Preliminary protective orders; contents of order.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 861 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 861.
You're tracking SB 861
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 861 — Preliminary protective orders; contents of order.
Last action — Tabled in Courts of Justice by voice vote
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Provides that if a preliminary protective order is issued in an ex parte hearing where the petition for the order is supported by sworn testimony and not an affidavit or a completed form submitted with an emergency protective order request, the court issuing the order shall state in the order the basis on which the order was entered, including a summary of the allegations made and the court's findings.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
58 added · 65 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SB 861 clarify the process for issuing ex parte orders related to family abuse. Specifically, if an order is issued without an affidavit, the court must provide detailed reasoning behind its decision. This change is significant because it ensures greater transparency and accountability in the court's actions, potentially offering better protection for those at risk of family abuse. Additionally, the amendments outline circumstances under which the court can determine immediate danger, making it easier for petitioners to present their cases effectively.
861 OfferedSenate JanuaryAmendments 11,in 2017[ Prefiled] December-- 7,January 201630, 2017 A BILL to amend and reenact §§ 16.1-253.1 and 19.2-152.9 of the Code of Virginia, relating to preliminary protective orders;
---------- Patron--Patron Prior to Engrossment--Senator Surovell ---------- Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice ---------- Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
If an ex parte order is issued without an affidavit [ or a completed form as prescribed by subsection D of § 16.1-253.4 ] being presented, the court, in its order, shall state the basis upon which the order was entered, including a summary of the allegations made and the court's findings.
Evidence that the petitioner has been subjected to family abuse within a reasonable time and evidence of immediate and present danger of family abuse may be established by a showing that (i) the allegedly abusing person is incarcerated and is to be released from incarceration within 30 days following the petition or has been released from incarceration within 30 days prior to the petition, (ii) the crime for which the allegedly abusing person was convicted and incarcerated involved family abuse against the petitioner, and (iii) the allegedly abusing person has made threatening contact with the petitioner while he was incarcerated, exhibiting a renewed threat to the petitioner of family abuse.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Senate: Printed as engrossed 17100608D-E Current html January 30, 2017
- Prefiled Senate: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/17 17100608D html December 07, 2016
Action History
-
Tabled in Courts of Justice by voice vote
-
Assigned Courts sub: Criminal Law
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Read first time
-
Placed on Calendar
-
Printed as engrossed 17100608D-E
-
Engrossed by Senate as amended SB861E
-
Committee amendment agreed to
-
Reading of amendment waived
-
Read second time
-
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
-
Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/17 17100608D
Sponsors
- Scott A. Surovell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 861 do?
- Provides that if a preliminary protective order is issued in an ex parte hearing where the petition for the order is supported by sworn testimony and not an affidavit or a completed form submitted with an emergency protective order request, the court issuing the order shall state in the order the basis on which the order was entered, including a summary of the allegations made and the court's findings.
- Who sponsors SB 861?
- SB 861 is sponsored by Scott A. Surovell.
- What is the current status of SB 861?
- This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 861?
- Track SB 861 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 861
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 861
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →