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 6526?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6526?
- Track SB 6526 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6526
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6526
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →