Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed House

HB 1920 — Concerning inspections of licensed marijuana processors' equipment and facilities.

Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill HB 1920 allows inspections of marijuana processing facilities to be conducted not only by local fire code officials but also by the director of fire protection or accredited commercial electrical inspectors if the local official does not respond within thirty days of a request. Additionally, the new version removes a requirement that electrical safety standards must be adhered to, streamlining oversight for marijuana processors. This change aims to expedite the inspection process and ensure compliance with safety regulations while still holding processors accountable for their operations.

→
Previous
Latest
H-1760.1SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 1920State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy House Commerce & Gaming (originally sponsored by Representatives Condotta, Sawyer, Blake, Young, and Appleton)READ FIRST TIME 02/16/17.AN ACT Relating to inspections of licensed marijuana processors' equipment and facilities;
H-1383.2HOUSE BILL 1920State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Representatives Condotta, Sawyer, Blake, Young, and AppletonRead first time 02/02/17.
Referred to Committee on Commerce & Gaming.AN ACT Relating to inspections of licensed marijuana processors' equipment and facilities;
Cooking oil, butter, and other nonexplosive home cooking substances may be used to make marijuana extracts for noncommercial personal use.(2) Except for the use of butane, the state liquor and cannabis board may not enforce this section until it has adopted the rules required by RCW 69.51A.270.(3)(a) Any inspection of or approval of a marijuana processor's professional closed loop systems, equipment, extraction operation, or facilities to ensure compliance with applicable fire, safety, or building code requirements that must be performed by a local fire code official pursuant to state liquor and cannabis board rule may, instead, be performed by the director of fire protection or designee, if the marijuana processor requests that the local fire code official perform the inspection or approval described in (a) of this subsection and thirty calendar days after the date of the request the local fire code official has not performed the inspection or approval.
Cooking oil, butter, and other nonexplosive home cooking substances may be used to make marijuana extracts for noncommercial personal use.(2) Except for the use of butane, the state liquor and cannabis board may not enforce this section until it has adopted the rules required by RCW 69.51A.270.(3)(a) Any inspection of or approval of a marijuana processor's professional closed loop systems, equipment, extraction operation, or facilities to ensure compliance with applicable fire, safety, or building code requirements that must be performed by a local fire code official pursuant to state liquor and cannabis board rule may, instead, be performed by the director of fire protection or designee, or by an accredited commercial electrical inspector, if the marijuana processor requests that the local fire code official perform the inspection or approval described in (a) of this subsection and thirty calendar days after the date of the request the local fire code official has not performed the inspection or approval.(b) If an inspection or approval described in (a) of this subsection is performed by the director of fire protection or designee, or by an accredited commercial electrical inspector, the county, city, or town in which the licensee is located shall reimburse the director of fire protection or designee, or the accredited commercial electrical inspector, as appropriate, for the costs of performing the inspection or approval within thirty calendar days of receiving a request for reimbursement.(c) Nothing in this subsection (3) requires a local fire code official, the director of fire protection or designee, or an accredited commercial electrical inspector to approve of a marijuana processor's professional closed loop systems, equipment, extraction operation, or facilities if the systems, equipment, operation, or facilities is not in compliance with applicable fire, safety, or building code requirements.(d) For purposes of this subsection (3), "director of fire protection" means the director of fire protection described in RCW 43.43.938.--- END ---
In addition to the requirements of this chapter, all electrical wiring and equipment must conform to chapter 19.28 RCW requirements for electrical safety to life and property including, but not limited to, electrical contractor licensing, electrician certification, and electrical permitting and inspection.(b) If an inspection or approval described in (a) of this subsection is performed by the director of fire protection or designee, the county, city, or town in which the licensee is located shall reimburse the director of fire protection or designee, as appropriate, for the costs of performing the inspection or approval within thirty calendar days of receiving a request for reimbursement.(c) Nothing in this subsection (3) requires a local fire code official or the director of fire protection or designee to approve of a marijuana processor's professional closed loop systems, equipment, extraction operation, or facilities if the systems, equipment, operation, or facilities is not in compliance with applicable fire, safety, or building code requirements.(d) For purposes of this subsection (3), "director of fire protection" means the director of fire protection described in RCW 43.43.938.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  4. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  5. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  6. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  7. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  8. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  9. Referred to Appropriations.

  10. Referred to Appropriations.

  11. COG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  12. COG - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  13. First reading, referred to Commerce & Gaming (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

  • Condotta · Primary
  • Appleton · Cosponsor
  • Blake · Cosponsor
  • Sawyer · Cosponsor
  • Young · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Condotta

Co-sponsors (4)

  • Appleton
  • Blake
  • Sawyer
  • Young

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 1920?
HB 1920 is sponsored by Condotta, Appleton, Blake, Sawyer, and Young.
What is the current status of HB 1920?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 1920?
Track HB 1920 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1920

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1920

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →