Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 8 D cosponsors

SB 6002 — Enacting the Washington voting rights act of 2018.

Last action — Effective date 6/7/2018.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 06, 2017. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 21 sponsors

    1 primary, 20 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 D).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 6 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of SB 6002 introduces new provisions that allow local governments in Washington to voluntarily change their electoral systems to promote fair voting opportunities for minority groups. This includes using district-based elections or alternative voting methods if they identify that their current systems dilute the voting power of protected classes. These changes are significant because they empower local jurisdictions to collaborate with affected communities to improve representation and ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws. By allowing these adjustments, the bill aims to enhance equal access to elections for all voters, particularly those from marginalized groups.

→
Previous
Latest
S-3854.1SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6002State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate State Government, Tribal Relations & Elections (originally sponsored by Senators Saldaña, Billig, Palumbo, Frockt, Rolfes, Van De Wege, Liias, Ranker, Keiser, Pedersen, Hunt, Wellman, Conway, Chase, McCoy, Dhingra, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Nelson, Carlyle, and Mullet)READ FIRST TIME 01/15/18.AN ACT Relating to establishing a voting rights act to promote equal voting opportunity in certain political subdivisions and establishing a cause of action to redress lack of voter opportunity;
S-3209.3SENATE BILL 6002State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Saldaña, Billig, Palumbo, Frockt, Rolfes, Van De Wege, Liias, Ranker, Keiser, Pedersen, Hunt, Wellman, Conway, Chase, McCoy, Dhingra, Kuderer, Hasegawa, Nelson, Carlyle, and MulletPrefiled 12/06/17.
amending RCW 36.32.020, 36.32.040, 54.12.010, and 2.06.030;
Read first time 01/08/18.
Referred to Committee on State Government, Tribal Relations & Elections.AN ACT Relating to establishing a voting rights act to promote equal voting opportunity in certain political subdivisions and establishing a cause of action to redress lack of voter opportunity;
amending RCW 36.32.020, 36.32.040, and 54.12.010;
In applying these definitions and other terms in this chapter, courts may rely on relevant federal case law for guidance.(1) "At-large election" means any of the following methods of electing members of the governing body of a political subdivision:(a) One in which the voters of the entire jurisdiction elect the members to the governing body;(b) One in which the candidates are required to reside within given areas of the jurisdiction and the voters of the entire jurisdiction elect the members to the governing body;
In applying these definitions and other terms in this chapter, courts may rely on relevant federal case law for guidance.(1) "Alternative proportional voting method" means any at-large election that includes one of the following methods of voting for multiple members of the governing body of a political subdivision:(a) Limiting the number of votes a voter is entitled to cast to fewer than there are positions to elect;(b) Cumulating the number of votes a voter is entitled to cast for each position, and allowing the voter to cast the total number of votes in favor of a single candidate or to distribute the total number of votes among multiple candidates;
or(c) One that combines the criteria in (a) and (b) of this subsection or one that combines at-large with district-based elections.(2) "District-based elections" means a method of electing members to the governing body of a political subdivision in which the candidate must reside within an election district that is a divisible part of the political subdivision and is elected only by voters residing within that election district.(3) "Polarized voting" means voting in which there is a difference, as defined in case law regarding enforcement of the federal voting rights act, 52 U.S.C.
or(c) Voting in a single transferable vote where voters rank each candidate in order of preference, with their vote counting towards the highest ranked candidate, and preferences allocated among other candidates who are not elected on first place votes.(2) "At-large election" means any of the following methods of electing members of the governing body of a political subdivision:(a) One in which the voters of the entire jurisdiction elect the members to the governing body;(b) One in which the candidates are required to reside within given areas of the jurisdiction and the voters of the entire jurisdiction elect the members to the governing body;
10301 et seq., in the choice of candidates or other electoral choices that are preferred by voters in a protected class, and in the choice of candidates and electoral choices that are preferred by voters in the rest of the electorate.(4) "Political subdivision" means any county, city, town, school district, fire protection district, port district, or public utility district, but does not include the state.(5) "Protected class" means a class of voters who are members of a race, color, or language minority group, as this class is referenced and defined in the federal voting rights act, 52 U.S.C.
or(c) One that combines the criteria in (a) and (b) of this subsection or one that combines at-large with district-based elections.(3) "District-based elections" means a method of electing members to the governing body of a political subdivision in which the candidate must reside within an election district that is a divisible part of the political subdivision and is elected only by voters residing within that election district.(4) "Polarized voting" means voting in which there is a difference, as defined in case law regarding enforcement of the federal voting rights act, 52 U.S.C.
10301 et seq.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 104.  As provided in section 302 of this act, no method of electing the governing body of a political subdivision may be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of members of a protected class or classes to have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice as a result of the dilution or abridgment of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class or classes.PART II - VOLUNTARY CHANGES TO ELECTORAL PROCESSESNEW SECTION.  Sec. 201.  (1) A political subdivision that conducts an election pursuant to state, county, or local law, is authorized to change its electoral system, including, but not limited to, implementing a district-based election system, to remedy a potential violation of section 104 of this act.(2) If a political subdivision invokes its authority under this section to implement a district-based election system, the districts shall be drawn in a manner consistent with section 202 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 202.  (1)(a) Prior to the adoption of its proposed plan, the political subdivision must provide public notice to the community about the proposed remedy to a potential violation of section 104 of this act.
10301 et seq., in the choice of candidates or other electoral choices that are preferred by voters in a protected class, and in the choice of candidates and electoral choices that are preferred by voters in the rest of the electorate.(5) "Political subdivision" means any county, city, town, school district, fire protection district, port district, or public utility district, but does not include the state.(6) "Protected class" means a class of voters who are members of a race, color, or language minority group, as this class is referenced and defined in the federal voting rights act, 52 U.S.C.
10301 et seq.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 104.  As provided in section 302 of this act, no method of electing the governing body of a political subdivision may be imposed or applied in a manner that impairs the ability of members of a protected class to have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or an equal opportunity to influence the outcome of an election as a result of the dilution or abridgment of the rights of voters who are members of a protected class.PART II - VOLUNTARY CHANGES TO ELECTORAL PROCESSESNEW SECTION.  Sec. 201.  (1) A political subdivision that conducts an election pursuant to state, county, or local law, is authorized to change its electoral system including, but not limited to, implementing a district-based election system or an alternative proportional voting method to remedy a potential violation of section 104 of this act.(2) If a political subdivision invokes its authority under this section to implement a district-based election system, the districts shall be drawn in a manner consistent with section 202 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 202.  (1)(a) Prior to the adoption of its proposed plan, the political subdivision must provide public notice to the community about the proposed remedy to a potential violation of section 104 of this act.
and(ii) Air radio or television public service announcements describing the proposed remedy broadcast in the languages that diverse residents of the political subdivision can understand, as indicated by demographic data.(b) The political subdivision shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed plan at least one week before adoption.(c) For purposes of this section, "significant segment of the community" means five percent or more of residents, or five hundred or more residents, whichever is fewer, residing in the political subdivision.(2)(a) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section and the plan is adopted during the period of time between the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November and on or before January 15th of the following year, the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur at the next succeeding general election.(b) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section and the plan is adopted during the period of time between January 16th and on or before the first Monday of November, the next election will occur as scheduled and organized under the current electoral system, but the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur pursuant to the remedy at the general election the following calendar year.(3) If a political subdivision implements a district-based election system, the plan shall be consistent with the following criteria:(a) Each district shall be as reasonably equal in population as possible to each and every other such district comprising the political subdivision.(b) Each district shall be reasonably compact.(c) Each district shall consist of geographically contiguous area.(d) To the extent feasible, the district boundaries shall coincide with existing recognized natural boundaries and shall, to the extent possible, preserve existing communities of related and mutual interest.(e) District boundaries may not be drawn or maintained in a manner that creates or perpetuates the dilution of the votes of the members of a protected class or classes.(4) Within forty-five days after receipt of federal decennial census information applicable to a specific local area, the commission established in RCW 44.05.030 shall forward the census information to each political subdivision.(5) No later than eight months after its receipt of federal decennial census data, the governing body of the political subdivision that had previously invoked its authority under this section to implement a district-based election system, or that was previously charged with redistricting under section 403 of this act, shall prepare a plan for redistricting its districts, pursuant to RCW 29A.76.010, and in a manner consistent with this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 203.  (1) A political subdivision that conducts an election pursuant to state, county, or local law, is authorized to change its electoral system to implement an alternative proportional voting method to remedy a potential violation of section 104 of this act.(2) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section, the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur no sooner than as provided in section 202(2) of this act.(3) A political subdivision may eliminate the staggered terms of any position in order to implement an alternative proportional voting method.(4) As used in this chapter, "alternative proportional voting method" means any at-large election that includes one of the following methods of voting for multiple members of the governing body of a political subdivision:(a) Limiting the number of votes a voter is entitled to cast to fewer than there are positions to elect;(b) Cumulating the number of votes a voter is entitled to cast for each position, and allowing the voter to cast the total number of votes in favor of a single candidate or to distribute the total number of votes among multiple candidates;
and(ii) Air radio or television public service announcements describing the proposed remedy broadcast in the languages that diverse residents of the political subdivision can understand, as indicated by demographic data.(b) The political subdivision shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed plan at least one week before adoption.(c) For purposes of this section, "significant segment of the community" means five percent or more of residents, or five hundred or more residents, whichever is fewer, residing in the political subdivision.(2)(a) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section and the plan is adopted during the period of time between the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November and on or before January 15th of the following year, the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur at the next succeeding general election.(b) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section and the plan is adopted during the period of time between January 16th and on or before the first Monday of November, the next election will occur as scheduled and organized under the current electoral system, but the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur pursuant to the remedy at the general election the following calendar year.(c) If the political subdivision invokes its authority under this section and the plan uses an alternative proportional voting method, the political subdivision shall order new elections to occur no sooner than as provided in (a) and (b) of this subsection.(3) If a political subdivision implements a district-based election system, the plan shall be consistent with the following criteria:(a) Each district shall be as reasonably equal in population as possible to each and every other such district comprising the political subdivision.(b) Each district shall be reasonably compact.(c) Each district shall consist of geographically contiguous area.(d) To the extent feasible, the district boundaries shall coincide with existing recognized natural boundaries and shall, to the extent possible, preserve existing communities of related and mutual interest.(e) District boundaries may not be drawn or maintained in a manner that denies a protected class an equal opportunity to elect candidates of its choice or an equal opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.(4) Within forty-five days after receipt of federal decennial census information applicable to a specific local area, the commission established in RCW 44.05.030 shall forward the census information to each political subdivision that has invoked its authority under this section to implement a district-based election system, or that is charged with redistricting under section 403 of this act.(5) No later than eight months after its receipt of federal decennial census data, the governing body of the political subdivision that had previously invoked its authority under this section to implement a district-based election system, or that was previously charged with redistricting under section 403 of this act, shall prepare a plan for redistricting its districts, pursuant to RCW 29A.76.010, and in a manner consistent with this act.(6) A political subdivision may eliminate the staggered terms of any position in order to implement an alternative proportional voting method.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 203.  A new section is added to chapter 28A.343 RCW to read as follows:The school board of directors may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.
or(c) Voting in a single transferable vote where voters rank each candidate in order of preference, with their vote counting towards the highest ranked candidate, and preferences allocated among other candidates who are not elected on first place votes.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 204.  A new section is added to chapter 28A.343 RCW to read as follows:The school board of directors may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.
Any staggering of directors' terms shall be accomplished as provided in RCW 28A.343.030 and 28A.343.600 through 28A.343.650.Sec. 204.  RCW 36.32.020 and 1982 c 226 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:The board of county commissioners of each county shall divide their county into three commissioner districts so that each district shall comprise as nearly as possible one-third of the population of the county:
Any staggering of directors' terms shall be accomplished as provided in RCW 28A.343.030 and 28A.343.600 through 28A.343.650.Sec. 205.  RCW 36.32.020 and 1982 c 226 s 4 are each amended to read as follows:The board of county commissioners of each county shall divide their county into three commissioner districts so that each district shall comprise as nearly as possible one-third of the population of the county:
Except where necessary to comply with a court order issued pursuant to section 403 of this act, and except in the case of an intervening census, the lines of the districts shall not be changed ((oftener)) more often than once in four years and only when a full board of commissioners is present.
Except where necessary to comply with a court order issued pursuant to section 403 of this act, the lines of the districts shall not be changed ((oftener)) more often than once in four years and only when a full board of commissioners is present.
The districts shall be designated as districts numbered one, two and three.Sec. 206.  RCW 36.32.040 and 1982 c 226 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the qualified electors of each county commissioner district, and they only, shall nominate from among their own number, candidates for the office of county commissioner of such commissioner district to be voted for at the following general election.
The districts shall be designated as districts numbered one, two and three.Sec. 205.  RCW 36.32.040 and 1982 c 226 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, the qualified electors of each county commissioner district, and they only, shall nominate from among their own number, candidates for the office of county commissioner of such commissioner district to be voted for at the following general election.
Such candidates shall be nominated in the same manner as candidates for other county offices are nominated in all other respects.(3) The commissioners of any county may authorize a change to their electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 207.  A new section is added to chapter 35.21 RCW to read as follows:The legislative authority of a city or town may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 208.  A new section is added to chapter 35A.21 RCW to read as follows:The legislative authority of a code city or town may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 209.  A new section is added to chapter 52.14 RCW to read as follows:The board of fire commissioners of a fire protection district may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act by majority vote.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 210.  A new section is added to chapter 53.12 RCW to read as follows:The port commission may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.Sec. 211.  RCW 54.12.010 and 2004 c 113 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:A public utility district that is created as provided in RCW 54.08.010 shall be a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, and the name of such public utility district shall be Public Utility District No.
Such candidates shall be nominated in the same manner as candidates for other county offices are nominated in all other respects.(3) The commissioners of any county may authorize a change to their electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 206.  A new section is added to chapter 35.21 RCW to read as follows:The legislative authority of a city or town may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 207.  A new section is added to chapter 35A.21 RCW to read as follows:The legislative authority of a code city or town may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 208.  A new section is added to chapter 52.14 RCW to read as follows:The board of fire commissioners of a fire protection district may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act by majority vote.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 209.  A new section is added to chapter 53.12 RCW to read as follows:The port commission may authorize a change to its electoral system pursuant to section 201 of this act.Sec. 210.  RCW 54.12.010 and 2004 c 113 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:A public utility district that is created as provided in RCW 54.08.010 shall be a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, and the name of such public utility district shall be Public Utility District No.
Except as provided in this section ((or)), section 403 of this act, RCW 54.04.039, or in the case of an intervening census, the boundaries shall not be changed ((oftener)) more often than once in four years.
Except as provided in this section, section 403 of this act, or RCW 54.04.039, the boundaries shall not be changed ((oftener)) more often than once in four years.
The political subdivision shall promptly make such notice public.(2) The notice provided shall identify the person or persons who intend to file an action, and the protected class or classes whose members do not have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice because of alleged vote dilution and polarized voting.
The political subdivision shall promptly make such notice public.(2) The notice provided shall identify the person or persons who intend to file an action, and the protected class or classes whose members do not have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or an equal opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.
The notice shall also include a type of remedy the person believes may address the alleged violation of section 302 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 302.  (1) A political subdivision is in violation of this act when it is shown that:(a) Elections in the political subdivision exhibit polarized voting;
The notice shall also include a specific description of the alleged vote dilution and polarized voting, and a type of remedy the person believes may address the alleged violation of section 302 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 302.  (1) A political subdivision is in violation of this act when it is shown that:(a) Elections in the political subdivision exhibit polarized voting;
and(b) There is a significant risk that members of a protected class or classes do not have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice as a result of the dilution or abridgment of the rights of members of that protected class or classes.(2) The fact that members of a protected class are not geographically compact or concentrated to constitute a majority in a proposed or existing district-based election district shall not preclude a finding of a violation under this act, but may be a factor in determining a remedy.
and(b) Members of a protected class do not have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or an equal opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.(2) The fact that members of a protected class are not geographically compact or concentrated to constitute a majority in a proposed or existing district-based election district shall not preclude a finding of a violation under this act, but may be a factor in determining a remedy.(3) In determining whether there is polarized voting under this act, the court shall analyze elections of the governing body of the political subdivision, ballot measure elections, elections in which at least one candidate is a member of a protected class, and other electoral choices that affect the rights and privileges of members of a protected class.
The equal opportunity to elect shall be assessed pragmatically, based on local election conditions, and may include crossover districts.(3) In determining whether there is polarized voting under this act, the court shall analyze elections of the governing body of the political subdivision, ballot measure elections, elections in which at least one candidate is a member of a protected class, and other electoral choices that affect the rights and privileges of members of a protected class.
Only elections conducted prior to the filing of an action pursuant to this act shall be used to establish or rebut the existence of polarized voting.(4) The election of candidates who are members of a protected class and who were elected prior to the filing of an action pursuant to this act shall not preclude a finding of polarized voting that results in an unequal opportunity for a protected class to elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of an election.(5) Proof of intent on the part of the voters or elected officials to discriminate against a protected class is not required for a cause of action to be sustained.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 303.  (1) The political subdivision shall work in good faith with the person providing the notice to implement a remedy that provides the protected class or classes identified in the notice an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of an election.(2) If the political subdivision adopts a remedy that takes the notice into account, or adopts the notice's proposed remedy, the political subdivision shall seek a court order acknowledging that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act.
Only elections conducted prior to the filing of an action pursuant to this act shall be used to establish or rebut the existence of polarized voting.(4) The election of candidates who are members of a protected class and who were elected prior to the filing of an action pursuant to this act shall not preclude a finding of polarized voting that results in an unequal opportunity for a protected class to elect candidates of their choice.(5) Proof of intent on the part of the voters or elected officials to discriminate against a protected class is not required for a cause of action to be sustained.(6) Other factors such as the history of discrimination, the use of electoral devices or other voting practices or procedures that may enhance the dilutive effects of at-large elections, denial of access to those processes determining which groups of candidates will receive financial or other support in a given election, the extent to which members of a protected class bear the effects of past discrimination in areas such as education, employment, and health, which hinder their ability to participate effectively in the political process, and the use of overt or subtle racial appeals in political campaigns are probative, but not necessary factors, to establish a violation of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 303.  (1) The political subdivision shall work in good faith with the person providing the notice to implement a remedy that provides the protected class or classes identified in the notice an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.(2) If the political subdivision adopts a remedy that takes the notice into account, or adopts the notice's proposed remedy, the political subdivision shall seek a court order, which shall be subject to mandatory direct appeal to the supreme court, acknowledging that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act and was prompted by a plausible violation.
The political subdivision must provide all political, census, and demographic data and any analysis of that data used to develop the remedy in its filings seeking the court order and with any documents made public.(3) If the court concludes that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act, an action under this act may not be brought against that political subdivision for four years by any party so long as the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.(4) In agreeing to adopt the person's proposed remedy, the political subdivision may do so by stipulation, which shall become a public document.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 304.  (1) Any person may file an action under this act if, one hundred eighty days after a political subdivision receives notice of a challenge to its electoral system under section 301 of this act, the political subdivision has not obtained a court order stating that it has adopted a remedy in compliance with section 104 of this act.(2) If a political subdivision has received two or more notices containing materially different proposed remedies, the political subdivision shall work in good faith with the persons to implement a remedy that provides the protected class or classes identified in the notices an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.
The political subdivision must provide all political, census, and demographic data and any analysis of that data used to develop the remedy in its filings seeking the court order and with any documents made public.(3) If the court concludes that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act, an action under this act may not be brought against that political subdivision for four years by any party so long as the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.(4) In agreeing to adopt the person's proposed remedy, the political subdivision may do so by stipulation, which shall become a public document.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 304.  (1) Any person may file an action under this act if, one hundred eighty days after a political subdivision receives notice of a challenge to its electoral system under section 301 of this act, the political subdivision has not obtained a court order stating that it has adopted a remedy in compliance with section 104 of this act.(2) If, within one hundred eighty days after receiving a person's notice, a political subdivision receives any other notice containing a materially different proposed remedy than the first notice, no action may be filed under this act within two hundred seventy days after receiving the initial notice.
If the political subdivision adopts one of the remedies offered, or a different remedy that takes multiple notices into account, the political subdivision shall seek a court order, which is subject to mandatory direct appeal to the supreme court, acknowledging that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act and was prompted by a plausible violation.
All notices shall be made public promptly.(3) If a political subdivision has received two or more notices containing materially different proposed remedies, the political subdivision shall work in good faith with the persons to implement a remedy that provides the protected class or classes identified in the notices an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or influence the outcome of an election.
If the political subdivision adopts one of the remedies offered, or a different remedy that takes multiple notices into account, the political subdivision shall seek a court order acknowledging that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act.
The political subdivision must provide all political, census, and demographic data and any analysis of that data used to develop the remedy in its filings seeking the court order.(3) If the court concludes that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act, an action under this act may not be brought against that political subdivision for four years by any party so long as the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.Sec. 305.  RCW 2.06.030 and 1980 c 76 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:The administration and procedures of the court shall be as provided by rules of the supreme court.
The political subdivision must provide all political, census, and demographic data and any analysis of that data used to develop the remedy in its filings seeking the court order.(4) If the court concludes that the political subdivision's remedy complies with section 104 of this act, an action under this act may not be brought against that political subdivision for four years by any party so long as the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.PART IV - SAFE HARBOR AND LEGAL ACTION UNDER THIS ACTNEW SECTION.  Sec. 401.  (1) After exhaustion of the time period in section 304 of this act, any voter who resides in a political subdivision where a violation of section 104 of this act is alleged may file an action in the superior court of the county in which the political subdivision is located.
The court shall be vested with all power and authority, not inconsistent with said rules, necessary to carry into complete execution all of its judgments, decrees and determinations in all matters within its jurisdiction, according to the rules and principles of the common law and the Constitution and laws of this state.For the prompt and orderly administration of justice, the supreme court may (1) transfer to the appropriate division of the court for decision a case or appeal pending before the supreme court;
or (2) transfer to the supreme court for decision a case or appeal pending in a division of the court.Subject to the provisions of this section, the court shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction in all cases except:(a) cases of quo warranto, prohibition, injunction or mandamus directed to state officials;(b) criminal cases where the death penalty has been decreed;(c) cases where the validity of all or any portion of a statute, ordinance, tax, impost, assessment or toll is drawn into question on the grounds of repugnancy to the Constitution of the United States or of the state of Washington, or to a statute or treaty of the United States, and the superior court has held against its validity;(d) cases involving fundamental and urgent issues of broad public import requiring prompt and ultimate determination;
and(e) cases involving substantive issues on which there is a direct conflict among prevailing decisions of panels of the court or between decisions of the supreme court;all of which shall be appealed directly to the supreme court:
PROVIDED, That whenever a majority of the court before which an appeal is pending, but before a hearing thereon, is in doubt as to whether such appeal is within the categories set forth in subsection (d) or (e) of this section, the cause shall be certified to the supreme court for such determination.The appellate jurisdiction of the court of appeals does not extend to civil actions at law for the recovery of money or personal property when the original amount in controversy, or the value of the property does not exceed the sum of two hundred dollars.The court shall have appellate jurisdiction over review of final decisions of administrative agencies certified by the superior court pursuant to RCW 34.05.518.The court has mandatory appellate jurisdiction over superior court orders regarding remedies sought by political subdivisions pursuant to sections 303 and 304 of this act.Appeals from the court to the supreme court shall be only at the discretion of the supreme court upon the filing of a petition for review.
No case, appeal or petition for a writ filed in the supreme court or the court shall be dismissed for the reason that it was not filed in the proper court, but it shall be transferred to the proper court.PART IV - SAFE HARBOR AND LEGAL ACTION UNDER THIS ACTNEW SECTION.  Sec. 401.  (1) After exhaustion of the time period in section 304 of this act, any voter who resides in a political subdivision where a violation of section 104 of this act is alleged may file an action in the superior court of the county in which the political subdivision is located.
An action filed pursuant to this chapter does not need to be filed as a class action.(2) Members of different protected classes may file an action jointly pursuant to this act if they demonstrate that the combined voting preferences of the multiple protected classes are polarized against the rest of the electorate.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 402.  (1) In an action filed pursuant to this act, the trial court shall set a trial to be held no later than one year after the filing of a complaint, and shall set a discovery and motions calendar accordingly.(2) For purposes of any applicable statute of limitations, a cause of action under this act arises every time there is an election for any members of the governing body of the political subdivision.(3) The plaintiff's constitutional right to the secrecy of the plaintiff's vote is preserved and is not waived by the filing of an action pursuant to this act, and the filing is not subject to discovery or disclosure.(4) In seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff shall not be required to post a bond or any other security in order to secure such equitable relief.(5) No notice may be submitted to any political subdivision pursuant to this act before July 19, 2018.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 403.  (1) The court may order appropriate remedies including, but not limited to, the imposition of a district-based election system.
An action filed pursuant to this chapter does not need to be filed as a class action.(2) Members of different protected classes may file an action jointly pursuant to this act if they demonstrate that their combined voting preferences as a group are different from the rest of the electorate.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 402.  (1) In an action filed pursuant to this act, the trial court shall set a trial to be held no later than one year after the filing of a complaint, and shall set a discovery and motions calendar accordingly.(2) For purposes of any applicable statute of limitations, a cause of action under this act arises every time there is an election for any members of the governing body of the political subdivision.(3) The plaintiff's constitutional right to the secrecy of the plaintiff's vote is preserved and is not waived by the filing of an action pursuant to this act, and the filing is not subject to discovery or disclosure.(4) In seeking a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction, a plaintiff shall not be required to post a bond or any other security in order to secure such equitable relief.(5) No notice may be submitted to any political subdivision pursuant to this act before July 19, 2018.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 403.  (1) The court may order appropriate remedies including, but not limited to, the imposition of a district-based election system or an alternative proportional voting method.
If, in tailoring a remedy, the court orders the implementation of a district-based election district where the members of the protected class are not a numerical majority, the court shall do so in a manner that provides the protected class an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.
If, in tailoring a remedy, the court orders the implementation of a district-based election district where the members of the protected class are not a numerical majority, the court shall do so in a manner that provides the protected class an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice or an equal opportunity to influence the outcome of an election.(3) In tailoring a remedy after a finding of a violation of section 104 of this act:(a) If the court's order providing a remedy or approving proposed districts, whichever is later, is issued during the period of time between the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November and on or before January 15th of the following year, the court shall order new elections, conducted pursuant to the remedy, to occur at the next succeeding general election.
The court may also approve a district-based election system that provides the protected class the opportunity to join in a coalition of two or more protected classes to elect candidates of their choice if there is demonstrated political cohesion among the protected classes.(3) In tailoring a remedy after a finding of a violation of section 104 of this act:(a) If the court's order providing a remedy or approving proposed districts, whichever is later, is issued during the period of time between the first Tuesday after the first Monday of November and on or before January 15th of the following year, the court shall order new elections, conducted pursuant to the remedy, to occur at the next succeeding general election.
If a special filing period is required, filings for that office shall be reopened for a period of three business days, such three-day period to be fixed by the filing officer.(b) If the court's order providing a remedy or approving proposed districts, whichever is later, is issued during the period of time between January 16th and on or before the first Monday of November, the next election will occur as scheduled and organized under the current electoral system, but the court shall order new elections to occur pursuant to the remedy at the general election the following calendar year.(c) If the court's order uses an alternative proportional voting method, the court shall order new elections to occur no sooner than as provided in (a) and (b) of this subsection.(d) The remedy may provide for a political subdivision to eliminate the staggered terms of any position in order to implement an alternative proportional voting method.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 404.  (1) No action under this act may be brought by any person against a political subdivision that has adopted a remedy to its electoral system after an action is filed that is approved by a court pursuant to section 303 of this act or implemented a court-ordered remedy pursuant to section 403 of this act for four years after adoption of the remedy if the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.(2) No action under this act may be brought by any person against a political subdivision that has adopted a remedy to its electoral system in the previous decade before the effective date of this section as a result of a claim under the federal voting rights act until after the political subdivision completes redistricting pursuant to RCW 29A.76.010 for the 2020 decennial census.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 405.  (1) In any action to enforce this chapter, the court may allow the prevailing plaintiff or plaintiffs, other than the state or political subdivision thereof, reasonable attorneys' fees, all nonattorney fee costs as defined by RCW 4.84.010, and all reasonable expert witness fees.
If a special filing period is required, filings for that office shall be reopened for a period of three business days, such three-day period to be fixed by the filing officer.(b) If the court's order providing a remedy or approving proposed districts, whichever is later, is issued during the period of time between January 16th and on or before the first Monday of November, the next election will occur as scheduled and organized under the current electoral system, but the court shall order new elections to occur pursuant to the remedy at the general election the following calendar year.(c) The remedy may provide for the political subdivision to hold elections for the members of its governing body at the same time as regularly scheduled elections for statewide or federal offices.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 404.  (1) The court may order imposition of an alternative proportional voting method, as defined in section 203 of this act.(2) If the court's order uses an alternative proportional voting method, the court shall order new elections to occur no sooner than as provided in section 403(3) (a) and (b) of this act.(3) The court's order may provide for a political subdivision to eliminate the staggered terms of any position in order to implement an alternative proportional voting method.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 405.  (1) No action under this act may be brought by any person against a political subdivision that has adopted a remedy to its electoral system after an action is filed that is approved by a court pursuant to section 303 of this act or implemented a court-ordered remedy pursuant to section 403 of this act for four years after adoption of the remedy if the political subdivision does not enact a change to or deviation from the remedy during this four-year period that would otherwise give rise to an action under this act.(2) No action under this act may be brought by any person against a political subdivision that has adopted a remedy to its electoral system in the previous decade before the effective date of this section as a result of a claim under the federal voting rights act until after the political subdivision completes redistricting pursuant to RCW 29A.76.010 for the 2020 decennial census.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 406.  (1) In any action to enforce this chapter, the court may allow the prevailing plaintiff or plaintiffs, other than the state or political subdivision thereof, reasonable attorneys' fees, all nonattorney fee costs as defined by RCW 4.84.010, and all reasonable expert witness fees.
No fees or costs may be awarded if no action is filed.(2) Prevailing defendants may recover an award of fees or costs pursuant to RCW 4.84.185.PART V - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONSNEW SECTION.  Sec. 501.  The provisions of parts I, III, and IV of this act are not applicable to cities and towns with populations under one thousand or to school districts with K-12 full-time equivalent enrollments of less than two hundred fifty.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 502.  A new section is added to chapter 29A.76 RCW to read as follows:In any change to its electoral system under section 201 of this act or preparation of a subsequent redistricting plan, political subdivisions may use population data regarding political parties or racial, ethnic, or language groups only to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 503.  This act supersedes other state laws and local ordinances to the extent that those state laws or ordinances would otherwise restrict a jurisdiction's ability to comply with this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 504.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 505.  Sections 101 through 202, 301 through 501, and 503 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 29A RCW.--- END ---
No fees or costs may be awarded if no action is filed.(2) Prevailing defendants may recover an award of fees or costs pursuant to RCW 4.84.185.PART V - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONSNEW SECTION.  Sec. 501.  The provisions of parts I, III, and IV of this act are not applicable to cities and towns with populations under one thousand or to school districts with K-12 full-time equivalent enrollments of less than two hundred fifty.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 502.  A new section is added to chapter 29A.76 RCW to read as follows:In any change to its electoral system under section 201 of this act or preparation of a subsequent redistricting plan, political subdivisions may use population data regarding political parties only to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with this act or federal law.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 503.  This act supersedes other state laws and local ordinances to the extent that those state laws or ordinances would otherwise restrict a jurisdiction's ability to comply with this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 504.  If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 505.  Sections 101 through 203, 301 through 501, and 503 of this act constitute a new chapter in Title 29A RCW.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/7/2018.

  2. Chapter 113, 2018 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. Speaker signed.

  6. President signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 29; nays, 20; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. Senate concurred in House amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 52; nays, 46; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted as amended.

  12. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  13. Amendment ruled beyond the scope and object of the bill.

  14. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  15. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. SEIT - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  18. First reading, referred to State Government, Elections & Information Technology (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

  19. Third reading, passed; yeas, 29; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  20. Third reading.

  21. Held on second reading.

  22. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  23. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  24. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  25. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  26. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  27. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  28. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  29. Minority; without recommendation.

  30. SGTE - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  31. Minority; without recommendation.

  32. SGTE - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  33. First reading, referred to State Government, Tribal Relations & Elections.

  34. Prefiled for introduction.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 20 co-sponsors · 130 not signed on · 59 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (20)

Not signed on (130)

130 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 130 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 29 Yea · 20 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 191200
Democrat 9000
Republican 1800
Total 292000
% of votes cast 59%41%0%0%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Nay
Baumgartner — Nay
Becker — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
O'Ban — Nay
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Nay
Bailey — Nay
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
Nelson — Yea
Wilson — Nay
Padden — Nay
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

1165 Walsh Pg 14 Ln 17 (#7)

Failed 48 Yea · 50 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 321800
Republican 15000
Democrat 13200
Total 485000
% of votes cast 49%51%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Blake — Yea
Buys — Yea
Cody — Nay
Dolan — Nay
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Nay
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Nay
Sells — Nay
Shea — Yea
Appleton — Nay
Hargrove — Yea
Smith — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Chopp — Nay
Clibborn — Nay
Condotta — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Hudgins — Nay
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Nay
Kirby — Nay
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Lytton — Nay
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Nay
McCaslin — Nay
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Nay
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Nay
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Nay
Tarleton — Nay
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Nay
Chris Kilduff Democrat Nay
Cindy Ryu Democrat Nay
Derek Stanford Democrat Nay
Drew Hansen Democrat Nay
Gerry Pollet Democrat Nay
Jake Fey Democrat Nay
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Nay
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Nay
John Lovick Democrat Nay
June Robinson Democrat Nay
Kristine Reeves Democrat Nay
Larry Springer Democrat Nay
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Nay
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Nay
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Nay
Mia Gregerson Democrat Nay
Mike Chapman Democrat Nay
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Nay
Nicole Macri Democrat Nay
Noel Frame Democrat Nay
Roger Goodman Democrat Nay
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Nay
Sharon Wylie Democrat Nay
Shelley Kloba Democrat Nay
Steve Bergquist Democrat Nay
Steve Tharinger Democrat Nay
Strom Peterson Democrat Nay
Tana Senn Democrat Nay
Timm Ormsby Democrat Nay
Tina Orwall Democrat Nay
Vandana Slatter Democrat Nay
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 52 Yea · 46 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 203000
Republican 01500
Democrat 32100
Total 524600
% of votes cast 53%47%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Nay
Hayes — Nay
Mosbrucker — Nay
Nealey — Nay
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Nay
Rodne — Nay
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Wilcox — Nay
Buys — Nay
Chandler — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Hargrove — Nay
Smith — Nay
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Nay
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Nay
Jenkin — Nay
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Nay
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Kristiansen — Nay
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Nay
McDonald — Nay
Morris — Yea
Muri — Nay
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Nay
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Young — Nay
Johnson, J. — Nay
Van Werven — Nay
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Nay
Carolyn Eslick Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Nay
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Nay
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Nay
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

1176 Irwin Pg 2 Ln 33 (#6)

Failed 48 Yea · 50 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 321800
Democrat 13200
Republican 15000
Total 485000
% of votes cast 49%51%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Nay
Chopp — Nay
Cody — Nay
Dolan — Nay
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Nay
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Nay
Sells — Nay
Shea — Yea
Hargrove — Yea
Blake — Nay
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Clibborn — Nay
Condotta — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Hudgins — Nay
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Nay
Kirby — Nay
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Lytton — Nay
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Nay
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Nay
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Nay
Smith — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Nay
Tarleton — Nay
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Nay
Chris Kilduff Democrat Nay
Cindy Ryu Democrat Nay
Derek Stanford Democrat Nay
Drew Hansen Democrat Nay
Gerry Pollet Democrat Nay
Jake Fey Democrat Nay
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Nay
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Nay
John Lovick Democrat Nay
June Robinson Democrat Nay
Kristine Reeves Democrat Nay
Larry Springer Democrat Nay
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Nay
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Nay
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Nay
Mia Gregerson Democrat Nay
Mike Chapman Democrat Nay
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Nay
Nicole Macri Democrat Nay
Noel Frame Democrat Nay
Roger Goodman Democrat Nay
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Nay
Sharon Wylie Democrat Nay
Shelley Kloba Democrat Nay
Steve Bergquist Democrat Nay
Steve Tharinger Democrat Nay
Strom Peterson Democrat Nay
Tana Senn Democrat Nay
Timm Ormsby Democrat Nay
Tina Orwall Democrat Nay
Vandana Slatter Democrat Nay
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Yea
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 29 Yea · 19 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 191101
Democrat 9000
Republican 1800
Total 291901
% of votes cast 59%39%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Nay
Becker — Nay
Baumgartner — Not Voting
Darneille — Yea
Fain — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Padden — Nay
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Nay
Wilson — Nay
Bailey — Nay
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Nay
Ranker — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

333 Baumgartner Striker (#7)

Failed 19 Yea · 26 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121603
Republican 7101
Democrat 0900
Total 192604
% of votes cast 39%53%0%8%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Nay
Miloscia — Yea
O'Ban — Not Voting
Palumbo — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Becker — Not Voting
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Darneille — Nay
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Nay
Frockt — Nay
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
Padden — Yea
Ranker — Nay
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Not Voting
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 18 Yea · 27 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 111703
Democrat 0900
Republican 7101
Total 182704
% of votes cast 37%55%0%8%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Becker — Not Voting
Ericksen — Yea
Hawkins — Nay
Hobbs — Nay
Palumbo — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Darneille — Nay
Fain — Nay
Frockt — Nay
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
O'Ban — Not Voting
Padden — Yea
Ranker — Nay
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Not Voting
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 19 Yea · 26 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121603
Republican 7101
Democrat 0900
Total 192604
% of votes cast 39%53%0%8%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Not Voting
Darneille — Nay
Fain — Nay
Frockt — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Nay
O'Ban — Not Voting
Palumbo — Nay
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Rivers — Yea
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Not Voting
Brown — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Ericksen — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
Padden — Yea
Ranker — Nay
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

335 Padden Pg 16 Ln 16 (#6)

Failed 20 Yea · 25 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 131503
Republican 7101
Democrat 0900
Total 202504
% of votes cast 41%51%0%8%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Not Voting
Darneille — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Ericksen — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Nay
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
O'Ban — Not Voting
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Nay
Ranker — Nay
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Not Voting
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Not Voting
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6002?
SB 6002 is sponsored by Billig, Frockt, Marko Liias (Democrat), Palumbo, Rolfes, Chase, Manka Dhingra (Democrat), Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Kuderer, McCoy, Nelson, Jamie Pedersen (Democrat), Rebecca Saldaña (Democrat), Carlyle, Steve Conway (Democrat), Keiser, Mullet, Ranker, Lisa Wellman (Democrat), Victoria Hunt (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
What is the current status of SB 6002?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 06, 2017. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 6002?
Track SB 6002 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6002

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6002

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →