Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 11 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 2590 — Regarding the transitional bilingual instruction program.

Last action — By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised bill includes new requirements for school districts that provide bilingual instruction to English learners starting in the 2019-20 school year. Key changes include mandates that classroom teachers must have specific qualifications, limits on the number of paraeducators in a classroom, and strict guidelines on hiring practices to ensure qualified teachers are employed. These changes are intended to enhance the quality of education for English learners, who often struggle with academic proficiency, by ensuring they are taught by well-qualified staff. This matters because it aims to improve educational outcomes and address the challenges faced by a significant portion of the student population.

→
Previous
Latest
H-4349.1SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2590State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy House Education (originally sponsored by Representatives Ortiz-Self, Harris, Kilduff, Stonier, Lovick, Gregerson, McBride, Fitzgibbon, Peterson, Valdez, Stanford, Doglio, and Macri)READ FIRST TIME 02/02/18.AN ACT Relating to the transitional bilingual instruction program;
H-3656.1HOUSE BILL 2590State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Representatives Ortiz-Self, Harris, Kilduff, Stonier, Lovick, Gregerson, McBride, Fitzgibbon, Peterson, Valdez, Stanford, Doglio, and MacriRead first time 01/10/18.
creating new sections;
Referred to Committee on Education.AN ACT Relating to the transitional bilingual instruction program;
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  (1) The legislature acknowledges that state and federal civil rights and education laws require public schools to provide opportunities for English learners to participate meaningfully and equally in educational programs.
amending RCW 28A.180.040;
In Washington, the transitional bilingual instruction program, part of the state's program of basic education, is designed to help English learners meet state standards and develop language proficiency in an environment where language and cultural assets are recognized as valuable resources for learning.(2) The legislature finds over ten percent of public school students are English learners.
and adding new sections to chapter 28A.180 RCW.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 28A.180 RCW to read as follows:Beginning in the 2019-20 school year, school districts must meet the following requirements when assigning staff to provide supplemental instruction for eligible pupils using funds for the transitional bilingual instruction program:(1) Classroom teachers must hold an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both.(2) School districts with more than two thousand pupils are limited to a maximum ratio of two paraeducators per classroom teacher.(3) School districts with program enrollment sufficient to fund a 1.0 full-time equivalent certificated instructional staff position must spend, after indirect costs, at least seventy-five percent of the transitional bilingual instruction program allocation on qualified certificated staff, if such staff are available.(4)(a) Paraeducators may not take the place of qualified classroom teachers except as an interim measure while the school district hires, trains, or otherwise secures enough qualified classroom teachers to serve its eligible pupils.(b) School districts using paraeducators as an interim measure must submit a strategy and timeline to secure enough qualified classroom teachers in the program plan that the district annually submits to the superintendent of public instruction for approval.
These students come from linguistically and culturally diverse backgrounds, and are sometimes new to Washington or to the United States.
Strategies may include support for paraeducators to pursue teacher certification with a bilingual education or English language learner endorsement.(5) Paraeducators must instruct eligible pupils under the direct supervision of a qualified classroom teacher and earn the paraeducator subject matter certificate in English language learner, in accordance with RCW 28A.413.080 and rules adopted by the paraeducator board, within twenty-four months of employment in the program.Sec. 2.  RCW 28A.180.040 and 2016 c 72 s 301 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Every school district board of directors shall:(a) Make available to each eligible pupil transitional bilingual instruction to achieve competency in English, in accord with rules of the superintendent of public instruction;(b) Wherever feasible, ensure that communications to parents emanating from the schools shall be appropriately bilingual for those parents of pupils in the bilingual instruction program;(c) Determine, by administration of an English test approved by the superintendent of public instruction the number of eligible pupils enrolled in the school district at the beginning of a school year and thereafter during the year as necessary in individual cases;(d) Ensure that a student who is a child of a military family in transition and who has been assessed as in need of, or enrolled in, a bilingual instruction program, the receiving school shall initially honor placement of the student into a like program.(i) The receiving school shall determine whether the district's program is a like program when compared to the sending school's program;
As a category, English learners have some of the lowest proficiency rates on federally required state assessments and some of the lowest graduation rates.
and(ii) The receiving school may conduct subsequent assessments pursuant to RCW 28A.180.090 to determine appropriate placement and continued enrollment in the program;(e) Before the conclusion of each school year, measure each eligible pupil's improvement in learning the English language by means of a test approved by the superintendent of public instruction;(f) Provide in-service training for teachers, counselors, and other staff, who are involved in the district's transitional bilingual program.
Unfortunately, these needy students are frequently taught by the least qualified school staff, including paraeducators and classroom teachers with little training on working with English learners.(3) The legislature recognizes that it enacted legislation in 2016 that requires all classroom teachers assigned using funds for the transitional bilingual instruction program to provide supplemental instruction for eligible pupils to hold an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both, by the 2019-20 school year.
Such training shall include appropriate instructional strategies for children of culturally different backgrounds, use of curriculum materials, and program models;
The legislature intends to determine the qualifications of school staff currently providing supplemental instruction to English learners, the number of vacant positions for school staff with training on working with English learners, and whether programs and processes are in place to prepare enough qualified staff to meet the 2019-20 school year deadline.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  (1) By December 15, 2018, and in compliance with RCW 43.01.036, the office of the superintendent of public instruction and the professional educator standards board must work together to compile the information required in this section and report it to the appropriate committees of the legislature.(2)(a) The following transitional bilingual instruction program data from the 2017-18 school year must be collected at the school level:(i) The number of eligible pupils;(ii) The number of full-time equivalent classroom teachers with and without an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both;(iii) The number of full-time equivalent paraeducators;(iv) The number of paraeducators who have received training or professional development related to English learners;(v) The number of classroom teacher applicants with an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both;(vi) The number of vacant full-time equivalent positions for classroom teachers with an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both;(vii) The number of vacant full-time equivalent paraeducator positions for English learner paraeducators;
and(g) Make available a program of instructional support for up to two years immediately after pupils exit from the program, for exited pupils who need assistance in reaching grade-level performance in academic subjects even though they have achieved English proficiency for purposes of the transitional bilingual instructional program.(2) ((Beginning in the 2019-20 school year, all classroom teachers assigned using funds for the transitional bilingual instruction program to provide supplemental instruction for eligible pupils must hold an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both.(3))) The definitions in Article II of RCW 28A.705.010 apply to subsection (1)(d) of this section.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 28A.180 RCW to read as follows:(1)(a) To ensure that school districts are meeting the requirements of this chapter, the superintendent of public instruction shall monitor transitional bilingual instruction programs at least once every five years by reviewing the components described in (b) of this subsection.(b) Program monitoring must be designed to support effective program implementation by schools and school districts and to improve educational outcomes for eligible pupils.
and(viii) The barriers to hiring classroom teachers with an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both.(b) The data collected and reported under this subsection (2) must also be calculated as ratios of staff to students, where applicable.(3) The following data about the preparation of classroom teachers and paraeducators with specialties in bilingual education or English language learner, or both, from the 2017-18 academic year must be collected from each community and technical college, and each teacher preparation program approved by the professional educator standards board:(a) The number of students in the pipeline to become English learner paraeducators by the 2019-20 school year;(b) The number of students in the pipeline to become classroom teachers with an endorsement in bilingual education or English language learner, or both, by the 2019-20 school year;
Program monitoring must include a review of the following components:(i) Identification of eligible pupils;(ii) Language development support to eligible pupils, with fidelity to approved program models;(iii) Implementation of an approved bilingual education program that, when feasible, prioritizes a two-way dual language program model.
and(c) If a college or program does not have any students in either pipeline, the barriers to developing a pipeline for preparation of classroom teachers or paraeducators with specialties in bilingual education or English language learner, or both.(4) The public schools, the community and technical colleges, and the teacher preparation programs approved by the professional educator standards board must cooperate with the office of the superintendent of public instruction and the professional educator standards board to collect and submit the data required under this section.(5) This section expires August 1, 2019.--- END ---
When a two-way dual language program is not feasible, the priority shifts to a one-way dual language program for English learners;(iv) Qualifications of certificated and classified staff funded through the program;(v) Academic support to eligible exited pupils;(vi) Effective use of funds consistent with the intent and purpose of the program, including the supplemental use of program funds to provide comprehensive educational programs to English learners;(vii) Program evaluation and program planning, including a focus on building supports for struggling English learners in high school and for eligible pupils who are more age-appropriately suited for a postsecondary learning environment than for a high school, but who need more time to develop language proficiency;(viii) Opportunities for systemic improvement to strengthen educational outcomes for English learners;(ix) Ongoing support and oversight for implementation of corrective action plans related to program services;
and(x) Targeted technical assistance.(2) Program monitoring under this section may be conducted concurrently with other program reviews and monitoring conducted by the office of the superintendent of public instruction.(3) The superintendent of public instruction must establish a program compliance timetable, rules, and guidelines for enforcement of this chapter.
By January 1, 2019, and in compliance with RCW 43.01.036, the superintendent must submit this information to the appropriate committees of the legislature.(4) The superintendent of public instruction may adopt rules to implement this section.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.

  2. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  3. Minority; without recommendation.

  4. EDU - Majority; do pass.

  5. First reading, referred to Early Learning & K-12 Education.

  6. Third reading, passed; yeas, 63; nays, 34; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  7. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  8. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  9. 1st substitute bill substituted.

  10. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  11. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  12. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  13. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  14. Minority; without recommendation.

  15. ED - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  16. Minority; without recommendation.

  17. ED - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  18. First reading, referred to Education (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (138)

138 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 138 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage (#15)

Passed 63 Yea · 34 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 262301
Republican 51000
Democrat 32100
Total 633401
% of votes cast 64%35%0%1%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Nay
Harmsworth — Nay
Hayes — Nay
Nealey — Nay
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Nay
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Wilcox — Not Voting
Hargrove — Nay
Smith — Yea
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Nay
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Nay
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Nay
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Kristiansen — Nay
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Nay
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Nay
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Young — Nay
Buys — Nay
Chandler — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Nay
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Nay
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Nay
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2590?
HB 2590 is sponsored by Beth Doglio (Democrat), Paul Harris (Republican), John Lovick (Democrat), Nicole Macri (Democrat), McBride, Joe Fitzgibbon (Democrat), Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Lillian Ortiz-Self (Democrat), Strom Peterson (Democrat), Derek Stanford (Democrat), Javier Valdez (Democrat), Chris Kilduff (Democrat), and Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 2590?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2590?
Track HB 2590 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2590

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2590

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →