HB 1981 — Estimating the effective tax rate of proposed ballot measures and legislation.
Last action — By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to HB 1981 establish clearer requirements for how information about proposed tax measures is presented to voters. The bill now mandates the creation of detailed "revenue equity statements," which will outline how proposed measures could impact average tax rates for different income levels, as well as a summary that is accessible and easy to understand. This matters because it aims to enhance transparency and help voters make informed decisions about ballot measures that may affect their finances.
H-2021.1SUBSTITUTEH-1111.2HOUSE HOUSE BILL 1981State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy House State Government, Elections & Information Technology (originally sponsored by Representatives Farrell, Ormsby, Slatter, Pollet, and Jinkins)READJinkinsRead FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/17/17.AN02/06/17. ACT Relating to estimating the effective tax rate of proposed ballot measures and legislation;
amendingReferred RCWto 29A.32.070Committee on State Govt, Elections & IT.AN ACT Relating to estimating the effective tax rate of proposed ballot measures and 29A.72.025;legislation;
amending RCW 29A.32.070;
and(d) A summary of the ballot measure not to exceed two hundred words and a more detailed disclosure that includes the assumptions that were made to estimate the effective rate of taxes, and any unavoidable limitations on the availability of data for a comprehensive analysis.(3) Revenue equity statements must be written in clear and concise language, avoid legal and technical terms when possible, and be filed with the secretary of state no later than the lasttenth business day inof JulyAugust for a ballot measure to the people, or no later than the first day of the legislative session for which an initiative to the legislature has been submitted.
and(d) A summary of the bill not to exceed two hundred words and a more detailed disclosure that includes the assumptions that were made to estimate the effective rate of taxes, and any unavoidable limitations on the availability of data for a comprehensive analysis.(3) For the purposes of this section "effective tax rate" includes fees that apply broadly to the majority of Washington residents as well as revenue measures that are identified as taxes.Sec. 4. RCWtaxes.--- 29A.72.025END and--- 2009 c 415 s 7 are each amended to read as follows:The office of financial management, in consultation with the secretary of state, the attorney general, and any other appropriate state or local agency, shall prepare a fiscal impact statement for each of the following state ballot measures:
(1) An initiative to the people that is certified to the ballot;
(2) an initiative to the legislature that will appear on the ballot;
(3) an alternative measure appearing on the ballot that the legislature proposes to an initiative to the legislature;
(4) a referendum bill referred to voters by the legislature;
and (5) a referendum measure appearing on the ballot.
Fiscal impact statements must be written in clear and concise language, avoid legal and technical terms when possible, and be filed with the secretary of state no later than the ((tenth day of August)) last business day of July.
Fiscal impact statements may include easily understood graphics.A fiscal impact statement must describe any projected increase or decrease in revenues, costs, expenditures, or indebtedness that the state or local governments will experience if the ballot measure were approved by state voters.
Where appropriate, a fiscal impact statement may include both estimated dollar amounts and a description placing the estimated dollar amounts into context.
A fiscal impact statement must include both a summary of not to exceed one hundred words and a more detailed statement that includes the assumptions that were made to develop the fiscal impacts.Fiscal impact statements must be available online from the secretary of state's web site and included in the state voters' pamphlet.
Additional information may be posted on the web site of the office of financial management.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill View text Current html
- Substitute Substitute Bill html
Action History
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
SEIT - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
Referred to Appropriations.
-
Minority; without recommendation.
-
Minority; do not pass.
-
SEIT - Majority; 1st substitute bill be substituted, do pass.
-
First reading, referred to State Government, Elections & Information Technology (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
Sponsors
- Farrell · Primary
- Laurie Jinkins · Cosponsor
- Timm Ormsby · Cosponsor
- Gerry Pollet · Cosponsor
- Vandana Slatter · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Farrell
Co-sponsors (4)
- Laurie Jinkins Democrat
- Timm Ormsby Democrat
- Gerry Pollet Democrat
- Vandana Slatter Democrat
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1981?
- HB 1981 is sponsored by Farrell, Laurie Jinkins (Democrat), Timm Ormsby (Democrat), Gerry Pollet (Democrat), and Vandana Slatter (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 1981?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 1981?
- Track HB 1981 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1981
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1981
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →