Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 5952 — Concerning the department of corrections.

Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to Bill SB 5952 create a "corrections ombuds" office, which will help protect the rights of inmates and ensure accountability within the Department of Corrections. It establishes this office to investigate complaints regarding inmate treatment and improve conditions in correctional facilities, addressing past failures linked to early release errors. These changes are significant as they aim to enhance public safety, promote better rehabilitation practices, and prevent legal liabilities for the department. Overall, the bill seeks to create a more transparent and responsive corrections system.

→
Previous
Latest
S-2888.1SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5952State of Washington65th Legislature2017 2nd Special SessionBy Senate Law & Justice (originally sponsored by Senators Padden and O'Ban)READ FIRST TIME 06/21/17.AN ACT Relating to addressing the department of corrections early release error;
S-2841.2SENATE BILL 5952State of Washington65th Legislature2017 2nd Special SessionBy Senators Padden and O'BanRead first time 06/16/17.
Referred to Committee on Law & Justice.AN ACT Relating to addressing the department of corrections early release error;
and(c) A representative of the governor's office.(5) After the full membership is attained, the council shall develop a process for replacing members in case of resignation or expiration of terms.(6) Councilmembers serve a term of two years, except that the council shall create and implement a system of staggered terms, and no member other than the department staff serving as the internal ombuds may serve more than two consecutive terms.
and(c) A representative of the governor's office.(5) After the full membership is attained, the council shall develop a process for replacing members in case of resignation or expiration of terms.
The council must meet at least once a year.(6) Councilmembers serve a term of two years, except that the council shall create and implement a system of staggered terms, and no member other than the department staff serving as the internal ombuds may serve more than two consecutive terms.
The selected organization must have experience and the capacity to communicate effectively regarding criminal justice issues with policymakers, stakeholders, and the general public, and must be prepared and able to provide all program and staff support necessary, directly or through subcontracts, to carry out all duties of the office.(2) The organization and its subcontractors, if any, are not state agencies or departments, but instead are private, independent entities operating under contract with the state.(3) The organization must be an objective and neutral entity that will impartially investigate complaints.(4) The organization is subject to financial and other audits by the state auditor's office, and its employees must abide by the provisions of chapter 42.52 RCW.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  (1) The ombuds shall:(a) Establish priorities for use of the limited resources appropriated to implement this chapter;(b) Maintain a statewide toll-free telephone number, a collect telephone number, a web site, and a mailing address for the receipt of complaints and inquiries;(c) Provide information, as appropriate, to inmates, family members, representatives of inmates, department employees, and others regarding the rights of inmates;(d) Provide technical assistance to support inmate participation in self-advocacy;(e) Monitor department compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and policies with a view toward the appropriate health, safety, welfare, and rehabilitation of inmates;(f) Monitor and participate in legislative and policy developments affecting correctional facilities;(g) Establish a statewide uniform reporting system to collect and analyze data related to complaints regarding the department;(h) Establish procedures to receive, investigate, and resolve complaints;(i) Submit annually to the council, the governor's office, and the legislature, by November 1st of each year, a report analyzing the work of the office, including any recommendations;
The selected organization must have experience and the capacity to communicate effectively regarding criminal justice issues with policymakers, stakeholders, and the general public, and must be prepared and able to provide all program and staff support necessary, directly or through subcontracts, to carry out all duties of the office.(2) The organization and its subcontractors, if any, are not state agencies or departments, but instead are private, independent entities operating under contract with the state.(3) The organization must be an objective and neutral entity that will impartially investigate complaints.(4) The organization is subject to financial and other audits by the state auditor's office, and its employees must abide by the provisions of chapter 42.52 RCW.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  (1) The ombuds shall:(a) Establish priorities for use of the limited resources appropriated to implement this chapter;(b) Develop policies for responding to records requests from the public.
and(j) Adopt and comply with rules, policies, and procedures necessary to implement this chapter.(2)(a) The ombuds may initiate and attempt to resolve an investigation upon his or her own initiative, or upon receipt of a complaint from an inmate, a family member, a representative of an inmate, a department employee, or others, regarding any allegation of the following that may adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, and rights of inmates:(i) Abuse or neglect;(ii) Department decisions or administrative actions;(iii) Inactions or omissions;(iv) Policies, rules, or procedures;
These policies shall be similar in scope to the requirements in the public records act except that identifying information about complainants or witnesses must be protected and nondisclosable unless the complainant or witness waives confidentiality;(c) Maintain a statewide toll-free telephone number, a collect telephone number, a web site, and a mailing address for the receipt of complaints and inquiries;(d) Provide information, as appropriate, to inmates, family members, representatives of inmates, department employees, and others regarding the rights of inmates;(e) Provide technical assistance to support inmate participation in self-advocacy;(f) Monitor department compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and policies with a view toward the appropriate health, safety, welfare, and rehabilitation of inmates;(g) Monitor and participate in legislative and policy developments affecting correctional facilities;(h) Establish a statewide uniform reporting system to collect and analyze data related to complaints regarding the department;(i) Establish procedures to receive, investigate, and resolve complaints;(j) Submit annually to the council, the governor's office, and the legislature, by November 1st of each year, a report analyzing the work of the office, including any recommendations;
or(v) Alleged violations of law by the department.(b) Prior to filing a complaint with the ombuds, a person shall have reasonably pursued resolution of the complaint through the internal grievance, administrative, or appellate procedures with the department.
and(k) Adopt and comply with rules, policies, and procedures necessary to implement this chapter.(2)(a) The ombuds may initiate and attempt to resolve an investigation upon his or her own initiative, or upon receipt of a complaint from an inmate, a family member, a representative of an inmate, a department employee, or others, regarding:(i) Abuse or neglect;(ii) Department decisions or administrative actions;(iii) Inactions or omissions;(iv) Policies, rules, or procedures;
or(v) Alleged violations of law by the department that may adversely affect the health, safety, welfare, and rights of inmates.(b) Prior to filing a complaint with the ombuds, a person shall have reasonably pursued resolution of the complaint through the internal grievance, administrative, or appellate procedures with the department.
and(b) Department employees, or other persons, who might be reasonably believed to have knowledge of the incident under investigation, which includes the opportunity to interview those individuals.(3) Upon the ombuds' request, the department shall grant the ombuds the right to access, inspect, and copy all relevant information, records, or documents in the possession or control of the department that the ombuds considers necessary in an investigation of a complaint filed under this chapter, and must assist the ombuds in obtaining the necessary releases of documents that are specifically restricted or privileged for use by the ombuds.(4) Following notification from the ombuds with a written demand for access to agency records, the delegated department staff must provide the ombuds with access to the requested documentation not later than thirty business days after the ombuds' written request for the records.(5) A state or local government agency or entity that has records that are relevant to a complaint or an investigation conducted by the ombuds must provide the ombuds with access to such records.(6) The department may not hinder the lawful actions of the ombuds or employees of the office, or willfully refuse to comply with lawful demands of the office.(7) The ombuds must work with the department to minimize disruption to the operations of the department due to ombuds activities, and must comply with the department's security clearance processes, provided these processes do not impede the activities outlined in this chapter.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.  (1) The ombuds shall treat all matters under investigation, including the identities of service recipients, complainants, and individuals from whom information is acquired, as confidential, except as far as disclosures may be necessary to enable the ombuds to perform the duties of the office and to support any recommendations resulting from an investigation.(2) Upon receipt of information that by law is confidential or privileged or exempt from disclosure under chapter 42.56 RCW, the ombuds shall maintain the confidentiality of such information and shall not further disclose or disseminate the information except as provided by applicable state or federal law.(3) Investigative records of the office of the ombuds are confidential and are exempt from public disclosure under chapter 42.56 RCW.
and(b) Department employees, or other persons, who might be reasonably believed to have knowledge of the incident under investigation, which includes the opportunity to interview those individuals.(3) Upon the ombuds' request, the department shall grant the ombuds the right to access, inspect, and copy all relevant information, records, or documents in the possession or control of the department that the ombuds considers necessary in an investigation of a complaint filed under this chapter, and must assist the ombuds in obtaining the necessary releases of documents that are specifically restricted or privileged for use by the ombuds.(4) Following notification from the ombuds with a written demand for access to agency records, the delegated department staff must provide the ombuds with access to the requested documentation not later than twenty business days after the ombuds' written request for the records.(5) A state or local government agency or entity that has records that are relevant to a complaint or an investigation conducted by the ombuds must provide the ombuds with access to such records.(6) The department may not hinder the lawful actions of the ombuds or employees of the office, or willfully refuse to comply with lawful demands of the office.(7) The ombuds must work with the department to minimize disruption to the operations of the department due to ombuds activities, and must comply with the department's security clearance processes, provided these processes do not impede the activities outlined in this chapter.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 8.  (1) Correspondence and communication with the office is confidential and must be protected as privileged correspondence in the same manner as legal correspondence or communication.(2) The office shall establish confidentiality rules and procedures for all information maintained by the office.(3) The office shall preserve the confidentiality of information obtained while providing services, including general information, technical assistance, and investigations, to individuals, including inmates, family members and representatives of inmates, department employees, and others.
Records provided to and communications with the office of the ombuds related to an investigation are also exempt from public disclosure under chapter 42.56 RCWNEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.  (1) Identifying information about complainants or witnesses is not subject to any method of legal compulsion and may not be revealed to the legislature or the governor except under the following circumstances:(a) The complainant or witness waives confidentiality;(b) Under a legislative subpoena when there is a legislative investigation for neglect of duty or misconduct by the ombuds or ombuds' office when the identifying information is necessary to the investigation of the ombuds' acts;
Confidential information may not be disclosed unless the individual gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out ombuds services, or the disclosure is authorized by subsection (4) of this section.(4) To the extent the ombuds reasonably believes necessary, the ombuds:(a) Must reveal information obtained in the course of providing ombuds services to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm;
or(c) Under an investigation or inquiry by the governor as to neglect of duty or misconduct by the ombuds or ombuds' office when the identifying information is necessary to the investigation of the ombuds' acts.(2) For the purposes of this section, "identifying information" includes the complainant's or witness's name, location, telephone number, likeness, social security number or other identification number, or identification of immediate family members.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10.  The privilege described in section 9 of this act does not apply when:(1) The ombuds or ombuds' staff member has direct knowledge of an alleged crime, and the testimony, evidence, or discovery sought is relevant to that allegation;(2) The ombuds or a member of the ombuds' staff has received a threat of, or becomes aware of a risk of, imminent serious harm to any person, and the testimony, evidence, or discovery sought is relevant to that threat or risk;
and(b) May reveal information obtained in the course of providing ombuds services to prevent the commission of a crime.(5) If the ombuds receives personally identifying information about individual corrections staff during the course of an investigation that the ombuds determines is unrelated or unnecessary to the subject of the investigation or recommendation for action, the ombuds will not further disclose such information.
or(3) The ombuds has been asked to provide general information regarding the general operation of, or the general processes employed at, the ombuds' office.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11.  (1) A civil action may not be brought against any employee of the office for good faith performance of responsibilities under this chapter.(2) No discriminatory, disciplinary, or retaliatory action may be taken against a department employee, subcontractor, or volunteer, an inmate, or a family member or representative of an inmate for any communication made, or information given or disclosed, to aid the office in carrying out its responsibilities, unless the communication or information is made, given, or disclosed maliciously or without good faith.(3) This section is not intended to infringe on the rights of an employer to supervise, discipline, or terminate an employee for other reasons.PART 2DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSec. 12.  RCW 72.09.010 and 1995 1st sp.s.
If the ombuds determines that such disclosure is necessary to an investigation or recommendation, the ombuds will contact the staff member as well as the bargaining unit representative before any disclosure.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 9.  (1) A civil action may not be brought against any employee of the office for good faith performance of responsibilities under this chapter.(2) No discriminatory, disciplinary, or retaliatory action may be taken against a department employee, subcontractor, or volunteer, an inmate, or a family member or representative of an inmate for any communication made, or information given or disclosed, to aid the office in carrying out its responsibilities, unless the communication or information is made, given, or disclosed maliciously or without good faith.(3) This section is not intended to infringe on the rights of an employer to supervise, discipline, or terminate an employee for other reasons.PART 2DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSSec. 10.  RCW 72.09.010 and 1995 1st sp.s.
In return, the individual citizens and local units of government must meet their responsibilities to make the corrections system effective.(9) The system should meet those national standards which the state determines to be appropriate.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 13.  A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:To ensure public safety and the administration of justice, if the department has actual knowledge or reason to believe that a computer calculation error is or has caused an error in the calculation of the release date for any prisoner, the department shall immediately manually calculate the release date of that prisoner as well as the release dates of any similarly sentenced prisoners.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 14.  A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:On December 1st of each year, and in compliance with RCW 43.01.036, the department must submit a report to the governor and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the legislature that details any information technology backlog at the department along with specific requirements and plans to address such backlog.PART 3JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMITTEENEW SECTION.  Sec. 15.  (1) Pursuant to chapter 43.09 RCW, the joint legislative audit and review committee must conduct a performance audit of the information technology and records related units at the department of corrections, including:(a) The administrative structure of the units, including whether the units should be restructured to respond efficiently to changes in sentencing laws and other emergent issues;(b) The sufficiency of staffing levels and expertise at each of the units;
In return, the individual citizens and local units of government must meet their responsibilities to make the corrections system effective.(9) The system should meet those national standards which the state determines to be appropriate.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 11.  A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:To ensure public safety and the administration of justice, if the department has actual knowledge or reason to believe that a computer calculation error is or has caused an error in the calculation of the release date for any prisoner, the department shall immediately manually calculate the release date of that prisoner as well as the release dates of any similarly sentenced prisoners.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12.  A new section is added to chapter 72.09 RCW to read as follows:On December 1st of each year, and in compliance with RCW 43.01.036, the department must submit a report to the governor and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the legislature that details any information technology backlog at the department along with specific requirements and plans to address such backlog.PART 3JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMITTEENEW SECTION.  Sec. 13.  (1) Pursuant to chapter 43.09 RCW, the joint legislative audit and review committee must conduct a performance audit of the information technology and records related units at the department of corrections, including:(a) The administrative structure of the units, including whether the units should be restructured to respond efficiently to changes in sentencing laws and other emergent issues;(b) The sufficiency of staffing levels and expertise at each of the units;
and(c) An evaluation of the advance corrections project's impact on workload and staff resources at each of the units.(2) The joint legislative audit and review committee shall report its findings to the governor and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the legislature by December 1, 2018.PART 4SENTENCING REFORMNEW SECTION.  Sec. 16.  A new section is added to chapter 9.94A RCW to read as follows:In consultation with the administrative office of the courts, superior court judges' association, Washington association of prosecuting attorneys, Washington association of criminal defense lawyers, Washington public defender association, and Washington association of county clerks, the department shall develop a mandatory sentencing elements worksheet.
and(c) An evaluation of the advance corrections project's impact on workload and staff resources at each of the units.(2) The joint legislative audit and review committee shall report its findings to the governor and relevant policy and fiscal committees of the legislature by December 1, 2018.PART 4SENTENCING REFORMNEW SECTION.  Sec. 14.  A new section is added to chapter 9.94A RCW to read as follows:In consultation with the administrative office of the courts, superior court judges' association, Washington association of prosecuting attorneys, Washington association of criminal defense lawyers, Washington public defender association, and Washington association of county clerks, the department shall develop a mandatory sentencing elements worksheet.
The Washington administrative office of the courts must include the mandatory sentencing elements worksheet in a specific section within its felony judgment and sentence forms.Sec. 17.  RCW 9.94A.480 and 2011 1st sp.s.
The Washington administrative office of the courts must include the mandatory sentencing elements worksheet in a specific section within its felony judgment and sentence forms.Sec. 15.  RCW 9.94A.480 and 2011 1st sp.s.
In addition, each felony judgment and sentence document must contain in a specific section the mandatory sentencing elements worksheet developed by the department of corrections in section 16 of this act.
In addition, each felony judgment and sentence document must contain in a specific section the mandatory sentencing elements worksheet developed by the department of corrections in section 14 of this act.
Both the sentencing judge and the prosecuting attorney's office shall each retain or receive a completed copy of each sentencing document as defined in this section for their own records.(2) The caseload forecast council shall be sent a completed copy of the judgment and sentence document upon conviction for each felony sentencing under subsection (1) of this section.(3) If any completed judgment and sentence document as defined in subsection (1) of this section is not sent to the caseload forecast council as required in subsection (2) of this section, the caseload forecast council shall have the authority and shall undertake reasonable and necessary steps to assure that all past, current, and future sentencing documents as defined in subsection (1) of this section are received by the caseload forecast council.Sec. 18.  RCW 9.94A.585 and 2002 c 290 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A sentence within the standard sentence range, under RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517, for an offense shall not be appealed.
Both the sentencing judge and the prosecuting attorney's office shall each retain or receive a completed copy of each sentencing document as defined in this section for their own records.(2) The caseload forecast council shall be sent a completed copy of the judgment and sentence document upon conviction for each felony sentencing under subsection (1) of this section.(3) If any completed judgment and sentence document as defined in subsection (1) of this section is not sent to the caseload forecast council as required in subsection (2) of this section, the caseload forecast council shall have the authority and shall undertake reasonable and necessary steps to assure that all past, current, and future sentencing documents as defined in subsection (1) of this section are received by the caseload forecast council.Sec. 16.  RCW 9.94A.585 and 2002 c 290 s 19 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A sentence within the standard sentence range, under RCW 9.94A.510 or 9.94A.517, for an offense shall not be appealed.
The petition shall include a certification by the department that all reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute at the superior court level have been exhausted.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 19.  (1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the sentencing guidelines commission shall contract for the services of one or more external consultants to evaluate the state's sentencing laws and practices.
The petition shall include a certification by the department that all reasonable efforts to resolve the dispute at the superior court level have been exhausted.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 17.  (1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the sentencing guidelines commission shall contract for the services of one or more external consultants to evaluate the state's sentencing laws and practices.
Recommendations from the sentencing guidelines commission shall be included in the consultant's final report.(3) The consultant shall complete its evaluation and submit a report to the commission, the joint legislative task force on criminal sentencing under section 20 of this act, the appropriate committees of the legislature, and the governor by September 1, 2018.
Recommendations from the sentencing guidelines commission shall be included in the consultant's final report.(3) The consultant shall complete its evaluation and submit a report to the commission, the joint legislative task force on criminal sentencing under section 18 of this act, the appropriate committees of the legislature, and the governor by September 1, 2018.
The contract for services must include a requirement for three briefings before the legislature to take place during the 2018 interim and 2019 regular legislative session, including for the joint legislative task force on sentencing, the house of representatives, and the senate.(4) This section expires July 1, 2019.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 20.  (1) A joint legislative task force to simplify criminal sentencing is established.(2) The task force is composed of members as provided in this subsection.(a) The president of the senate shall appoint one member from each of the two largest caucuses of the senate.(b) The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint one member from each of the two largest caucuses of the house of representatives.(c) The president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives jointly shall appoint members representing the:(i) Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs;(ii) Washington state patrol;(iii) Caseload forecast council;(iv) Washington association of prosecuting attorneys;(v) Washington association of criminal defense attorneys or the Washington defender association;(vi) Washington state association of counties;(vii) Office of the attorney general;(viii) American civil liberties union of Washington;(ix) Sentencing guidelines commission;(x) Department of corrections;(xi) Superior court judges' association;
The contract for services must include a requirement for three briefings before the legislature to take place during the 2018 interim and 2019 regular legislative session, including for the joint legislative task force on sentencing, the house of representatives, and the senate.(4) This section expires July 1, 2019.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 18.  (1) A joint legislative task force to simplify criminal sentencing is established.(2) The task force is composed of members as provided in this subsection.(a) The president of the senate shall appoint one member from each of the two largest caucuses of the senate.(b) The speaker of the house of representatives shall appoint one member from each of the two largest caucuses of the house of representatives.(c) The president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives jointly shall appoint members representing the:(i) Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs;(ii) Washington state patrol;(iii) Caseload forecast council;(iv) Washington association of prosecuting attorneys;(v) Washington association of criminal defense attorneys or the Washington defender association;(vi) Washington state association of counties;(vii) Office of the attorney general;(viii) American civil liberties union of Washington;(ix) Sentencing guidelines commission;(x) Department of corrections;(xi) Superior court judges' association;
and(xii) Administrative office for the courts.(3) The task force shall review sentencing laws after consideration of the study under section 19 of this act and the consultant's recommendations.
and(xii) Administrative office for the courts.(3) The task force shall review sentencing laws after consideration of the study under section 17 of this act and the consultant's recommendations.
Task force expenditures are subject to approval by the senate facilities and operations committee and the house executive rules committee, or their successor committees.(9) This section expires July 1, 2020.PART 5GENERAL PROVISIONSSec. 21.  RCW 49.60.210 and 2011 1st sp.s.
Task force expenditures are subject to approval by the senate facilities and operations committee and the house executive rules committee, or their successor committees.(9) This section expires July 1, 2020.PART 5GENERAL PROVISIONSSec. 19.  RCW 49.60.210 and 2011 1st sp.s.
c 42 s 25 are each amended to read as follows:(1) It is an unfair practice for any employer, employment agency, labor union, or other person to discharge, expel, or otherwise discriminate against any person because he or she has opposed any practices forbidden by this chapter, or because he or she has filed a charge, testified, or assisted in any proceeding under this chapter.(2)(a) It is an unfair practice for a government agency or government manager or supervisor to retaliate against a whistleblower as defined in chapter 42.40 RCW.(b) A settlement of any cause of action brought by an employee under this subsection may not contain a provision prohibiting the employee from future work in state government unless the government agency has a significant ongoing concern for the public health, safety, or welfare as a result of the person's future employment.(3) It is an unfair practice for any employer, employment agency, labor union, government agency, government manager, or government supervisor to discharge, expel, discriminate, or otherwise retaliate against an individual assisting with an office of fraud and accountability investigation under RCW 74.04.012, unless the individual has willfully disregarded the truth in providing information to the office.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 22.  In the contract for the next regularly scheduled performance audit under RCW 42.40.110 following the effective date of this section, the office of financial management must require the audit to review the ability of department of corrections employees to use the state employee whistleblower program.
c 42 s 25 are each amended to read as follows:(1) It is an unfair practice for any employer, employment agency, labor union, or other person to discharge, expel, or otherwise discriminate against any person because he or she has opposed any practices forbidden by this chapter, or because he or she has filed a charge, testified, or assisted in any proceeding under this chapter.(2)(a) It is an unfair practice for a government agency or government manager or supervisor to retaliate against a whistleblower as defined in chapter 42.40 RCW.(b) A settlement of any cause of action brought by an employee under this subsection may not contain a provision prohibiting the employee from future work in state government unless the government agency has a significant ongoing concern for the public health, safety, or welfare as a result of the person's future employment.(3) It is an unfair practice for any employer, employment agency, labor union, government agency, government manager, or government supervisor to discharge, expel, discriminate, or otherwise retaliate against an individual assisting with an office of fraud and accountability investigation under RCW 74.04.012, unless the individual has willfully disregarded the truth in providing information to the office.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 20.  In the contract for the next regularly scheduled performance audit under RCW 42.40.110 following the effective date of this section, the office of financial management must require the audit to review the ability of department of corrections employees to use the state employee whistleblower program.
The audit must include findings and recommendations, including possible changes to improve the effectiveness of the whistleblower program.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 23.  Sections 16 through 18 of this act apply to sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2018.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 24.  Sections 2 through 11 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW.--- END ---
The audit must include findings and recommendations, including possible changes to improve the effectiveness of the whistleblower program.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 21.  Sections 14, 15, and 16 of this act apply to sentences imposed on or after July 1, 2018.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 22.  Sections 2 through 9 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 43 RCW.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Senate Rules "X" file.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. Returned to Senate Rules 3.

  4. Third reading, passed; yeas, 43; nays, 6; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  5. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  6. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  7. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  8. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  9. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  10. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  11. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  12. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  13. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  14. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  15. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. LAW - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  17. First reading, referred to Law & Justice.

Sponsors

  • O'Ban · Cosponsor
  • Padden · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Padden

Co-sponsors (1)

  • O'Ban

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 43 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28500
Republican 8000
Democrat 7100
Total 43600
% of votes cast 88%12%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Rossi — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Becker — Yea
Billig — Nay
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Nelson — Nay
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Pearson — Yea
Ranker — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5952?
SB 5952 is sponsored by O'Ban and Padden.
What is the current status of SB 5952?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5952?
Track SB 5952 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5952

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5952

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →