Washington 2017-2018 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 5065 — Concerning government performance and accountability.

Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

1 added · 1 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to SB 5065 introduced the creation of an Office of Performance Management within state government, tasked with enhancing efficiency and accountability across agencies. This office is designed to implement a lean performance management system, coordinate performance assessments, and report findings to the public and legislature. These changes are significant because they aim to improve how state agencies operate, leading to more effective use of taxpayer funds and better delivery of public services. Furthermore, they set specific performance targets for agencies, thereby pushing towards measurable improvement and accountability in government operations.

→
Previous
Latest
S-1776.1SECOND SUBSTITUTE SENATE BILL 5065State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senate Ways & Means (originally sponsored by Senators Miloscia and Zeiger)READ FIRST TIME 02/23/17.AN ACT Relating to government performance and accountability;
S-0451.1SENATE BILL 5065State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senators Miloscia and ZeigerRead first time 01/11/17.
Referred to Committee on State Government.AN ACT Relating to government performance and accountability;
and(e) Analyze and report agency performance systems, data, and assessment results to the public, appropriate agencies, and the legislature.(2) The office's goal is to develop and implement documented world-class lean performance management systems that can be duplicated in all other states.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  (1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, there is created in the office of the governor the office of performance management.(2) The executive head of the office of performance management is a director appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate, who serves at the pleasure of the governor.(3) The director may employ personnel necessary for the administration of the office of performance management.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Agency" means every state agency, department, office, officer, board, commission, bureau, division, institution, or institution of higher education, and all offices of executive branch state government-elected officials, except agricultural commissions under Titles 15 and 16 RCW.(2) "Agency ethics plan" means a plan to promote ethical practices and to eliminate fraudulent practices in agency operations.(3) "Agency performance management implementation plan" means a detailed plan to implement a lean performance management system that:(a) Provides for gathering, monitoring, and analysis of data to measure performance and eliminate waste and inefficiency in agency operations;(b) Conforms to an internationally recognized quality management system, such as ISO 9001 or ISO 9004, or its equivalent;(c) Includes all activities and requirements necessary to reduce agency costs by one percent annually within two years of adoption and two percent annually within four years of adoption;(d) Allocates resources to improve performance;
and(e) Analyze and report agency performance systems, data, and assessment results to the public, appropriate agencies, and the legislature.(2) The office's goal is to develop and implement documented world-class lean performance management systems that can be duplicated in all other states.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 2.  (1) There is created in the office of the governor the office of performance management.(2) The executive head of the office of performance management is a director appointed by the governor with the consent of the senate, who serves at the pleasure of the governor.(3) The director may employ personnel necessary for the administration of the office of performance management.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 3.  The definitions in this section apply throughout this chapter unless the context clearly requires otherwise.(1) "Agency" means every state agency, department, office, officer, board, commission, bureau, division, institution, or institution of higher education, and all offices of executive branch state government-elected officials, except agricultural commissions under Title 15 RCW.(2) "Agency ethics plan" means a plan to promote ethical practices and to eliminate fraudulent practices in agency operations.(3) "Agency performance management implementation plan" means a detailed plan to implement a lean performance management system that:(a) Provides for gathering, monitoring, and analysis of data to measure performance and eliminate waste and inefficiency in agency operations;(b) Conforms to an internationally recognized quality management system, such as ISO 9001 or ISO 9004, or its equivalent;(c) Includes all activities and requirements necessary to reduce agency costs by one percent annually within two years of adoption and two percent annually within four years of adoption;(d) Allocates resources to improve performance;
and(d) Monitors implementation by all agencies.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, the office of performance management must:(1) Adopt, by January 1, 2018, and implement a state strategic plan and a state performance management implementation plan, and delegate authority, as necessary, to agencies best suited to implement elements of the state performance management implementation plan;(2) Assist agencies in developing agency strategic plans, agency ethics plans, workforce learning and training development and workforce performance management systems, and agency performance management implementation plans, and review and approve or disapprove the foregoing plans based on predetermined criteria;(3) Enter into a partnership with the national institutes of standards and technology, United States department of commerce, and performance excellence northwest and Washington state quality award to:(a) Ensure that a sufficient number of trained examiners are available to conduct excellence assessments of all agencies;(b) Coordinate and schedule excellence assessments of all agencies;(c) Develop criteria, as needed, for excellence assessments for very small agencies with fewer than twenty full-time equivalent employees;(d) Develop specific criteria for a statewide lean performance management system and agency lean performance management systems;
and(d) Monitors implementation by all agencies.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 4.  The office of performance management must:(1) Adopt, by January 1, 2018, and implement a state strategic plan and a state performance management implementation plan, and delegate authority, as necessary, to agencies best suited to implement elements of the state performance management implementation plan;(2) Assist agencies in developing agency strategic plans, agency ethics plans, workforce learning and training development and workforce performance management systems, and agency performance management implementation plans, and review and approve or disapprove the foregoing plans based on predetermined criteria;(3) Enter into a partnership with the national institutes of standards and technology, United States department of commerce, and performance excellence northwest and Washington state quality award to:(a) Ensure that a sufficient number of trained examiners are available to conduct excellence assessments of all agencies;(b) Coordinate and schedule excellence assessments of all agencies;(c) Develop criteria, as needed, for excellence assessments for very small agencies with fewer than twenty full-time equivalent employees;(d) Develop specific criteria for a statewide lean performance management system and agency lean performance management systems;
and(8) Adopt rules necessary to administer this chapter.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  (1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, each agency must:(a) Adopt an agency strategic plan pursuant to section 6 of this act, an agency ethics plan, a workforce learning and training development and workforce performance management system, and an agency performance management implementation plan;(b) Provide quarterly reports to the office of performance management regarding implementation of its agency performance management implementation plan;(c) Provide annual reports to pertinent legislative committees regarding implementation of its agency performance management implementation plan, including the number and type of lean management projects conducted during the reporting period, fiscal savings attributable to the projects, performance goals for the upcoming reporting period, and a summary of all previous performance audits conducted by the state auditor and the joint legislative audit and review committee, and previous excellence assessments;(d) Coordinate with the office of performance management to provide for excellence assessments of its operations every two years, and transmit completed excellence assessments and feedback reports to the office of performance management;
and(8) Adopt rules necessary to administer this chapter.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 5.  (1) Each agency must:(a) Adopt an agency strategic plan pursuant to section 6 of this act, an agency ethics plan, a workforce learning and training development and workforce performance management system, and an agency performance management implementation plan;(b) Provide quarterly reports to the office of performance management regarding implementation of its agency performance management implementation plan;(c) Provide annual reports to pertinent legislative committees regarding implementation of its agency performance management implementation plan, including the number and type of lean management projects conducted during the reporting period, fiscal savings attributable to the projects, performance goals for the upcoming reporting period, and a summary of all previous performance audits conducted by the state auditor and the joint legislative audit and review committee, and previous excellence assessments;(d) Coordinate with the office of performance management to provide for excellence assessments of its operations every two years, and transmit completed excellence assessments and feedback reports to the office of performance management;
and(b) Fails to achieve the goal in subsection (2) of this section must achieve certification under an internationally recognized quality management system, such as ISO 9001, or its equivalent, within seven years of the first excellence assessment.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  (1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, each agency must adopt an agency strategic plan that:(a) Defines its mission and sets measurable goals for achieving desirable results for those receiving its services and taxpayers paying for its services.
and(b) Fails to achieve the goal in subsection (2) of this section must achieve certification under an internationally recognized quality management system, such as ISO 9001, or its equivalent, within seven years of the first excellence assessment.NEW SECTION.  Sec. 6.  (1) Each agency must adopt an agency strategic plan that:(a) Defines its mission and sets measurable goals for achieving desirable results for those receiving its services and taxpayers paying for its services.
and(iii) Specifically address the statutory purpose or intent of the program or activity and focus on data that measures whether the agency is achieving or making progress toward the purpose of the activity and toward statewide priorities.(2) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, each agency must also adopt an agency ethics plan and an agency performance management implementation plan pursuant to section 5 of this act.Sec. 7.  RCW 43.17.385 and 2014 c 68 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Subject to the availability of amounts appropriated for this specific purpose, each state agency ((shall, within available funds, develop and implement a quality management, accountability, and performance system to improve the public services it provides.(2) Each agency shall ensure that managers and staff at all levels, including those who directly deliver services, are engaged in the system and shall provide managers and staff with the training necessary for successful implementation.(3) Each agency shall, within available funds, ensure that its quality management, accountability, and performance system:(a) Uses strategic business planning to establish goals, objectives, and activities consistent with the priorities of government, as provided in statute;(b) Engages stakeholders and customers in establishing service requirements and improving service delivery systems;(c) Includes clear, relevant, and easy-to-understand measures for each activity;(d) Gathers, monitors, and analyzes activity data;(e) Uses the data to evaluate the effectiveness of programs to manage process performance, improve efficiency, and reduce costs;(f) Establishes performance goals and expectations for employees that reflect the organization's objectives;
and(iii) Specifically address the statutory purpose or intent of the program or activity and focus on data that measures whether the agency is achieving or making progress toward the purpose of the activity and toward statewide priorities.(2) Each agency must also adopt an agency ethics plan and an agency performance management implementation plan pursuant to section 5 of this act.Sec. 7.  RCW 43.17.385 and 2014 c 68 s 6 are each amended to read as follows:(1) Each state agency ((shall, within available funds, develop and implement a quality management, accountability, and performance system to improve the public services it provides.(2) Each agency shall ensure that managers and staff at all levels, including those who directly deliver services, are engaged in the system and shall provide managers and staff with the training necessary for successful implementation.(3) Each agency shall, within available funds, ensure that its quality management, accountability, and performance system:(a) Uses strategic business planning to establish goals, objectives, and activities consistent with the priorities of government, as provided in statute;(b) Engages stakeholders and customers in establishing service requirements and improving service delivery systems;(c) Includes clear, relevant, and easy-to-understand measures for each activity;(d) Gathers, monitors, and analyzes activity data;(e) Uses the data to evaluate the effectiveness of programs to manage process performance, improve efficiency, and reduce costs;(f) Establishes performance goals and expectations for employees that reflect the organization's objectives;
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Senate Rules "X" file.

  2. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  3. Senate Rules "X" file.

  4. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  5. Senate Rules "X" file.

  6. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  7. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  8. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  9. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  10. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  11. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  12. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  13. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  14. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  15. By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.

  16. Returned to Rules.

  17. Returned to Rules.

  18. Returned to Rules.

  19. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  20. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  21. Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.

  22. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  23. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  24. Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.

  25. Minority; without recommendation.

  26. Minority; do not pass.

  27. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  28. Minority; without recommendation.

  29. Minority; do not pass.

  30. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  31. Minority; without recommendation.

  32. Minority; do not pass.

  33. WM - Majority; 2nd substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  34. Referred to Ways & Means.

  35. Referred to Ways & Means.

  36. Minority; do not pass.

  37. And refer to Ways & Means.

  38. SGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  39. Minority; do not pass.

  40. And refer to Ways & Means.

  41. SGOV - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.

  42. First reading, referred to State Government.

Sponsors

  • Miloscia · Primary
  • Zeiger · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Miloscia

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Zeiger

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 5065?
SB 5065 is sponsored by Miloscia and Zeiger.
What is the current status of SB 5065?
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 5065?
Track SB 5065 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 5065

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 5065

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →