Relating to DEP standards of water quality and effluent limitations
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 290 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 290.
You're tracking SB 290
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 290 — Relating to DEP standards of water quality and effluent limitations
Last action — Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2018
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
26 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 290 includes several major changes aimed at streamlining water pollution control permits. Notably, the bill now allows for adjustments in water quality-based limits to account for pollutants already present in the water being drawn in for use, which could make it easier for businesses to meet regulations. Additionally, it prevents the state from enforcing more stringent benchmarks for stormwater discharges than existing federal standards, which could reduce compliance costs for permit holders. These changes are seen as a way to balance environmental protection with economic considerations, meaning businesses may face less regulatory burden while still adhering to necessary water quality standards.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS EnrolledSB290 VersionSUB1 - Final Version « Senate Bill 290 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeEnrolled SubstituteVersion (1)- Final Version | Introduced Version | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Enrolled Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 290 By Senators Smith, Azinger, Boso, Clements, and Cline,Cline original[Originating sponsorsin [Passedthe MarchCommittee 8,on 2018;the Judiciary;
inReported effecton 90February days7, from2018] passage] ANA ACTBILL to amend and reenact §22-11-6 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to standards of water quality and effluent limitations;
(1) Where necessary and proper, the secretary may specify a reasonable time for persons not complying withwith the standards and limitations to complycomply with the rules and, upon the expiration of that period of time, the secretary shall revoke or modify any permit previously issued which authorized the discharge of treated or untreated sewage, industrial wastes, or other wastes into the waters of this state which result in reduction of the quality ofof the waters below the standards and limitations established therefor by rules of the board or secretary;
(2) For purposes of both this article and sections 309 and 505 of the federal Water Pollution Control Act, compliance with a permit issued pursuant to this article shall bebe considered compliance for purposes of both this article and sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307,307 and 403 of the federal Water Pollution Control Act and with all applicable state and federal water quality standards, except for any standard imposed under section 307 of the federal Water Pollution Control Act for a toxic pollutant injurious to human health.
Notwithstanding any provision of this code or rule or permit condition to the contrary, water quality standards themselves shall not be considered effluent standards or limitations for the purposes of both this article and sections 309 and 505 of the federal Water Pollution Control Act and shall may not be independently or directly enforced or implemented except through the development of terms and conditions of a permit issued pursuant to this article.
Any denial or approval of an application shall detail the specific basis for the denial or approval and any revisions needed to the application.application. Any denial or approval of a request may be appealed to the environmental quality board pursuant to §22-11-21 of this code.
Any denial or approval of a request may be appealed to the environmental quality board pursuant to §22-11-21 of this code.
View plain text versions (3)
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Chapter 85, Acts, Regular Session, 2018
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18
-
To Governor 3/19/18
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18 - Senate Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/19/18 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/19/18 - House Journal
-
House Message received
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Passed House (Roll No. 401)
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 105)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Laid over on 3rd reading 2/12/18
-
Read 3rd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
To Judiciary
-
Reported do pass, but first to Judiciary
-
To Energy, Industry and Mining
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Energy, Industry and Mining then Judiciary
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Charles H. Clements · Cosponsor
- Boso · Cosponsor
- Cline · Cosponsor
- Mike Azinger · Cosponsor
- Randy E. Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Randy E. Smith Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Charles H. Clements Republican
- Boso
- Cline
- Mike Azinger Republican
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 88 | 9 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 9% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Love | — | Yea |
| Evans, A. | — | Yea |
| Evans, E. | — | Yea |
| Lane | — | Yea |
| Romine, C. | — | Yea |
| Romine, R. | — | Yea |
| Blair | — | Yea |
| Foster | — | Yea |
| Atkinson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Boggs | — | Yea |
| Brewer | — | Yea |
| Espinosa | — | Yea |
| Ferro | — | Yea |
| Frich | — | Yea |
| Isner | — | Nay |
| Kessinger | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| Pyles | — | Nay |
| Rowan | — | Yea |
| Rowe | — | Nay |
| Shott | — | Yea |
| Martin | — | Yea |
| Maynard | — | Yea |
| Sypolt | — | Yea |
| Thompson | — | Yea |
| Hartman | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Canestraro | — | Yea |
| Capito | — | Yea |
| Cowles | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Hamrick | — | Yea |
| Hicks | — | Yea |
| Higginbotham | — | Yea |
| Overington | — | Yea |
| Sponaugle | — | Yea |
| Storch | — | Yea |
| Upson | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Diserio | — | Yea |
| Phillips | — | Yea |
| Speaker Armstead | — | Yea |
| Deem | — | Not Voting |
| Householder | — | Yea |
| Pack | — | Yea |
| Pethtel | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Ambler | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Caputo | — | Yea |
| Fast | — | Yea |
| Fleischauer | — | Nay |
| Folk | — | Yea |
| Harshbarger | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hollen | — | Yea |
| Iaquinta | — | Yea |
| Longstreth | — | Yea |
| Marcum | — | Yea |
| Miley | — | Yea |
| Moye | — | Yea |
| Paynter | — | Yea |
| Robinson | — | Not Voting |
| Rodighiero | — | Yea |
| Sobonya | — | Yea |
| Summers | — | Yea |
| Westfall | — | Yea |
| John Williams | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Pushkin | Democrat | Nay |
| Sean Hornbuckle | Democrat | Nay |
| Shawn Fluharty | Democrat | Nay |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| D. Rolland Jennings | Republican | Yea |
| Erica Moore | Republican | Nay |
| Gary G. Howell | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Guy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Eldridge | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Ellington | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Statler | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa White | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Zatezalo | Republican | Yea |
| Marty Gearheart | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Rohrbach | Republican | Yea |
| Pat McGeehan | Republican | Yea |
| Roger Hanshaw | Republican | Yea |
| Roy Cooper | Republican | Yea |
| Stanley Adkins | Republican | Yea |
| Vernon Criss | Republican | Yea |
| William Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ARVON | — | Yea |
| GAUNCH | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Not Voting |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| BOSO | — | Yea |
| OJEDA | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| FERNS | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Sarah Drennan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 290?
- SB 290 is sponsored by Charles H. Clements (Republican), Boso, Cline, Mike Azinger (Republican), and Randy E. Smith (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 290?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 16, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 290?
- Track SB 290 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 290
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 290
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →