SB 445 — Allowing DOH acquire real or personal property for utility accommodation
Last action — Chapter 223, Acts, Regular Session, 2018
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
163 added · 219 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 445 clarifies the provisions concerning utility relocation, especially how the Division of Highways can acquire property needed for utility services. Key changes include allowing the Division to lease property to utility companies, and establishing guidelines for how the costs of relocating utilities will be managed through reimbursement agreements. These updates are important as they aim to improve coordination between highway management and utility services, ensuring that essential services can be maintained without disrupting public safety and infrastructure.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS SB445Introduced SUB1Version - Originating in Committee « Senate Bill 445 History OTHER VERSIONS — Committee Substitute (1) | Enrolled Version - Final Version | Engrossed Version | Introduced Version - Originating in Committee | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session CommitteeOriginating Substitute for Senate Bill 445 By Senators Boso, Swope, Gaunch, Jeffries, Rucker, Maroney, Plymale, Maynard, and Beach [Originating in the Committee on GovernmentTransportation Organization;and Infrastructure;
reportedReported on FebruaryJanuary 23,31, 2018] A BILL to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by adding thereto a new section, designated §17-2A-17a;
and to amend saidand codereenact by§17-4-17b addingof theretosaid twocode, newall sections,relating designatedto §17-4-17butility andrelocation; §17-4-17e;
andstating tolegislative amendfindings; said code by adding thereto a new section, designated §24-2-20, all relating to public utilities;
creatingdefining newterm; legislative findings;
definingauthorizing athe newDivision term;of Highways to acquire real or personal property for utility accommodation;
establishingauthorizing a method by which the Commissionerdivision ofto thelease Divisionreal ofproperty Highways may acquire certain rights-of-way and easements for the purpose of increasing public access to utilities;
establishingallowing a procedure for the Divisiondivision of Highways to leasepay acquisitionsfor toutility utilitiesrelocation forcosts fairsubject marketto value;reimbursement agreement;
andspecifying establishingmethods aof cost-sharingpreliminary procedureengineering fordesign determiningwork howcompletion relocationand costsutility arerelocation toconstruction bework paidpayment; by the utility.
and providing legislative and emergency rule-making authority.
CHAPTER 17.
ROADS AND HIGHWAYS.
(a) The Legislature finds that it is in the public interest for utility facilities to be accommodated on the right-of-way of state highways when such use and occupancy of the highway right-of-way do not adversely affect highway or traffic safetysafety, or otherwise impair the highway or its aesthetic quality, and do not conflict with the provisions of federal, state, or local laws, legislative rules, and regulations or agency policies.
Utilities provide an essential service to the generalpublic, publicand and, as a matter of sound economic public policy and law, utilities have used state road rights-of-wayright-of-way for transmitting and distributing their services.
(b) “Utility” means, for purposes of this chapter, privately, publicly, or cooperativelycooperatively-owned owned line, facility, or system for producing, transmitting, or distributing communications, data, information, video services, power, electricity, light, heat, gas, oil, crude products, water, steam, waste, stormwaterstorm water not connected with highway drainage, or any other similar commodity, including any fire or police signal system or street lighting system, which directly or indirectly serves the public.
The term “utility” also includes those similar facilities whichthat are owned or leased by a government agency for its own use,use or otherwise dedicated solely to governmental use.
(c) In addition to all other powers given and assigned to the commissioner in this chapter, the commissioner may acquire, either temporarily or permanently, in the name of the Division of Highways, all real or personal property, public or private, or any interests or rights therein, including any easement, riparian right, or right of access, determined by the commissioner to be necessary for present or presently foreseeable future utility accommodation purposes.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of this article, the commissioner may lease real property held by the Division of HighwaysHighways, or any interest or right in the property, including airspace rights, if any, forto theaccommodate purpose of accommodating any utility that has requested a lease if the commissioner finds, in his or her sole discretion, that entering into the lease agreement with the utility is in the public interest.
The term of any accommodation lease authorized by this section shall not exceed 30 years. Neither competitive bids nor public solicitations are required prior to entering into a utility accommodation lease.
Any utility accommodation lease shall require the utility to pay fairfair-market market value for the real property interest as determined by the commissioner using common valuation methods,methods. which shall include consideration of the use of the property for utility accommodation purposes:
Provided,All Thatmoneys amountsreceived paidfrom forutility propertyaccommodation damageleases byshall thebe divisionpaid ininto athe condemnationState caseTreasury shalland notcredited beto considered in the commissioner’sState determinationRoad ofFund. fair market value.
The commissioner shall have the option to charge and collect a one-time lease payment or fixed installment lease payments from a utility in connection with an accommodation lease. All moneys received from utility accommodation leases shall be paid into the state Treasury and credited to the State Road Fund. The provisions of this subsection are completely voluntary and shall not be interpreted to require any utility to lease any real property, or any interest or right in the property, from the commissioner. ARTICLE 4.
Prior to the notice directing the physical removal, relocation, or adjustment of a utility line or facility, the utility shall adhere to the division’sdivision's utility relocation procedures for public road improvements which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(3) If the utility is adjusting, locating, or relocating facilities or lines from or into the division’sdivision's right-of-way, the utility must submit to the division plans showing existing and proposed locations of utility facilities.
(4) The utility’sutility's submission shall include with the plans a work plan demonstrating that the utility adjustment, location, or relocation will be accomplished in a manner and time frame established by the division’sdivision's written procedures and instructions.
(c) If additional utility removal, relocation, or adjustment work is found necessary after the letting date of the highway improvement project, the utility shall provide a revised work plan within 30 calendar days after receipt of the division’sdivision's written notification of the additional work.
The utility’sutility's revised work plan shall be reviewed by the division to ensure compliance with the highway project or improvement.
(d) Should the utility fail to comply with the notice to remove, relocate, or adjust, the utility is liable to the division for direct contract damages, including costs, fees, penalties, or other contract charges, for which the division is proven to be liable to a contractor caused by the utility’sutility's failure to timely remove, relocate, or adjust, unless a written extension is granted by the division.
The utility shall not be liable for any delay or other failure to comply with a notice to remove, relocaterelocate, or adjust that is not solely the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) The division has not performed its obligations in accordance with the division’sdivision's rules;
(3) The delay or other failure to comply by the utility is due to the division’sdivision's failure to manage schedules and communicate with the utility;
(4) The division seeks to impose liability on the utility based solely upon oral communications or communications not directed to the utility’sutility's designated contact person;
(5) The division changes construction plans in any manner following the notice to remove or relocate and the change affects the utility’sutility's facilities;
oror, (6) Other good cause, beyond the control of and not the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, labor disputes, unavailability of materials on a national level, act of God, or extreme weather conditions.
(f) If a utility that is required by law to bear all or a portion of its own relocation costs elects to pursue a reimbursement agreement with the division pursuant to this subsection and provides the division with sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the utility is not adequately staffed, equipped, or capitalized to perform such relocation work with its own forces or contractors at a time convenient to and in coordination with the associated highway project, the division may pay for the associated relocation costs, includingincluding, but not limited toto, design engineering, design review, construction, and inspection costs, out of the State Road Fund:
Provided, That the utility shall reimburse the division in full for such portion of the relocation costs that it is required by law to bear within two years of the completion of the highway project.
The division shall deduct from the utility’s reimbursement amount any costs resulting from work performed asbecause a result of plan changes made by the division.
Before the division may pay any relocation costs, the division and the utility shall enter into a written reimbursement agreementagreement. containing(1) termsPreliminary thatengineering aredesign mutuallywork acceptableassociated with utility relocations to be paid for by the division andpursuant theto utilitya seekingreimbursement agreement shall be completed by any of the reimbursementfollowing agreement.methods:
(A) (1)The Preliminarydivision’s engineeringor design work associated with utility relocations to be paid for by the divisionutility's pursuantinternal toforces; a reimbursement agreement shall be completed by any of the following methods:
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
(A)(B) TheA division’sconsultant orselected by the utility’sdivision internalwith forces;the contract administered by the division:
(B)Provided, AThat consultantthe selected consultant is pre-approved by the divisionutility ifand the contractutility’s ispre-approval administeredprocess bydoes thenot division:unreasonably limit competition or project completion;
Provided,or That(C) Inclusion as part of the selectedhighway consultantconstruction shallcontract belet pre-approvedby the division as agreed to by the utility;utility.
or (C) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:
Provided, That the subcontractor performing the preliminary engineering design work associated with the relocation is pre-approved by the utility.
(A) A contract awarded by the division to the lowest qualified and mutually pre-approved bidder based on an appropriate competitive solicitation:
Provided, That the lowestutility’s qualifiedpre-approval bidderprocess fordoes utilitynot relocationunreasonably constructionlimit workcompetition isor pre-approvedproject bycompletion; the utility;
oror (B) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:utility.
Provided,(3) ThatAll thedesign subcontractorand performingconstruction work paid for by the utilitydivision relocationpursuant constructionto worka reimbursement agreement is pre-approvedsubject byto the utility.reasonable inspection and acceptance of the utility, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(3)(4) All designrelocation and construction work paidperformed for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement isshall subjectconform to theapplicable reasonablestate inspection and acceptancefederal oflaws, therules, utility, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shallregulations. be performed in accordance with the specifications and standards required by the utility.
(4)(5) AllThe relocationdivision workmay performedpropose pursuantrules tofor alegislative reimbursementapproval agreementin shallaccordance conformwith tothe applicableprovisions stateof and§29A-3-1 federalet lawsseq. or regulations.
(5) The provisions of this subsectioncode, are completely voluntary and shallthe notdivision bemay interpretedpromulgate toemergency requirerules anypursuant utility to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the divisionprovisions orof avail§29A-3-15 itself of thethis optionscode authorizedto byimplement this subsection.
(6) The division may propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code, and the division may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code in order to comply with this subsection.
§17-4-17e. Utility relocation on state highway construction projects financed by proceeds of bonds or notes issued before July 1, 2021.
Subject to the provisions of §17-4-17d of this code, and notwithstanding any other provisions to the contrary, whenever the Commissioner of Highways determines that any utility facility located upon, across, above, or under any portion of a state highway needs to be relocated in order to accommodate a highway project funded, in whole or in part, with proceeds of bonds or notes issued by the division, commissioner, West Virginia Parkways Authority, or the State of West Virginia on or after January 1, 2018, and on or before July 1, 2021, the commissioner shall notify the utility owning or operating the facility, which shall relocate the facility in accordance with this article and in accordance with the cost-sharing provisions of this section.
The utility shall bear 85 percent of any such relocation costs, and the Division of Highways shall bear percent of any such relocation costs.
The division’s share shall be paid out of the State Road Fund or paid with other eligible funds, and shall be considered a cost of the highway project:
Provided, That nothing in this section shall alter or amend the responsibility of the division to pay for the cost of utility facilities relocation when such costs are incurred to accommodate a highway project and such utilities maintain pre-existing property rights in their facilities’ present location.
The purpose of this bill is to allow the Division of Highways to acquire and lease interest in real property for utility accommodation upon agency right-of-wayright of way and increase public access to utility services, and to permit the division to advance the cost of utility relocation for those utilities which must bear their own utility relocation costs, whereby allowing timely utility relocation and road constructionconstruction, and exponentially reducing division contract costs.
This bill establishes a completely voluntary process whereby a utility company may choose to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the division to lease right-of-wayright of way space.
§17-2A-17aBill andStatus | §17-4-17eBill areTracking | new;Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
therefore, these sections have been underscored in their entirety.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Originating in Committee View text Current html
- Committee Substitute View text html
- Committee Substitute Engrossed Committee Substitute html
- Committee Substitute Enrolled Committee Substitute html
Action History
-
Chapter 223, Acts, Regular Session, 2018
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18
-
To Governor 3/21/18
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18 - Senate Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/27/18 - House Journal
-
To Governor 3/21/18 - Senate Journal
-
To Governor 3/21/18 - House Journal
-
House received Senate message
-
Completed legislative action
-
Communicated to House
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 479)
-
House Message received
-
Communicated to Senate
-
Title amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
House further considered bill
-
Passed House (Roll No. 462)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Amended on 3rd reading
-
Amendment reported by the Clerk
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
With amendment, do pass
-
To House Judiciary
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in House
-
Ordered to House
-
Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 237)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Floor amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
On 3rd reading with right to amend
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
Committee substitute reported
-
Referred to Government Organization
-
Unanimous consent to refer bill
-
Reported do pass
-
Originating in Senate Transportation and Infrastructure
Sponsors
- Maroney · Cosponsor
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Boso · Primary
- Plymale · Cosponsor
- Beach · Cosponsor
- Gaunch · Cosponsor
- Swope · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Maynard · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Boso
Co-sponsors (8)
- Maroney
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Plymale
- Beach
- Gaunch
- Swope
- Jeffries
- Maynard
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 62 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 23 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 8% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Martin | — | Nay |
| Evans, E. | — | Yea |
| Romine, C. | — | Yea |
| Fast | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Kessinger | — | Nay |
| Lane | — | Yea |
| Romine, R. | — | Yea |
| Blair | — | Yea |
| Foster | — | Yea |
| Maynard | — | Yea |
| Sypolt | — | Yea |
| Thompson | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| Hartman | — | Yea |
| Phillips | — | Yea |
| Diserio | — | Yea |
| Speaker Armstead | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Boggs | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Capito | — | Yea |
| Caputo | — | Yea |
| Cowles | — | Yea |
| Espinosa | — | Yea |
| Ferro | — | Yea |
| Folk | — | Yea |
| Frich | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Harshbarger | — | Yea |
| Higginbotham | — | Yea |
| Hollen | — | Yea |
| Householder | — | Yea |
| Love | — | Yea |
| Lovejoy | — | Yea |
| Miley | — | Yea |
| Overington | — | Yea |
| Pack | — | Yea |
| Pethtel | — | Yea |
| Pyles | — | Yea |
| Shott | — | Yea |
| Sponaugle | — | Yea |
| Storch | — | Yea |
| Summers | — | Yea |
| Upson | — | Yea |
| Westfall | — | Yea |
| Evans, A. | — | Yea |
| Iaquinta | — | Yea |
| Isner | — | Yea |
| Marcum | — | Not Voting |
| Rodighiero | — | Yea |
| Ambler | — | Yea |
| Atkinson | — | Yea |
| Brewer | — | Yea |
| Canestraro | — | Yea |
| Deem | — | Not Voting |
| Fleischauer | — | Yea |
| Hamrick | — | Yea |
| Hicks | — | Yea |
| Longstreth | — | Yea |
| Lynch | — | Yea |
| Moye | — | Yea |
| Paynter | — | Nay |
| Robinson | — | Yea |
| Rowan | — | Yea |
| Rowe | — | Yea |
| Sobonya | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| John Williams | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Pushkin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sean Hornbuckle | Democrat | Yea |
| Shawn Fluharty | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Betsy Kelly | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Hamilton | Republican | Yea |
| D. Rolland Jennings | Republican | Yea |
| Erica Moore | Republican | Yea |
| Gary G. Howell | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| George Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Guy Ward | Republican | Nay |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Eldridge | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Ellington | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Statler | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa White | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Zatezalo | Republican | Yea |
| Marty Gearheart | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Rohrbach | Republican | Yea |
| Pat McGeehan | Republican | Nay |
| Roger Hanshaw | Republican | Yea |
| Roy Cooper | Republican | Yea |
| Stanley Adkins | Republican | Yea |
| Vernon Criss | Republican | Yea |
| William Anderson | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ARVON | — | Yea |
| GAUNCH | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Nay |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| KARNES | — | Yea |
| STOLLINGS | — | Yea |
| BEACH | — | Yea |
| MANN | — | Yea |
| SWOPE | — | Yea |
| BLAIR | — | Yea |
| MARONEY | — | Yea |
| SYPOLT | — | Yea |
| BOLEY | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| BOSO | — | Yea |
| OJEDA | — | Yea |
| TRUMP | — | Yea |
| PALUMBO | — | Yea |
| UNGER | — | Yea |
| CLINE | — | Yea |
| PLYMALE | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| PREZIOSO | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| FACEMIRE | — | Yea |
| ROMANO | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| FERNS | — | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Sarah Drennan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 445?
- SB 445 is sponsored by Maroney, Patricia Rucker (Republican), Boso, Plymale, Beach, Gaunch, Swope, Jeffries, and Maynard.
- What is the current status of SB 445?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 31, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 445?
- Track SB 445 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 445
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 445
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →