Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 5 D cosponsors

HB 2750 — Concerning quality in assisted living facilities.

Last action — Effective date 6/7/2018.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2018. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of HB 2750 includes several important changes aimed at improving transparency and accountability in assisted living facilities. A key addition is the requirement for the state to provide online access to inspection reports and facility information, ensuring consumers can make well-informed choices. Additionally, a work group will be formed to establish quality metrics for these facilities, helping to monitor and enhance care standards. These changes are significant because they prioritize resident safety and provide families with the necessary information to choose appropriate living arrangements.

→
Previous
Latest
H-3696.1HOUSE BILL 2750State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Representatives Tharinger, Johnson, Cody, Stonier, Slatter, Robinson, Jinkins, Appleton, Muri, and GregersonRead first time 01/15/18.
ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2750State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Representatives Tharinger, Johnson, Cody, Stonier, Slatter, Robinson, Jinkins, Appleton, Muri, and GregersonRead first time 01/15/18.
prescribing penalties;
and prescribing penalties.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:(1) Washington state is ranked number one in the nation in offering quality choices in its long-term services and supports system.
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  The legislature finds that:(1) Washington state is ranked number one in the nation in offering quality choices in its long-term services and supports system.
Providing transparency will allow for more informed consumer choices;(5) State medicaid pays for approximately twenty-five percent of all residents in assisted living facilities, and the state should have more data on the quality of care offered to those residents;(6) A work group has been developing recommendations regarding medicaid rates to inform the legislature as it considers a methodology for adequately funding assisted living facilities so they may deliver safe and quality care to residents;(7) Consumers already have access to information on nursing homes and adult family homes.
Providing transparency will allow for more informed consumer choices;(5) Consumers already have access to information on nursing homes and adult family homes.
and(8) Assisted living facilities need to be held accountable for the residents in their care and the fine structure should be reflective of that responsibility.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 18.20 RCW to read as follows:(1) The assisted living facility quality council is established.
and(6) Assisted living facilities need to be held accountable for the residents in their care and the fine structure should be reflective of that responsibility.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 18.20 RCW to read as follows:The department shall provide information to consumers about assisted living facilities.
The council shall make recommendations on measuring quality, providing consumer information, and reporting value.(2) The panel shall consist of seventeen members, as follows:(a) One member from each of the two largest caucuses of the house of representatives, as appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives;(b) One member from each of the two largest caucuses of the senate, as appointed by the president of the senate;(c) The assistant secretary of the department of social and health services with jurisdiction over aging and long-term supports issues;(d) One representative of the office of the state long-term care ombuds;(e) One representative of the office of the developmental disabilities ombuds;(f) One representative of the state protection and advocacy program established pursuant to RCW 71A.10.080;(g) One representative of the Washington state developmental disabilities council;
This information must be made available online and must include information related to site visits, substantiated inspection and complaint investigation reports, including any citation and remedy imposed, and a listing of licensed assisted living facilities by geographic location.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 18.20 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department shall facilitate a work group process to recommend quality metrics for assisted living facilities.
and(h) The following members, as appointed by the governor:(i) One representative of the governor;(ii) Two representatives of organizations that represent assisted living facilities in Washington;(iii) One person with expertise in serving persons with mental health needs in an institutional setting;(iv) One person with expertise in serving persons with various forms of dementia;(v) One licensed health care professional with experience caring for geriatric patients;(vi) One representative of an organization that represents persons in Washington with Alzheimer's disease;
The department shall keep a public record of comments submitted by stakeholders throughout the work group process.(2) The work group shall consist of representatives from the department, assisted living provider associations, the long-term care ombuds;
and(vii) One representative of an organization that provides consumer advocacy services related to senior and aging issues.(3) The council shall be cochaired by the assistant secretary from the department of social and health services and one of the legislators from a majority caucus of the legislature.(4) Staffing support for the council shall be provided by the assisted living facilities quality measurement program established in section 3 of this act.(5) The council must create a uniform quality metric system for assisted living facilities by September 1, 2019.
organizations with expertise in serving persons with mental health needs in an institutional setting, as selected by the department;
The quality metric system must address the safety, health, and well-being of residents of assisted living facilities.(6)(a) The council must submit an interim report to the governor and the legislature by December 1, 2018, and a final report on the quality metric system by September 1, 2019.(b) The final report to the governor and the legislature must include recommendations that:(i) Identify quality measures for all assisted living facilities;(ii) Propose a process for monitoring and tracking performance;(iii) Propose a process for providing information to consumers;(iv) Propose a process for using quality measures when establishing medicaid rates;(v) Select data metrics to be reported by assisted living facilities to the department.
organizations with expertise in serving persons with developmental disability needs in an institutional setting, as selected by the department;
The selected data should promote quality care and avoid reporting data that is unnecessarily burdensome to assisted living facilities;(vi) Propose a process and frequency for reporting data;
licensed health care professionals with experience caring for geriatric patients, as selected by the department;
and(vii) Evaluate the merits of including a quality incentive payment program.(7) This section expires June 30, 2020.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 18.20 RCW to read as follows:(1) The assisted living facilities quality measurement program is established within the department to provide consumers with information and data about assisted living facilities to allow them to make informed decisions about residential options.(2) The program shall:(a) Provide staffing support to the assisted living facility quality council;
and an Alzheimer's advocacy organization.
and(b) Provide information to consumers about assisted living facilities.
The work group may solicit input from individuals with additional expertise, if necessary.(3) The work group shall make an interim report by September 1, 2019, and final recommendations to the appropriate legislative committees by September 1, 2020, and shall include a dissent report if agreement is not achieved among stakeholders and the department.(4) The work group must submit recommendations for a quality metric system, propose a process for monitoring and tracking performance, and recommend a process to inform consumers.(5) The department shall include at least one meeting dedicated to review and analysis of other states with quality metric methodologies for assisted living and must include information on how well each state is achieving quality care outcomes.
The information must be made available online and include information related to site visits, inspection and complaint investigation reports, licenses issued by the department, and citations issued by the department.(3) The program must submit an implementation report to the governor and the legislature by November 1, 2020, and an update report by November 1, 2022.Sec. 4.  RCW 18.20.190 and 2012 c 10 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The department of social and health services is authorized to take one or more of the actions listed in subsection (2) of this section in any case in which the department finds that an assisted living facility provider has:(a) Failed or refused to comply with the requirements of this chapter or the rules adopted under this chapter;(b) Operated an assisted living facility without a license or under a revoked license;(c) Knowingly, or with reason to know, made a false statement of material fact on his or her application for license or any data attached thereto, or in any matter under investigation by the department;
In addressing data metrics the work group shall consider whether the data that must be reported reflect and promote quality of care and whether reporting the data is unnecessarily burdensome upon assisted living facilities.Sec. 4.  RCW 18.20.190 and 2012 c 10 s 13 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The department of social and health services is authorized to take one or more of the actions listed in subsection (2) of this section in any case in which the department finds that an assisted living facility provider has:(a) Failed or refused to comply with the requirements of this chapter or the rules adopted under this chapter;(b) Operated an assisted living facility without a license or under a revoked license;(c) Knowingly, or with reason to know, made a false statement of material fact on his or her application for license or any data attached thereto, or in any matter under investigation by the department;
or(d) Willfully prevented or interfered with any inspection or investigation by the department.(2) When authorized by subsection (1) of this section, the department may take one or more of the following actions:(a) Refuse to issue a license;(b) Impose reasonable conditions on a license, such as correction within a specified time, training, and limits on the type of clients the provider may admit or serve;(c) Impose civil penalties of ((not more than)) at least one hundred dollars per day per violation;(d) Impose civil penalties of up to three thousand dollars for each incident that violates assisted living facility licensing statutes or rules, including this chapter and chapters 70.129, 74.34, and 74.39A RCW, and related rules.
or(d) Willfully prevented or interfered with any inspection or investigation by the department.(2) When authorized by subsection (1) of this section, the department may take one or more of the following actions, using a tiered sanction grid that considers the extent of harm from the deficiency and the regularity of the occurrence of the deficiency when imposing civil fines:(a) Refuse to issue a license;(b) Impose reasonable conditions on a license, such as correction within a specified time, training, and limits on the type of clients the provider may admit or serve;(c) Impose civil penalties of ((not more than)) at least one hundred dollars per day per violation.
Each day upon which the same or substantially similar action occurs is a separate violation subject to the assessment of a separate penalty;(e) Impose civil penalties of up to ten thousand dollars for a current or former licensed provider who is operating an unlicensed facility;(f) Suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a license;(((e))) (g) Suspend admissions to the assisted living facility by imposing stop placement;
Until July 1, 2019, the civil penalties may not exceed one thousand dollars per day per violation.
or(((f))) (h) Suspend admission of a specific category or categories of residents as related to the violation by imposing a limited stop placement.(3) The department shall adopt a method for determining appropriate actions to respond to deficiencies identified in subsection (1) of this section according to the severity and scope of the deficiencies.
Beginning July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020, the civil penalties may not exceed two thousand dollars per day per violation.
The method shall include the use of a tiered sanction grid that considers the extent of harm from the deficiency and the regularity of the occurrence of the deficiency when imposing civil fines.(4) When the department orders stop placement or a limited stop placement, the facility shall not admit any new resident until the stop placement or limited stop placement order is terminated.
Beginning July 1, 2020, the civil penalties may not exceed three thousand dollars per day per violation;(d) Impose civil penalties of up to ten thousand dollars for a current or former licensed provider who is operating an unlicensed facility;(e) Suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a license;(((e))) (f) Suspend admissions to the assisted living facility by imposing stop placement;
or(((f))) (g) Suspend admission of a specific category or categories of residents as related to the violation by imposing a limited stop placement.(3) When the department orders stop placement or a limited stop placement, the facility shall not admit any new resident until the stop placement or limited stop placement order is terminated.
However, if upon the revisit the department finds new violations that the department reasonably believes will result in a new stop placement or new limited stop placement, the previous stop placement or limited stop placement shall remain in effect until the new stop placement or new limited stop placement is imposed.(((4))) (5) After a department finding of a violation for which a stop placement or limited stop placement has been imposed, the department shall make an on-site revisit of the provider within fifteen working days from the request for revisit, to ensure correction of the violation.
However, if upon the revisit the department finds new violations that the department reasonably believes will result in a new stop placement or new limited stop placement, the previous stop placement or limited stop placement shall remain in effect until the new stop placement or new limited stop placement is imposed.(4) After a department finding of a violation for which a stop placement or limited stop placement has been imposed, the department shall make an on-site revisit of the provider within fifteen working days from the request for revisit, to ensure correction of the violation.
Nothing in this subsection shall interfere with or diminish the department's authority and duty to ensure that the provider adequately cares for residents, including to make departmental on-site revisits as needed to ensure that the provider protects residents, and to enforce compliance with this chapter.(((5))) (6) RCW 43.20A.205 governs notice of a license denial, revocation, suspension, or modification.
Nothing in this subsection shall interfere with or diminish the department's authority and duty to ensure that the provider adequately cares for residents, including to make departmental on-site revisits as needed to ensure that the provider protects residents, and to enforce compliance with this chapter.(5) RCW 43.20A.205 governs notice of a license denial, revocation, suspension, or modification.
Chapter 34.05 RCW applies to department actions under this section, except that orders of the department imposing license suspension, stop placement, limited stop placement, or conditions for continuation of a license are effective immediately upon notice and shall continue pending any hearing.(((6))) (7) All receipts from civil penalties imposed under this chapter must be deposited in the assisted living facility temporary management account created in RCW 18.20.430.(8) For the purposes of this section, "limited stop placement" means the ability to suspend admission of a specific category or categories of residents.Sec. 5.  RCW 18.20.430 and 2016 sp.s.
Chapter 34.05 RCW applies to department actions under this section, except that orders of the department imposing license suspension, stop placement, limited stop placement, or conditions for continuation of a license are effective immediately upon notice and shall continue pending any hearing.(6) All receipts from civil penalties imposed under this chapter must be deposited in the assisted living facility temporary management account created in RCW 18.20.430.(7) For the purposes of this section, "limited stop placement" means the ability to suspend admission of a specific category or categories of residents.Sec. 5.  RCW 18.20.430 and 2016 sp.s.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/7/2018.

  2. Chapter 173, 2018 Laws.

  3. Governor signed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. President signed.

  6. Speaker signed.

  7. Passed final passage; yeas, 95; nays, 3; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  8. House concurred in Senate amendments.

  9. Third reading, passed; yeas, 29; nays, 19; absent, 0; excused, 1.

  10. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  11. Committee amendment(s) adopted with no other amendments.

  12. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  13. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  14. Minority; without recommendation.

  15. WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).

  16. Referred to Ways & Means.

  17. Minority; do not pass.

  18. And refer to Ways & Means.

  19. HLTC - Majority; without recommendation.

  20. First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.

  21. Third reading, passed; yeas, 91; nays, 7; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  22. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  23. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  24. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  25. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  26. Minority; do not pass.

  27. APP - Majority; do pass.

  28. Referred to Appropriations.

  29. Minority; do not pass.

  30. HCW - Majority; do pass.

  31. First reading, referred to Health Care & Wellness (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 141 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (141)

141 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 141 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 95 Yea · 3 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 49100
Democrat 33000
Republican 13200
Total 95300
% of votes cast 97%3%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Lytton — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Hargrove — Yea
Blake — Yea
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Condotta — Yea
DeBolt — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Smith — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Nay
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Yea
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 29 Yea · 19 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 171400
Republican 3501
Democrat 9000
Total 291901
% of votes cast 59%39%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Nay
Bailey — Nay
Becker — Nay
Ericksen — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Yea
Palumbo — Yea
Rivers — Nay
Sheldon — Nay
Brown — Nay
Baumgartner — Nay
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Yea
Darneille — Yea
Fain — Nay
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Mullet — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Nay
Ranker — Yea
Wilson — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Not Voting
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Nay
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Final Passage (#18)

Passed 91 Yea · 7 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47300
Democrat 32100
Republican 12300
Total 91700
% of votes cast 93%7%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Yea
Harmsworth — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Yea
Kagi — Yea
Kristiansen — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Nealey — Yea
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Nay
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Yea
Smith — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Yea
Kraft — Yea
Kretz — Yea
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Yea
Maycumber — Yea
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Yea
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Muri — Yea
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Nay
Hargrove — Yea
Blake — Yea
Buys — Yea
Chandler — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Condotta — Yea
DeBolt — Nay
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Yea
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Yea
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
Joe Schmick Republican Yea
Mary Dye Republican Yea
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Yea
Mike Volz Republican Yea
Paul Harris Republican Yea
Tom Dent Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2750?
HB 2750 is sponsored by Cody, Laurie Jinkins (Democrat), Muri, Robinson, Appleton, Mia Gregerson (Democrat), Vandana Slatter (Democrat), Steve Tharinger (Democrat), Monica Jurado Stonier (Democrat), and Johnson, J..
What is the current status of HB 2750?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 15, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2750?
Track HB 2750 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2750

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2750

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →