Concerning the scope of land use control ordinances for purposes of vesting.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 5212 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 5212.
You're tracking SB 5212
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 5212 — Concerning the scope of land use control ordinances for purposes of vesting.
Last action — Senate Rules "X" file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to SB 5212 clarify how land use control ordinances apply to building permit and land division applications. Notably, they now specify that these applications will be considered based solely on the regulations in effect on the date of application, regardless of whether these regulations were introduced to comply with state law. This change simplifies the process for applicants by ensuring that they will not be affected by future changes to land use laws after their applications have been submitted, promoting consistency and predictability in the permitting process.
S-0388.2SENATEENGROSSED SENATE BILL 5212State of Washington65th Legislature2017 Regular SessionBy Senators Wilson, Angel, Honeyford, and SchoeslerRead first time 01/17/17.
and amending RCW 19.27.095 and 58.17.033.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec. 1. RCW 19.27.095 and 1991 c 281 s 27 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A valid and fully complete building permit application for a structure, that is permitted under the zoning or other land use control ordinances in effect on the date of the application shall be considered under the building permit ordinance in((in effect at the time of application,application)), the environmental and development regulations, and the zoning or other land use control ordinancesordinances, in effect on the date of application, includingwithout landrespect useto controlwhether ordinancesthe regulation or ordinance was enacted for the purpose of complying with state law.(2) The requirements for a fully completed application shall be defined by local ordinance but for any construction project costing more than five thousand dollars the application shall include, at a minimum:(a) The legal description, or the tax parcel number assigned pursuant to RCW 84.40.160, and the street address if available, and may include any other identification of the construction site by the prime contractor;(b) The property owner's name, address, and phone number;(c) The prime contractor's business name, address, phone number, current state contractor registration number;
However, the applicant shall provide the remaining information as soon as the applicant can reasonably obtain such information.(6) The limitations imposed by this section shall not restrict conditions imposed under chapter 43.21C RCW.Sec. 2. RCW 58.17.033 and 1987 c 104 s 2 are each amended to read as follows:(1) A proposed division of land, as defined in RCW 58.17.020, shall be considered under the subdivision or short subdivision ordinance, the environmental and development regulations, and the zoning or other land use control ordinances, includingin landeffect useon controlthe ordinancesland, without respect to whether the regulation or ordinance was enacted for the purpose of complying with state law, in effect on the land at the time a fully completed application for preliminary plat approval of the subdivision, or short plat approval of the short subdivision, has been submitted to the appropriate county, city, or town official.(2) The requirements for a fully completed application shall be defined by local ordinance.(3) The limitations imposed by this section shall not restrict conditions imposed under chapter 43.21C RCW.--- END ---
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Engrossed Bill Current html
- Bill View text html
Action History
-
Senate Rules "X" file.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
By resolution, reintroduced and retained in present status.
-
Placed on Rules White Sheet.
-
By resolution, returned to Senate Rules Committee for third reading.
-
First reading, referred to Judiciary (Not Officially read and referred until adoption of Introduction report).
-
Third reading, passed; yeas, 25; nays, 24; absent, 0; excused, 0.
-
Rules suspended. Placed on Third Reading.
-
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
-
Placed on second reading by Rules Committee.
-
Passed to Rules Committee for second reading.
-
LGOV - Majority; do pass.
-
First reading, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Wilson · Primary
- Honeyford · Cosponsor
- Angel · Cosponsor
- Mark Schoesler · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wilson
Co-sponsors (3)
- Honeyford
- Angel
- Mark Schoesler Republican
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 51% | 49% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (49)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Angel | — | Yea |
| Bailey | — | Yea |
| Becker | — | Yea |
| Darneille | — | Nay |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Hobbs | — | Nay |
| Kuderer | — | Nay |
| Nelson | — | Nay |
| Palumbo | — | Nay |
| Pearson | — | Yea |
| Rivers | — | Yea |
| Rolfes | — | Nay |
| Rossi | — | Yea |
| Sheldon | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Baumgartner | — | Yea |
| Billig | — | Nay |
| Carlyle | — | Nay |
| Ericksen | — | Yea |
| Fain | — | Yea |
| Frockt | — | Nay |
| Wilson | — | Yea |
| Honeyford | — | Yea |
| Keiser | — | Nay |
| McCoy | — | Nay |
| Miloscia | — | Yea |
| Mullet | — | Nay |
| O'Ban | — | Yea |
| Padden | — | Yea |
| Ranker | — | Nay |
| Takko | — | Nay |
| Zeiger | — | Yea |
| Van De Wege | — | Nay |
| Annette Cleveland | Democrat | Nay |
| Bob Hasegawa | Democrat | Nay |
| Jamie Pedersen | Democrat | Nay |
| Lisa Wellman | Democrat | Nay |
| Marko Liias | Democrat | Nay |
| Rebecca Saldaña | Democrat | Nay |
| Steve Conway | Democrat | Nay |
| Victoria Hunt | Democrat | Nay |
| Curtis King | Republican | Yea |
| Jim Walsh | Republican | Yea |
| John Braun | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Warnick | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Schoesler | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Fortunato | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Chase | Republican | Nay |
| Shelly Short | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 5212?
- SB 5212 is sponsored by Wilson, Honeyford, Angel, and Mark Schoesler (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 5212?
- This bill died with 2017-2018 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 5212?
- Track SB 5212 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 5212
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 5212
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →