Concerning transit-only lane enforcement cameras.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2403 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2403.
You're tracking HB 2403
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2403 — Concerning transit-only lane enforcement cameras.
Last action — Referred to Rules 2 Review.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill HB 2403 adds specific guidelines for the use of transit-only lane enforcement cameras, including requirements for local authorities to analyze locations before implementing cameras. Most notably, it introduces an initial warning system for first-time violators, allowing them to receive a notice of infraction only after a second violation within five years, which could help educate drivers and reduce unnecessary penalties. This change aims to improve compliance and understanding of traffic laws, particularly in transit lanes, ultimately making roads safer for everyone.
H-3980.2SUBSTITUTEH-3231.2HOUSE HOUSE BILL 2403State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy House Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Fitzgibbon and Tarleton)READTarletonPrefiled FIRST01/05/18. TIME 01/22/18.AN ACT Relating to transit-only lane enforcement cameras;
amendingRead RCWfirst 46.63.170;time 01/08/18.
andReferred providingto anCommittee expirationon date.BETransportation.AN ITACT ENACTEDRelating BYto THEtransit-only LEGISLATURElane OFenforcement THEcameras; STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 46.63.170 and 2015 3rd sp.s.
and amending RCW 46.63.170.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 46.63.170 and 2015 3rd sp.s.
Beginning one year after June 7, 2012, cities and counties using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera and any other relevant information about the automated traffic safety cameras that the city or county deems appropriate on the city's or county's web site.(b)(i)site.(b) AThe pilotappropriate projectlocal islegislative authorizedauthority formust upprepare toan threeanalysis transitof lanethe corridorslocations forwithin the testingjurisdiction ofwhere automated transit-only lane enforcement cameras inare citiesproposed withto populationsbe greaterlocated: than five hundred thousand.
Pilot(i) projectsBefore areenacting authorizedan fromordinance Septemberallowing 1,for 2018,the toinitial Decemberuse 31,of 2020.transit-only lane enforcement cameras;
Aand work(ii) groupbefore mustadding beadditional establishedcameras foror relocating any pilotexisting projectcamera to includea thenew locallocation transportationwithin authority of the cityjurisdiction. in which an included transit lane corridor is located, the metropolitan municipal corporation that operates transit on an included transit lane corridor, and the Washington state department of transportation.
The work group must recommend the transit lane corridors to be selected for inclusion in the pilot project.(ii) The appropriate local legislative authority must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where transit-only lane enforcement cameras are proposed to be located as part of a pilot project:
(A) Before enacting an ordinance allowing for the initial use of transit-only lane enforcement cameras;
and (B) before adding additional cameras or relocating any existing camera to a new location within the jurisdiction.
At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage.(iii)signage.(c) TheExcept pilotas projectprovided workin group(((c))) must(e) provideof anthis updatesubsection, byuse Novemberof 30,automated 2019,traffic andsafety acameras reportis byrestricted December 31, 2020, to the transportationfollowing committeeslocations ofonly: the legislature.
The report must include:(A) A recommendation for how transit lane usage policies may be used to address significant current and near-term building and roadway construction projects in the city that are adversely impacting or that will adversely impact traffic in the city;
and(B) A recommendation for enforcement policies for traffic infractions generated through the use of automated transit-only lane enforcement cameras that considers how drivers may be educated regarding the use of these cameras and the penalties that may result from infractions captured by them.(c) Except as provided in (((c))) (e) of this subsection, use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to the following locations only:
Cities and counties shall consider installing cameras in a manner that minimizes the impact of camera flash on drivers.(((e))) (g)(i)(g) A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within fourteen days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within fourteen days of establishing the renter's name and address under subsection (3)(a) of this section.
The law enforcement officer issuing the notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon inspection of photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety or a transit-only lane enforcement camera, stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction.
A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety or a transit-only lane enforcement camera may respond to the notice by mail.(ii)(A)mail.(((f))) A(h) noticeThe ofregistered infractionowner forof ana infractionvehicle generatedis throughresponsible thefor use of an automatedinfraction transit-onlyunder laneRCW enforcement46.63.030(1)(d) cameraunless maythe onlyregistered beowner issuedovercomes for the secondpresumption orin subsequentRCW violation46.63.075, withinor, ain five-year period by the registeredcase owner of thea vehiclerental orcar thebusiness, rentersatisfies of the vehicleconditions forunder ansubsection infraction(3) generated through the use of anthis automatedsection. transit-only lane enforcement camera.
A warning of infraction must be mailed in place of a notice of infraction for the first violation by the registered owner of the vehicle or the renter of the vehicle for an infraction generated through the use of an automated transit-only lane enforcement camera.(B) A warning of infraction must be issued in the same manner and is subject to the same evidentiary, inspection, and admission requirements, and opportunity for the recipient to respond by mail, applicable to a notice of infraction as provided in (g)(i) of this subsection.(C) No fine may be issued for a warning of infraction for a first infraction by the registered owner of the vehicle or the renter of the vehicle within a five-year period generated through the use of an automated transit-only lane enforcement camera.(((f))) (h) The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction under RCW 46.63.030(1)(d) unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption in RCW 46.63.075, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection (3) of this section.
or(c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty.Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction.(4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), (b), or (c).(5) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit as detected by a speed measuring device.(6) For the purposes of this section, "automated transit-only lane enforcement camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to monitor nontraffic transit vehicles in violation of designated transit-only lanes.(7) During the 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 fiscal biennia, this section does not apply to automated traffic safety cameras for the purposes of section 216(5), chapter 367, Laws of 2011 and section 216(6), chapter 306, Laws of 2013.NEW2013.--- SECTION. Sec. 2. This act expires December 31, 2020.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Joe Fitzgibbon · Primary
- Tarleton · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Tarleton
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2403?
- HB 2403 is sponsored by Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat) and Tarleton.
- What is the current status of HB 2403?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2403?
- Track HB 2403 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2403
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2403
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →