Eliminating the requirement that a city or town provide preservation rating information on a certain percen...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 1490 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 1490.
You're tracking HB 1490
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 1490 — Eliminating the requirement that a city or town provide preservation rating information on a certain percentage of its arterial network.
Last action — Effective date 7/23/2017.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill HB 1490 has been amended to completely remove the requirement for cities and towns to provide preservation rating information about their arterial road networks. Previously, cities were obligated to report on a portion of their roads, with a gradual increase in reporting requirements over the years. This change matters because it simplifies the reporting process for local governments, potentially reducing their administrative burden and allowing them to focus resources elsewhere. It also reflects a shift towards an assessment of pavement conditions through other reporting methods rather than mandated preservation ratings.
H-1644.2SUBSTITUTEH-0885.1HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1490State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy House Transportation (originally sponsored by Representatives Fey, Rodne, Clibborn, Hargrove, Riccelli, Van Werven, McBride, and Irwin)READIrwinRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/24/17.AN01/20/17. ACT Relating to eliminating the requirement that a city or town provide preservation rating information on a certain percentage of its arterial network;
andReferred amendingto RCWCommittee 46.68.113.BEon ITTransportation.AN ENACTEDACT BYRelating THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 46.68.113 and 2013 c 306 s 704 are each amended to readeliminating as follows:(1) During the 2013-2015requirement fiscalthat biennium,a citiescity andor townstown shall provide to the transportation commission, or its successor entity, preservation rating information on ata leastcertain seventypercentage percent of theits total city and town arterial network.network;
Thereafter,and therepealing preservationRCW rating46.68.113.BE informationIT requirementENACTED shallBY increaseTHE inLEGISLATURE fiveOF percentTHE incrementsSTATE inOF subsequentWASHINGTON:NEW biennia,SECTION. Sec. 1. RCW but46.68.113 in(Preservation norating) caseand shall2013 itc exceed306 eightys percent.704, 2011 c 353 s 7, 2006 c 334 s 21, & 2003 c 363 s 305 are each repealed.--- END ---
The rating system used by cities and towns must be based upon the Washington state pavement rating method or an equivalent standard approved by the department of transportation.
Beginning January 1, 2007, the preservation rating information shall be submitted to the department.(2) ((Cities and towns are exempt from the requirement to report preservation rating information to the department or the transportation commission through the 2013-2015 fiscal biennium.)) The requirement that cities and towns report preservation rating information to the department of transportation or the transportation commission under subsection (1) of this section is eliminated during the 2017-2019 fiscal biennium.(3) The department of transportation shall, in consultation with cities, towns, and the transportation commission, review the pavement preservation rating reporting requirements and recommend to the legislature whether a repeal of the pavement preservation rating report is warranted.
In its analysis, the department shall determine (a) what pavement preservation rating information exists through other reporting requirements and how the department's migration toward an asset management accountability framework affects the pavement preservation rating report, and (b) whether such other reporting requirements will serve as a replacement, or an addition, to the report.
The department must report its findings to the legislature by December 1, 2017.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
Effective date 7/23/2017.
-
Chapter 139, 2017 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Delivered to Governor.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 48; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
TRAN - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation.
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 97; nays, 0; absent, 0; excused, 1.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
1st substitute bill substituted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
TR - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Transportation (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
Sponsors
- Hargrove · Cosponsor
- Clibborn · Cosponsor
- Irwin · Cosponsor
- Marcus Riccelli · Cosponsor
- Jake Fey · Primary
- McBride · Cosponsor
- Rodne · Cosponsor
- Van Werven · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 143 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jake Fey Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Hargrove
- Clibborn
- Irwin
- Marcus Riccelli Democrat
- McBride
- Rodne
- Van Werven
Not signed on (143)
143 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 143 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 48 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Palumbo | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Yea |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Yea |
| Carlyle | — | Not Voting |
| Darneille | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Yea |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Kuderer | — | Yea |
| McCoy | — | Yea |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Yea |
| Nelson | — | Yea |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Yea |
| Takko | — | Yea |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Yea |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Yea |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Yea |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Yea |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Yea |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Yea |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (98)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | — | Yea |
| Clibborn | — | Yea |
| DeBolt | — | Yea |
| Dolan | — | Yea |
| Graves | — | Yea |
| Haler | — | Yea |
| Harmsworth | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Yea |
| McCaslin | — | Yea |
| Nealey | — | Yea |
| Pettigrew | — | Yea |
| Pike | — | Yea |
| Rodne | — | Yea |
| Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Sells | — | Yea |
| Shea | — | Yea |
| Hargrove | — | Yea |
| Johnson | — | Yea |
| Appleton | — | Yea |
| Blake | — | Yea |
| Chandler | — | Not Voting |
| Chopp | — | Yea |
| Cody | — | Yea |
| Condotta | — | Yea |
| Farrell | — | Yea |
| Hudgins | — | Yea |
| Irwin | — | Yea |
| Jenkin | — | Yea |
| Kagi | — | Yea |
| Kirby | — | Yea |
| Klippert | — | Yea |
| Koster | — | Yea |
| Kraft | — | Yea |
| Kretz | — | Yea |
| Kristiansen | — | Yea |
| Lytton | — | Yea |
| Manweller | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Maycumber | — | Yea |
| McBride | — | Yea |
| McDonald | — | Yea |
| Morris | — | Yea |
| Mosbrucker | — | Yea |
| Muri | — | Yea |
| Pellicciotti | — | Yea |
| Stambaugh | — | Yea |
| Sullivan | — | Yea |
| Tarleton | — | Yea |
| Vick | — | Yea |
| Wilcox | — | Yea |
| Young | — | Yea |
| Van Werven | — | Yea |
| Beth Doglio | Democrat | Yea |
| Chris Kilduff | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Ryu | Democrat | Yea |
| Derek Stanford | Democrat | Yea |
| Drew Hansen | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerry Pollet | Democrat | Yea |
| Jake Fey | Democrat | Yea |
| Jamila Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Joe Fitzgibbon | Democrat | Yea |
| John Lovick | Democrat | Yea |
| June Robinson | Democrat | Yea |
| Kristine Reeves | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Springer | Democrat | Yea |
| Laurie Jinkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Lillian Ortiz-Self | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Riccelli | Democrat | Yea |
| Mia Gregerson | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Chapman | Democrat | Yea |
| Monica Jurado Stonier | Democrat | Yea |
| Nicole Macri | Democrat | Yea |
| Noel Frame | Democrat | Yea |
| Roger Goodman | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Tomiko Santos | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharon Wylie | Democrat | Yea |
| Shelley Kloba | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Bergquist | Democrat | Yea |
| Steve Tharinger | Democrat | Yea |
| Strom Peterson | Democrat | Yea |
| Tana Senn | Democrat | Yea |
| Timm Ormsby | Democrat | Yea |
| Tina Orwall | Democrat | Yea |
| Vandana Slatter | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrew Barkis | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Griffey | Republican | Yea |
| Drew MacEwen | Republican | Yea |
| Drew Stokesbary | Republican | Yea |
| Ed Orcutt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Holy | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Schmick | Republican | Yea |
| Mary Dye | Republican | Yea |
| Michelle Valdez | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Steele | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Volz | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Harris | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Dent | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1490?
- HB 1490 is sponsored by Hargrove, Clibborn, Irwin, Marcus Riccelli (Democrat), Jake Fey (Democrat), McBride, Rodne, and Van Werven.
- What is the current status of HB 1490?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 1490?
- Track HB 1490 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1490
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1490
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →