Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 5 D cosponsors

HB 2957 — Reducing escape of nonnative finfish from marine finfish aquaculture facilities.

Last action — Effective date 6/7/2018.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 66% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 D).

  • Mixed recorded votes

    3 passed, 3 failed in recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 2957 includes stronger measures to phase out nonnative marine finfish aquaculture in Washington, citing concerns about its potential harm to native salmon populations and the broader marine environment. It outlines specific prohibitions on accepting new leases for such aquaculture and restricts extensions of existing ones. Additionally, the bill mandates regular inspections of fish farming facilities to ensure their structural integrity and compliance with environmental regulations, which are crucial for preventing escapes of nonnative species and protecting local ecosystems. This matters because it aims to preserve Washington's native fish populations and safeguard the health of marine environments.

→
Previous
Latest
H-4307.2HOUSE BILL 2957State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Representatives Lytton, Peterson, Robinson, Wilcox, Taylor, Stambaugh, Sawyer, Chapman, Pollet, and StanfordRead first time 01/30/18.
ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2957State of Washington65th Legislature2018 Regular SessionBy Representatives Lytton, Peterson, Robinson, Wilcox, Taylor, Stambaugh, Sawyer, Chapman, Pollet, and StanfordRead first time 01/30/18.
amending RCW 77.115.010, 77.115.030, 77.115.040, 77.125.030, 77.12.047, 90.48.220, and 50.04.075;
amending RCW 77.115.010, 77.115.030, 77.115.040, 77.125.030, 77.12.047, and 50.04.075;
adding new sections to chapter 77.12 RCW;
adding new sections to chapter 77.125 RCW;
creating a new section;
creating new sections;
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  A new section is added to chapter 79.105 RCW under the subchapter heading "general use, sale, and lease provisions" to read as follows:(1) On and after the effective date of this section, the department may not enter into a new lease or other use authorization where the use includes marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon.(2) On and after the effective date of this section, the department may not renew or extend a lease or other use authorization in existence on the effective date of this section where the use includes marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 77.12 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department may only authorize or permit marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon where it is an authorized use under a lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.(2) For marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon that qualifies under subsection (1) of this section, the department may not authorize or permit any such activities or operations after the expiration date of the relevant lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.(3) For purposes of this section, "state-owned aquatic lands" has the meaning provided in RCW 79.105.060.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department may only authorize or permit marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon where it is an authorized use under a lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.(2) For marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon that qualifies under subsection (1) of this section, the department may not authorize or permit any such activities or operations after the expiration date of the relevant lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.(3) For purposes of this section, "state-owned aquatic lands" has the meaning provided in RCW 79.105.060.Sec. 4.  RCW 77.115.010 and 2000 c 107 s 122 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The director of agriculture and the director shall jointly develop a program of disease inspection and control for aquatic farmers as defined in RCW 15.85.020.
and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:NEW SECTION.  Sec. 1.  Recent developments have thrown into stark relief the threat that nonnative marine finfish aquaculture may pose to Washington's native salmon populations.
But just as evidence has emerged that nonnative marine finfish aquaculture may endanger Washington's native salmon populations, so too has evidence emerged that marine finfish aquaculture in general may pose unacceptable risks not only to Washington's native salmon populations but also to the broader health of Washington's marine environment.
Given this evidence, the legislature intends to phase out nonnative finfish aquaculture in Washington's marine waters.
Because the state of the science and engineering with regard to marine finfish aquaculture may be evolving, the legislature further intends to study this issue in greater depth, and to revisit the issue of marine finfish aquaculture once additional research becomes available.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  A new section is added to chapter 79.105 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department may not allow nonnative marine finfish aquaculture as an authorized use under any new lease or other use authorization.(2) The department may not renew or extend a lease or other use authorization in existence on the effective date of this section where the use includes nonnative marine finfish aquaculture.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  A new section is added to chapter 77.125 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department may authorize or permit activities associated with the use of marine net pens for nonnative marine finfish aquaculture only if these activities are performed under a lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.
The department may not authorize or permit any of these activities or operations after the expiration date of the relevant lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.
(2) For purposes of this section, "state-owned aquatic lands" has the same meaning as defined in RCW 79.105.060.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  A new section is added to chapter 90.48 RCW to read as follows:(1) The department may issue national pollutant discharge elimination system permits associated with nonnative marine finfish aquaculture only if these activities are performed under a lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.
The department may not issue national pollutant discharge elimination system permits in connection with any of these activities or operations after the expiration date of the relevant lease of state-owned aquatic lands in effect on the effective date of this section.(2) For purposes of this section, "state-owned aquatic lands" has the same meaning as defined in RCW 79.105.060.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  (1) The departments of ecology, agriculture, and fish and wildlife, as well as the department of natural resources, shall continue the existing effort to update guidance and informational resources to industry and governments for planning and permitting commercial marine net pen aquaculture.
As part of this effort, the departments shall seek advice and technical assistance from the Northwest Indian fisheries commission, and the national centers for coastal ocean science, and shall invite consultation and participation from the University of Washington school of aquatic and fishery sciences, Western Washington University, Washington State University, Northwest Indian College, and additional authorities, as appropriate, including federally recognized Indian tribes.
The guidance must be designed to eliminate commercial marine net pen escapement and to eliminate negative impacts to water quality and native fish, shellfish, and wildlife.
At a minimum, the guidance must address the following topics:(a) Local shoreline permitting;(b) Water quality;(c) The state of the science concerning marine finfish aquaculture impacts on native fish, shellfish, and wildlife;(d) Best management practices for the safe and effective operation of finfish aquaculture in the marine environment;(e) Interagency coordination in permitting, inspections, and enforcement;
and(f) Recommendations for future legislative oversight of marine finfish net pen aquaculture.(2) The departments must report to the legislature, consistent with RCW 43.01.036, by November 1, 2019.(3) This section expires June 30, 2020.Sec. 6.  RCW 77.115.010 and 2000 c 107 s 122 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The director of agriculture and the director shall jointly develop a program of disease inspection and control for aquatic farmers as defined in RCW 15.85.020.
Neither the provisions of this subsection nor the provisions of subsection (2) of this section shall preclude the department from requesting the initiation of criminal proceedings for violations of the disease inspection and control rules.(4) A person shall not violate the rules adopted under subsection (2) or (3) of this section or violate RCW 77.115.040.(5) In administering the program established under this section, the department shall use the services of a pathologist licensed to practice veterinary medicine.(6) The director in administering the program shall not place constraints on or take enforcement actions in respect to the aquaculture industry that are more rigorous than those placed on the department or other fish-rearing entities.(7) The department must implement this section consistent with section 2 of this act.Sec. 5.  RCW 77.115.030 and 2000 c 107 s 124 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The director shall consult regarding the disease inspection and control program established under RCW 77.115.010 with federal agencies and Indian tribes to assure protection of state, federal, and tribal aquatic resources and to protect private sector cultured aquatic products from disease that could originate from waters or facilities managed by those agencies.(2) With regard to the program, the director may enter into contracts or interagency agreements for diagnostic field services with government agencies and institutions of higher education and private industry.(3) The director shall provide for the creation and distribution of a roster of biologists having a specialty in the diagnosis or treatment of diseases of fish or shellfish.
Neither the provisions of this subsection nor the provisions of subsection (2) of this section shall preclude the department from requesting the initiation of criminal proceedings for violations of the disease inspection and control rules.(4) A person shall not violate the rules adopted under subsection (2) or (3) of this section or violate RCW 77.115.040.(5) In administering the program established under this section, the department shall use the services of a pathologist licensed to practice veterinary medicine.(6) The director in administering the program shall not place constraints on or take enforcement actions in respect to the aquaculture industry that are more rigorous than those placed on the department or other fish-rearing entities.(7) The department must implement this section consistent with section 3 of this act.Sec. 7.  RCW 77.115.030 and 2000 c 107 s 124 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The director shall consult regarding the disease inspection and control program established under RCW 77.115.010 with federal agencies and Indian tribes to assure protection of state, federal, and tribal aquatic resources and to protect private sector cultured aquatic products from disease that could originate from waters or facilities managed by those agencies.(2) With regard to the program, the director may enter into contracts or interagency agreements for diagnostic field services with government agencies and institutions of higher education and private industry.(3) The director shall provide for the creation and distribution of a roster of biologists having a specialty in the diagnosis or treatment of diseases of fish or shellfish.
The director shall adopt rules specifying the qualifications which a person must have in order to be placed on the roster.(4) The department must implement this section consistent with section 2 of this act.Sec. 6.  RCW 77.115.040 and 2011 c 339 s 37 are each amended to read as follows:(1) All aquatic farmers, as defined in RCW 15.85.020, shall register with the department.
The director shall adopt rules specifying the qualifications which a person must have in order to be placed on the roster.(4) The department must implement this section consistent with section 3 of this act.Sec. 8.  RCW 77.115.040 and 2011 c 339 s 37 are each amended to read as follows:(1) All aquatic farmers, as defined in RCW 15.85.020, shall register with the department.
and(g) Statistical production data.(3) The state veterinarian shall be provided with registration and statistical data by the department.(4) The department must implement this section consistent with section 2 of this act.Sec. 7.  RCW 77.125.030 and 2001 c 86 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:The director, in cooperation with the marine finfish aquatic farmers, shall develop proposed rules for the implementation, administration, and enforcement of marine finfish aquaculture programs.
and(g) Statistical production data.(3) The state veterinarian shall be provided with registration and statistical data by the department.(4) The department must implement this section consistent with section 3 of this act.Sec. 9.  RCW 77.125.030 and 2001 c 86 s 3 are each amended to read as follows:The director, in cooperation with the marine finfish aquatic farmers, shall develop proposed rules for the implementation, administration, and enforcement of marine finfish aquaculture programs.
and(7) Provisions for the development of an education program to assist marine aquatic farmers so that they operate in an environmentally sound manner.(8) The department must implement this section consistent with section 2 of this act.Sec. 8.  RCW 77.12.047 and 2017 c 159 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The commission may adopt, amend, or repeal rules as follows:(a) Specifying the times when the taking of wildlife, fish, or shellfish is lawful or unlawful.(b) Specifying the areas and waters in which the taking and possession of wildlife, fish, or shellfish is lawful or unlawful.(c) Specifying and defining the gear, appliances, or other equipment and methods that may be used to take wildlife, fish, or shellfish, and specifying the times, places, and manner in which the equipment may be used or possessed.(d) Regulating the importation, transportation, possession, disposal, landing, and sale of wildlife, fish, shellfish, or seaweed within the state, whether acquired within or without the state.
and(7) Provisions for the development of an education program to assist marine aquatic farmers so that they operate in an environmentally sound manner.(8) The department must implement this section consistent with section 3 of this act.Sec. 10.  RCW 77.12.047 and 2017 c 159 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The commission may adopt, amend, or repeal rules as follows:(a) Specifying the times when the taking of wildlife, fish, or shellfish is lawful or unlawful.(b) Specifying the areas and waters in which the taking and possession of wildlife, fish, or shellfish is lawful or unlawful.(c) Specifying and defining the gear, appliances, or other equipment and methods that may be used to take wildlife, fish, or shellfish, and specifying the times, places, and manner in which the equipment may be used or possessed.(d) Regulating the importation, transportation, possession, disposal, landing, and sale of wildlife, fish, shellfish, or seaweed within the state, whether acquired within or without the state.
However, this authority must be exercised consistent with sections 2 and 12 of this act.
However, this authority must be exercised consistent with sections 3 and 12 of this act.
Subsection (1)(g) of this section does apply to such products.Sec. 9.  RCW 90.48.220 and 1993 c 296 s 1 are each amended to read as follows:(1) For the purposes of this section "marine finfish rearing facilities" means those private and public facilities located within the salt water of the state where finfish are fed, nurtured, held, maintained, or reared to reach the size of release or for market sale.(2) Not later than October 31, 1994, the department shall adopt criteria under chapter 34.05 RCW for allowable sediment impacts from organic enrichment due to marine finfish rearing facilities.(3) Not later than June 30, 1995, the department shall adopt standards under chapter 34.05 RCW for waste discharges from marine finfish rearing facilities.
Subsection (1)(g) of this section does apply to such products.Sec. 11.  RCW 50.04.075 and 2011 c 4 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:(1) With respect to claims with an effective date prior to July 1, 2012, "dislocated worker" means any individual who:(a) Has been terminated or received a notice of termination from employment;(b) Is eligible for or has exhausted entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits;
In establishing these standards, the department shall review and incorporate, to the extent possible, studies conducted by state and federal agencies on waste discharges from marine finfish rearing facilities, and any reports and other materials prepared by technical committees on waste discharges from marine finfish rearing facilities.
The department shall approve or deny discharge permit applications for marine finfish rearing facilities within one hundred eighty days from the date of application, unless a longer time is required to satisfy public participation requirements in the permit process in accordance with applicable rules, or compliance with the requirements of the state environmental policy act under chapter 43.21C RCW.
The department shall notify applicants as soon as it determines that a proposed discharge meets or fails to comply with the standards adopted pursuant to this section, or if a time period longer than one hundred eighty days is necessary to satisfy public participation requirements of the state environmental policy act.(4) The department may adopt rules to exempt marine finfish rearing facilities not requiring national pollutant discharge elimination system permits under the federal water pollution control act from the discharge permit requirement.(5) The department must implement this section consistent with section 3 of this act.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 10.  (1) The departments of ecology, natural resources, and fish and wildlife must continue the existing effort to update guidance and informational resources to industry and governments for planning and permitting commercial marine net pen aquaculture.(2) The effort must utilize new scientific information that has emerged since the current state guidance that dates from the late 1980s through 1990, and address topics including local shoreline permitting, water quality, impacts on native fish, shellfish, and wildlife, and interagency coordination in permitting, inspections, and enforcement.
The guidance must be designed to eliminate commercial marine net pen escapement and negative impacts to water quality and native fish, shellfish, and wildlife.(3) The guidance and resources must be completed by June 30, 2019.(4) This section expires December 31, 2020.Sec. 11.  RCW 50.04.075 and 2011 c 4 s 12 are each amended to read as follows:(1) With respect to claims with an effective date prior to July 1, 2012, "dislocated worker" means any individual who:(a) Has been terminated or received a notice of termination from employment;(b) Is eligible for or has exhausted entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits;
and(b) Is eligible for or has exhausted entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12.  A new section is added to chapter 77.12 RCW to read as follows:(1) For marine finfish aquaculture of Atlantic salmon authorized or permitted consistent with section 2 of this act, the facility operator must hire, at their own expense, a marine engineering firm approved by the department to conduct inspections.
and(b) Is eligible for or has exhausted entitlement to unemployment compensation benefits.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 12.  A new section is added to chapter 77.125 RCW to read as follows:(1) For marine finfish aquaculture, the facility operator must hire, at their own expense, a marine engineering firm approved by the department to conduct inspections.
Inspections must occur approximately every two years, when net pens are fallow, and must include topside and mooring assessments related to escapement potential, structural integrity, permit compliance, and operations.(2) Any net pen facility must be found to be in good working order to receive fish.(3) If the facility is found to be in imminent danger of collapse or release of Atlantic salmon, the director may require the operator to remove fish or deny a fish transfer permit.--- END ---
Inspections must occur approximately every two years, when net pens are fallow, and must include topside and mooring assessments related to escapement potential, structural integrity, permit compliance, and operations.(2) Any net pen facility must be found to be in good working order to receive fish.(3) If the facility is found to be in imminent danger of collapse or release of finfish, the director may require the operator to remove fish or deny a fish transfer permit.--- END ---
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Effective date 6/7/2018.

  2. Chapter 179, 2018 Laws.

  3. Governor partially vetoed.

  4. Delivered to Governor.

  5. President signed.

  6. Speaker signed.

  7. Third reading, passed; yeas, 31; nays, 16; absent, 1; excused, 1.

  8. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  9. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  10. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  11. Minority; do not pass.

  12. AWNP - Majority; do pass.

  13. First reading, referred to Agriculture, Water, Natural Resources & Parks.

  14. 1st substitute bill not substituted.

  15. Third reading, passed; yeas, 67; nays, 31; absent, 0; excused, 0.

  16. Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.

  17. Floor amendment(s) adopted.

  18. 1st substitute bill not substituted.

  19. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  20. Rules Committee relieved of further consideration. Placed on second reading.

  21. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  22. Referred to Rules 2 Review.

  23. Minority; do not pass.

  24. AGNR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  25. Minority; do not pass.

  26. AGNR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  27. First reading, referred to Agriculture & Natural Resources (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 141 not signed on · 31 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Lytton

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (141)

141 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 141 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 20 Yea · 28 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 121801
Democrat 0900
Republican 8100
Total 202801
% of votes cast 41%57%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Becker — Yea
Frockt — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Not Voting
Sheldon — Nay
Brown — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Wilson — Yea
Darneille — Nay
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Nay
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Nay
Ranker — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 19 Yea · 28 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 111802
Democrat 0900
Republican 8100
Total 192802
% of votes cast 39%57%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Becker — Yea
Frockt — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Not Voting
Sheldon — Nay
Brown — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Wilson — Yea
Darneille — Nay
Ericksen — Not Voting
Fain — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Nay
Mullet — Nay
Nelson — Nay
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Yea
Palumbo — Nay
Ranker — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Takko — Nay
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 31 Yea · 16 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20902
Democrat 9000
Republican 2700
Total 311602
% of votes cast 63%33%0%4%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Baumgartner — Nay
Becker — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Not Voting
Mullet — Yea
Sheldon — Yea
Brown — Nay
Bailey — Nay
Billig — Yea
Carlyle — Not Voting
Darneille — Yea
Ericksen — Nay
Fain — Yea
Frockt — Yea
Honeyford — Nay
Keiser — Yea
Wilson — Nay
Rivers — Nay
Rolfes — Yea
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Yea
Kuderer — Yea
McCoy — Yea
Miloscia — Yea
Nelson — Yea
O'Ban — Yea
Padden — Nay
Palumbo — Yea
Ranker — Yea
Van De Wege — Yea
Annette Cleveland Democrat Yea
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Yea
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Yea
Lisa Wellman Democrat Yea
Manka Dhingra Democrat Yea
Marko Liias Democrat Yea
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Yea
Steve Conway Democrat Yea
Victoria Hunt Democrat Yea
Curtis King Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
John Braun Republican Nay
Judy Warnick Republican Nay
Keith Wagoner Republican Nay
Mark Schoesler Republican Nay
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Yea
Shelly Short Republican Nay

Official roll call →

874 Warnick Striker (#51)

Failed 21 Yea · 27 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 131701
Republican 8100
Democrat 0900
Total 212701
% of votes cast 43%55%0%2%
How each member voted (49)
Member Party Vote
Angel — Yea
Becker — Yea
Baumgartner — Yea
Frockt — Nay
Hawkins — Yea
Hobbs — Not Voting
Nelson — Nay
Palumbo — Nay
Rivers — Yea
Rolfes — Nay
Sheldon — Nay
Brown — Yea
Wilson — Yea
Bailey — Yea
Billig — Nay
Carlyle — Nay
Darneille — Nay
Ericksen — Yea
Fain — Yea
Honeyford — Yea
Keiser — Nay
Kuderer — Nay
McCoy — Nay
Miloscia — Nay
Mullet — Nay
O'Ban — Nay
Padden — Yea
Ranker — Nay
Takko — Yea
Zeiger — Nay
Van De Wege — Nay
Annette Cleveland Democrat Nay
Bob Hasegawa Democrat Nay
Jamie Pedersen Democrat Nay
Lisa Wellman Democrat Nay
Manka Dhingra Democrat Nay
Marko Liias Democrat Nay
Rebecca Saldaña Democrat Nay
Steve Conway Democrat Nay
Victoria Hunt Democrat Nay
Curtis King Republican Yea
Jim Walsh Republican Yea
John Braun Republican Yea
Judy Warnick Republican Yea
Keith Wagoner Republican Yea
Mark Schoesler Republican Yea
Phil Fortunato Republican Yea
Rob Chase Republican Nay
Shelly Short Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage (#16)

Passed 67 Yea · 31 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 302000
Republican 51000
Democrat 32100
Total 673100
% of votes cast 68%32%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Yea
Blake — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Nay
Harmsworth — Nay
Hayes — Yea
Nealey — Nay
Pettigrew — Yea
Rodne — Yea
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Buys — Nay
Chandler — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Clibborn — Yea
Cody — Yea
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Nay
Hargrove — Nay
Smith — Yea
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Nay
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Klippert — Nay
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Kristiansen — Nay
Lytton — Yea
Manweller — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Nay
McDonald — Yea
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Yea
Muri — Nay
Pellicciotti — Yea
Pike — Nay
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Yea
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Yea
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Nay
Beth Doglio Democrat Yea
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Yea
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Yea
Mike Steele Republican Nay
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

1068 Blake Striker (#15)

Passed 56 Yea · 42 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 222800
Democrat 31200
Republican 31200
Total 564200
% of votes cast 57%43%0%0%
How each member voted (98)
Member Party Vote
Appleton — Nay
Chopp — Yea
Cody — Yea
Dolan — Yea
Graves — Yea
Haler — Nay
Harmsworth — Nay
Hayes — Nay
Klippert — Nay
Lytton — Yea
Muri — Nay
Nealey — Nay
Pettigrew — Yea
Pike — Nay
Rodne — Nay
Sawyer — Yea
Sells — Yea
Shea — Nay
Hargrove — Nay
Smith — Nay
Kagi — Yea
Kirby — Yea
Kraft — Nay
Kretz — Nay
Kristiansen — Nay
Manweller — Nay
Maycumber — Nay
McBride — Yea
McCaslin — Nay
McDonald — Nay
Morris — Yea
Mosbrucker — Nay
Pellicciotti — Yea
Stambaugh — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Tarleton — Yea
Vick — Nay
Wilcox — Yea
Young — Nay
Blake — Yea
Buys — Nay
Chandler — Nay
Clibborn — Yea
Condotta — Nay
DeBolt — Nay
Hudgins — Yea
Irwin — Yea
Jenkin — Nay
Johnson, J. — Yea
Van Werven — Nay
Beth Doglio Democrat Nay
Chris Kilduff Democrat Yea
Cindy Ryu Democrat Yea
Derek Stanford Democrat Yea
Drew Hansen Democrat Yea
Gerry Pollet Democrat Yea
Jake Fey Democrat Yea
Jamila Taylor Democrat Nay
Javier Valdez Democrat Yea
Joe Fitzgibbon Democrat Yea
John Lovick Democrat Yea
June Robinson Democrat Yea
Kristine Reeves Democrat Yea
Larry Springer Democrat Yea
Laurie Jinkins Democrat Yea
Lillian Ortiz-Self Democrat Yea
Marcus Riccelli Democrat Yea
Mia Gregerson Democrat Yea
Mike Chapman Democrat Yea
Monica Jurado Stonier Democrat Yea
Nicole Macri Democrat Yea
Noel Frame Democrat Yea
Roger Goodman Democrat Yea
Sharon Tomiko Santos Democrat Yea
Sharon Wylie Democrat Yea
Shelley Kloba Democrat Yea
Steve Bergquist Democrat Yea
Steve Tharinger Democrat Yea
Strom Peterson Democrat Yea
Tana Senn Democrat Yea
Timm Ormsby Democrat Yea
Tina Orwall Democrat Yea
Vandana Slatter Democrat Yea
Andrew Barkis Republican Yea
Carolyn Eslick Republican Nay
Dan Griffey Republican Yea
Drew MacEwen Republican Nay
Drew Stokesbary Republican Yea
Ed Orcutt Republican Nay
Jeff Holy Republican Nay
Jim Walsh Republican Nay
Joe Schmick Republican Nay
Mary Dye Republican Nay
Michelle Valdez Republican Nay
Mike Steele Republican Nay
Mike Volz Republican Nay
Paul Harris Republican Nay
Tom Dent Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2957?
HB 2957 is sponsored by Mike Chapman (Democrat), Lytton, Strom Peterson (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), Robinson, Sawyer, Stambaugh, Derek Stanford (Democrat), Wilcox, and Jamila Taylor (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 2957?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 2957?
Track HB 2957 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2957

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2957

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →