Providing cities and counties flexibility with existing resources.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2006 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2006.
You're tracking HB 2006
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2006 — Providing cities and counties flexibility with existing resources.
Last action — By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 2006 make significant changes to how local governments in Washington can utilize funds designated for criminal justice and related programs. Notably, the restriction preventing these funds from replacing existing financial support has been removed, which gives cities and counties more flexibility in managing their budgets during times of financial strain. This change can potentially allow local governments to better address growing needs in mental health and substance abuse programs, enhancing their capability to respond to community challenges effectively. Overall, this amendment aims to improve the responsiveness and efficiency of local criminal justice and social service systems.
H-4021.1SECONDH-1438.1HOUSE SUBSTITUTE HOUSE BILL 2006State of Washington65th Legislature2018Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy House Appropriations (originally sponsored by Representatives Koster, Lytton, Springer, Volz, Senn, Tharinger, Fey, Stokesbary, Appleton, Nealey, Chapman, and Ormsby)READOrmsbyRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 01/29/18.AN02/07/17. ACT Relating to providing cities and counties flexibility with existing resources;
andReferred amendingto RCWCommittee 82.14.460,on 84.52.135,Appropriations.AN andACT 84.55.050.BERelating IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 82.14.460 and 2015 c 291 s 5 are each amended to readproviding ascities follows:(1)(a) A county legislative authority may authorize, fix, and imposecounties aflexibility sales and use tax in accordance with theexisting termsresources; of this chapter.(b) If a county with a population over eight hundred thousand has not imposed the tax authorized under this subsection by January 1, 2011, any city with a population over thirty thousand located in that county may authorize, fix, and impose the sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter.
and amending RCW 82.14.310, 82.14.320, 82.14.330, and 82.14.460.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 82.14.310 and 2013 2nd sp.s.
c 4 s 1004 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The county criminal justice assistance account is created in the state treasury.
Beginning in fiscal year 2000, the state treasurer must transfer into the county criminal justice assistance account from the general fund the sum of twenty-three million two hundred thousand dollars divided into four equal deposits occurring on July 1, October 1, January 1, and April 1.
For each fiscal year thereafter, the state treasurer must increase the total transfer by the fiscal growth factor, as defined in RCW 43.135.025, forecast for that fiscal year by the office of financial management in November of the preceding year.(2) The moneys deposited in the county criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this section, less any moneys appropriated for purposes under subsection (4) of this section, must be distributed at such times as distributions are made under RCW 82.44.150 and on the relative basis of each county's funding factor as determined under this subsection.(a) A county's funding factor is the sum of:(i) The population of the county, divided by one thousand, and multiplied by two-tenths;(ii) The crime rate of the county, multiplied by three-tenths;
and(iii) The annual number of criminal cases filed in the county superior court, for each one thousand in population, multiplied by five-tenths.(b) Under this section and RCW 82.14.320 and 82.14.330:(i) The population of the county or city is as last determined by the office of financial management;(ii) The crime rate of the county or city is the annual occurrence of specified criminal offenses, as calculated in the most recent annual report on crime in Washington state as published by the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs, for each one thousand in population;(iii) The annual number of criminal cases filed in the county superior court must be determined by the most recent annual report of the courts of Washington, as published by the administrative office of the courts;(iv) Distributions and eligibility for distributions in the 1989-1991 biennium must be based on 1988 figures for both the crime rate as described under (ii) of this subsection and the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (iii) of this subsection.
Future distributions must be based on the most recent figures for both the crime rate as described under (ii) of this subsection and the annual number of criminal cases that are filed as described under (iii) of this subsection.(3) Moneys distributed under this section must be expended exclusively for criminal justice purposes ((and may not be used to replace or supplant existing funding)).
Criminal justice purposes are defined as activities that substantially assist the criminal justice system, which may include circumstances where ancillary benefit to the civil or juvenile justice system occurs, and which includes (a) domestic violence services such as those provided by domestic violence programs, community advocates, and legal advocates, as defined in RCW 70.123.020, and (b) during the 2001-2003 fiscal biennium, juvenile dispositional hearings relating to petitions for at-risk youth, truancy, and children in need of services.
((Existing funding for purposes of this subsection is defined as calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes.
Calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes exclude the following:
Expenditures for extraordinary events not likely to reoccur, changes in contract provisions for criminal justice services, beyond the control of the local jurisdiction receiving the services, and major nonrecurring capital expenditures.))(4) Not more than five percent of the funds deposited to the county criminal justice assistance account may be available for appropriations for enhancements to the state patrol crime laboratory system and the continuing costs related to these enhancements.
Funds appropriated from this account for such enhancements may not supplant existing funds from the state general fund.(((5) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the amount that would otherwise be transferred into the county criminal justice assistance account from the general fund under subsection (1) of this section must be reduced by 3.4 percent.(6) During the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium, for the purposes of substance abuse and other programs for offenders, the legislature may appropriate from the county criminal justice assistance account such amounts as are in excess of the amounts necessary to fully meet the state's obligations to the counties and to the Washington state patrol.
Excess amounts in this account are not the result of subsection (5) of this section.))Sec. 2. RCW 82.14.320 and 2011 1st sp.s.
c 50 s 971 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The municipal criminal justice assistance account is created in the state treasury.
Beginning in fiscal year 2000, the state treasurer must transfer into the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this section from the general fund the sum of four million six hundred thousand dollars divided into four equal deposits occurring on July 1, October 1, January 1, and April 1.
For each fiscal year thereafter, the state treasurer must increase the total transfer by the fiscal growth factor, as defined in RCW 43.135.025, forecast for that fiscal year by the office of financial management in November of the preceding year.(2) No city may receive a distribution under this section from the municipal criminal justice assistance account unless:(a) The city has a crime rate in excess of one hundred twenty-five percent of the statewide average as calculated in the most recent annual report on crime in Washington state as published by the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs;(b) The city has levied the tax authorized in RCW 82.14.030(2) at the maximum rate or the tax authorized in RCW 82.46.010(3) at the maximum rate;
and(c) The city has a per capita yield from the tax imposed under RCW 82.14.030(1) at the maximum rate of less than one hundred fifty percent of the statewide average per capita yield for all cities from such local sales and use tax.(3) The moneys deposited in the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this section, less any moneys appropriated for purposes under subsection (7) of this section, must be distributed at such times as distributions are made under RCW 82.44.150.
The distributions must be made as follows:(a) Unless reduced by this subsection, thirty percent of the moneys must be distributed ratably based on population as last determined by the office of financial management to those cities eligible under subsection (2) of this section that have a crime rate determined under subsection (2)(a) of this section which is greater than one hundred seventy-five percent of the statewide average crime rate.
No city may receive more than fifty percent of any moneys distributed under this subsection (a) but, if a city distribution is reduced as a result of exceeding the fifty percent limitation, the amount not distributed must be distributed under (b) of this subsection.(b) The remainder of the moneys, including any moneys not distributed in subsection (2)(a) of this section, must be distributed to all cities eligible under subsection (2) of this section ratably based on population as last determined by the office of financial management.(4) No city may receive more than thirty percent of all moneys distributed under subsection (3) of this section.(5) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the distributions to any city that substantially decriminalizes or repeals its criminal code after July 1, 1990, and that does not reimburse the county for costs associated with criminal cases under RCW 3.50.800 or 3.50.805(2), must be made to the county in which the city is located.(6) Moneys distributed under this section must be expended exclusively for criminal justice purposes ((and may not be used to replace or supplant existing funding)).
Criminal justice purposes are defined as activities that substantially assist the criminal justice system, which may include circumstances where ancillary benefit to the civil justice system occurs, and which includes domestic violence services such as those provided by domestic violence programs, community advocates, and legal advocates, as defined in RCW 70.123.020, and publications and public educational efforts designed to provide information and assistance to parents in dealing with runaway or at-risk youth.
((Existing funding for purposes of this subsection is defined as calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes.
Calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes exclude the following:
Expenditures for extraordinary events not likely to reoccur, changes in contract provisions for criminal justice services, beyond the control of the local jurisdiction receiving the services, and major nonrecurring capital expenditures.))(7) Not more than five percent of the funds deposited to the municipal criminal justice assistance account may be available for appropriations for enhancements to the state patrol crime laboratory system and the continuing costs related to these enhancements.
Funds appropriated from this account for such enhancements may not supplant existing funds from the state general fund.(((8) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the amount that would otherwise be transferred into the municipal criminal justice assistance account from the general fund under subsection (1) of this section must be reduced by 3.4 percent.))Sec. 3. RCW 82.14.330 and 2011 1st sp.s.
c 50 s 972 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(a) Beginning in fiscal year 2000, the state treasurer must transfer into the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this section from the general fund the sum of four million six hundred thousand dollars divided into four equal deposits occurring on July 1, October 1, January 1, and April 1.
For each fiscal year thereafter, the state treasurer must increase the total transfer by the fiscal growth factor, as defined in RCW 43.135.025, forecast for that fiscal year by the office of financial management in November of the preceding year.
The moneys deposited in the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this section, less any moneys appropriated for purposes under subsection (4) of this section, must be distributed to the cities of the state as follows:(i) Twenty percent appropriated for distribution must be distributed to cities with a three-year average violent crime rate for each one thousand in population in excess of one hundred fifty percent of the statewide three-year average violent crime rate for each one thousand in population.
The three-year average violent crime rate must be calculated using the violent crime rates for each of the preceding three years from the annual reports on crime in Washington state as published by the Washington association of sheriffs and police chiefs.
Moneys must be distributed under this subsection (1)(a) ratably based on population as last determined by the office of financial management, but no city may receive more than one dollar per capita.
Moneys remaining undistributed under this subsection at the end of each calendar year must be distributed to the criminal justice training commission to reimburse participating city law enforcement agencies with ten or fewer full-time commissioned patrol officers the cost of temporary replacement of each officer who is enrolled in basic law enforcement training, as provided in RCW 43.101.200.(ii) Sixteen percent must be distributed to cities ratably based on population as last determined by the office of financial management, but no city may receive less than one thousand dollars.(b) The moneys deposited in the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this subsection (1) must be distributed at such times as distributions are made under RCW 82.44.150.(c) Moneys distributed under this subsection (1) must be expended exclusively for criminal justice purposes ((and may not be used to replace or supplant existing funding)).
Criminal justice purposes are defined as activities that substantially assist the criminal justice system, which may include circumstances where ancillary benefit to the civil justice system occurs, and which includes domestic violence services such as those provided by domestic violence programs, community advocates, and legal advocates, as defined in RCW 70.123.020.
((Existing funding for purposes of this subsection is defined as calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes.
Calendar year 1989 actual operating expenditures for criminal justice purposes exclude the following:
Expenditures for extraordinary events not likely to reoccur, changes in contract provisions for criminal justice services, beyond the control of the local jurisdiction receiving the services, and major nonrecurring capital expenditures.))(2)(a) In addition to the distributions under subsection (1) of this section:(i) Ten percent must be distributed on a per capita basis to cities that contract with another governmental agency for the majority of the city's law enforcement services.
Cities that subsequently qualify for this distribution must notify the department of commerce by November 30th for the upcoming calendar year.
The department of commerce must provide a list of eligible cities to the state treasurer by December 31st.
The state treasurer must modify the distribution of these funds in the following year.
Cities have the responsibility to notify the department of commerce of any changes regarding these contractual relationships.
Adjustments in the distribution formula to add or delete cities may be made only for the upcoming calendar year;
Show all 59 changed lines (19 more)
no adjustments may be made retroactively.(ii) The remaining fifty-four percent must be distributed to cities and towns by the state treasurer on a per capita basis.
These funds must be used for:
(A) Innovative law enforcement strategies;
(B) programs to help at-risk children or child abuse victim response programs;
and (C) programs designed to reduce the level of domestic violence or to provide counseling for domestic violence victims.(b) The moneys deposited in the municipal criminal justice assistance account for distribution under this subsection (2), less any moneys appropriated for purposes under subsection (4) of this section, must be distributed at the times as distributions are made under RCW 82.44.150.
Moneys remaining undistributed under this subsection at the end of each calendar year must be distributed to the criminal justice training commission to reimburse participating city law enforcement agencies with ten or fewer full-time commissioned patrol officers the cost of temporary replacement of each officer who is enrolled in basic law enforcement training, as provided in RCW 43.101.200.(c) If a city is found by the state auditor to have expended funds received under this subsection (2) in a manner that does not comply with the criteria under which the moneys were received, the city is ineligible to receive future distributions under this subsection (2) until the use of the moneys are justified to the satisfaction of the director or are repaid to the state general fund.(3) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the distributions to any city that substantially decriminalizes or repeals its criminal code after July 1, 1990, and that does not reimburse the county for costs associated with criminal cases under RCW 3.50.800 or 3.50.805(2), must be made to the county in which the city is located.(4) Not more than five percent of the funds deposited to the municipal criminal justice assistance account may be available for appropriations for enhancements to the state patrol crime laboratory system and the continuing costs related to these enhancements.
((Funds appropriated from this account for such enhancements may not supplant existing funds from the state general fund.(5) During the 2011-2013 fiscal biennium, the amount that would otherwise be transferred into the municipal criminal justice assistance account from the general fund under subsection (1) of this section must be reduced by 3.4 percent.))Sec. 4. RCW 82.14.460 and 2015 c 291 s 5 are each amended to read as follows:(1)(a) A county legislative authority may authorize, fix, and impose a sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter.(b) If a county with a population over eight hundred thousand has not imposed the tax authorized under this subsection by January 1, 2011, any city with a population over thirty thousand located in that county may authorize, fix, and impose the sales and use tax in accordance with the terms of this chapter.
and(d) Notwithstanding (a) through (c) of this subsection, moneys collected under this section may be used to support the cost of the judicial officer and support staff of a therapeutic court.(5) Nothing in this section may be interpreted to prohibit the use of moneys collected under this section for the replacement of lapsed federal funding previously provided for the operation or delivery of services and programs as provided in this section.))Sec. 2. RCWsection.))--- 84.52.135END and--- 2004 c 80 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A county ((with a population of ninety thousand or less)) may impose additional regular property tax levies in an amount equal to fifty cents or less per thousand dollars of the assessed value of property in the county in accordance with the terms of this section.(2) The tax proposition may be submitted at a general or special election.(3) The tax may be imposed each year for six consecutive years when specifically authorized by the registered voters voting on the proposition, subject to the following:(a) If the number of registered voters voting on the proposition does not exceed forty percent of the total number of voters voting in the taxing district at the last general election, the number of persons voting "yes" on the proposition ((shall)) must constitute at least three-fifths of a number equal to forty percent of the total number of voters voting in the taxing district at the last general election.(b) If the number of registered voters voting on the proposition exceeds forty percent of the total number of voters voting in the taxing district at the last preceding general election, the number of persons voting "yes" on the proposition ((shall)) must be at least three-fifths of the registered voters voting on the proposition.(4) Ballot propositions ((shall)) must conform with RCW 29A.36.210.(5) Any tax imposed under this section ((shall)) must be used exclusively for criminal justice purposes as defined in RCW 82.14.310.(6) The limitations in RCW 84.52.043 do not apply to the tax authorized in this section.(7) The limitation in RCW 84.55.010 does not apply to the first tax levy imposed pursuant to this section following the approval of the levy by the voters pursuant to subsection (3) of this section.Sec. 3. RCW 84.55.050 and 2017 c 296 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Subject to any otherwise applicable statutory dollar rate limitations, regular property taxes may be levied by or for a taxing district in an amount exceeding the limitations provided for in this chapter if such levy is authorized by a proposition approved by a majority of the voters of the taxing district voting on the proposition at a general election held within the district or at a special election within the taxing district called by the district for the purpose of submitting such proposition to the voters.
Any election held pursuant to this section ((shall)) must be held not more than twelve months prior to the date on which the proposed levy is to be made, except as provided in subsection (2) of this section.
The ballot of the proposition ((shall)) must state the dollar rate proposed and ((shall)) must clearly state the conditions, if any, which are applicable under subsection (4) of this section.(2)(((a))) Subject to statutory dollar limitations, a proposition placed before the voters under this section may authorize annual increases in levies for multiple consecutive years, up to six consecutive years, during which period each year's authorized maximum legal levy ((shall)) must be used as the base upon which an increased levy limit for the succeeding year is computed, but the ballot proposition must state the dollar rate proposed only for the first year of the consecutive years and must state the limit factor, or a specified index to be used for determining a limit factor, such as the consumer price index, which need not be the same for all years, by which the regular tax levy for the district may be increased in each of the subsequent consecutive years.
Elections for this purpose must be held at a primary or general election.
The title of each ballot measure must state the limited purposes for which the proposed annual increases during the specified period of up to six consecutive years ((shall)) will be used.(((b)(i) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (2)(b), funds raised by a levy under this subsection may not supplant existing funds used for the limited purpose specified in the ballot title.
For purposes of this subsection, existing funds means the actual operating expenditures for the calendar year in which the ballot measure is approved by voters.
Actual operating expenditures excludes lost federal funds, lost or expired state grants or loans, extraordinary events not likely to reoccur, changes in contract provisions beyond the control of the taxing district receiving the services, and major nonrecurring capital expenditures.(ii) The supplanting limitations in (b)(i) of this subsection do not apply to levies approved by the voters in calendar years 2009, 2010, and 2011, in any county with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more.
This subsection (2)(b)(ii) only applies to levies approved by the voters after July 26, 2009.(iii) The supplanting limitations in (b)(i) of this subsection do not apply to levies approved by the voters in calendar year 2009 and thereafter in any county with a population less than one million five hundred thousand.
This subsection (2)(b)(iii) only applies to levies approved by the voters after July 26, 2009.))(3) After a levy authorized pursuant to this section is made, the dollar amount of such levy may not be used for the purpose of computing the limitations for subsequent levies provided for in this chapter, unless the ballot proposition expressly states that the levy made under this section will be used for this purpose.(4) If expressly stated, a proposition placed before the voters under subsection (1) or (2) of this section may:(a) Use the dollar amount of a levy under subsection (1) of this section, or the dollar amount of the final levy under subsection (2) of this section, for the purpose of computing the limitations for subsequent levies provided for in this chapter;(b) Limit the period for which the increased levy is to be made under (a) of this subsection;(c) Limit the purpose for which the increased levy is to be made under (a) of this subsection, but if the limited purpose includes making redemption payments on bonds;(i) For the county in which the state capitol is located, the period for which the increased levies are made may not exceed twenty-five years;
and(ii) For districts other than a district under (c)(i) of this subsection, the period for which the increased levies are made may not exceed nine years;(d) Set the levy or levies at a rate less than the maximum rate allowed for the district;
or(e) Include any combination of the conditions in this subsection.(5) Except as otherwise expressly stated in an approved ballot measure under this section, subsequent levies ((shall)) must be computed as if:(a) The proposition under this section had not been approved;
and(b) The taxing district had made levies at the maximum rates which would otherwise have been allowed under this chapter during the years levies were made under the proposition.--- END ---
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Second Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Engrossed Second Substitute Bill html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
WM - Majority; do pass with amendment(s) by Ways & Means.
-
Referred to Ways & Means.
-
And refer to Ways & Means.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 92; nays, 6; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
2nd substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, returned to House Rules Committee for third reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
LGOV - Majority; do pass with amendment(s).
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 87; nays, 10; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
APP - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Appropriations (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
Sponsors
- Mike Chapman · Cosponsor
- Jake Fey · Cosponsor
- Koster · Primary
- Lytton · Cosponsor
- Nealey · Cosponsor
- Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
- Appleton · Cosponsor
- Larry Springer · Cosponsor
- Drew Stokesbary · Cosponsor
- Steve Tharinger · Cosponsor
- Mike Volz · Cosponsor
- Tana Senn · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Koster
Co-sponsors (11)
- Mike Chapman Democrat
- Jake Fey Democrat
- Lytton
- Nealey
- Timm Ormsby Democrat
- Appleton
- Larry Springer Democrat
- Drew Stokesbary Republican
- Steve Tharinger Democrat
- Mike Volz Republican
- Tana Senn Democrat
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 92 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Haler | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Lytton | — | Yea |
| Nealey | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Pike | — | Yea |
| Rodne | — | Yea |
| Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Hargrove | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Buys | — | Nay |
| Chandler | — | Yea |
| Clibborn | — | Yea |
| Condotta | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Nay |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Harmsworth | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Kagi | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Kristiansen | — | Yea |
| Manweller | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McBride | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| McDonald | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Muri | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Stambaugh | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Johnson, J. | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Nay |
| Javier Valdez | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Carolyn Eslick | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 10% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Buys | — | Nay |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Haler | — | Yea |
| Harmsworth | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Yea |
| Muri | — | Yea |
| Nealey | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Pike | — | Yea |
| Rodne | — | Yea |
| Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Nay |
| Hargrove | — | Yea |
| Johnson | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Nay |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Clibborn | — | Yea |
| Condotta | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Nay |
| Farrell | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Kagi | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Koster | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Nay |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Kristiansen | — | Yea |
| Lytton | — | Yea |
| Manweller | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McBride | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Nay |
| McDonald | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Not Voting |
| Stambaugh | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Nay |
| Van Werven | — | Nay |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Nay |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2006?
- HB 2006 is sponsored by Mike Chapman (Democrat), Jake Fey (Democrat), Koster, Lytton, Nealey, Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Appleton, Larry Springer (Democrat), Drew Stokesbary (Republican), Steve Tharinger (Democrat), Mike Volz (Republican), and Tana Senn (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 2006?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2006?
- Track HB 2006 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2006
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2006
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →