Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 6396 — Concerning the use of perfluorinated chemicals in food packaging.

Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 6396 includes a shift in the timeline for prohibiting the use of PFAS chemicals in food packaging. Previously set for January 1, 2022, the effective date has been changed to January 1, 2021, contingent upon the Department of Ecology confirming that safer alternatives are available. This matters because it aims to accelerate the elimination of harmful chemicals in food packaging, promoting public health and environmental safety. Additionally, the new language emphasizes ongoing assessments to find alternatives if no safe option is currently available, ensuring that the legislation remains responsive to future developments.

→
Previous
Latest
S-4594.1SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 6396State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks (originally sponsored by Senators Wellman, Carlyle, McCoy, Van De Wege, Billig, Chase, Keiser, and Kuderer)READ FIRST TIME 02/02/18.AN ACT Relating to the use of perfluorinated chemicals in food packaging;
S-3518.2SENATE BILL 6396State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senators Wellman, Carlyle, McCoy, Van De Wege, Billig, Chase, Keiser, and KudererRead first time 01/15/18.
Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks.AN ACT Relating to the use of perfluorinated chemicals in food packaging;
"Package" also means and includes unsealed receptacles such as carrying cases, crates, cups, pails, rigid foil and other trays, wrappers and wrapping films, bags, and tubs.(2) "Manufacturer" means a person, firm, association, partnership, government entity, organization, joint venture, or corporation that applies a package to a product for distribution or sale.(3) "Packaging component" means an individual assembled part of a package such as, but not limited to, any interior or exterior blocking, bracing, cushioning, weatherproofing, exterior strapping, coatings, closures, inks, and labels.(4) "Food package" means a package or packaging component that is intended for direct food contact and is comprised, in substantial part, of paper, paperboard, or other materials originally derived from plant fibers.(5) "Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances" or "PFAS chemicals" means, for the purposes of food packaging, a class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.(6) "Safer alternative" means an alternative substance or chemical, demonstrated by an alternatives assessment, that meets improved hazard and exposure considerations and can be practicably and economically substituted for the original chemical.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 70.95G RCW to read as follows:(1) Beginning January 1, 2022, no person may manufacture, knowingly sell, offer for sale, distribute for sale, or distribute for use in this state food packaging to which PFAS chemicals have been intentionally added in any amount.
"Package" also means and includes unsealed receptacles such as carrying cases, crates, cups, pails, rigid foil and other trays, wrappers and wrapping films, bags, and tubs.(2) "Manufacturer" means a person, firm, association, partnership, government entity, organization, joint venture, or corporation that applies a package to a product for distribution or sale.(3) "Packaging component" means an individual assembled part of a package such as, but not limited to, any interior or exterior blocking, bracing, cushioning, weatherproofing, exterior strapping, coatings, closures, inks, and labels.(4) "Food package" means a package or packaging component that is intended for the marketing, protection, or handling of a product intended for food contact or used to store food and foodstuffs for sale.(5) "Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances" or "PFAS chemicals" means, for the purposes of food packaging, a class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.(6) "Safer alternative" means an alternative substance or chemical, demonstrated by an alternatives assessment, that meets improved hazard and exposure considerations and can be practicably and economically substituted for the original chemical.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 70.95G RCW to read as follows:(1) Beginning January 1, 2021, no person may manufacture, knowingly sell, offer for sale, distribute for sale, or distribute for use in this state food packaging to which PFAS chemicals have been intentionally added in any amount.
and(c) Includes, at a minimum, an evaluation of chemical hazards, exposure, performance, cost, and availability.(3) By January 1, 2020, the department of ecology must publish its findings in the Washington State Register on whether a safer alternative to PFAS chemicals in specific applications of food packaging is available for each assessed application and submit a report with the findings to the appropriate committees of the legislature.(4) The prohibition on the use of PFAS chemicals in food packaging:(a) Becomes effective January 1, 2022, if the report required under subsection (3) of this section finds that a safer alternative is available for specific food packaging applications;(b) Does not take effect January 1, 2022, if the report required under subsection (3) of this section does not find that a safer alternative is available for specific food packaging applications.(5) If the department of ecology does not find that a safer alternative is available for some or all categories of food packaging applications, beginning January 1, 2021, and each year following, the department of ecology must review and report on alternatives as described in subsection (2) of this section.
and(c) Includes, at a minimum, an evaluation of chemical hazards, exposure, performance, cost, and availability.(3) By January 1, 2020, the department of ecology must publish its findings in the Washington State Register on whether a safer alternative to PFAS chemicals in food packaging is available and submit a report with the findings to the appropriate committees of the legislature.(4) The prohibition on the use of PFAS chemicals in food packaging:(a) Becomes effective January 1, 2021, if the report required under subsection (3) of this section finds that a safer alternative is available;(b) Does not take effect January 1, 2021, if the report required under subsection (3) of this section does not find that a safer alternative is available.(5) If the department of ecology does not find that a safer alternative is available, beginning January 1, 2021, and each year following, the department of ecology must review and report on alternatives as described in subsection (2) of this section.
The prohibition in this section for specific food packaging applications takes effect two years after a report submitted to the legislature required under subsection (3) of this section finds that a safer alternative is available.Sec. 3.  RCW 70.95G.040 and 1991 c 319 s 110 are each amended to read as follows:((By July 1, 1993,)) A certificate of compliance stating that a package or packaging component is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter shall be developed by its manufacturer.
The prohibition in this section takes effect one year after a report submitted to the legislature required under subsection (3) of this section finds that a safer alternative is available.Sec. 3.  RCW 70.95G.040 and 1991 c 319 s 110 are each amended to read as follows:((By July 1, 1993,)) A certificate of compliance stating that a package or packaging component is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter shall be developed by its manufacturer.
For food packaging, a manufacturer shall develop a compliance certificate by the date of a prohibition taking effect under section 2 of this act.
For food packaging, a manufacturer shall develop a compliance certificate within one year of the prohibition becoming effective as required under section 2 of this act.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Senate Rules "X" file.

  2. Senate Rules "X" file.

  3. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  4. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  5. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  6. Minority; do not pass 1st substitute.

  7. Minority; do not pass.

  8. WM - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks.

  9. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  10. Minority; do not pass 1st substitute.

  11. Minority; do not pass.

  12. WM - Majority; do pass 1st substitute bill proposed by Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks.

  13. Referred to Ways & Means.

  14. Referred to Ways & Means.

  15. Minority; without recommendation.

  16. Minority; do not pass.

  17. And refer to Ways & Means.

  18. AWNP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  19. Minority; without recommendation.

  20. Minority; do not pass.

  21. And refer to Ways & Means.

  22. AWNP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  23. First reading, referred to Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks.

Sponsors

  • Carlyle · Cosponsor
  • Keiser · Cosponsor
  • Kuderer · Cosponsor
  • McCoy · Cosponsor
  • Billig · Cosponsor
  • Chase · Cosponsor
  • Lisa Wellman · Primary
  • Van De Wege · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (7)

  • Carlyle
  • Keiser
  • Kuderer
  • McCoy
  • Billig
  • Chase
  • Van De Wege

Not signed on (143)

143 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 143 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 6396?
SB 6396 is sponsored by Carlyle, Keiser, Kuderer, McCoy, Billig, Chase, Lisa Wellman (Democrat), and Van De Wege.
What is the current status of SB 6396?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 6396?
Track SB 6396 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 6396

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 6396

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →