SB 6490 — Authorizing cities planning under the growth management act to impose certain real estate excise taxes by councilmatic action.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill SB 6490 was amended to remove a requirement that counties and cities could only impose new real estate excise taxes with voter approval. This change allows local governments more flexibility to implement these taxes without needing to hold an election first. This matters because it could streamline the funding process for essential capital projects, enabling cities and counties to respond more quickly to local infrastructure needs without waiting for a public vote.
S-4372.1SUBSTITUTES-3998.2SENATE SENATE BILL 6490State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Local Government (originally sponsored by Senators Takko and Walsh)READWalshRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 01/26/18.AN01/19/18. ACT Relating to authorizing counties and cities planning under the growth management act to impose certain real estate excise taxes by councilmanic action;
Referred to Committee on Local Government.AN ACT Relating to authorizing cities planning under the growth management act to impose certain real estate excise taxes by councilmatic action;
If a county uses available funds for payment of existing debt service under RCW 82.46.010, the total amount used for payment of debt service and any amounts used for operations and maintenance is subject to the limits in this subsection.(8)(a)(i)subsection.--- AnyEND referendum--- petition to repeal a county or city ordinance imposing a tax authorized by subsection (2) of this section must be filed with a filing officer, as identified in the ordinance, within seven days of passage of the ordinance.
Within ten days of receiving a referendum petition, the filing officer must confer with the petitioner concerning form and style of the petition, issue an identification number for the petition, and write a ballot title for the measure.
The ballot title must be posed as a question so that an affirmative answer to the question and an affirmative vote on the measure results in the tax being imposed and a negative answer to the question and a negative vote on the measure results in the tax not being imposed.
The petitioner must be notified of the identification number and ballot title within this ten-day period.(ii) Within thirty days of notification of the identification number and ballot title, the petitioner must secure and file with the filing officer petition forms with the signatures of at least fifteen percent of the registered voters of the county for county measures, or at least fifteen percent of the registered voters of the city for city measures.
Each petition form must contain the ballot title and the full text of the measure to be referred.
The filing officer must verify the sufficiency of the signatures on the petitions.
If sufficient valid signatures are properly submitted, the filing officer must submit the referendum measure to the county or city voters at a general or special election held on one of the dates provided in RCW 29A.04.321 as determined by the county or city legislative authority.
The election must not take place later than one hundred twenty days after the signed petition has been filed with the filing officer.(b) The referendum and initiative procedure provided in (a) of this subsection applies only to ordinances imposing a tax authorized in subsection (2) of this section enacted by a county choosing to plan under RCW 36.70A.040(2) and any city within such a county.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Walsh · Cosponsor
- Takko · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Takko
Co-sponsors (1)
- Walsh
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6490?
- SB 6490 is sponsored by Walsh and Takko.
- What is the current status of SB 6490?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6490?
- Track SB 6490 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6490
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6490
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →