Adopting policy and procedures on student interviews and interrogations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 6065 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 6065.
You're tracking SB 6065
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 6065 — Adopting policy and procedures on student interviews and interrogations.
Last action — By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of SB 6065 updates the age categories regarding parental notification for student interviews by law enforcement on school premises. The key changes include clarifying that students aged twelve to eighteen must have their parents contacted before an interview, while students aged eighteen to twenty-one do not require parental contact at all. These adjustments aim to balance the rights of students with the need for timely law enforcement response, which is important for student safety and supports appropriate legal procedures in schools.
S-4191.3SUBSTITUTES-3504.1SENATE SENATE BILL 6065State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Senate Early Learning & K-12 Education (originally sponsored by Senators Wellman, Hunt, and Hasegawa)READHasegawaPrefiled FIRST01/03/18. TIME 01/26/18.AN ACT Relating to school district policy and procedures for interviews and interrogations of students on school premises;
andRead addingfirst atime new01/08/18. section to chapter 28A.320 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 28A.320 RCW to read as follows:(1) By August 1, 2018, each school district shall adopt a policy and procedures for interviews and interrogations of students on school premises that at a minimum incorporates the model policy and procedures on this topic revised by the Washington state school directors' association in July of 2013.(2) The procedures adopted under subsection (1) of this section must include the following for law enforcement interviews and interrogations of students not involving child abuse or neglect investigations:(a) If a student is under twelve years of age, parents, guardians, or designated adults must be notified and give permission before any interview or interrogation takes place unless the law enforcement officer has a warrant, court order, or stipulates that exigent circumstances exist;(b) If a student is twelve years of age or older, the principal or designee will make a reasonable effort to contact the parents or guardians prior to the interview or as soon as possible thereafter.
Referred to Committee on Early Learning & K-12 Education.AN ACT Relating to school district policy and procedures for interviews and interrogations of students on school premises;
and adding a new section to chapter 28A.320 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION. Sec. 1. A new section is added to chapter 28A.320 RCW to read as follows:(1) By August 1, 2018, each school district shall adopt a policy and procedures for interviews and interrogations of students on school premises that at a minimum incorporates the model policy and procedures on this topic revised by the Washington state school directors' association in July of 2013.(2) The procedures adopted under subsection (1) of this section must include the following for law enforcement interviews and interrogations of students not involving child abuse or neglect investigations:(a) If a student is under twelve years of age, parents, guardians, or designated adults must be notified and give permission before any interview or interrogation takes place unless the law enforcement official has a warrant, court order, or the official stipulates that exigent circumstances exist;(b) If a student is twelve years of age or older, the principal or designee will make a reasonable effort to contact the parents or guardians prior to the interview or as soon as possible thereafter.
View plain text versions (3)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Engrossed Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
ED - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
First reading, referred to Education (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 47; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 2.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
EDU - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Early Learning & K-12 Education.
-
Prefiled for introduction.
Sponsors
- Bob Hasegawa · Cosponsor
- Lisa Wellman · Primary
- Victoria Hunt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 148 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lisa Wellman Democrat
Co-sponsors (2)
- Bob Hasegawa Democrat
- Victoria Hunt Democrat
Not signed on (148)
148 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 148 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Manka Dhingra | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Not Voting |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Keith Wagoner | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Not Voting |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 6065?
- SB 6065 is sponsored by Bob Hasegawa (Democrat), Lisa Wellman (Democrat), and Victoria Hunt (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 6065?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 6065?
- Track SB 6065 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 6065
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 6065
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →